Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Progress In Power Amplifier Design

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Progress In Power Amplifier Design"— Presentation transcript:

1 Progress In Power Amplifier Design
AES WARSAW 2015 Engineering Brief EB-2-2 Progress In Power Amplifier Design Thermal Distortion Douglas Self

2 Power amplifier imperfections
Frequency response: no problem Slew-rate: no problem Noise: Blameless amplifier with differential pair input has an EIN of approx -123 dBu. Gain of 23 times: (+27 dB) output noise is -96 dBu. Add only a 5534 voltage follower in front; amplifier output noise goes up 3 dB Distortion: still with us

3 Blameless power amplifier: CFP output stage

4 Power amplifier distortions
CONFIGURATION D1: Input stage non-linearity D2: Voltage Amplifier Stage (VAS) non-linearity D3: Output stage non-linearity D4: Non-linear loading of VAS TOPOLOGY D5: Decoupling ground problems D6: Rail induction D7: Negative feedback takeoff point errors This list assumes the use of the standard Blameless configuration. This classification assumes no clipping, overload, slew-limiting, or parasitic oscillation. COMPONENTS D8: Capacitor distortion (NFB cap, compensation cap

5 More power amplifier distortions
INTERFACING D9: Magnetic conductor distortion (relay frames, terminals) D10: Non-linear input currents flowing in significant source impedances D11: Premature operation of SOAR protection

6 Distortions to not worry about
ND1: Input-Stage Common-Mode Distortion. Only important at very low closed-loop gains ND2: Thermal Distortion over a cycle. Not to be confused with slow bias changes in a Class-B output stage. Would cause rise in THD at LF; not previously observed But... with better test gear and higher output levels of up to 100W/8Ω, a rise in THD at LF is visible... A quick digression as to why these distortion mechanisms are not a source of concern. For example, you often see cascode input stages recommended as a cure for input-stage CM distortion.

7 THD of Compact Class-B CFP power amp: no-load, 20W/16Ω, 40W/8Ω, 80W/4Ω and genmon. Normal Miller compen. Measurement bwidth kHz

8 40W/8Ω = dBu 0.0003% = dB Thus indicated noise floor is at dBu Amplifier alone has noise floor at -96 dBu So AP noise limits the measurement here

9 LF THD is essentially not a function of output current
LF THD is essentially not a function of output current. (slightly at 4Ω) It rises very slowly as frequency falls; takes three octaves to double in amplitude.

10 Also, LF THD: Increases with output voltage, more steeply as output voltage increases Is not a function of supply voltage The feedback capacitor is not involved. Doubling its size made no difference. Is not affected by the compensation scheme used (eg output inclusive compensation) Implies source of LF distortion is not in amplifier forward path.

11 Standard NFB network. 332 mW in 750mW resistor Rnfb1
15 mW in resistor Rnfb2

12 The most severe conditions for any passive component in the amplifier.
Thermal distortion? At 100W/8Ω output, upper feedback resistor Rnfb1 dissipates 332 mW. See resistor temp coefficient. At 100W/8Ω output, upper feedback resistor Rnfb1 has 27 Vrms (40 Vpeak) across it. See resistor voltage coefficient. The most severe conditions for any passive component in the amplifier.

13 Distortion models Straightforward for voltage-coefficent distortion. All odd harmonics are generated, and all have a THD % proportional to signal level; see APAD6. Much more complicated for thermal distortion as heat spreading out from surface film into resistor body is hard to model. FEA approach required.

14 Four 250 mW resistors in parallel Power reduced to 1/4
Voltage the same LF distortion reduced by a factor of 0.77 times, slope vs freq unchanged Eight 250 mW resistors in parallel Power reduced to 1/8 Voltage the same LF distortion reduced by a factor of 0.55 times, slope vs freq unchanged Suggests power and not voltage is the issue.

15 Four resistors in series-parallel
Power reduced to 1/4, voltage halved Samples: 2k2 750mW ±100 ppm/°C Metal Film PR 2k2 500mW ±50 ppm/°C Metal Film Same highly reputable manufacturer

16 THD of Compact Class-B CFP power amp 100W/8Ω
Single k2 750mW ±100 ppm/°C MF resistor BROWN Single PR 2k2 500mW ±50 ppm/°C MF resistor RED Test gear output labelled ‘genmon’. Bandwidth kHz

17 THD of Compact Class-B CFP power amp 100W/8Ω
Appears to show we have done all we can with tempco and voltage coeff of top NFB resistor THD of Compact Class-B CFP power amp 100W/8Ω Single k2 750mW ±100 ppm/°C MF resistor BROWN Single PR 2k2 500mW ±50 ppm/°C MF resistor RED Series-parallel 4x PR 2k2 500mW ±50 ppm/°C MF resistor BLUE Test gear output labelled ‘genmon’. Bandwidth kHz

18 Added to the distortion list
D12: Thermal distortion in the upper feedback resistor But LF distortion still visible in previous plot, although thermal distortion from upper resistor now negligible. Likely to be outside NFB loop- probably thermal effects affecting accuracy of the NFB subtraction by the input pair, so perhaps: D13: Thermal distortion in input pair ?? Work in progress. THE END

19 Other resistor types An old 2% 250 mW MF resistor was tried in an attempt to show some bad thermal distortion. However, despite being run at 30% above its rating, THD was the same as for the PR 500mW ±50 ppm/°C MF resistor. MORAL: this is an area where you can’t take things for granted. Test!

20 Progress in Power Amplifier Design
AES WARSAW 2015 Engineering Brief EB-2-2 Progress in Power Amplifier Design Thermal Distortion douglas-self.com


Download ppt "Progress In Power Amplifier Design"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google