1. 2012-2 Regular Cycle Transmittal Public Hearing July 31, 2012

2.  2012-2 Regular Cycle –Privately-Initiated Future Land Use Map Amendments –Staff-Initiated Future Land Use Map and Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments Today’s Amendments

3.  2012-2 Regular Cycle –Privately-Initiated Future Land Use Map Amendments –Staff-Initiated Future Land Use Map and Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments Today’s Amendments

4. Amendment:2012-2-A-5-1Agent: Thomas R. Sullivan Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor, & Reed, P.A. Owner: A and V Property Group Inc. Yen Ming Tr. and Ludwig Goetz Jr. From: Planned Development-Commercial (PD-C); Commercial (C); and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) To: Planned Development-Medium Density Residential (PD-MDR) (Student Housing) Acreage: 46.2 gross / 36 net Proposed use: 906 student housing beds Board of County Commissioners 2012-2 Regular Cycle Privately Initiated Amendment

5. 2012-2-A-5-1 Location

6. 2012-2-A-5-1 Aerial

8. 2012-2-A-5-1 Future Land Use

9. 2012-2-A-5-1 Zoning

10. 2012-2-A-5-1 PD Zoning

11. 2012-2-A-5-1 Subject Site

12. 2012-2-A-5-1 North of Subject Site

13. 2012-2-A-5-1 South of Subject Site

14. 2012-2-A-5-1 East of Subject Site

15. 2012-2-A-5-1 West of Subject Site

16. ConcernResponse Crime / securityApplicant has proposed to gate the community and provide dense vegetation and an eight-foot composite fence around the property to buffer the project from adjacent single-family units. Increased trafficProject will result in a net decrease of trips compared to the currently-adopted future land use designations. CompatibilityProject has been designed as a collection of “cottages” to resemble the single-family character of the adjacent properties. 2012-2-A-5-1 Resident Concerns and Responses

17. 2012-2-A-5-1 Analysis and Recommendations Comprehensive Plan consistency  Encourage infill development to:  Promote compact urban form  Efficiently use land and infrastructure in the Urban Service Area  Promote a diverse mix of uses and housing types  Facilitate provision of adequate housing supply with a broad range of types and price levels

18. 2012-2-A-5-1 Analysis and Recommendations Staff Analysis  FLU1.1.5 Orange County shall encourage mixed-use development, infill development and transit-oriented development to promote compact urban form and efficiently use land and infrastructure in the Urban Service Area. The County may require minimum FARs and densities in its Land Development Code to achieve the County’s desired urban framework. Infill is defined as development consistent with the Infill Master Plan (2008).  FLU1.4.1 Orange County shall promote a range of living environments and employment opportunities in order to achieve a stable and diversified population and community.

19. 2012-2-A-5-1 Analysis and Recommendations Staff Analysis  GOAL FLU2 URBAN STRATEGIES. Orange County will encourage urban strategies such as infill development, coordinated land use and transportation planning, and mixed-use development, which promote efficient use of infrastructure, compact development and an urban experience with a range of choices and living options.  OBJ FLU2.1 INFILL. Orange County shall promote and encourage infill development through incentives identified in the Land Development Code for relatively small vacant and underutilized parcels within the County’s established core areas in the Urban Service Area.

20. 2012-2-A-5-1 Analysis and Recommendations Staff Analysis  OBJ FLU8.2 COMPATIBILITY. Compatibility will continue to be the fundamental consideration in all land use and zoning decisions. For purposes of this objective, the following policies shall guide regulatory decisions that involve differing land uses.  FLU8.2.1. Land use changes shall be required to be compatible with the existing development and development trend in the area. Performance restrictions and/or conditions may be placed on property through the appropriate development order to ensure compatibility. No restrictions or conditions shall be placed on a Future Land Use Map change. (Policy 3.2.25)  FLU8.2.2. Continuous stretches of similar housing types and density of units shall be avoided. A diverse mix of uses and housing types shall be promoted. (Policy 3.1.1)

