USDA Farm Service Agency GIS Enterprise Architecture Status Jim Heald Director, USDA FSA ITSD GIS Center 202-720-0787 May 11, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2008 NAIP Orthoimagery Update Chris Cialek MN Land Management Information Center May 7, 2008.
Advertisements

Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
The Farm Service Agencys National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) Presentation for the U. S. Geological Survey Eastern Region Geography State Cooperators.
Indiana State Land Office Digital Conversion Project Overview Justin P. Peters, GISP.
Geospatial Technologies Briefing PEMA Law Enforcement Briefing 22 March 2004 Jim Knudson, Director GT
Use of cadastral data in the Rural Support Service
VGIN 5 Year GIS Strategic Plan
Geo-Enabled Business Work Group Presentation to the Federal Geographic Data Committee Coordination Group October 13, 2009 Geospatial Line of Business.
NATIONAL STATES GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION COUNCIL 2105 Laurel Bush Rd. Suite 200 Bel Air, MD GIS Inventory powered by Ramona.
NAIP Preview for FSA State Office GIS Specialists February 24, 2010 NAIP 2010.
Alabama Geospatial Office Established May 2007 Mike Vanhook State GIS Coordinator.
Enterprise Architecture The Arkansas Approach. Key Areas What is enterprise architecture? Why is it important? How you can participate Current status.
WHO ARE WE? The Alabama Association of Regional Councils (AARC) is composed of twelve regions. Each regional planning council is a public organization.
1 Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Fundamentals for Program Managers.
1 Imagery for the Nation FGDC Coordination Group Update 1-meter 1-foot 6 inches Vicki Lukas, USGS September 4, 2008.
Building GIS as platform for e-government
Vers. national spatial data infrastructure training program Geospatial Business Planning Introduction to FGDC Initiatives Related to Geospatial Business.
State of Tennessee Office for Information Resources – GIS Services State of Tennessee and Enterprise GIS Activities Oak Ridge National Lab February 26,
Imagery for Supporting FSA Farm Programs Review FSA Requirements for Imagery Identify and Evaluate Possible Alternatives Recommend Plan of Action Objectives.
Adem.alabama.gov GIS for Water Management: Flow Data Flow Building a Framework for Alabama.
Who We Are APFO is the primary source of aerial imagery for the U.S. Department of Agriculture. APFO is the primary source of aerial imagery for the U.S.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Integrating Agriculture into National Statistical Systems Section A 1.
Pennsylvania GTO 3-Year Strategic Plan NSGIC Annual Conference 2005 Rochester, NY Jim Knudson Stacey White
USDA Farm Service Agency National Agricultural Imagery Program Presented by Dan Janes, GIS Specialist North Dakota State Office.
Geospatial Concepts for Executives April 11, 2007 Shirley Hall GIS Program Manager USDA-FSA Geospatial Information Systems in the Farm Service Agency.
1 “The National Cadastre” FGDC Cadastral Subcommittee Presentation to the NGAC October 2008 Don Buhler.
USDA–FSA-APFO Storage provisioning within a Geospatial Data Warehouse USDA Imagery Planning and Coordination December 5, 2006 David A. Nabity Aerial Photography.
WLIA March Evolution in National Data Sharing Richard Vraga Wisconsin & Illinois State Liaison U.S. Geological Survey Madison, WI.
Integrating Parcels Into Farm Records Management Larry Cutforth WLIA Conference 2/23/04.
Shirley Hall GIS Program Manager Farm Service Agency Homeland Infrastructure Foundation – Level Data (HIFLD) Working Group Meeting.
2005 USDA Imagery Contracts May 4, 2005 NDOP Steering Committee Meeting Asheville, North Carolina W. Geoffrey Gabbott, Contracting Officer USDA, FSA, Aerial.
USDA 2008 Imagery Planning Meeting Shirley Hall Farm Service Agency.
Farm Service Agency National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) Pecora Conference November 13, 2002 Denver, Colorado Kent Williams, USDA FSA Aerial Photography.
APFO Data Distribution and Services. Bulk Data Distribution Options: –CD –DVD –LTO4 Tape (New this year) –Hard Drive Requestor has the option of using.
material assembled from the web pages at
National Agriculture Imagery Program NAIP Informational Meeting July 19, 2006 Washington DC Jim Mauck U.S. Geological Survey, 511 National Center,
