WBS 6: Magnetic Shielding B. Filippone and B. Plaster Caltech December 3, 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Magnetic Field Finite-Element Calculations for the Upper Cryostat S. Balascuta, R. Alarcon Arizona State University B. Plaster, B. Filippone, R. Schmid.
Advertisements

Magnetic fields R&D update B. PlasternEDM November 2007 Collaboration Meeting Results from prototype studies of a 1/6-scale B 0 coil with Results from.
Magnetic shielding calculations and also Petr Volegov Andrei Matlashov Michelle Espy LANL, P-21, SQUID team Igor Savukov.
Zian Zhu Superconducting Solenoid Magnet BESIII Workshop Zian Zhu Beijing, Oct.13,2001.
Large Magnetic Volumes for Neutrino Factory Detectors A.Bross ISS Detector Phone Meeting June 22, 2006.
Trip Report on the visit to ICST of HIT, Harbin, China Derun Li Mike Green Steve Virostek Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (from December.
1 Large Magnetic Volumes for Neutrino Factory Detectors A.Bross ISS Detector Phone Meeting July 3, 2006.
Major Management & Systems Engineering Ideas for Reducing Costs Peter Wizinowich NGAO Team Meeting September 11-12, 2008.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
An updated Baseline Design for MICE From proposal to technical reference Paul Drumm, Dec 2003.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
What are MRLs ? Alfred W. Clark Dawnbreaker, Inc.
RF Cavity / Coupling Coil Module
Solenoid-Based Focusing Lens for a Superconducting RF Proton Linac Presentation prepared for AEM 11/08/20101I. Terechkine.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
LARP review, Fermilab, 6/10/2013Magnet Project Overview – G. Sabbi 1 HL-LHC IR Quadrupole Magnet Project Overview GianLuca Sabbi Internal Review of proposed.
Takeyasu Ito University of Tennessee EDM Collaboration meeting December, 2004 Cost and Schedule Estimate WBS 2.5- Neutron beam polarizer/splitter for SNS.
MCTF Michael Lamm MUTAC 5-Year Plan Review 22 August Magnet R&D for Muon Accelerator R&D Program Goals Proposed Studies Preliminary Effort and Cost.
From Research Prototype to Production
NEDM Construction Project Cost & Schedule Philosophy Vince Cianciolo, ORNL Physics Division Internal Cost & Schedule Review 02/11/2005.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
1 UK PM Report Costs & Schedule Alan Grant, STFC.
U.S. MICE Schedule, Cost, & Risks Peter H. Garbincius Mark Palmer, Alan Bross, Rich Krull Fermilab Presented at RAL – November 13, 2013.
EDM Magnetic Shielding (WBS 5) and Magnets (WBS 6) B. Filippone and B. Plaster Caltech Internal Cost and Schedule Review February 11, 2004.
Tariq J. Solaija, NCP Forward RPC EDR, Tariq Solaija Forward RPC EDR The Standard RPC for low  regions Tariq J. Solaija National Centre for.
October 4-5, Status of ARRA funded AIPs Electron Lens Scope, Cost, and Schedule Wolfram Fischer October 4, 2010 Electron Lens.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
Cost Estimate Marion White (Argonne) SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting December 16, 2014.
Mechanical Status of EUDET Module Marc Anduze – 05/04/07.
Muon Acceleration Program Technology Development A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009 It is not a Project!
The Four-Layer Conventional Magnetic Shield Brad Plaster, Caltech May 25, 2006  “Current” design  Estimated shielding factors  Production and time-scale.
Magnet development experiments B. Plaster Last collaboration meeting (February 2007) x : field direction y : “vertical” z : axial N = 40 cos θ coil 1/7-prototype.
U.S. Muon Accelerator Program: MICE Milestones & Resource-Loaded Schedule M. A. Palmer, Director October 31, 2012.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Cryogenics Systems WBS-62 Steve Raftopoulos NCSX Cryogenic Systems WBS(62)
