1. Plantar Fasciitis: Are Pain and Fascial Thickness Associated With Arch Shape and Loading? by Scott C Wearing, James E Smeathers, Patrick M Sullivan, Bede Yates, Stephen R Urry, and Philip Dubois ptjournal Volume 87(8):1002-1008 July 31, 2007 Physical Therapy

2. The thickness of the proximal insertion of the plantar fascia (d) was measured from sagittal sonograms at a standard reference point 5 mm from the anterior, inferior border of the fascial insertion into the calcaneus (C). Scott C Wearing et al. PHYS THER 2007;87:1002-1008 Physical Therapy

3. Illustration of the calcaneal-first metatarsal (CMT1) angle. Scott C Wearing et al. PHYS THER 2007;87:1002-1008 Physical Therapy

4. The average peak vertical force, expressed as a percentage of body weight, beneath the rear foot, midfoot, forefoot, and digits of symptomatic, asymptomatic, and control limbs. Scott C Wearing et al. PHYS THER 2007;87:1002-1008 Physical Therapy

5. Pearson r Correlation Coefficients (P Value) Between Perceived Pain on Weight Bearing and the Sagittal Thickness of the Plantar Fascia, Calcaneal-First Metatarsal (CMT1) Angle, and Regional Loading Beneath the Symptomatic Foot of the Subjects With Heel Pain (n=10). Scott C Wearing et al. PHYS THER 2007;87:1002-1008 Physical Therapy

6. Pearson r Correlation Coefficients (P Value) Between the Sagittal Thickness of the Plantar Fascia and the Calcaneal-First Metatarsal (CMT1) Angle and Regional Loading Beneath the Foot in Symptomatic, Asymptomatic, and Matched Control Limbs. Scott C Wearing et al. PHYS THER 2007;87:1002-1008 Physical Therapy