Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Recent Successes in Demand Response
Advertisements

Oncors Advanced Meter System (AMS) Enabling Demand Response for Retail Electric Providers in Texas Mark Carpenter June 24, 2010.
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Smart grid energy business
Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
Introduction Build and impact metric data provided by the SGIG recipients convey the type and extent of technology deployment, as well as its effect on.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Aggregating Small Loads to provide Ancillary Services
Brian Kebbekus  City of Austin  Austin Energy  The University of Texas  Austin Technology Incubator  Greater Austin Chamber of.
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
24 May 2007 PROGRESS & PROMISE ON DR/AMI Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
VPP: Converting Capacity in the Home into Valuable Energy Reserves Wayne Callender.
SmartGridCity™: A blueprint for a connected, intelligent grid community Presented to the Utah Public Service Commission May 13, 2009.
Critical Peak Pricing Gulf Power’s Experience Dan Merilatt, V.P. Marketing Services GoodCents Solutions, Inc. Stone Mountain, GA September 9, 2002.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
Enhancing Interruptible Rates Through MISO Demand Response: WIEG Annual Meeting June 19, 2008 Presented by: Kavita Maini, Principal KM Energy Consulting,
SmartMeter Program Overview Jana Corey Director, Energy Information Network Pacific Gas & Electric Company.
Solutions to California’s Energy Crisis: Real-Time Pricing by Frank Wolak Chairman, Market Surveillance Committee March 17, 2001.
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA Module 14 Energy Efficiency Module 14: DEMAND-SIDE MANAGEMENT.
Informing Utilities and Policymakers on the Customer Side of Smart Grid Harvey Michaels, Scientist/Lecturer DUSP Environmental Policy and MITEI
American Electric Power (AEP) Virtual Power Plant Simulator (VPPS) Tom Jones, Manger – Corporate Technology Development American Electric Power Grid-InterOp.
1 Demand Response Update April, Strategic Perspective Demand Response  Aligns with PGE’s Strategic Direction; helping to provide exceptional.
Smart Grid Utility Challenges in the 21 st Century Andrew Tang Smart Energy Web Pacific Gas and Electric Company September 18, 2009.
Getting ready for Advanced Metering Infrastructure Paper by : Rajesh Nimare Presented by : Prashant Sharma.
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
Over 3,300 Megawatts and Counting Growing and Transforming One of Nation’s Largest DSM Portfolios.
Battling Load Growth in NYC Chris Smith NYSERDA NARUC 2007 Summer Meeting.
Pricing Enabled by AMI What Types? What are the Benefits? Dr. Steven D. Braithwait Christensen Associates Energy Consulting EUCI Webinar September 12,
Future of Smart Metering Kansas Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Conference September 26, 2007.
Energy Trends. 2 Trift bridge 560’ long 333’ high.
Efficiency and Demand Response NARUC Washington, DC February 14, 2006 Steve Specker President & CEO.
Energate: Leaders in Consumer Demand Response ENERGATE: AN ONTARIO CASE STUDY A fully integrated 2.0 Smart Grid… with Ontario Consumers.
© 2009 IBM Corporation Smart Grid Research Consortium Customer Operations Transformation Global E&U Industry January 2011.
Infrastructure & Cities Sector – Smart Grid Division © Siemens AG All rights reserved. October 2012Page 1 The Smart Grid by Siemens Constant energy.
California Energy Efficiency Retrofit Market Size Estimates, Alongside Solar and Demand Response Options Reference material for October 12, 2012 Governor’s.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Reshaping Utility/ Consumer Relationships MEC October 5, 2010 Pinehurst, NC Penni McLean-Conner.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Demand Response Products. Discussion Points 1.Setting the scene….. 2.Virtual Power Station 3.Reserves deployment order 4.Demand Response Products.
The Secrets to Successful AMI Deployment – The Ontario Experience Paul Murphy, President & CEO Independent Electricity System Operator February 19, 2007.
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. Existing Demand Response Programs Kurt Castleberry Director, Operating Committee Support May 24, 2007.
Meter, Facility Interfaces
OVERVIEW OF ISSUES DR AND AMI HELP SOLVE Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Smart Grid: What’s In It for the Customer? Wharton Energy Conference 2010 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing & Regulatory Services.
Demand Response in Energy and Capacity Markets David Kathan FERC IRPS Conference May 12, 2006.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Demand Response: What It Is and Why It’s Important 2007 APPA National Conference San Antonio, Texas June 26, :00 a.m. to Noon Glenn M. Wilson Director.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
© 2004 San Diego Gas and Electric. All copyright and trademark rights reserved Demand Response Programs Backup Material.
EDISON INTERNATIONAL® SM Smart Grid Value Proposition October 4, 2010 Lynda Ziegler.
TRANSMISSION CONSTRAINTS KENNETH A. DONOHOO, P.E. Manager of System Planning, Technical Operations
An Overview of Demand Response in California July 2011.
California’s Summer Outlook and Emerging Electricity Issues Dave Ashuckian, P.E., Manager Electricity Analysis Office Irwindale Energy Forum February 15,
Government’s Evolving Role in Resource Planning and Environmental Protection Arthur H. Rosenfeld, Commissioner California Energy Commission April 19, 2002.
Demand Response as a Distributed Energy Resource presented by: Mark S. Martinez Manager, Program Development PLMA Fall Conference September 2004.
CEC Public Workshop Order Instituting Informational and Rulemaking Proceeding (08-DR-01) March 3, 2008.
Demand Response 2010 and Beyond April 28, 2011 Pete Pengilly.
©2003 PJM 1 Presentation to: Maryland Public Service Commission May 16, 2003.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
1 A Conversation about MISO Paul Spicer November 8, 2007.
Workshop February 4, Idaho Power Smart Grid Vision At Idaho Power, our smart grid vision remains focused on seven major characteristics : 1.Enhance.
SMECO Demand Response filing
MEPAV 2010 CONFERENCE. AMI MANASSAS Gregg S. Paulson, P. E
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Demand Response in the 7th Power Plan
Electricity Demand Response and Advanced Metering for Integrated Utilities Arkansas Public Service Commission Lonni Dieck AEP May 24, 2007.
Reference Design for Residential Energy Gateway
Presentation transcript:

