 Simply too many cars(2.5million) and too little space to park  Cost of parking is very high-Government make £565million in London

CONVENTIONAL PARKING SYSTEM AUTOMATED PARKING SYSTEM ^.^ ^.^

 Much more efficient use of space  Lower costs for clients  Better security  Save time  Advance technology simple maintaince

 Several different types of aps systems  The aps tower is the most space efficient, and cost effective.

 USA JAPAN NETHERLANDS CHINA GERMANY KOREA AUSTRALIA  Same problem

Central London

 $1000 for 1 parking space-20 spaces  Occasional maintenance/services  Shipping cost  Construction  Purchase of land

 £12-£15 per day  £2-£2.50 per hour  Advertising on our premises  £750 per month on screen

 Indirect competition Local Council-National Car Parking  Direct competition- Wohr parking small scale aps’ focused within apartment blocks.

 Land  Planning permission  Meeting health and safety regulations  Power cut  Fault in equipment