Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Capacitance variation 3/ (%)

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Capacitance variation 3/ (%)"— Presentation transcript:

1 Capacitance variation 3/ (%)
Performance and Variability Driven Guidelines for BEOL Layout Decomposition with LELE Double Patterning Tuck-Boon Chan† Andrew B. Kahng†‡ ECE† & CSE‡ Depts., UC San Diego MOTIVATION Resist Patterning variations in LELE double patterning lithography (DPL) Different stitching locations are possible for double patterning Hardmask Questions: Metal 1st Exp. & Etch Can LELE pattern stitching strategy reduce on-chip timing variability? What is the “best-practice” for choosing stitching location? Is redundant stitching better? stitches 1) Overlay 2) Independent exposures 1st Exp. 2nd Exp. Interconnect spacing variation 2nd Exp. Uncorrelated critical dimension (CD) variation 1st Exp. 2nd Exp. 2nd Etch Final patterns BIMODALITY IN DPL RC VARIATION ANALYSIS Study three interconnect patterns Derive analytical equations for interconnect RC Use 45nm (commercial) and 22nm (ITRS) parameters to calculate interconnect RC values Ground plane Cs Cc H SL W2 neighbors T SR victim Color 1 Color 2 W1 DPL prints layout shapes in two exposures  Uncorrelated CD distribution  Different-color interconnects have uncorrelated RC distribution (a) Capacitance variation 3/ (%) 3 lines symmetric Ground plane Cs Cc SL neighbors SR victim (b) 1) Interconnect has less RC variation with uncorrelated RC distribution than with correlated RC distribution due to averaging effect 2) Stitching on long/critical interconnect  uncorrelated RC values  less timing variability 3 lines asymmetric 1) Pattern interconnect using DPL reduces capacitance variation by 20% (from 23% to 17%) compared to single patterning lithography (SPL) Redundant stitching reduces variability 2) Capacitance variation of symmetric case is 15% (from 20% to 17%) less than the asymmetric case Ground plane Cs Cc SL neighbor victim Y X (c) 2 lines STITCHING IMPACT ON RC STITCHING IMPACT ON DELAY Calculate capacitance at different stitching locations using 45nm commercial parameters Assign RC module before stitch location to Color 1 and after stitching location to Color 2 Simulate circuit delay using 22nm (predictive technology) and 45nm (commercial) HSPICE models delay stitching location Color 1 length : x1 Stitching location interconnect length Color 2 length : x2 Color 1 Color 1 Color 2 Color 2 driver receiver 20 RC modules 45nm technology 22nm technology 3 lines SPL 3 lines DPL 3 lines DPL asym. 2 lines SPL 2 lines DPL CONCLUSIONS 3 lines SPL 2 lines SPL 3 lines DPL symmetric 2 lines DPL Optimizing stitching location in DPL reduces 3 delay variation by 25% (from 20% to 15%) Optimal stitching location is at midpoint along an interconnect but slightly shifted toward driver’s side due to resistance shielding effect 3/ capacitance (%) 3 lines DPL Asymmetric 3/ capacitance (%) midpoint midpoint x1/(x1 +x2) (%) x1/(x1 +x2) (%) Optimal stitching location shifts to the driver side due to resistance shielding Similar trends for 45nm and 22nm Stitching at midpoint minimizes RC variation No difference between asym. and sym. DPL at midpoint


Download ppt "Capacitance variation 3/ (%)"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google