1. LARP Review, June 10, 2013Cost and Schedule Overview – M. Kaducak 1 Cost and Schedule Overview Marc Kaducak LARP Review June 10, 2013

2. LARP Review, June 10, 2013Cost and Schedule Overview – M. Kaducak 2 Outline Cost Estimate Methodology Project Management Effort Cost Overview NOTE: These slides do not include information about potential CERN or GAD contributions. Details included in parallel sessions. Only activities directly funded by LARP are represented. APOLOGY: These slides are not aesthetically pleasing. Shorter projects would require fewer columns and therefore look better.

3. LARP Review, June 10, 2013Cost and Schedule Overview – M. Kaducak 3 Cost Estimate Methodology Initial cost estimates developed for Dec.2012 deliverable down- selection process. Guidelines issued for estimating each deliverable with respect to project accounting (overheads, escalation, contingency). Formats were time phased estimates on spreadsheets. These are ok for now, but do not lend themselves to updates based on status. Attempted to reconcile with near term budget realities, but there are still challenges.

4. LARP Review, June 10, 2013Cost and Schedule Overview – M. Kaducak 4 Project Management Staff Functions Typical project management roles for $200M project in “DOE 413 style” context: Covered in existing LARP budget

5. LARP Review, June 10, 2013Cost and Schedule Overview – M. Kaducak 5 Overall Costs and Existing LARP Budget **No Contingency in these columns, see following slides

6. LARP Review, June 10, 2013Cost and Schedule Overview – M. Kaducak 6 Overall Costs and Existing LARP Budget con’t *Contingency distributed uniformly by % in these columns

7. LARP Review, June 10, 2013Cost and Schedule Overview – M. Kaducak 7 Totals (with Distributed Contingency)

8. LARP Review, June 10, 2013Cost and Schedule Overview – M. Kaducak 8 Funding

9. LARP Review, June 10, 2013Cost and Schedule Overview – M. Kaducak 9 Summary Substantial work put into estimates for a project at this stage. Management model and staffing plan under development. Unknown parameter is level of rigor required for a “proceed as- if in CD process” scenario. Prototyping development and long lead procurements will require funding in advance of the assumed FY17 CD-3 in addition to the existing flat-flat LARP levels. Thank you

10. LARP Review, June 10, 2013Cost and Schedule Overview – M. Kaducak 10 Backup

11. LARP Review, June 10, 2013Cost and Schedule Overview – M. Kaducak 11 Prototype Cost Profile (with Distributed Contingency)

12. LARP Review, June 10, 2013Cost and Schedule Overview – M. Kaducak 12 Construction Cost Profile (with Distributed Contingency)