MICE Status & Plans MICE-UK paul drumm 15 th September 2004.
Last collaboration meeting B. Plaster nEDM February 2008 Collaboration Meeting Attention now focused on construction of a 1/2-scale prototype modified.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule RF Cavity / Coupling Coil Module Plan and Progress Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab.
EDM Engineering Issues General Mechanical Considerations EDM Cryostat Plan D ANSYS EMAG Calculations ANSYS MECH Calculations 3 June ‘03 J. Boissevain.
Takeyasu Ito University of Tennessee/Oak Ridge National Laboratory EDM Cost and Schedule Review February, 2005 Beam Splitter / State Selector, Polarizing.
SC Project Review of NCSX, April 8-10, 2008 NCSX Cryogenics Systems WBS-62 Steve Raftopoulos NCSX Cryogenic Systems WBS(62) Manager.
SNuMI 1 Outline Action Items PP2 Progress [Nancy/Elaine] –Org Chart Update –FY07 Budget/Plans Discussion –FY08 Summer Shutdown –Overall cost Reduction.
RHIC 56 MHz Cryomodule Informational Review RHIC Integration Cross-sectional view of 56 MHz Cavity in Vacuum Vessel.
EDMEDM LANL Review of EDM Cost and Schedule Jan Boissevain, P-25 February 11, 2005, Los Alamos National Laboratory EDM Reference Design Tour of the Reference.
MICE Prototype Coupling Coil Fabrication Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE CM38 - Napa California February 25, 2014 February.
Marc Anduze – CALICE Meeting – KOBE 10/05/07 Mechanical R&D for Technological EUDET ECAL Prototype.
EDM Fast Start Presentation WBS 11 – Assembly and Commissioning Vince Cianciolo, Paul Huffman May 23, 2006.
SCU 3-Lab Review Meeting, Dec. 16, 2014 SCU Presentations Today Intro. & Performance Motivations (P. Emma, SLAC, 20+5) Conceptual Cryostat Design: Option-A.
Recent Magnetic Field Results Results from our automated field-mapper system Mappings of N = 8 and N = 40 coil –Coil field profile –Coil + Magnetic Shield.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
WBS ? Proposed by IPRP … –Preparation for a review –MICE Costs & Time Scales need to be more accurate & Justified –Technical Leaders arranged by technology.
Magnetic Field and Magnetic Shielding R&D
High Intensity Neutrino Source Program Overview for CD Controls Management Meeting Bob Webber October 6, 2006.
Cos θ Coil and Magnetic Shielding Progress B. Filippone and B. Plaster Caltech December 3, 2004.
Assembly 12/14/06 #1 Assembly and Commissioning Paul Huffman.
LARP review, Fermilab, 6/10/2013Magnet Project Overview – G. Sabbi 1 HL-LHC IR Quadrupole Magnet Project Overview GianLuca Sabbi Internal Review of proposed.
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel and HGRP Tom Peterson 4 December 2014 Design Review.
Magnet R&D for Large Volume Magnetization A.V. Zlobin Fermilab Fifth IDS-NF Plenary Meeting 8-10 April 2010 at Fermilab.
Single-Phase ProtoDUNE Construction Planning Jim Stewart LBNC January 11, 2016.
Attempting to Cost Estimate the nEDM Upper Cryostat Larry Bartoszek, PE Bartoszek Engineering 12/2/04.
Concepts Beyond the Neutrino Factory Baseline Design Detector R&D Alan Bross, Malcolm Ellis, Steve Geer, Olga Mena, Silvia Pascoli.
Ex-Situ NMR LDRD Progress report 1/27/03 1/27/03 1.Review of problem, status/plans - GianLuca 2.Magnetic and mechanical design- Paolo 3.Magnet configuration/fabrication.
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Darryl Orris 21 January 2015 Final Design Review: Instrumentation.
Status of the MICE Construction Project
MQXF Planning Paolo Fessia, Frederic Savary, Ezio Todesco, Lucio Rossi - CERN Mike Anerella, Peter Wanderer - BNL Giorgio Ambrosio, Mark Kaducak - FNAL.
PROGRESS REPORT OF A NLNS-FFAG ADS MAGNET
SiD LoI Costs M. Breidenbach 29 July 2010 M. Breidenbach.
Upgrade Strategy for the Experimental Vacuum Systems
SoLID Magnet - Engineering and Cost
Presentation transcript:

