Terminal Airspace Traffic Complexity Fedja Netjasov University of Belgrade Faculty of Traffic and Transport Engineering Division of Airports and Air Traffic.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PHARE Operational Scenarios J-P. Nicolaon, Operational Task Force Chairman EUROCONTROL Experimental Centre.
Advertisements

1 The PHARE Concept and Scenarios by Job Brüggen Head Air Transport Division National Aerospace Laboratory, NLR.
UNIVERSITY of GLASGOW A Comprehensive Approach to ATM Incorporating Autonomous Aircraft ATM Research Group University of Glasgow.
European ATFM From current operation towards the future Patrick Ky
Airport ATC Capacity Research Programme
Imperial College 1 Towards a Controller Pilot Collaborative Decision Making Methodology A. Majumdar, W.Y. Ochieng, J.W. Polak Centre for Transport Studies.
Airspace Volumes and Sectorisation Good Design Practice Airspace Volumes and Sectorisation Good Design Practice 1.
Continuous Climb Operations ( CCO )
Airside Capacity Enhancement
Modeling Airport Capacity
Airport planning.
1 Military and TMA Sectors Sequences since ACE2009A (UR 422 implemented) Author Pascal Pauchet IPAS data preparation TRAINING EUROCONTROL- Tuesday, 20.
Episode 3 1 Episode 3 EX-COM D Final Report and Recommendations Operational and Processes Feasibility Pablo Sánchez-Escalonilla CNS/ATM Simulation.
A unique TOOLSET for ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILTY ASSESSMENT TESA Tous droits réservés ©net-aviation.com.
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
M I T I n t e r n a t i o n a l C e n t e r f o r A i r T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Influence of Structure on Complexity Management Strategies of Air Traffic.
Development of a Closed-Loop Testing Method for a Next-Generation Terminal Area Automation System JUP Quarterly Review April 4, 2002 John Robinson Doug.
The European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation BORYSPIL ACE & PLANNING STUDY Mariia Naumenko.
Good Design Practices BEIJING, CHINA; 30 JUN-11 JUL 2014.
The Next Generation Air Transportation System “The Near Term and Beyond” Presented by Charles Leader, Director Joint Planning and Development Office.
Design of a Certifiably Dependable Next- Generation Air Transportation System Stephen A. JacklinMichelle M. Eshow Michael R. LowryDave McNally Ewen Denny.
Users’ Perspective of PBN Achieving Improvements Joël Morin Head, ATM Harmonization.
Air traffic controllers (ATC) consideration and ATC solutions Session 5 Presentation 4.
Federal Aviation Administration FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (Public availability to be determined under 5USC 552) Data Communications Program DCL Benefits Modeling.
THE SUSTAINABILITY OF AIRPORTS
„ Fuzzy Expert” System for Determination of Runways in Use Case Study: Zurich Airport Fedja Netjasov University of Belgrade Faculty of Traffic and Transport.
ICRAT 2004 IMPACT OF FUTURE GENERATION AIRCRAFT IN AIRPORT OPERATIVITY
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL Presented by S.SUMESWAR PATRO Regd no:
Review Continuous Descent Operations Manual Roosevelt Pena (Dom Rep)
Study Continuous Climb Operations
3 – 4 September 2015 Delhi, India Piyawut Tantimekabut (Toon)
1 1st ANNUAL WORKSHOP NAS-WIDE SIMULATION IN SUPPORT OF NEXTGEN: REQUIREMENTS AND CAPABILITIES Lance Sherry Center for Air Transportation Systems Research.
Survey of Traffic and Radar Controller Communication and Workload
Situational Awareness Numerous aircraft and operational displays, when combined with effective and efficient communications and facilities, provide Air.
Presented to: NAS-Wide Simulation Workshop By: Kimberly Noonan, FAA NextGen and Ops Planning Date: January 28, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
1 ATM System Wide Modeling Capabilities in Fast-Time Simulation 1 st Annual Workshop – NAS-Wide Simulation in Support of NextGen Dec. 10th – George Mason.
Draft High Level Operational Concept V0.4 Mode of Operation for the Single European Sky Deployable from /11/04.
- Session 4: Interoperation José M. Roca Air/Ground Cooperative ATS Programme Eurocontrol.
F066-B © 2008 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved. MITRE-CAASD’s systemwideModeler State and Near-Term Plans Pete Kuzminski 10 December 2008.
“METHODS OF OPTIMIZING THE USE OF AIRSPACE” “МЕТОДИ ОПТИМІЗАЦІЇ ВИКОРИСТАННЯ ПОВІТРЯНОГО ПРОСТОРУ” MASTER’S DEGREE THESIS KYIV 2015 MINISTRY OF EDUCATION.
Ames Research Center 1 FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Banavar Sridhar Shon Grabbe First Annual Workshop NAS-Wide Simulation.
The presentation of the investment project proposition: The international airport «Priluki» Yalta June, 2009 м. Київ, вул. Мельникова, 81 тел/факс +38.
Green actions in the Air Traffic Management perspective Flygteknik 2010, October Tomas Mårtensson, Martin Hagström; FOI.
KLM - Operations at Schiphol: how does ASAS fit? ASAS TN2: final seminar, April, Paris E. Kleiboer Sr. Manager Strategy ATM.
ICC © Ifield Computer Consultancy Limited 2013 Ifield Computer Consultancy Limited Presentation to Directorate General of Civil Aviation of Kuwait And.
DIRECTION TECHNIQUE CERTIFICATION Paris, April 2008 SL ASAS TN2 Workshop ppt ASAS & Business.
CARE/ASAS Activity 2 Follow-up: Validation Framework Dissemination Forum Isdefe Ingeniería de Sistemas CARE/ASAS ACTIVITY 2 FOLLOW-UP: VALIDATION.
1 ILA Berlin - May 2008 Marc Brochard - EEC EPATS ATM General Requirements & relative issues to be solved.
MODEL FOR DAILY OPERATIONAL FLIGHT SCHEDULE DESIGNING Slavica Nedeljković Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering, University of Belgrade Serbia and.
Airspace 1 st LT Zouhar Jakub 12 th September 2014.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Tradeoff Optimization at STL: a Case Study Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo tel.: (617) CDM.
A consolidated starting point from DFS / AENA / LFV ASAS Thematic Network Workshop Toulouse, Is ASAS /ADS-B needed for ANSP strategy?
Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 29 March RNA and RNAV and RNP Strategy in Japan Yoshiki Imawaka Director.
1 EUROCONTROL S TRATEGIES FOR The ATM Strategy for the Years As from MATSE/6 decision (Jan. 2000): To cater for forecast increase in demand.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Capacity Tradeoff Optimization: a Case Study at the St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL) Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo.
EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE1 / 29/06/2016  Raphaël CHRISTIEN  Network Capacity & Demand Management  5 th USA/Europe ATM 2003 R&D seminar  23 rd.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
DETECTION AND ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY PROBLEMS WITHIN ROAD TRANSPORT DECISION MAKING Prof. Dr. Nikolay Georgiev eng. Violina Velyova ‘Todor Kableshkov’ University.
Jon Hadler and Dr. David Ison
COmbining Probable TRAjectories — COPTRA
Users’ Perspective of PBN Achieving Improvements
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Pilot considerations and pilot solutions
Good Design Practices Narrator BEIJING, CHINA; 30 JUN-11 JUL 2014.
Soren Dissing - EUROCONTROL
Airspace Volumes and Sectorisation Good Design Practice
Presentation transcript:

