Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

(CMR vs. guidelines, p < 0.001)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "(CMR vs. guidelines, p < 0.001)"— Presentation transcript:

1 (CMR vs. guidelines, p < 0.001)
CE-MARC 2 Trial design: Patients with suspected CHD were randomized to CMR-guided care (n = 481) versus MPS-guided care (n = 481) versus NICE guideline-directed care (n = 240). Results (CMR vs. guidelines, p < 0.001) CMR vs. MPS, p = 0.32) Unnecessary invasive angiography: 7.5% of the CMR group vs. 7.1% of the MPS group vs. 28.8% of the NICE guideline-directed care group (CMR vs. NICE, p < 0.001; CMR vs. MPS, p = 0.32) MACE at 12 months: 2.5% of the CMR group vs. 2.5% of the MPS group vs. 1.7% of the NICE guideline-directed care group (CMR vs. NICE, p = NS; CMR vs. MPS, p = NS) % 28.8 7.5 7.1 Conclusions Among patients with suspected CHD, CMR-guided care resulted in a lower frequency of unnecessary invasive angiography versus NICE guideline-directed care CMR group MPS group Guideline-directed care group Greenwood JP, et al. JAMA 2016;316:


Download ppt "(CMR vs. guidelines, p < 0.001)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google