WBS 6: Magnetic Shielding B. Filippone and B. Plaster Caltech December 3, 2004

Zeroth-Order Concept cos θ coil: r ~ 35cm; ℓ ~ 300cm 4K ferromagnetic shield: r ~ 40cm; ℓ ~ 300cm superconducting shield: r ~ 50cm; ℓ ~ 300cm (neither shown here) 4-layer µ-metal shielding configuration Large cylindrical µ-metal shields with end-caps: r ~ 106.7cm, 110.5cm, 114.3cm, 118.1cm ℓ ~ 445.8cm, cm, 461.0cm, 468.6cm [J. Boissevain]

Zeroth-Order Concept cos θ coil: r ~ 61cm; ℓ ~ 393cm 4K ferromagnetic shield: r ~ 60cm; ℓ ~ 400cm superconducting shield: r ~ 63cm; ℓ ~ 400cm (neither shown here) 4-layer µ-metal shielding configuration Large cylindrical µ-metal shields with end-caps: r ~ 106.7cm, 110.5cm, 114.3cm, 118.1cm ℓ ~ 445.8cm, cm, 461.0cm, 468.6cm [J. Boissevain]

Estimated Costs 4K ferromagnetic shield –Open cylinder with no end caps 20 mil thickness –Cryoperm option Amuneal quote for r ~ 40cm, ℓ ~ 300cm: $30,000 Scale up to latest reference design of r ~ 60cm, ℓ ~ 400cm: $60,000 –Metglas option Honeywell quote: $515/kg 20 mils thick will require ~70 kg → $40,000 Al cylinder support frame: $8,000 VERY LABOR INTENSIVE: ~5 miles of 2-inch wide Metglas strips !!! 300K ferromagnetic shields –Cylindrical µ-metal shields with end-caps; take baseline 62 mils Larry Maltin (President of Technical Products at Amuneal): –“…confident that we could engineer, fabricate, anneal, and install such a [sized] shield…” Cost estimate for largest cylinder with end caps: $60,000 → ~$250,000 for 4 If want larger spacing between layers: $300,000 ~3 to 6 month lead time (freight truck shipping) and will require some on-site assembly 4-layer structure estimated to weigh ~2.5 English tons

Estimated Costs Superconducting shield –Not as well thought out at this point –Proposed idea is to melt lead and pour into a cylindrical Al casting frame Will require design engineering efforts –Estimate: $100,000 $100,000 is estimated cost in pre-proposal No experience yet; crude guess is $50,000 In-house vs. out-sourcing “Room-sized” box-type µ-metal shield or large tri-axial square Helmholtz bucking coils –Estimate for thin (14 mil) box-type (or large cylindrical) shield: $75,000

Estimated Costs AC demagnetization circuit for the ferromagnetic shields –Demagnetizing prototype Cryoperm and µ-metal shields has proven to be difficult (later talk) –High-power, variable-frequency, programmable AC power supply: $25,000 –Demagnetization circuit supplies: $5,000 Technical/Engineering/Machining work at Caltech –Support for design engineer and machinist for assistance with integration of shielding with experiment –Estimated labor costs: $30,000 Note: We did not include expenses related to materials/construction of support structures for the shielding (only for design engineering)

Costs Roll Up WBS 6: Magnetic Shielding Layer Ferromagnetic Shield$360, a 0.3K Ferromagnetic Shield$60, b 300K 4-Layer Ferromagnetic Shield$300, Superconducting Shield$50, Other Shielding (e.g., “room-sized”)$75, AC Demagnetization Circuit$30, Technical/Engineering/Machining Support$30, TOTAL$545,000 Risk Level [ 1 = lowest; 3 = highest ] [Pre-Proposal: $415,000]

