1. Capabilities Requirements Documents for Information Systems (IS) and Information Technology (IT)
Eric Jefferies
Professor, Requirements Management
Defense Systems Management College
Defense Acquisition University
December 2016

2. Lesson Objectives
Review Capabilities Development documents and processes for Information Technology and Information Systems
IT Box – (current JCIDS manual)
Introduce IT Box review exercise – CAMPS IT Box CDD (conducted Thursday)
Know how the JCIDS documents and process are modified when using the IT Box guidance in JCIDS manual for warfighter IT/IS development
Identify the Business System Document portion that contains capability requirements for business IT/IS development
Requirements Organization & Oversight
Validated Capabilities &
Initial MOEs $
Estimated Sustainment Costs (Lifetime)
JROC
Approved
IS ICD
Estimated Applications & System Software
Development & Integration Costs (Lifetime)
DoDI , Encl 12 replaces
Defense Acquisition Guidebook Chapter 12
Conduct a Class IT knowledge level exercise. What groupings of IT/IS programs do we have.
Business
Embedded
C2 C4 - warfighting 1

3. PREVIEW: THURSday Assignment
Review IT Box CDD
– Template and documents in K Drive
K:\Clsrm and Conf Room Temp Files\RQM 310 DEC FY 17\Exercises ICD CDD FCB\Thursday 8 Dec IT Box

4. PREVIEW: THURSday Assignment
You are a USAF member and serving as a Requirements Manager at HQ Air Mobility Command (HQ AMC)
– You are the sponsor of the Information Systems Capability Development Document for Consolidated Air Mobility Planning System (CAMPS)
– JSD: JCB Interest
– Bringing forward your IS-CDD to the FCB Working Group
– Populate the IT Box CDD Slide to brief the FCB WG

5. IT BOX CDD review responsibilities
Organization & Oversight
Chair:
Co-chairs:
Table 1
Table 2
Table 4/7
Hardware Refresh and System
Enhancements & Integration
Lifecycle Cost= $ (FY
Per year = $ M
Rationale:
Capability Name
Approval:
Validation:
Capability Oversight:
Program Management Oversight:
Table 6
Key Performance Parameters
• KPP#l
• KPP#2
• KPP#3
Table 5 RDP
Applications & System Software Development
• Lifecycle Cost = $ (FY__ to __ )
• Per year = $
Rationale: Provide
Table 3/8

6. Definition of the IT Box – JCIDS Manual : Enclosure D IS ICD
Organization & Oversight
Flag-level oversight thru [describe ]
Chair: XXXX
Members:
XXXX , XXXX , XXXX
IS ICD, JCIDS Manual Page D-32
“Boundaries”
JROC-Approved
IS ICD
[Topic name]
Oversight – [Name]
Execute – [Name]
Capabilities and Initial
Minimum Values
Hardware Refresh and System Enhancements &I ntegration:
Per year =$XX
Lifecycle Cost = $XX
Rationale….
NR KPP Table
Capability #1 [Describe] = initial value
Capability #2 [Describe] = initial value
Etc. [List the operational attributes/ initial values that apply to this IS-ICD]
Application and System Software Development:
Per year =$XX
Lifecycle Cost = $XX
Rationale….
Biannual status review by the Lead FCB
Revalidation by JCB / JROC if:
a) new core capabilities added to the ICD
b) Increase programmed development and integration funding
c) Disestablishment of oversight body or designation of new oversight body
d) Exception: Changes to MAIS programs proposed in conjunction

7. Definition of the IT Box – JCIDS Manual : Enclosure D IS CDD
Organization & Oversight
Flag-level oversight thru [describe ]
Chair: XXXX
Members:
XXXX , XXXX , XXXX
IS CDD, JCIDS Manual page D-65
Key Performance Parameters
“Boundaries”
JROC-Approved
IS CCD
[Topic name]
Oversight – [Name]
Execute – [Name]
Hardware Refresh and System Enhancements &I ntegration:
Per year =$XX
Lifecycle Cost = $XX
Rationale….
NR KPP Table
Capability #1 [Describe] = initial value
Capability #2 [Describe] = initial value
Etc. [List the operational attributes/ initial values that apply to this IS-ICD]
Application and System Software Development:
Per year =$XX
Lifecycle Cost = $XX
Rationale….
Biannual status review by the Lead FCB
Revalidation by JCB / JROC if:
a) new core capabilities added to the ICD
b) Increase programmed development and integration funding
c) Disestablishment of oversight body or designation of new oversight body
d) Exception: Changes to MAIS programs proposed in conjunction