National Agriculture Imagery Program Potential Program Changes USDA Planning Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah December 4-6, 2006 Kent Williams NAIP Program.
United We Ride: Where are we Going? December 11, 2013 Rik Opstelten United We Ride Program Analyst.
FSA State Office NAIP Training Kent Williams Cindy Sessions David Davis Brian Vanderbilt June 15, 2006.
1 Dan Widner VGIN Coordinator VGIN Advisory Board January 9,
December 2, 2008 Salt Lake City, Utah W. Geoffrey Gabbott, Contracting Officer USDA, FSA, Aerial Photography Field Office USDA Imagery Planning & Coordination.
Office for Information Resources GIS Services The Tennessee Base Mapping Program “A New Beginning” Dennis Pedersen, Director OIR – GIS Services.
Lean Six Sigma in MIDAS 1. Lean Six Sigma (LSS) Defined Lean Six Sigma is a recognized industry best practice for business improvement which focuses on.
National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) National States Geographic Information Council September 15, 2003 Nashville, Tennessee W. Geoffrey Gabbott,
Long-Term Preservation of At- Risk Digital Geospatial Data: A Cooperative Agreement with Library of Congress Steve Morris NCSU Libraries Zsolt Nagy NC.
Wisconsin Aerial Imagery Ted Koch, Wisconsin State Cartographer’s Office WLIA 2005 Annual Conference February 24 th, 2005 Wisconsin Aerial Imagery
National Digital Orthoimagery Program (NDOP) Update to Coordination Group Chair: Anne O’Connor Census February 18, 2014 Coordination.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
Catawba County Board of Commissioners Retreat June 11, 2007 It is a great time to be an innovator 2007 Technology Strategic Plan *
1 Imagery for the Nation FGDC Steering Committee Meeting May 1, meter 1-foot 6 inches.
USDA Geospatial Data Warehouse NCGC Data Center 15 TB Online Data Bi-directional Data Replication and Failover for Business Continuity Data Themes: NAIP.
2006 West Virginia GIS Forum. Objectives 1) Centralize all infrastructure responsibilities. 2) Select common (standard) hardware, software and service.
NAIP 2010 Presentation to National States Geographic Information Council Kent Williams USDA Farm Service Agency Aerial Photography Field Office (APFO )
National Agriculture Imagery Program NAIP Informational Meeting USDA Forest Service Benefits from NAIP Cooperation July 19, 2006 Washington DC Bill Belton.
The technology and techniques driving effective highway management LandScope Engineering Ltd Sarah Jones GI Manager.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Information and Technology Management Office of the Chief Information Officer Review of Unified Geospatial Segment Architecture.
FSA Geospatial Support Kevin Clarke USDA-FSA-APFO USDA Planning Meeting Dec 11-13, 2007.
Citation: Moskal., L. M. and D. M. Styers, Land use/land cover (LULC) from high-resolution near infrared aerial imagery: costs and applications.
National Digital Orthoimagery Program (NDOP) Update to Coordination Group Chair: Chris Barnard Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program Integrated eGovernment Reporting May 2004.
National Geospatial Enterprise Architecture N S D I National Spatial Data Infrastructure An Architectural Process Overview Presented by Eliot Christian.
Imagery for the Nation Update and Next Steps FGDC Coordination Group Vicki Lukas U.S. Geological Survey October 13, 2009.
1 Imagery for the Nation Coordination Group Update July 1, meter 1-foot 6 inches Vicki Lukas, USGS.
3 Digital Terrain Model (DTM) products: Issues Enhanced DTM & 10m DTM are created as part of the orthophotography creation process New 50m DTM to be created.
NRCS Business Processes and Geospatial Integration Kansas Natural Resources GIS Technical Meeting March 16, 2016 Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Texas Geographic Information Council September 19, 2007 Texas Geographic Information Council September 19, 2007.
USDA/FSA Service Center - GIS Implementation Implementation Strategy: Provide best starting point for digitizing field boundaries Quality Assured User.
Forest Service Geospatial Enterprise Architecture
Geospatial Data Distribution
What is a CLU? A Common Land Unit (CLU) is the smallest unit, which has: a permanent, contiguous boundary common land cover management common owner common.
Presentation transcript:

