1. Straights: Heterosexuality in Post-Closeted Culture James Joseph Dean
“Chapter 6: Straights, Post-Closeted Culture, and the Continuum of Identity Practices”

2. Straights and Post-Closeted Culture
Dean argues that a post-closeted dynamic, which is marked by the pervasive presence of openly gay and lesbian individuals and a pattern of cultural normalization, is increasingly common in core areas of social life, and is thus refashioning sexual identity performances, normative heterosexuality, and homophobias.
Dean does not claim the end of the closet; rather, though the conditions of the closet persist, the chief patterns of sexual and gender disadvantage in the core institutions of American society are decreasingly a product of compulsory heterosexuality.
If the concept of a post-closeted dynamic seems to overstate the increasing tolerance, cultural normalization, and social integration of gay men and lesbians, it is due to the contradiction between everyday and institutional life in America.
Gay cultural normalization and social integration form an uneven pattern that is most salient in everyday life and interpersonal relationships. A post-closeted dynamic represents more of a micro-sociological phenomenon, and it doesn’t capture as well the experiences of gay men and lesbians in many social institutions, regions, and places

3. Straights and Post-Closeted Culture
Straights and gays now often look and act alike. In other words, gay integration is in part conditioned by gay men and lesbians who embody conventional, even normative, gender self-presentations.
While straights attempt to use gender-normative practices to recuperate straight privilege, gender-conventional gay men and lesbians undercut this strategy.
As a result, if gender-normative practices fail to project a clear heterosexual identity, then resorting to normative heterosexual boundary practices, which put social distance between oneself as straight and gay individuals, signifiers, and spaces, makes sociological sense in post-closeted contexts.

4. Historical Shifts in the Closet
The historical shifts represent broad reconfigurations in the closet, gender, and the homo/heterosexual division since the 1890s.
Between the 1930s and 1950s in America, the closet of antihomosexual discrimination was built— homosexuals were prohibited from being served in bars and restaurants and fired from federal government jobs, and Hollywood films were forbidden to portray homosexual characters or even mention their existence (Chauncey 2004, 5–22; D’Emilio 1983, 2002). Historians, legal scholars, and sociologists have documented the dismantling of the various parts of the closet and its repressive practices of oppression over the course of the thirty-year period from the 1960s to the 1990s
Following their lead, Dean claimed that a post-closeted culture has arisen under conditions of unprecedented popular cultural visibility and social and legal enfranchisement in the mid-1990s and the first decade of the twenty-first century..
In table 6.1, Dean offers a typology of what he calls “historical shifts in the closet,” using both the research in this book and the historical scholarship to date, to understand the present period and its historical antecedents

6. Understanding Straight Identity Practices and the Reproduction of Heteronormativity
Dean talked with black and white straight men and women to understand the meanings they attached to being straight, to analyze the interactions they reported with lesbians and gay men, and to document the variety of homophobic and antihomophobic stances (as well as the mixture of the two) that were found among their conventional ways of speaking and acting in everyday life.
He claimed that straight identities were socially constructed through the boundaries of social distance that the respondents enacted in performing their identities in various situations and contexts.
By boundaries of social distance, Dean means the practices these straight individuals used to associate or disassociate themselves from lesbian and gay symbols, individuals, and spaces.
By capturing a range of identity practices and mapping them onto to a continuum, categorized as moving from homophobic practices at one end to antihomophobic practices on the other, he developed three broad categories: strongly aversive, weak, and blurred boundaries of social distance.
The continuum provided a grading of the boundary practices that straight men and women used, and showed how race shaped respondents’ positions on it. Table 6.2 summarizes the continuum and provides an overview of the main points of the book.

8. Conclusion
Dean argued for a social and historical approach to understanding the shifts and changes in the social status of black and white straight men’s and women’s identities.
The concept of a post-closeted culture captures the dismantling of antigay discrimination, the integration of out lesbians and gay men, and the number of vivid LGBTQ representations in American society’s diverse media landscape today.
In this study Dean documented the different ways that straight people, through actions and words, have socially constructed boundaries between heterosexuality and homosexuality.
As their interactions with lesbian and gay individuals, symbols, and spaces have become more varied, numerous, and complicated, straights have become more conscious, defensive, and deliberate in establishing their identity status.
With the rise of a post-closeted culture, black and white straight men and women have started to rethink what it means to be straight and their place in America in the twenty-first century.

9. Discussion Questions
Define the term the closet. What does it mean for the closet to be part of state formation and repression?
Define the term post-closeted. What does the term include conceptually?
What are the key characteristics of a closeted versus a post-closeted period?
Explain the differences between straight men and women in the strongly aversive category versus the weak category of the continuum of identity practices.
List the key characteristics of straight men and women in the blurred boundaries category.
What does it mean for straight masculinity and straight femininity to be socially constructed through words and actions?