Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA School Concurrency BCC Transmittal Public Hearing Orange County, Florida School Concurrency BCC Transmittal.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA School Concurrency BCC Transmittal Public Hearing Orange County, Florida School Concurrency BCC Transmittal."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA School Concurrency BCC Transmittal Public Hearing Orange County, Florida School Concurrency BCC Transmittal Public Hearing Orange County, Florida January 29, 2008 Board of County Commissioners

2 2 ! Background ! Requirements ! CPP Amendments ! Outstanding Issues ! Requested Action ! Background ! Requirements ! CPP Amendments ! Outstanding Issues ! Requested Action Board of County Commissioners Presentation Outline

3 3 ! Background ! Requirements ! CPP Amendments ! Outstanding Issues ! Requested Action ! Background ! Requirements ! CPP Amendments ! Outstanding Issues ! Requested Action Board of County Commissioners Presentation Outline

4 4 Senate Bill 360 Public schools are subject to concurrency. Requires that adequate school capacity be available to support the impact of residential development at the adopted Level of Service (LOS). Applied at time of site plan, final subdivision approval, or the functional equivalent, for a development or phase of development. Adopt by April 1, 2008. Senate Bill 360 Public schools are subject to concurrency. Requires that adequate school capacity be available to support the impact of residential development at the adopted Level of Service (LOS). Applied at time of site plan, final subdivision approval, or the functional equivalent, for a development or phase of development. Adopt by April 1, 2008. Board of County Commissioners Background

5 5 Board of County Commissioners Review Process Interlocal Planners/Technical Committee Stakeholders Committee Policy Committee Legal Committee Review Process Interlocal Planners/Technical Committee Stakeholders Committee Policy Committee Legal Committee Background

6 6 ! Background ! Requirements ! CPP Amendments ! Outstanding Issues ! Requested Action ! Background ! Requirements ! CPP Amendments ! Outstanding Issues ! Requested Action Board of County Commissioners Presentation Outline

7 7 Components of School Concurrency Data and analysis Level of Service (LOS) Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) Financially feasible 5/10 year CIP for schools Comprehensive Policy Plan (CPP) Element updates Executed Interlocal Agreement between OCPS, the County and the municipalities Proportionate share mitigation Components of School Concurrency Data and analysis Level of Service (LOS) Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) Financially feasible 5/10 year CIP for schools Comprehensive Policy Plan (CPP) Element updates Executed Interlocal Agreement between OCPS, the County and the municipalities Proportionate share mitigation Board of County Commissioners Requirements

8 8 Levels of Service (LOS) (a) Elementary:110% of adjusted FISH * (b) Middle:100% of adjusted FISH * (c) High:100% of adjusted FISH * Permanent FISH, adjusted to include “in-slot” schools not to exceed Core Capacity. Levels of Service (LOS) (a) Elementary:110% of adjusted FISH * (b) Middle:100% of adjusted FISH * (c) High:100% of adjusted FISH * Permanent FISH, adjusted to include “in-slot” schools not to exceed Core Capacity. Board of County Commissioners Requirements

9 9 Board of County Commissioners Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) Geographically demarcated areas in which school capacity will be measured using adopted levels of service. May be district-wide or less than district-wide (e.g., district, sub-district, school attendance zones). If less than district-wide, must apply the adjacency rule. Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) Geographically demarcated areas in which school capacity will be measured using adopted levels of service. May be district-wide or less than district-wide (e.g., district, sub-district, school attendance zones). If less than district-wide, must apply the adjacency rule. Requirements

10 10 Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) Elementary School CSAs = Modified Middle School Attendance Zones Middle School CSAs = Middle School Attendance Zones High School CSAs = High School Attendance Zones Concurrency Service Areas (CSA) Elementary School CSAs = Modified Middle School Attendance Zones Middle School CSAs = Middle School Attendance Zones High School CSAs = High School Attendance Zones Board of County Commissioners Requirements

11 11 Interlocal Agreement (ILA) Level of service standards Financially feasible school capital program School concurrency service areas defined Coordinated student projections Development review procedures School siting criteria Proportionate share mitigation process Interlocal Agreement (ILA) Level of service standards Financially feasible school capital program School concurrency service areas defined Coordinated student projections Development review procedures School siting criteria Proportionate share mitigation process Board of County Commissioners Requirements

12 12 ! Background ! Requirements ! CPP Amendments ! Outstanding Issues ! Requested Action ! Background ! Requirements ! CPP Amendments ! Outstanding Issues ! Requested Action Board of County Commissioners Presentation Outline

13 13 Required CPP Element Updates Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Required CPP Element Updates Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Board of County Commissioners CPP Amendments

