Revisiting and Reshaping the Investment Focus

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Revisiting and Reshaping the Investment Focus"— Presentation transcript:

1 Revisiting and Reshaping the Investment Focus
Integrating Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) and Climate Change Adaptation (CCA): Revisiting and Reshaping the Investment Focus DRR CCA DRRCCA

2 Presentation Outline Definitions
Relationship between Disaster Risk Reduction and Climate Change Adaptation Drivers of DRR/CCA Issues relating to DRR/CCA The Investment Focus Challenges and Opportunities Guided Questions

3 . Over the last two decades ( ), 76% of all disaster events were hydrological, meteorological or climatological in nature; these accounted for 45% of the deaths and 79% of the economic losses caused by natural hazards.” (UN/ISDR, 2008).

4 Disaster Risk Reduction
Definitions The concept and practice of reducing disaster risks through systematic efforts to analyze and manage the causal factors of disasters, including through reduced exposure to hazards, lessened vulnerability of people and property, wise management of land and the environment, and improved preparedness for adverse events’ (UNISDR, 2009). Disaster Risk Reduction

5 IPC 4th Assessment Report 2007
Climate Change Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, because of increases in air and ocean temperatures, widespread melting of snow and ice and rising global average sea levels. IPC 4th Assessment Report 2007

6 Definitions Adaptation
The adjustment in natural or human systems in response to actual or expected climatic stimuli or their effects, which moderates harm or exploits beneficial opportunities (UNISDR 2009) Adaptation

7 Relationship - Differences and Similarities of CCA/DRR
Origins in humanitarian assistance after a disaster event Evolved from top-down and bottom-up perspectives CCA Origins in scientific theory Generally emerged from top-down driven policies Mercer 2010

8 Differences and Similarities of CCA/DRR
Recognise the focus on underlying causes of vulnerability which also gives it a futuristic perspective. Time frame consideration is less – 20 years CCA CCA has strong emphasis on future hazards and projections of the possible outcomes from these hazards Time frame is much longer – 100 years and beyond

9 Differences and Similarities of CCA/DRR
DRR addresses hazards broadly to include both climatic and non-climatic hazards Focus is usually on existing hazards or hazards that have a historical base, and can be recounted from experiences CCA CCA focuses specifically on climatic hazards CCA has strong emphasis on future hazards and projections of the possible outcomes from these hazards

10 Differences and Similarities of CCA/DRR
DRR has at its centre: human welfare, in terms of the impacts of events on society and infrastructure. Mitigation in a DRR context refers to the use of structural and non-structural measures to limit the adverse impact of natural hazards CCA Initially, climate change looked more on atmospheric processes and physical exposure Mitigation in CCA context means climate change setting it means the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions

11 Differences and Similarities of CCA/DRR
Adaptation from a DRR refers to both climatic and non-climatic hazards (UNISDR 2012) Institutional arrangements and frameworks existed much longer than CCA hence an older discipline CCA Adaptation from a CCA refers to hazards (UNISDR 2012) Institutional arrangements and frameworks more recent hence CCA a younger discipline compared to DRR (UNISDR 2012) DRR is Regional insitution for DRR (CDEMA) established 1991 Regional insitution for CCA (CCCCC) established 2005

12 Differences and Similarities of CCA/DRR
The Hyogo framework has been adopted worldwide and is accepted as a global frame in tackling hazards, CCA Still no official or widely accepted framework in the CCA arena. There are several guiding frameworks

13 and do not outweigh the similarities
The differences between DRR and CCA may seem many, however they are inconsequential for practical application (Mercer, 2010) and do not outweigh the similarities

14 HAZARDS & Implications for Sectors
September, 2013

15 CCA and DRR Source: Venton and Latrobe, 2008; UNISDR, 2012

16 Similarities Both DRR and CCA aim to reduce the vulnerability of countries, to hazard events Both are interested in building resilience for communities Pursue and practice risk management approaches (i) Impacts the development portfolios of countries to include poverty reduction strategies (UNISDR, 2012), health programmes, land use planning and environmental protection (Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre, 2012). Disasters undo decades of development efforts and may reverse the gains in poverty reduction (UNISDR, 2008). (2) CCA and DRR are thus poised to reduce vulnerability and enhance resilience.