8. JCIDS Document Tracks JROC JCB Sponsor Joint Staffing Designator (JSD)
FCB review &
prioritization
JROC
Interest
JCB
Review
JROC
KM/DS staffing & comment
ACAT I/IA programs & Joint DCRs
FCB review &
prioritization
JCB
Interest
JCB
KM/DS staffing & comment
ACAT II & below with impact on interoperability
Sponsor
FCB review &
prioritization
Joint
Integration
KM/DS staffing & comment
ACAT II & below that require endorsements & certifications
The J-8 Gatekeeper (J-8/Deputy Director for Requirements) assigns a Joint Staffing Designator (JSD) after the Sponsor submits a JCIDS document to the Knowledge Management/Decision Support (KM/DS) tool on the SIPRNET.
The Gatekeeper will also assign the document to the appropriate Functional Capability Board (FCB) for review, assessment, and prioritization.
The FCB (often assisted by other supporting FCBs), will conduct their review concurrent with the review of the document by all other stakeholders via KM/DS. The Sponsor will adjudicate comments from those stakeholders, and when necessary ask the FCB for assistance.
Comments submitted to KM/DS in response to document staffing are expected to be signed out at the GO/FO, or civilian equivalent, level.
For documents with JSDs below JCB or JROC Interest, the JROC delegates validation authority to the Sponsor organization, and Sponsors may use their own internal staffing processes for review and validation. Sponsor processes must accommodate the time required to obtain Joint Staff endorsements and/or certifications where applicable.
Endorsements and certifications include: J-7 (Training KPP and non-materiel solutions); J-2 (Threat validation and intelligence certification); J-8 (weapon safety endorsement); J-6 (Net-Ready KPP certification); J-4 (review and endorsement of sustainment and energy KPPs); Protection FCB (review and endorsement of Force Protection and Survivability KPPs)
FCB review &
prioritization
Joint
Information
KM/DS staffing & comment
ACAT II & below that do not require endorsements & certifications
Validation
Authority
KM/DS: Knowledge Management/Decision Support tool

9. BACKUP

10. Adapting Capabilities Requirements Documents for IT /IS
IF: The JCIDS process and documents optimized for MDAP hardware with high cost of sustainability
THEN: JCIDS documents and process tend not to be supportive of the rapid pace of development and deployment IS systems/capabilities needed to meet operational needs.
PROCESS TO-BE: Provide agile and responsive Capabilities Requirements documents and process to enable rapid development of IS capabilities
PROCESS IMPROVEMENT: SEVEN aspects of the JCIDS process are modified by the “IT Box” in conjunction with changes in the acquisition process, to meet the needs of the operational user so that new capabilities can be delivered rapidly, and adapted as necessitated by changes in the operational environment
This describes why additional change was required for the IT Box process in the 19 Jan 2012 JCIDS Manual
Discussion: What are some typical categories of DoD and Service IT/IS systems? 9

11. Assumptions
Information System (IS) development is different from major weapon systems development
Modify their processes and documentation expectations accordingly (DODI )
The test and certification communities can deliver more responsive test and certification processes to achieve timely delivery of capabilities
Necessitates incremental/iterative development and testing
Validation authority for managing requirements can be pushed down to a lower level to better enable adjustment to capability deployment schedule and KPP level performance decisions (normally retained as a JROC authority) 10

12. areas of JCIDS modified With “IT Box” guidance
Capabilities Document content and supporting Analysis for ICD and CDD
FCB briefing format
Validating JROCM format
Follow on capability document format loosely defined as Requirements Definition Package (RDP) with Capabilities Drops (CD)
Designation of an Oversight Body with more authority than typically delegated for Joint Capabilities Requirements
NR KPP table defined immediately
Funding table defined immediately 11

13. Funding Table & NR KPP Table
NR KPP Attribute
Key Performance Parameter
Initial Minimum
Support to military operations
Mission: Tracking and locating (Finding, Fixing, Finishing) High-Value Target (HVT)
Measure: Timely, actionable dissemination of acquisition data for HVT
Conditions: Targeting quality data to the neutralizing/tracking entity
<10 minutes
Area denial of HVT activities
Mission Activities: Find HVT
Measure: Location accuracy
Conditions: Individual differentiation
100 meter circle
Identify armed/ not armed
Enter and be managed in the network
Network: SIPRNET
Measure: Time to connect to an operational network from power up
Conditions: Continuous Network Connectivity
<2 minutes
Network: NIPRNET
Conditions: Continuous Network Connectivity
Up to 2 minutes
Exchange information
Information Element: Target Data
Measure: Dissemination of HVT biographic and physical data
Measure: Latency of data
Condition: NSA Type 1 Certified Encryption
Condition: Continuous Network Connectivity
<10 seconds
<5 seconds
Resources Required (Note 2)
Base Year $$
(Note 1)
FYxx
FYxx+1
FYxx+2
FYDP Total
Post-FYDP (FYyy-FYzz)
Life Cycle Cost (FYxx-FYzz)
Application and System Software Development Costs
Hardware Refresh, System Integration Costs
Total
Note 1: All resources normalized to a standard base year (BY) reference – BY$$.
Note 2: Current year is FYxx. First post-FYDP year is FYyy. End of planned capability life, or
end of 30-year TOA projection if no planned service life, is FYzz.
Table D-4. Example Life Cycle Cost Summary Table for IS-ICDs
(JCIDS Manual)
Example NR KPP table
(derived from Table D-E-3 , JCIDS Manual) 12