Proposed Schedule Personnel during construction phase (1.0 FTE): 1 faculty; 1 post-doc; 1 design engineer; 1 machinist; undergraduate student(s) and/or 1 graduate student Rough Timeline (assuming funding available FY2007) Finalize shield design/geometry Finalize/integrate support structure Procure ferromagnetic shields Construct/test superconducting shield Procure AC demagnetization equipment Install all magnetic shielding Install/test AC demagnetization circuit..... potential hold-ups

300K Four-Layer Shield r = 106.7cm, 110.5cm, 114.3cm, 118.1cm (nominal design) r = 106.7cm, 115.0cm, 125.0cm, 135.0cm r = 106.7cm, 120.0cm, 135.0cm, 150.0cm

WBS 7: Magnets B. Filippone and B. Plaster Caltech December 3, 2004

Overview of Magnets Magnets to be constructed –cos θ coil for static field 1-10 mGauss DC field; ±0.1% spatial uniformity; temporal stability –Solenoid as “π/2 r.f.” 3 He and neutron spin-flip coil 0.1 mGauss AC field; Hz; 1.58 second duration –Spin-dressing cos θ coils Field parameters to be defined … Accompanying instrumentation needs –Highly-stable AC and DC power supplies –Mapping hardware and probes for field monitoring Labor costs (design engineering and machining/construction) and raw materials will comprise the core costs for WBS 7 –As opposed to mostly procurement costs for WBS 6

Zeroth-Order Concept static cos θ coil“π/2 r.f.” solenoid spin-dressing cos θ coils [180° phase difference] 4K ferromagnetic shield Χ x y superconducting shield

Estimated Costs Design and construction of static cos θ coil: $130,000 –¼-scale prototype already constructed at Caltech → have acquired experience with design and machining efforts (later talk) Design engineering/integration labor costs: $20,000 Materials and supplies: $30,000 Machining/production labor costs: $80,000 –Assuming out-sourcing; in-house could lead to reduction Design and construction of “π/2 r.f.” solenoid: $20,000 –Solenoid → design and construction should be simpler (in principle) Design engineering/integration labor costs: $5,000 Materials and supplies: $10,000 Machining/production labor costs: $5,000

Estimated Costs Construction/integration of spin-dressing coils: $150,000 –Prototype AC cos θ coils to be built as part of the R&D efforts at Caltech Design engineering/integration labor costs: $20,000 Materials and supplies: $50,000 Machining/production labor costs: $80,000 –Assuming out-sourcing; in-house could lead to reduction AC and DC power supplies: $60,000 –Require highly-stable power supplies and stabilization circuits DC power supply with accompanying stabilization circuit for the static cos θ coil: $30,000 Low-frequency AC power supply for “π/2 r.f.” spin-flip solenoid: $10,000 High-frequency AC power supply for spin-dressing coils: $10,000 Computer-controlled interface for all power supplies: $10,000 –Possibly coupled to AC demagnetization circuit in WBS 6

Estimated Costs Mapping hardware and probes for (possible) in-situ real-time field monitoring: $80,000 –DC field profile independent of 3 He co-magnetometry –Appropriate tuning of AC fields Computer-controlled positioning/stepping hardware and readout (difficulties due to the cryogenic environment): $50,000 Engineering for integration: $10,000 Cryogenic 3-axis fluxgate magnetometers and probes: $20,000

Costs Roll Up WBS 7: Magnets 7.1 Static Field cos θ Coil$130, r.f. Spin-Flip Coil$20, Spin Dressing Coils$150, AC and DC Power Supplies$60, Field Monitors$80,0001 and 3 7 TOTAL$440,000 Risk Level [ 1 = lowest; 3 = highest ] [ Pre-Proposal: $270,000 ]

Proposed Schedule Personnel during construction phase (2.0 FTE): 1 faculty; 1 post-doc; 1 professional staff member; 1 design engineer; 1 machinist; 1 graduate student (?); undergraduate student(s) Rough Timeline (assuming funding available FY2007) Finalize magnet parameters/geometry Construct/test static cos θ coil Construct/test “π/2 r.f.” spin-flip coil Construct/test spin-dressing coils Procure/test AC and DC power supplies Design/construct field monitors Procure magnetometer/probes Install all components..... potential hold-ups