1. Psychomotor Assessment
Aries, Dan, Justin, Christy, Isac

2. Goals
We expect to learn about the skill-related physical fitness of various college-age individuals. The tests evaluate agility, balance, coordination, power, reaction time, speed.
Tests: shuttle run, stork stand, body coordination test (lateral jumping), vertical jump, 30-meter sprint, and hand reaction time test,

3. Reliability, Validity, Objectivity
Reliable: The test was consistent since we performed it at one time with the same testers. Used the same equipment for each test.
Valid: This is an integrated test that measures general physical fitness of individuals.
Objective: The same student administered each tests. (i.e. Christy administered standing long jump only)

4. Choice of Subjects College students (20-23 years old)
We tested everyone in the group (5 people) plus 5 others.
8 males & 2 females

5. Assessment Tool Agility: 4x10m Shuttle Run Test
Balance: Stork Stand Test
Coordination: Lateral Jumping Test
Power: Vertical Jump Test
Speed: 30-meterDash
Reaction Time: Hand Reaction Time Test

6. Assessment Tool Things we needed: Cones Meter Stick Stopwatch
Measuring tape
Chalk
Tests were chosen to measure the general physical fitness of an individual without testing the ability of performing certain skills in a specific sport.
Do not correlate with the sports of our subjects.

7. Raw Data

8. Raw Data

9. Raw Data https://hubpages.com/sports/Vertical-Jump-How-to-Jump-Higher

10. Evaluation and Interpretation
4x10m Shuttle Run Test
Half of our subjects are classified as excellent
The rest of them are on average or below average
Stork Stand Test
No one has a score of less than 10 seconds
Nobody in this study has poor balance
Big proportion of the subjects - mean or regular

11. Evaluation and Interpretation
Lateral Jumping Test
No particular classification
Most subjects accomplished the test within reps
Best = 33 reps
Vertical Jump Test
70% of the subjects, are in the range of average to above average
The group is either on average or better than average in lower body’s power

12. Evaluation and Interpretation
30-meter Dash Test
Only one person has an excellent result in this test
60% of the subjects, performed worse than average in this test while four of them did poorly
Most of them are not very fast in short distance sprinting
Hand Reaction Time Test
t=sqrt(2d/g)
All results were very close (0.11s)
Range = From 0.14s to 0.25s

13. Application General physical tests
Implement more cardio and power exercises for better scores in sprinting and jumping
Implement more plyometrics to increase jumping scores. All participants were pretty poor in this category.

14. Reflections
The shuttle test could have been completed on the basketball court to give more consistent surface
Doing the tests over a couple of days instead of in one day could help produce better results.
Tough to determine when to stop the stopwatch for the standing stork test
30 meter dash was the easiest test to administer

15. Citations
Castillo-Rodríguez, A., & Chinchilla-Minguet, J. L. (2014, August 13). [Full text] Cardiovascular
program to improve physical fitness in those over 60&nb | CIA. Retrieved April 24, 2017, from
0nbs-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-CIA
Lacy, A. C. (2015). Measurement and evaluation in physical education and exercise science. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Lee, J. (2014, December 01). The Soccer (Football) 30 meter Sprint Test. Retrieved April 24, 2017, from
Preparing for Test. (2016, May 13). Retrieved April 24, 2017, from
R. (2015, June 01). Vertical Jump - How to Jump Higher. Retrieved April 24, 2017, from