21. 2012-2-A-5-1 Analysis and Recommendations Staff Analysis  FLU 8.2.11. Compatibility may not necessarily be determined to be a land use that is identical to those uses that surround it. Other factors may be considered, such as the design attributes of the project, its urban form, the physical integration of a project and its function in the broader community, as well its contribution toward the Goals and Objectives in the CP. The CP shall specifically allow for such a balance of considerations to occur.  GOAL H1. Orange County’s goal is to promote and assist in the provision of ample housing supply, within a broad range of types and price levels, to meet current and anticipated housing needs so that all our residents have the opportunity to purchase or rent standard housing.  OBJ H1.1. The County will continue to support private sector housing production capacity sufficient to meet the housing needs of existing and future residents.

22. 2012-2-A-5-1 Analysis and Recommendations Staff Recommendation:Transmit LPA Recommendation:Transmit  Make a finding of consistency with the Comprehensive Plan −See Future Land Use Element Goal FLU2, Housing Element Goal H1, FLU Objectives FLU2.1 and FLU8.2, Housing Objective H1.1, and Policies FLU1.1.5, FLU1.4.1, FLU8.2.1, FLU8.2.2, and FLU8.2.11;  Determine that the amendment is in compliance; and  Transmit Amendment 2012-2-A-5-1 −Planned Development-Commercial (PD-C), Commercial (C), and Low Medium Density Residential (LMDR) to Planned Development-Medium Density Residential (PD-MDR) (Student Housing).

23.  2012-2 Regular Cycle –Privately-Initiated Future Land Use Map Amendments –Staff-Initiated Future Land Use Map and Comprehensive Plan Text Amendments Today’s Amendments

24. Amendment:2012-2-B-FLUM-1Request: Map amendment removing Future Land Use designations for parcels annexed by incorporated jurisdictions within the County District:Countywide Board of County Commissioners 2012-2 Regular Cycle Staff Initiated Amendment Staff Recommendation:Transmit LPA Recommendation:Transmit

25. Board of County Commissioners 2012-2 Regular Cycle Staff Initiated Amendment

26. Amendment:2012-2-B-FLUE-1Request: Amendment to Policy FLU8.1.4 establishing maximum densities and intensities for proposed Planned Developments District:Countywide Board of County Commissioners 2012-2 Regular Cycle Staff Initiated Amendment

27. FLU8.1.4The following table details the maximum densities and intensities for the Planned Development (PD) Future Land Use designations that have been adopted subsequent to January 1, 2007. Amendment Number FLUM DesignationMaximum Intensity and Density Ordinance Number 2012-2-A-5-1 The Retreat at Orlando Planned Development- Medium Density Residential (PD-MDR) (Student Housing) 906 student housing beds2013-_ 2012-2-B-FLUE-1 Policy FLU8.1.4 Staff Recommendation:Transmit LPA Recommendation:Transmit

28. Amendment:2012-2-B-FLUE-2Request: Amendments to Future Land Use Element policies related to Horizon West – update of policies affected by County adoption of Horizon West Global Road Agreement, as well updates to reflect implementation measures District:1 Board of County Commissioners 2012-2 Regular Cycle Staff Initiated Amendment

29. 2012-2-B-FLUE-2 Analysis Policy amendments reflect:  BCC adoption of the Horizon West Global Road Agreement  Requirements for additional Village-specific roadway network agreements  Roadway construction and other implementation measures Staff Recommendation:Transmit LPA Recommendation:Transmit

30. Amendment:2012-2-B-FLUE-3Request: Amendments to Future Land Use Element policies related to Horizon West Village H – policy updates for APF requirements and transportation agreements District:1 Board of County Commissioners 2012-2 Regular Cycle Staff Initiated Amendment Staff Recommendation:Transmit LPA Recommendation:Transmit

31. 2012-2-B-FLUE-3 Analysis Policy amendments address:  Requirements for Village H roadway improvements and capacity credits  Requirements for planning, design, and funding of master utilities  Timing of agreements for conveying Adequate Public Facilities lands Staff Recommendation:Transmit LPA Recommendation:Transmit

