1. Ethic of Conscience?
Thoreau, Tolstoy, et al

2. What is an ethic of Conscience?**
Conscience, this theory goes,
provides knowledge about right and wrong,
motivates us to do what is right,
and demands that we act in accord with it.
Some refer to as a “moral sense” comparable to other cognitive faculties.
Some identify conscience with an external entity (e.g. Socrates’ Daimon)
** This outline is adapted from Judith A. Boss, Ethics for Life: An Interdisciplinary and Multicultural Introduction, Mayfield Pub. Co., 1998

3. Where does Conscience come from?
Most views identify three main forces that shape ones conscience:
Heredity or biological factors include natural virtues such as sympathy and a sense of justice. The frontal lobes of the brain also appear to play a critical role in conscience.
Learning or environmental factors that shape our conscience include our cultural norms, our family, and our experiences. Cultural relativists, behaviorists, and Freudians maintain that morality is largely the result of environmental forces.
Conscious moral direction involves active deliberation and accepting responsibility for our moral decisions. Most philosophers contend that the development of conscious moral direction is necessary for becoming a truly moral person and a person of integrity. That is, Conscience is a product of rational reflection.

4. Passion and Reason
The affective element of conscience includes moral sentiments or feelings such as sympathy, “helpers high,” moral outrage, and guilt. Consider Gilligan’s view.
The cognitive element of conscience involves making rational moral judgments. Appeals to conscience entail a “rational struggle” with the elements of conscience.
The affective and cognitive elements of conscience work together.

5. Development of Concience
Many psychologists have agreed that there are stages of development of the conscience. The cognitive development approach to moral development is based on some basic assumptions.
Certain concepts, such as moral excellence, are fundamental to all humans.
Humans have an intrinsic potential and drive to grow from lower to higher stages of moral development.
Each stage of moral development involves a structurally different mode, or paradigm, for making moral decisions.
Stages of moral development are universal and transcultural.
People progress through the stages sequentially; they don’t skip stages.
Gains made in moral development tend to be retained.
People tend to prefer the highest stage of moral development that is conceptually available to them.

6. Lawrence Kohlberg
Three levels of moral development, each having two stages.
The preconventional level includes punishment and obedience and the egoist stages;
the conventional level includes the good boy/nice girl and culture- maintaining stages;
the postconventional level includes social contract reasoning and principled moral reasoning.
According to Kohlberg, only about ten percent of the U.S. adults ever reach the postconventional stage of moral reasoning.

7. Carol Gilligan
argued that women, in general, are more likely to use a care perspective and that men are more likely to use a justice perspective in their moral reasoning.
Gilligan postulated three stages of moral reasoning:
preconventional or self-centered;
conventional or self-sacrificing; and
postconventional or mature care ethics.
Gilligan and Kohlberg agreed that moral maturity involves a synthesis of both care and justice perspectives.

8. James Rest identified four components of moral behavior.
Moral sensitivity: the awareness of how our actions affect others.
Moral reasoning and judgment involves the ability to make critical judgments regarding moral values and various courses of action.
Moral motivation entails placing moral values above competing non- moral values.
Moral character involves having certain personality traits, such as courage, perseverance, and high self-esteem, that predispose us to act morally.

9. Thoreau’s Ethic of Conscience
Autonomy and self-governance
“Can there not be a government in which majorities do not virtually decide right and wrong, but conscience? — in which majorities decide only those questions to which the rule of expediency is applicable? Must the citizen ever for a moment, or in the least degree, resign his conscience to the legislator? Why has every man a conscience, then? I think that we should be men first, and subjects afterward. It is not desirable to cultivate a respect for the law, so much as for the right.”

10. Thoreau’s Ethic of Conscience
Repudiation of Ethics of Law
“Law never made men a whit more just; and, by means of their respect for it, even the well-disposed are daily made the agents of injustice. A common and natural result of an undue respect for law is, that you may see a file of soldiers, colonel, captain, corporal, privates, powder- monkeys, and all, marching in admirable order over hill and dale to the wars, against their wills, ay, against their common sense and consciences, which makes it very steep marching indeed, and produces a palpitation of the heart.”

11. Thoreau’s Ethic of Conscience
Institutional/Systemic Violence via complacency/collaboration
“How does it become a man to behave toward this American government to- day? I answer, that he cannot without disgrace be associated with it. I cannot for an instant recognize that political organization as my government which is the slave's government also…All men recognize the right of revolution; that is, the right to refuse allegiance to, and to resist, the government, when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and unendurable. But almost all say that such is not the case now.”
“I quarrel not with far-off foes, but with those who, near at home, co- operate with, and do the bidding of those far away, and without whom the latter would be harmless.”