Terminal Airspace Traffic Complexity Fedja Netjasov University of Belgrade Faculty of Traffic and Transport Engineering Division of Airports and Air Traffic Safety.

Why Terminal Airspace? Terminal airspace (TMA) represents transitional airspace between airports and ATC sectors; The TMA contains a high concentration of arrival trajectories converging on the airport as well as departure trajectories diverging from the airport.

Why Complexity? Mix of aircraft types resulting in different separation rules; Aircraft traverse the TMA at a broad range of speeds.

Definition of Complexity complexity presents a measure of quantity as well as quality of the interactions between the aircraft which are to be controlled (managed) by one air traffic controller.

Concept of Complexity airline costs airport and sector traffic complexity traffic situation noise level and air pollution influence on quality of passengers service controller workload

Basic assumptions Complexity depends on two groups of factors: static factors: TMA geometry; dynamic factors: traffic demand characteristics, distribution of traffic in TMA, etc.

Causes of Complexity (1) In the case of arrival, traffic complexity could be generated because of: existence of traffic on trajectories (C’ ARR ); potential catching-up situations (C’’ ARR ); potential conflict at trajectory merging points (C’’’ ARR ) ; demand exceeding trajectory capacity (C’’’’ ARR )

T s T s T r T r Catching-up situation Conflict at trajectory merging point

Causes of Complexity (2) In the case of departure, traffic complexity could be generated because of: existence of traffic on trajectories (C’ DEP ); potential catching-up situations (C’’ DEP );

Index of Complexity The concept of measuring complexity is based on a no-dimensional variable named “Index of complexity”. It is assumed that the Index of traffic complexity (C) consists of two components: Index of static complexity (C s ) and Index of dynamic complexity (C d ).

Index of Static Complexity - C s Depends on airspace geometry, i.e. number of trajectories and their length, number of runways, number of entry and exit points, etc.

Index of Dynamic Complexity - C d Presents the sum of two elements: Index of dinamic complexity in case of arrival traffic - C d ARR and Index of dinamic complexity in case of departure traffic - C d DEP

Index of Dynamic Complexity in case of arrival traffic - C d ARR Presents the sum of four elements: C d ARR = C ARR ’ + C ARR ’’ + C ARR ’’’ + C ARR ’’’’ C’C’’C’’’C’’’’

Index of Dynamic Complexity in case of departure traffic - C d DEP Presents the sum of two elements: C d DEP = C DEP ’ + C DEP ’’ C’C’’

Index of Complexity (rèsumè)

Experiments (1) Characteristics: TMA contains two arrival and two departure trajectories (generic case); hypothetical traffic; simulation of traffic in TMA

Experiments (2) Changes in the number of trajectories in the TMA - the purpose of which is to determine what influence changes in the number of trajectories have on the value of the Index of complexity; and Changes of traffic volume - the purpose of which is to determine what influence change in traffic volume has on the value of the Index of complexity.

Changes in the number of trajectories in the TMA (1) op/h

Changes in the number of trajectories in the TMA (2) ≈ 800≈ 2100≈ 3200

Changes of traffic volume (1)

Changes of traffic volume (2) ≈ 130≈ 700≈ 2400

The main result of this research is the development of a model for the Index of complexity, of general use. This model could be used: for evaluation of current and novel organisational solutions for the TMA containing one single runway airport, or for estimation of effects of implementing new arrival and departure trajectories, on traffic in a TMA. Conclusion

Consideration of irregular situations such as missed-approaches; Consideration of influences of the meteorological situation on traffic; Analysis of traffic complexity for airports with multiple runways; Usage of weight factors; Consideration of heterogeneous aircraft fleet, etc. Further research

University of Belgrade Faculty of Transport and Traffic Engineering Department of Air Transport Division of Airports and Air Traffic Safety Vojvode Stepe 305, Belgrade Serbia and Montenegro tel: fax: Thank you for your attention