Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Measuring College and Career Readiness 2015 PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE EDGEWATER SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEANOR VAN GELDER SCHOOL.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Measuring College and Career Readiness 2015 PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE EDGEWATER SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEANOR VAN GELDER SCHOOL."— Presentation transcript:

1 Measuring College and Career Readiness 2015 PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE EDGEWATER SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEANOR VAN GELDER SCHOOL

2 UNDERSTANDING THE SCORE REPORT

3 ✓ Determine whether students are college- and career-ready or “on track” ✓ Provide tools to assess student learning and support instruction during the school year ✓ Report growth in performance as well as absolute achievement ✓ Report comparable results across schools, districts and member states ✓ Generate valid and reliable information to inform instruction and accountability decisions What are the primary objectives of the PARCC Assessment System? ✓ Use technology for a range of purposes including increasing student access, providing accommodations, engaging students, and creating efficiencies in administration, scoring and reporting 3

4 Test Administration in 2015 1.2 million students in one day 204,000 students in one hour Peak: 1m testers per day x 5 days Thousands of hours contributed by thousands of educators to develop the test Key Stats

5  Level 1: Not yet meeting grade-level expectations  Level 2: Partially meeting grade-level expectations  Level 3: Approaching grade-level expectations  Level 4: Meeting grade-level expectations  Level 5: Exceeding grade-level expectations PARCC PERFORMANCE LEVELS

6 Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % >= Level 4 Grade 315%18%24%39%5%44% Grade 48%15%27%39%12%51% Grade 57%15%26%45%6%52% Grade 68%16%28%40%9%49% NEW JERSEY’S 2015 PARCC OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY.

7 Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectations (Level 5) % >= Level 4 Grade 38%19%28%37%8%45% Grade 47%22%30%36%4%41% Grade 56%21%32%35%6%41% Grade 68%21%30%35%6%41% NEW JERSEY’S 2015 PARCC OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS.

8 Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectatio n (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 Grade 3 10010142840848%44%38% Grade 4 9061620421759%51%42% Grade 5 93882357562%52%40% Grade 6 751721561571%49%39% EDGEWATER’S 2015 PARCC GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY

9 Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 Grade 3 10391227391655%45%38% Grade 4 9551724411354%41%32% Grade 5 978181948755%41%32% Grade 6 761838361753%41%32% EDGEWATER’S 2015 PARCC GRADE-LEVEL OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS

10 EDGEWATER’S 3 RD GRADE 2015 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 3 rd General Education 948132738849% 3 rd Economically Disadvantaged 195653016% 3 rd Special Education 62112033% 3 rd English Language Learners 60114067% District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 48%44%38%

11 Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 4 th General Education 8031015371565% 4 th Economically Disadvantaged 132236046% 4 th Special Education 102431010% 4 th English Language Learners 60204067% EDGEWATER’S 4 TH GRADE 2015 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 59%51%42%

12 EDGEWATER’S 5 TH GRADE 2015 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 5 th General Education 82341753571% 5 th Economically Disadvantaged 224385232% 5 th Special Education 11434000% 5 th English Language Learners 42011025% District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 62%52%40%

13 Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 6 th General Education 680315401074% 6 th Economically Disadvantaged 150159093% 6 th Special Education 71212143% 6 th English Language Learners 1100000% EDGEWATER’S 6 TH GRADE 2015 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS/LITERACY District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 71%49%39%

14 EDGEWATER’S 3 RD GRADE 2015 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 3 rd General Education 9771126371655% 3 rd Economically Disadvantaged 19468105% 3 rd Special Education 62112033% 3 rd English Language Learners 70032257% District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 55%45%38%

15 Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 4 th General Education 85142034391260% 4 th Economically Disadvantaged 131435038% 4 th Special Education 10235000% 4 th English Language Learners 91133144% EDGEWATER’S 4 TH GRADE 2015 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 54%41%32%

16 Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 5 th General Education 862141647763% 5 th Economically Disadvantaged 224664227% 5 th Special Education 11632000% 5 th English Language Learners 71411014% EDGEWATER’S 5 TH GRADE 2015 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 55%41%32%

17 Count of Valid Test Scores Not Yet Meeting (Level 1) Partially Meeting (Level 2) Approaching Expectations (Level 3) Meeting Expectations (Level 4) Exceeding Expectation (Level 5) District % >= Level 4 6 th General Education 690625 1355% 6 th Economically Disadvantaged 150285033% 6 th Special Education 71042029% 6 th English Language Learners 1100000% EDGEWATER’S 6 TH GRADE 2015 PARCC SUBGROUP OUTCOMES MATHEMATICS District % >= Level 4 NJ % >= Level 4 PARCC % >= Level 4 53%41%32%

18 SUMMARY OF SCORE REPORT ELA Average Edgewater Score Average State Average PARCC 3 rd Grade 751743736 4 th Grade 756750742 5 th Grade 755750741 6 th Grade 761747740 MATH Average Edgewater Score Average State Average PARCC 3 rd Grade 754745738 4 th Grade 745743736 5 th Grade 748743736 6 th Grade 755742735

19 QUESTIONS TO GUIDE PARCC DATA REFLECTION  How will we use PARCC data to identify strengths and gaps that exist in curriculum and instruction?  How will we use PARCC data to inform the conversations of our educators?  What can we learn about where additional professional resources are needed to meet the learning needs of all students?

20 District and School Level Data: Math, ELA, reading and writing, and also by grade levels Disaggregated data, by subgroups Disaggregated data by categories, (i.e., standards sub-claims) Item analysis Student-level analysis YEAR ONE DATA ANALYSIS PLAN: DRILLING DOWN

21 tudent Roster Report (Sub-Scores) 10 What trends can be discerned from the data?

22 DraftofStudentRosterReport(ItemScores) 11 What are student’s strengths and weaknesses?

23 SUMMARY  PARCC 2016 will consist of one testing window instead of two, and the amount of questions are reduced.  The PARCC tests replace the old state tests. They measure how well students are performing against the new state standards that guide math and English language arts instruction.  The PARCC tests are only one of several measures, including report card grades and in-class performance, that are used to determine a student's academic achievement. They do not impact a student’s GPA.  The score reports are a valuable tool for parents and teachers. The report provides a deeper level of information that can be used to better understand where students are doing well and where they need additional support.  The PARCC tests moves away from multiple choice questions to ones that allow students to demonstrate a real understanding of what they know and can do by writing essays, solving real world problems, and reading and analyzing complex text—all critical skills in the real-world.  The students’ scores may look lower this year because the tests measured more complex skills.  A low score does not mean students did not improve or learned less, but instead that the expectations have been raised for students.  The first year’s scores are a new baseline from which to progress from and measure against moving forward.


Download ppt "Measuring College and Career Readiness 2015 PARCC RESULTS: YEAR ONE EDGEWATER SCHOOL DISTRICT ELEANOR VAN GELDER SCHOOL."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google