Utility Benefits of Demand Response Trevor Lauer DTE Energy Marketing Executive Conference Coeur d’Alene, Idaho

2 Why Does a Utility Value Demand Response? Virtual Power Plant Capacity Value Optionality Value Customer Satisfaction Technology Development and Deployment Demand Response A Utilities Perspective

3 Demand Response Direct Load Control vs. Passive Control Demand Response (DR) – An action taken to reduce load when: Planning tool to reduce capacity purchases Contingencies occur that threaten supply-demand balance Market conditions occur that raise supply costs Direct Load Control Utility has physical control to interrupt or reduce customer load Control device at customer premise Rate incentive to customer Examples include: Interruptible Air Conditioning Interruptible Water Heating Passive Load Control Customer controls load reduction based on notification from utility Rate incentive to customer Rate penalties for failing to curtail load Examples include: Industrial Interruptible Supply Primary Interruptible Supply Direct Load Control vs. Passive Load Control

4 Value of Demand Response to the Utility – A Virtual Power Plant Peak Day Generation Shortfall Analysis Hour

5 - Demand Response programs have a lower $ / KW cost than other options, such as Capacity Only payments or building a new Peaking CT, when levelized from 2009 – Demand Response lowers DTE’s capacity purchases and reserve margins. Value of Demand Response to the Utility – Low Cost Capacity

6 Value of Demand Response to the Utility – Optionality Value MISO Capacity Market < $75> $90 $ per MW Average Cost of Interruption

7 Value of Demand Response to the Utility – Improved Customer Satisfaction Overall customer satisfaction for Demand Response customers is greater than customers on standard tariffs. Data from 2007 Residential Customer Attitude Survey

8 Value of Demand Response to the Utility – New Technology Development (AMI) AMI Enabled Smart Meters Real Time Load Monitoring Customer Communication Vehicles In-Home Display Smart Appliances Thermostat Gas Meter Home Gateway Home Area Network

9 Value of Demand Response to the Utility – A Win – Win Situation Customer Wins Utility WinsDemand Response Value √√ Customers get the lowest cost alternative for capacity √√ Utilities gain a planning advantage for summer capacity purchases while maintaining system stability √√ ISO/RTO’s get a resource that can be counted on in the case of a system emergency √√ State Regulators get a well designed program that customers enroll in and are satisfied with