17 Relationship between DRR/CCA

18 Drivers of DRR/CCA Integration
Common goal of sustainable development Addressing vulnerability to climate-related hazards Reality of climate variability and change “No Regrets Approach” Transboundary nature of climate related hazards Mainstreaming efforts at the sectoral level

19 Concepts Influencing DRR/CCA Integration
National Policies and Programmes Sustainable Development agenda support Stable, transparent and effective Governance Inter-sectoral dialogue and coordination Existing practices tools and systems Integration within development budgets Capacity building and institutional frameworks For CCA and DRR to be most effective, the ey should be integrated into national policies and programmes.

20 Issues related to DRR/CCA
Separate institutional arrangements, strategies, conceptual approaches, assessment methodologies and frameworks exists Both areas have developed separately within the past two decades Funding streams for DRR are insufficient and ad hoc whilst increasing for CCA Numerous calls for integration but no agreement on how

21 The Investment Focus At the global level, climate change is slowly rising in importance on the development agendas of nations Funds are increasingly becoming available to cope and adapt to these impacts, while DRR funds are at times insufficient or are tied to humanitarian assistance (UNISDR, 2008)

22 The Investment Focus There is now the propensity ‘to exclusively target CCA to attract funds, thereby deflecting from wider development issues upon which those funds might otherwise be expended (Mercer 2010) The separation of funding mechanisms has served to reinforce the divide between DRR and CCA (UNISDR, 2012). Outcomes include overlapping policies and institutional arrangements, the replication of duties and a general inefficient use of resources.

23 The Investment Focus Climate change really represents one contributing factor to vulnerability, Resource allocations, focus is automatically placed on adaptation initiatives at the expense of broader hazard management issues

24 Challenges and Opportunities
Inadequate institutional arrangements Artificial separation of limited human resources into separate communities Institutional Capacity Need for involvement of all stakeholders Review reporting lines for DRR/CCA in countries Political Support

25 Challenges and Opportunities
Imbalance in resource allocation Lack of dedicated resources from national budgets for programming Budgetary Support Require efforts to harmonise policies and financing mechanisms International Support

26 At the community level, not much distinction is made between CCA and DRR for residents (Mercer, 2010). Focus is more on interrelated issues (i.e. political, social, economic) and viewing problems as a whole versus in separate parts (Mercer, 2010). Residents are therefore more concerned with dealing with hazards, rather than differentiating them and their responses. If this is the case, climate change should not be considered a stand-alone issue, but rather integrated into a DRR framework, where all vulnerable factors contributing to community risk are addressed. If not the global level, this can occur at the regional, national and local levels.

27 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE CARIBBEAN

28 RECOMMENDATIONS (CON’T)
The enhanced comprehensive disaster management strategy presents an opportunity to integrate CCA and by extension climate change mitigation. These are not addressed in depth. The new CDM strategy (2014 – 2024) has stated the need ‘to harmonize a clearly established and understood nexus between CCA and DRR….’ but has not yet completed the process of defining how this integration will occur. The Regional Framework for Achieving Development Resilient to Climate Change has already initiated this. In fact, climate change may seem to be an ‘add-on’ as expressed in the mandate: ‘to strengthen regional, national, and community level capacity for mitigation, management and coordinated response to natural and technological hazards and the effects of climate change.’

29 Case Examples: TONGA & VANUATU
Tonga - developed an integrated plan for Disaster Risk Management and Climate Change that includes reduction in green house gas emissions (UNISDR, 2012). Vanuatu - At the national level, this can also be achieved through logistics and physical location They co-located the national disaster management office and meteorological services (that housed the climate change unit) (UNISDR, 2012). This can also be applied in a Caribbean context, once the political will exists.

30 INTEGRATED DRR & CCA STRATEGY + IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
RFADRCC Implementation Plan (IP) Regional Framework for Achieving Development Resilient to Climate Change ( RFADRCC) CDM Strategy + Human Activities Risks of occurrence Hazards & Potential Impacts Climate System Unacceptable risk Acceptable risk Natural Phenomenon (non-human) Reduction of Green House Gases (mitigation) CDEMA CCCCC CIMH UWI- Seismic INTEGRATED DRR & CCA STRATEGY + IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Reduce Risk Through Disaster Risk Reduction and Adaptation Non – Climatic Systems Raise Risk Threshold through Adaptation Learn from Experiences CC DRR & CCA DRR OTHER

31 Guided Questions Is there a need for improved DRR/CCA integration
At what levels? All or some. Why is there a need for this integration? What are some of the barriers to integration? What are some of the opportunities? What are some of the emerging good practices? Feedback on the model Recommendations


Download ppt "Revisiting and Reshaping the Investment Focus"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google