Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial © 2015 Cengage Learning.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial © 2015 Cengage Learning."— Presentation transcript:

1 © 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial © 2015 Cengage Learning

2 Learning Objective 1 Identify the basic protections enjoyed by criminal defendants in the United States. AP Photo/Keith Srakocic, Pool

3 © 2015 Cengage Learning Special Features of Criminal Trials Speedy Trial: – Required by the Sixth amendment – Barker v. Wingo (1972) – All 50 states have their own speedy-trial statutes Role of the Jury: – 6th amendment guarantees an “impartial” jury – Duncan v. Louisiana (1968) – Unanimity – most states require a unanimous verdict

4 © 2015 Cengage Learning Learning Objective 2 Explain what “taking the Fifth” really means. AP Photo/M. Spencer Green

5 © 2015 Cengage Learning Special Features of Criminal Trials The Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: – Provided for in the Fifth amendment No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself – Witnesses are granted Immunity – Adamson v. California (1947) The decision to “take the fifth” should not prejudice the jury

6 © 2015 Cengage Learning Special Features of Criminal Trials The defendant is innocent until proven guilty Burden of proof is on the state (prosecutor) Beyond a reasonable doubt – In re Winship (1970) applicable to juveniles

7 © 2015 Cengage Learning Learning Objective 3 List the requirements normally imposed on potential jurors. Jim McIsaac/Getty Images

8 © 2015 Cengage Learning Jury Selection Defendants are entitled to a jury of “peers.” Eligible persons are selected from a Master List, or jury pool. Jurors must be: – A United States citizen – Over 18 years of age – Free of felony convictions – Of the necessary good health to serve – Sufficiently intelligent to understand the issues in the trial – Able to read, write and comprehend English

9 © 2015 Cengage Learning Learning Objective 4 Contrast challenges for cause and peremptory challenges during voir dire. AP Photo/CJ Gunther, Pool

10 © 2015 Cengage Learning Jury Selection Master jury list or jury pool lists eligible jurors from the community Venire- group of citizens form which the jury is selected Voir Dire- preliminary questions the trial attorneys ask potential jurors to determine whether they have a connection with the defendant or witness

11 © 2015 Cengage Learning Jury Selection There are two ways jurors are excluded: 1.Challenges for Cause The attorney must provide a sound, legally justifiable reason why a juror cannot serve 2.Peremptory Challenges The attorney can remove a juror without showing and supporting reason or cause Batson v. Kentucky (1986)

12 © 2015 Cengage Learning Learning Objective 5 List the standard steps in a criminal jury trial.

13 © 2015 Cengage Learning Learning Objective 5 Opening Statements: – The first step of the trial process – The prosecutor speaks first, followed by defense counsel – Each side attempts to construct a “road map” of their case for the jury to follow by outlining their evidence

14 © 2015 Cengage Learning The Trial © Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved.

15 © 2015 Cengage Learning Learning Objective 6 Explain the difference between testimony and real evidence, between lay witnesses and expert witnesses, and between direct and circumstantial evidence. Joe Burbank/MCT/Landov

16 © 2015 Cengage Learning The Trial Testimonial Evidence – Statements made by competent witnesses. – Lay witnesses versus expert witnesses. – Expert witnesses may based their opinions on three types of information Facts or data of which they have personal knowledge Material presented at trial Secondhand information given to the expert outside the courtroom

17 © 2015 Cengage Learning The Trial Real Evidence – Presented to the court in the form of exhibits, includes any physical items. Direct versus Circumstantial Evidence – Direct- witnessed by person giving testimony – Circumstantial- indirect evidence that does not establish the fact in question but only a degree of likelihood of the fact, EX: Mary testifies in court that she saw Robert standing over a man with a bloody knife in his hand. Mary did not see Robert stab the victim, so she can only testify and describe what she saw. This circumstantial evidence is likely not enough by itself to convict Robert, so the prosecution provides other evidence which, when added to Mary’s testimony, leads the jury to the conclusion that Robert stabbed the victim.

18 © 2015 Cengage Learning The Trial Relevant evidence – Proves or disproves a fact in question Prejudicial evidence – May be excluded if it would tend to distract the jury from the main issues of the case, mislead the jury, or cause jurors to decide the issue on an emotional basis

19 © 2015 Cengage Learning Learning Objective 7 Identify the primary method that defense attorneys use in most trials to weaken the prosecution’s case against their client. AP Photo/Sara D. Davis, File

20 © 2015 Cengage Learning The Trial Prosecution’s case – Direct examination of witnesses Leading questions – Cross-examination Confrontation clause – Questioning witnesses Redirect examination – Hearsay-information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor. The Illinois Exception

21 © 2015 Cengage Learning The Trial Defense Strategies: – Motion for a directed verdict – Create reasonable doubt – Present an alibi defense – Present an affirmative defense Self defense Insanity Duress Entrapment

22 © 2015 Cengage Learning Learning Objective 8 Delineate circumstances in which a criminal defendant may be tried a second time for the same act.

23 © 2015 Cengage Learning Discussion Question Discuss the 4 defenses and which you feel are more accepted by the court. Locate a case for each type of defense and discuss them with the case. Discuss whether any should be eliminated for use within the criminal justice system.

24 © 2015 Cengage Learning The Final Steps of the Trial and Postconviction Procedures Appeals: – The defendant can appeal only if they show the trial court acted improperly on a question of law – Only the defense can appeal. The prosecution is limited by double jeopardy – Double jeopardy does not preclude the victim from bringing a civil suit, or prevent the defendant from being charged in federal court – A hung jury does not preclude a retrial

25 © 2015 Cengage Learning Learning Objective 9 List the five basic steps of an appeal. Stringer/Reuters /Landov

26 © 2015 Cengage Learning The Final Steps of the Trial and Postconviction Procedures

27 © 2015 Cengage Learning Discussion Questions Reflect on the Trayvon Martin case. What type of jurors would you choose if you were the prosecutor? What type of jurors would you choose if you were the defense? What questions would you pose on both sides?

28 © 2015 Cengage Learning Discussion Questions Discuss the case of the “Barbie Bandits” which was seen on national television. What type of evidence was used in this case? What was the evidence in this case? How did the 5 th and 6 th amendment appear in this case?


Download ppt "© 2015 Cengage Learning Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial Chapter 10 The Criminal Trial © 2015 Cengage Learning."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google