14 14 Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) Correct existing deficiencies Ensure adequate school capacity for the 5-year and long- term planning periods Ensure necessary supporting infrastructure Include options for proportionate-share mitigation Coordinate school location with residential development Incorporate procedures for school site selection - 163.3177(12), F.S. Public School Facilities Element (PSFE) Correct existing deficiencies Ensure adequate school capacity for the 5-year and long- term planning periods Ensure necessary supporting infrastructure Include options for proportionate-share mitigation Coordinate school location with residential development Incorporate procedures for school site selection - 163.3177(12), F.S. Board of County Commissioners CPP Amendments

15 15 Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Incorporate OCPS’ financially feasible public school capital facilities program Include LOS standards Update public school capital facilities program and CSA boundaries in conjunction with the annual CIE update - 163.3180(13)(b)2 and 163.3180(13)(d)1, F.S. Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Incorporate OCPS’ financially feasible public school capital facilities program Include LOS standards Update public school capital facilities program and CSA boundaries in conjunction with the annual CIE update - 163.3180(13)(b)2 and 163.3180(13)(d)1, F.S. Board of County Commissioners CPP Amendments

16 16 Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) Policies establishing joint processes for population projections and school siting Policies coordinating the comprehensive plan with the plans of the school board - 163.3177(6)(h)1 and 2, 163.3177(6)(h)4a, F.S. Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) Policies establishing joint processes for population projections and school siting Policies coordinating the comprehensive plan with the plans of the school board - 163.3177(6)(h)1 and 2, 163.3177(6)(h)4a, F.S. Board of County Commissioners CPP Amendments

17 17 Timeline November 2007LPA Transmittal Hearing January 29, 2008BCC Transmittal Hearing February/March 2008DCA Review March 2008 LPA Adoption Hearing April 2008BCC Adoption Hearing Timeline November 2007LPA Transmittal Hearing January 29, 2008BCC Transmittal Hearing February/March 2008DCA Review March 2008 LPA Adoption Hearing April 2008BCC Adoption Hearing Board of County Commissioners CPP Amendments

18 18 ! Background ! Requirements ! CPP Amendments ! Outstanding Issues ! Requested Action ! Background ! Requirements ! CPP Amendments ! Outstanding Issues ! Requested Action Board of County Commissioners Presentation Outline

19 19 Concurrency Service Areas Proportionate share – impact fee credits Building in long-term concurrency Interlocal Agreement (ILA) Reconciling process outlined in ILA with concurrency management system and CEA process Concurrency Service Areas Proportionate share – impact fee credits Building in long-term concurrency Interlocal Agreement (ILA) Reconciling process outlined in ILA with concurrency management system and CEA process Board of County Commissioners Outstanding Issues

20 20 ! Background ! Requirements ! CPP Amendments ! Outstanding Issues ! Requested Action ! Background ! Requirements ! CPP Amendments ! Outstanding Issues ! Requested Action Board of County Commissioners Presentation Outline

21 21 Action Requested Transmit the amendments as amended (PSFE Policy 6.1.3, CIE Policy 1.3.9) to the Public Schools Facilities Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element and Capital Improvement Element, and the Draft Amended Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and Implementation of Concurrency, to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for further review. ALL DISTRICTS Action Requested Transmit the amendments as amended (PSFE Policy 6.1.3, CIE Policy 1.3.9) to the Public Schools Facilities Element, Intergovernmental Coordination Element and Capital Improvement Element, and the Draft Amended Interlocal Agreement for Public School Facility Planning and Implementation of Concurrency, to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for further review. ALL DISTRICTS Board of County Commissioners Requested Action

22 22 PSFE Policy 6.1.3, CIE Policy 1.3.9 The LOS standards to implement school concurrency shall be calculated as a percentage of the adjusted permanent Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity as follows: (a) Elementary: 110% of adjusted FISH using Modified Middle School Attendance Zones as CSAs (b) Middle: 100% of adjusted FISH using Middle School Attendance Zones as CSAs (c) High: 100% of adjusted FISH using High School Attendance Zones as CSAs (Note: Adjusted permanent FISH for High Schools does not include in-slots) PSFE Policy 6.1.3, CIE Policy 1.3.9 The LOS standards to implement school concurrency shall be calculated as a percentage of the adjusted permanent Florida Inventory of School Houses (FISH) capacity as follows: (a) Elementary: 110% of adjusted FISH using Modified Middle School Attendance Zones as CSAs (b) Middle: 100% of adjusted FISH using Middle School Attendance Zones as CSAs (c) High: 100% of adjusted FISH using High School Attendance Zones as CSAs (Note: Adjusted permanent FISH for High Schools does not include in-slots) Board of County Commissioners Amended Policies

23 23 ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA School Concurrency BCC Transmittal Public Hearing Orange County, Florida School Concurrency BCC Transmittal Public Hearing Orange County, Florida January 29, 2008 Board of County Commissioners


Download ppt "1 ORANGE COUNTY BCC, ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA School Concurrency BCC Transmittal Public Hearing Orange County, Florida School Concurrency BCC Transmittal."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google