14. Applicability of the JCIDS IT Box (see JCIDS Manual IS ICD, IS CDD)
Efforts where an IT box may be considered:
JROC Gatekeeper oversight (Life cycle program costs ≥ $15 million)
Hardware: All hardware associated with an IS-ICD must be COTS/GOTS. Hardware modifications are restricted to those necessary for system integration and enhancements to meet capability requirements. Includes periodic refresh through lifecycle.
Software - Development, integration, and acquisition of customized applications, including commercial IS capability solutions with integrated, DOD-specific performance characteristics/standards. Includes continued development and deployment through lifecycle.
IT box IS NOT appropriate where:
Software is embedded as a subset of a capability solution developed under other validated capability requirement documents.
IT capability gap is better addressed by DBS process 13
DBS: Defense Business Systems
HW: Hardware
COTS: Commercial off the shelf
GOTS: Government off the shelf

15. IT Box & Requirements Management
Must meet data requirements for NR KPP certification
CDDs and CPDs required for programs identified as MDAPs (there are currently no MDAP – MAIS programs) 14 14
Fielding Decisions

16. defense business system description -enclosure of 12 dodi 5000
defense business system description -enclosure of 12 dodi jan 7, 2015
Have a life-cycle cost in excess of $1 million over the current Future Years Defense Program
An information system, other than a National Security System, operated by, for, or on behalf of the DoD, including:
financial systems
management information systems
financial data feeder systems
the information technology and cybersecurity infrastructure used to support business activities, such as
contracting
pay and personnel management systems
some logistics systems
financial planning and budgeting
installations management
human resource management 15 15

17. Updated Problem Statement
Capabilities Requirements in Business System Lifecycle Documents – DoDI Encl 12
Prior to MDD:
Problem Statement
After MDD:
Updated Problem Statement
Model 2: Defense Unique Software Intensive Program
Model 3: Incrementally Fielded Software Intensive Program
Hybrid Program B (Software Dominant) 16

18. Model 2: Defense Unique Software Intensive Program
Complex, usually defense unique, software program that will not be fielded until several software builds have been completed.
Examples: command and control systems and significant upgrades to the combat systems found on major weapons systems such as surface combatants and tactical aircraft.
Several software builds are typically necessary to achieve a deployable capability.
The central feature of this model is the planned software builds – a series of testable, integrated subsets of the overall capability – which together with clearly defined decision criteria, ensure adequate progress is being made before fully committing to subsequent builds
Examples of this type of product include military unique command and control systems and significant upgrades to the combat systems found on major weapons systems such as surface combatants and tactical aircraft. 17
*The actual number and type of builds during the program will depend on system type.

19. Resources BBP 3.0 http://bbp.dau.mil NSS
QDR
Joint Electronic Library +
JDEIS
CAC enabled
JCIDS
CAC enabled
DoD
4. DBS PROBLEM STATEMENT.

20. Model 3: Incrementally Fielded Software Intensive ProgramB A
Materiel Development Decision
Development RFP Release
CDD
Validation
IOC
Limited Fielding
Decisions
Materiel Solution Analysis
Risk
Reduction
Development &
Deployment
Sustainment
Build 0
Build
OT&E
Build 1.1
Build 1.2
. . .
Full Deployment Decision
(FDD)
Full
(FD)
Operations &
Support
Build 1.n
Increment N
Development RFP
Release Decision
Limited Fielding Decisions FD
Development &
Build n.1
Build n.2
Build n.n
Increment 2
FDD
Build 2.1
Build 2.2
Build 2.n
Sustainment Disposal
This model will apply in cases where commercial off-the-shelf software, such as commercial business systems with multiple modular capabilities, are acquired and adapted for DoD. This model is distinguished by the rapid delivery of capability through multiple acquisition increments, each of which provides part of the overall required program capability. 19

21. Model 6. Hybrid Program B (Software Dominant)
Development RFP Release
CDD
Validation B A C
Build 1.1.1
Build 1.1.2
Build 1.0.1
Integration
Build 1.1.3
Build 1.2
Materiel Solution Analysis
Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction
Production and Deployment
Engineering & Manufacturing Development
Sustainment
Materiel Development Decision
IOC FD
FDD
Build 1.3.1
Build 1.3.2*
Limited
Deployment LD)
Operations & Support
OT&E
Increment 2
Development RFP
Release Decision
Build 2.1.1
Build 2.1.2
Build 2.3.1
Sustainment Disposal LD
Build 2.3.2
Technology Maturation &
Risk Reduction
Build 2.1.3
Build 2.2
Depicts how s/w intensive product development can include mix of incrementally fielded software products or releases that include intermediate software builds
Risk Management: Highly-integrated, complex s/w & h/w development risks must be managed throughout life cycle -- special interest at decision points and milestones