Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

GrocerSmart™ 4.0 RTF Approval of Software and Adherence to RTF Guidelines April 5, 2011.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "GrocerSmart™ 4.0 RTF Approval of Software and Adherence to RTF Guidelines April 5, 2011."— Presentation transcript:

1 GrocerSmart™ 4.0 RTF Approval of Software and Adherence to RTF Guidelines April 5, 2011

2 2 Topics: Today’s Decisions GrocerSmart 4 Purpose and Timeline Documentation Result Validation Plan for Calibration

3 Today’s Decisions RTF approval of the documentation and output validation approach Baseline refrigeration system calibration for GrocerSmart 4.0 provisional protocol status Feedback on measure savings calibration approach, plan and timeline

4 Purpose and Timeline

5 Refresher Increase audit information gathered with fewer assumptions Perform site-specific calculations Capture interactivity Offer programs measure complexity

6 GS4 History with RTF

7 Documentation Approach reviewed and approved by RTF Refrigeration Subcommittee

8 8 DOE2 Baseline Energy DOE2 Proposed Energy Template Code Envelope HVAC auto-sized Lighting W/SF Equipment W/SF Standard Values Audit Code Fixtures Walk-Ins Compressors Condensers Schedules Measure Code Keyword Changes

9 Audit

10 Template

11 Measures

12 Validation

13 13 Validation....Calibration Calculator Validation –Confirms energy calcs are within reasonable range –Reasonable range defined by GS3 historical data CBSA –Building level and system level Results Validation –Similar to Calculator Validation –Done for every audit –Continuous Improvement Calibration –Confirms energy calcs closely match metered data as required by proposed guidelines Site specific Compared to metered data

14 14 TestingPilot Roll Out In Market Calculator Validation Template adjustment Baseline energy validation System level calibration Result Validation DOE2 default and assumption adjustment Per Audit Result validation Continuous Improvement Measure isolation calibration Time Now

15 Validation Methods Operational parameters –Building Level –System Level Measure savings ranges

16 16 Operational Parameters 1. Building Level 2. System Level Validation Question: Is the modeled building functioning in an expected way? Source: Parameter: Energy Use Index (EUI) CBSA – Northwest Commercial Building Stock Assessment

17 17 Operational Parameters 1. Building Level 2. System Level Validation Question: Are building systems operating at expected levels as modeled? Parameters: Refrigeration energy use in kWh/ton Circuit Temperatures Unmet Load Hours Source: Simulation Results

18 Example Measure Savings Ranges From Historic GrocerSmart 3.0 Calculated Savings Acceptable Savings Ranges

19 Validation of GrocerSmart 4.0 Tests Acceptable Savings Ranges

20 Field Staff Training Refrigeration schedule review Auditing best practices Visual glossary of equipment likely to be seen in field Full EMS training with mock system Full audit walk through with senior field staff

21 Within Acceptable Ranges? SIM Param EUI Space Temps Measures Savings Audit Calcs Complete Recommendations to customer based on historic savings averages Examine cause of out-of-bound results. Apply the following as necessary: Adjustments to Template, Audit-generated, or Measure BDL code Field staff training Audit Process Calculated Savings Accepted Where necessary, recommended calculator changes to RTF subcommittee for approval PECI Field Staff PECI Engineering Staff Yes No

22 Calibration

23 23 Potential Best Practice Methods for Savings Calibration PROS CONS Whole Building Data availability (compared to end use) Savings estimated from actual usage Estimates include non-refrigeration activities/changes Calibration approach unclear Measure Isolation Savings estimated from end use level usage Builds end use data for region Estimates do not capture interactions with other systems Cost Calibrated Simulation Data availability Difficult to align with template approach Difficult to implement

24 Savings Calculator Calibration Outline 1. Refrigeration subsystem calibration kWh/ton of system, for different configurations 2. Calibration of energy savings by measure High Impact Measures (HIM) Metering with measure isolation

25 25 Possible Sources: Meter refrigeration subsystems Lights, fan motors, anti-sweat heaters, compressors and condenser fan motors. Meter data from measurements (field not lab) reported in literature (e.g. Summit Blue program evaluation, PNNL LED case lighting), from store monitoring system (compressors) and from PECI measurements. 1. Refrigeration subsystem calibration kWh/ton of system, for different configurations RTF/Subcommittee discussion points: Number of tests Level of calibration Valid data sources Schedule

26 Baseline Refrigeration Calibration Variables Matrix Variables Affecting AccuracySource(s) of Value Calibration Variables Refrigerated case conduction Case libraryX Refrigerated case infiltration Case libraryX Walk-in infiltration Audit driven estimateX Walk-in design capacity Audit driven estimateX Walk-in latent heat ratio TemplateX Walk-in occupancy and schedule TemplateX Walk-in equipment loads TemplateX Saturated suction temperature throttle TemplateX EPR valve pressure drop TemplateX Saturated condensing temperature throttle TemplateX Backflood valve setpoint TemplateX Design TDs for condenser sizing Condenser libraryX OA temperature Weather fileX

27 2. Calibration of energy savings by measure High Impact Measures (HIM) Metering with measure isolation Measurement Approach: Meter end use data for measure Calculate difference between GrocerSmart 4.0 results and metered data on all sites Examine trends in error data to determine root cause Modify GS inputs to reduce error to 20% for all sites and HIM measures RTF/Subcommittee discussion points: Number of tests Length of time for pre and post metering Define “Best Method” Confidence level Schedule

28 2. Calibration of energy savings by measure High Impact Measures (HIM) Metering with measure isolation Measure Calibration Variables Matrix Example: FHP Control Variables Affecting AccuracySource(s) of Value Calibration Variables Baseline condenser fan control Audit input Baseline minimum set point Audit input Number and size of condenser fans Audit input, library Condenser type: air-cooled or evap-cooled Audit input Condensing unit or remote condenser Audit input Condenser over-sizing Audit input, library Fan control for measure EEM keywords Condenser fan VSD Audit driven estimateX Total hours above and below new and old minimum set point Weather file Refrigeration load during floating hours - case load Audit input, libraryX Refrigeration load during floating hours - walk-in load Audit driven estimateX Refrigeration load during floating hours - store humidity and temperature Weather file, template for HVAC X Compressor capacity control (multiplex, unloaders, VFD) Audit input

29 Measure Isolation Sample Size and Cost

30 30 RTF Approval: Documentation Result Validation Provisional Approval: Approval of calibration approach to be developed by PECI and refrigeration subcommittee, and approved by subcommittee

31


Download ppt "GrocerSmart™ 4.0 RTF Approval of Software and Adherence to RTF Guidelines April 5, 2011."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google