1. API Standard 6X: API/ASME Design Calculations
New Draft Standard under Subcommittee 6

2. Task Group Membership John Fowler – On-Line Resources - Chairman
Jim Britton – Cameron – 17D and 16C
Paul Bunch – Cameron – 16A and 17D
Jean Brunjes – GE – 6A
Bill Carbaugh – GE – 16A
Maynard Chance – West Engineering – All specs
Chris Johnson - NOV – 16A
Jim Kaculi – DrilQuip – 17D
Chris Kocurek – Cameron – 17D
John McCaskill - Expro – 16C
Nigel McKie – FMC – 17D
Mark Miser – DNV – All specs
Ramon Sanpredro – Stress Engineering – all specs
Alireza Shirani – GE – All specs

3. History and Objective
API 6A, 16A, and 16C referenced the ASME Code Section VIII Division 2, 2004 Edition, Appendix 4.
Since referencing an obsolete spec is awkward, an Annex (Annex I) was prepared for 16A capturing the method from that ASME Appendix.
Subcommittee 6 proposed that the method be put in a separate document to assure uniformity.

4. Task Group Charge
Create a new API standard documenting the rules of the ASME Code, based on Annex I.
Problem: 16A and 6A used different allowable stresses.
Stress value
Spec 6A requirement
Spec 16A requirement
Max SI at test pressure
5/6 of Sy
90% of Sy
Sm for standard materials
2/3 of Sy
Sm for non-standard materials
Lower of 2/3 Sy or ½ Su
2/3 of Sy

5. Resolution
The task group consensus was to use the rules of 16A, since going to the slightly more conservative 6A rules would penalize 16A/16C users who had designed to higher allowable stresses.
The 90% of Sy used in 16A and 16C is the same as the limit in the 2004 ASME Code Section VIII Division 2
Using only the yield strength as a basis follows Section VIII Division 3 practice.

6. Changes to Annex I
Several revisions were made to the Annex I document to clarify the requirements, including several changes to the wording..
Information of elastic-plastic collapse was added to the document. ASME Appendix 4 had referred to a method in Appendix 6 on experimental stress analysis.
The uses of limit analysis and elastic/plastic analysis were clarified.
The requirement on the sum of the three principal stresses was clarified as to the calculation basis.

7. Follow-on actions after publication of the new Standard
Specifications 6A, 16A and 16C should revise their design section to direct the designer to this new standard instead of the 2004 Code.
This may require several changes in the body of the specifications.
Since 17D refers to 6A for design requirements, no change is needed.
The1004 ASME Code Section VIII Division 2 can be removed as a referenced standard, and Standard 6X added.

8. Status of the draft Standard
The TG has finalized the draft and agreed it is ready for ballot.
API will edit the document into standard API format and return it to the TG for review.
After review the draft standard will be sent out for ballot by SC6.
SC 16 and SC 17 will solicit comments from their member companies, which will be considered along with those from SC6 members.