12. Thoreau’s Ethic of Conscience
Expedience (prudence) vs. Morality
“But Paley appears never to have contemplated those cases to which the rule of expediency does not apply, in which a people, as well as an individual, must do justice, cost what it may. If I have unjustly wrested a plank from a drowning man, I must restore it to him though I drown myself. This, according to Paley, would be inconvenient. But he that would save his life, in such a case, shall lose it. This people must cease to hold slaves, and to make war on Mexico, though it cost them their existence as a people.”

13. Thoreau’s Ethic of Conscience
Principle of Non-cooperation “It is not a man's duty, as a matter of course, to devote himself to the eradication of any, even the most enormous wrong; he may still properly have other concerns to engage him; but it is his duty, at least, to wash his hands of it, and, if he gives it no thought longer, not to give it practically his support.”

14. Thoreau’s Ethic of Conscience
Banality of Evil “After the first blush of sin comes its indifference; and from immoral it becomes, as it were, unmoral, and not quite unnecessary to that life which we have made.”

15. Thoreau’s Ethic of Conscience
Right to petition grievance sufficient for Tacit Consent?
“Unjust laws exist; shall we be content to obey them, or shall we endeavor to amend them, and obey them until we have succeeded, or shall we transgress them at once? Men generally, under such a government as this, think that they ought to wait until they have persuaded the majority to alter them. They think that, if they should resist, the remedy would be worse than the evil. But it is the fault of the government itself that the remedy is worse than the evil. It makes it worse. Why is it not more apt to anticipate and provide for reform? Why does it not cherish its wise minority? Why does it cry and resist before it is hurt? Why does it not encourage its citizens to be on the alert to point out its faults, and do better than it would have them? Why does it always crucify Christ, and excommunicate Copernicus (2) and Luther,(3) and pronounce Washington and Franklin rebels?”

16. Thoreau’s Ethic of Conscience
Right to petition grievance sufficient for Tacit Consent?
“As for adopting the ways which the State has provided for remedying the evil, I know not of such ways. They take too much time, and a man's life will be gone. I have other affairs to attend to. I came into this world, not chiefly to make this a good place to live in, but to live in it, be it good or bad. A man has not everything to do, but something; and because he cannot do everything, it is not necessary that he should do something wrong.”
“The State, having thus learned that I did not wish to be regarded as a member of that church, has never made a like demand on me since; though it said that it must adhere to its original presumption that time. If I had known how to name them, I should then have signed off in detail from all the societies which I never signed on to; but I did not know where to find a complete list.” 
“I have never declined paying the highway tax, because I am as desirous of being a good neighbor as I am of being a bad subject; and as for supporting schools, I am doing my part to educate my fellow- countrymen now. It is for no particular item in the tax-bill that I refuse to pay it. I simply wish to refuse allegiance to the State, to withdraw and stand aloof from it effectually. I do not care to trace the course of my dollar, if I could, till it buys a man or a musket to shoot one with — the dollar is innocent — but I am concerned to trace the effects of my allegiance. In fact, I quietly declare war with the State, after my fashion, though I will still make what use and get what advantage of her I can, as is usual in such cases.”

17. Thoreau’s Ethic of Conscience
Duty to break unjust laws “[B]ut if it is of such a nature that it requires you to be the agent of injustice to another, then, I say, break the law. Let your life be a counter friction to stop the machine. What I have to do is to see, at any rate, that I do not lend myself to the wrong which I condemn.” “Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also a prison.”

18. Thoreau’s Ethic of Conscience
Obedience is the nature of power
“If the alternative is to keep all just men in prison, or give up war and slavery, the State will not hesitate which to choose. If a thousand men were not to pay their tax-bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the State to commit violence and shed innocent blood. This is, in fact, the definition of a peaceable revolution, if any such is possible. If the tax-gatherer, or any other public officer, asks me, as one has done, "But what shall I do?" my answer is, "If you really wish to do anything, resign your office." When the subject has refused allegiance, and the officer has resigned his office, then the revolution is accomplished.”
“However, the government does not concern me much, and I shall bestow the fewest possible thoughts on it. It is not many moments that I live under a government, even in this world. If a man is thought-free, fancy-free, imagination-free, that which is not never for a long time appearing to be to him, unwise rulers or reformers cannot fatally interrupt him.”
“There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are derived, and treats him accordingly.”

19. Thoreau’s Ethic of Conscience
Wealth and the compromise of Conscience
“But the rich man — not to make any invidious comparison — is always sold to the institution which makes him rich. Absolutely speaking, the more money, the less virtue; for money comes between a man and his objects, and obtains them for him; and it was certainly no great virtue to obtain it. It puts to rest many questions which he would otherwise be taxed to answer; while the only new question which it puts is the hard but superfluous one, how to spend it… This is hard. This makes it impossible for a man to live honestly, and at the same time comfortably in outward respects. It will not be worth the while to accumulate property; that would be sure to go again.”