32. Amendment:2012-2-B-NE-1Request: Amendments to Neighborhood Element adding Goal N6, Objective N6.1, and policies N6.1.1 – N6.1.6, which address neighborhood business corridors District:Countywide Board of County Commissioners 2012-2 Regular Cycle Staff Initiated Amendment

33. 2012-2-B-NE-1 Analysis Strategies to improve neighborhood business corridors  Designate target areas  Work with area businesses  Identify and implement business incentives  Market County’s grant programs Staff Recommendation:Transmit LPA Recommendation:Transmit

34. Amendment:2012-2-B-CP-1Request: Amendments to the Transportation Element updating Multi-Modal Transportation District (MMTD) policies District:4 Board of County Commissioners 2012-2 Regular Cycle Staff Initiated Amendment

35. 2012-2-B-CP-1 Analysis Policy amendments:  Revise Transportation Element policies to correspond to updated Future Land Use Element (FLUE) policies  Reflect discussions with Innovation Way property owner representatives as the County works to develop the Innovation Way Land Development Code Staff Recommendation:Transmit LPA Recommendation:Transmit

36. Amendment:2012-2-B-CP-2Request: Amendments to the Future Land Use and Transportation Elements to clarify transportation analysis requirements for Mixed Use Activity Centers District:Countywide Board of County Commissioners 2012-2 Regular Cycle Staff Initiated Amendment

37. 2012-2-B-CP-2 Analysis Policy amendments:  Clarify the relationship between Mixed Use Development Activity Center (MXDAC) policies in the Future Land Use and Transportation elements  Clarify requirements for transportation studies and analyses  Streamline the development application process for MXDACs Staff Recommendation:Transmit LPA Recommendation:Transmit

38. Amendment:2012-2-B-CP-3Request: Amendments to the Intergovernmental Coordination Element to reflect current transportation-related County coordination activities District:Countywide Board of County Commissioners 2012-2 Regular Cycle Staff Initiated Amendment

39. 2012-2-B-CP-3 Analysis Policy amendments:  Clarify that all municipalities within Orange County are included in transportation planning and coordination efforts  Clarify coordination requirements for all types of rail systems, existing and planned  Better reflect current levels of regional transportation planning and coordination Staff Recommendation:Transmit LPA Recommendation:Transmit

40. Amendment:2012-2-B-TRAN-1Request: Amendments to the Transportation Element for Projects That Promote Public Transportation, as well as Alternative Mobility Areas (AMAs) District:Countywide Board of County Commissioners 2012-2 Regular Cycle Staff Initiated Amendment

41. 2012-2-B-TRAN-1 Analysis Policy amendments:  Projects that Promote Public Transportation – would allow developments to claim a partial concurrency exception for meeting certain project design criteria on a portion of a project  AMA – clarify transportation study requirements and reflect recommendations of the proposed Transportation Impact Fee update

42. Board of County Commissioners 2012-2 Regular Cycle Staff Initiated Amendment

44. 2012-2-B-TRAN-1 Analysis Projects That Promote Public Transportation  Within the Urban Service Area  Directly affect provision of public transit  Includes:  Transit terminals  Transit lines, routes, and dedicated lanes  Transit stops (shelters and stations)  Projects that include fixed-rail or transit terminals as part of the building  TOD projects Staff Recommendation:Transmit LPA Recommendation:Transmit

45. Amendment:2012-2-B-TRAN-2Request: Amendments to the Transportation Element updating the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) map and policies District:Countywide Board of County Commissioners 2012-2 Regular Cycle Staff Initiated Amendment

46. 2012-2-B-TRAN-2 Analysis Amendments:  Update the LRTP to reflect completed roads, name changes, and other updates  Reflect current practices in LRTP implementation  Clarify the County’s Capital Improvements Program prioritization criteria  Support integrated land use/transportation planning Staff Recommendation:Transmit LPA Recommendation:Transmit

47. 2012-2 Regular Cycle Transmittal Public Hearing July 31, 2012