USDA Farm Service Agency GIS Enterprise Architecture Status Jim Heald Director, USDA FSA ITSD GIS Center May 11, 2005

Scope of Activities FSA currently manages or will manage several Enterprise-level geospatial data layers – Common Land Unit (vector layer) – National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) orthophotography – Agricultural Land Use (vector layer) – Conservation Programs (vector layer) All are good candidates for inclusion in the FSA Enterprise Architecture

CLU is the smallest unit of land that has a: permanent, contiguous boundary common land cover and land management common owner common producer association Note: CLUs are closely related to: FSA’s definition of “fields”, according to 2-CP lands units such as parcels, farmsteads, and lots, that are used by NRCS, RMA, and RD program administration. Generally this is PRIVATE land that has some relation to agriculture. CLU Definition

CLU CLU originated as a cross-agency data layer for management of USDA Service Center activities between FSA, NRCS and Rural Development. – Source data previously maintained at FSA County offices as annotations on Hard Copy Aerial Photography – Database for conducting FSA program business Other USDA agencies have expressed an interest in using the CLU for business purposes including NASS, APHIS, RMA – Not involved in the original data design efforts – Have different, possibly incompatible needs FSA has coordinated with other Federal Agencies, State Agriculture and EPA to share data or discuss the possibility

Common Land Unit Status As of May 6th – 2678 Counties Digitized (85%) 925 Counties Certified (29%) – Certification is validation and correction of the digitized data by the FSA Service Center with Producer input ~250 additional Counties under contract for completion by September, 2005 – Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, and West Virginia – Contract completion will bring us to about 93% – Another ~150 counties anticipated done in-house by the same date (about 3050 counties – 98%) Digitizing for Continental US complete by the end of FY 2005 – Alaska, Puerto Rico and Territories delivery TBD

Contract data To be delivered by 8/31/05

Land Use and Conservation Layers Strong integration with the CLU For purposes of discussion, these layers are extensions of the CLU layer

NAIP Vision The National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) consolidates USDA’s imagery requirements into a national strategy that acquires the best value products for FSA and other USDA agencies. USDA would like to create win-win partnerships with Federal agencies, State and local governments, and private entities. NAIP will maximize the informational value of acquisitions by minimizing the cycle time from acquisition to fielding while keeping the image content information for the creation of traditional photographic and orthoimagery.

NAIP Program Goals Provide new photography/digital imagery on an annual basis – Some products available within days of flying Update orthoimagery base on 1-5 year cycle (depending on USDA Service Center needs) Aerial film archived at APFO and made available for photographic products Digital imagery furnished to the “National Map” concept in place of or to augment the NAPP/NDOP

NAIP Missouri Ralls County With CLU Color – IR One Meter

NAIP Minnesota Renville County With CLU Natural Color 1 Meter

FSA Application Architecture Path Current Environment Arcview 3.x environment – Standalone systems – Single-user WRITE access to GIS data – NO Database Integration – Limited communication with System 36/AS 400 FY 2005/2006 ArcGIS environment – Server-based systems – Relational Database – Multi-user access to GIS data Key feature for Acreage Reporting and Compliance – Integrated solution – Visual Basic Desktop applications – Service Center data storage CLU replicated to GDW FY 2006/7 and beyond Database driven Browser-based Central data storage Integrated part of MIDAS architecture

General EA Status at USDA What is the status of Enterprise Architecture deployment in your agency? – USDA is currently implementing the EA Repository across the Department. This application will be used to collect enterprise-wide information on investments, applications and related systems. USDA is conducting basic training for agency designees through mid-June. What software do you use to describe or model your EA? – USDA EA Repository (Adaptive) This is the vehicle USDA agencies will use to capture and validate current and target architectures at the agency and Department levels. How is your architecture documented (formats, models, etc)? – The Repository is capable of importing architecture models from other sources (Popkin, Metis, Visio, etc.) Word-processing documents can also be captured in the Repository.

What outcome from this GEA activity would be helpful to your organization to better identify geospatial resources for others internal/external to find? What would a "Geospatial Profile" mean to you? – A tool or a vocabulary for making it easier to present Geospatial data to our Architects and OMB What ancillary documentation or guidance would be useful? – Anything to make it easier to expose the Geospatial data to our Architects – 300 Examples – Business Case examples What outreach resources would be helpful? Who are the audiences? – Something showing the importance/benefits of including Geospatial information in the Enterprise Architecture – Architects, IT Managers, GIS Managers

Enterprise Architecture Issues No Fully Articulated Enterprise Architecture – Just starting – Includes Geospatial data tangentially CLU Data originated at Separate offices – Standards based, but locally interpreted – Holes in the dataset Land not covered by FSA Programs Land administered in one office but physically located elsewhere – Duplicate data – Topological issues between counties Also between CLU and other cadastral data layers – Ultimate goal to build a seamless, non-redundant national dataset Evolutionary path from distributed database to a centralized database with real-time Web Accessibility

Enterprise Architecture Issues (continued) NAIP – Coverage area depends on funding Varies from year to year States with local and Federal partnerships will get flown FSA will only fly agricultural areas (generally at 2m resolution) without partners – Mixed resolution (1 meter and 2 meter) – Mixed format (digital and film, Natural color and IR) – Currently matching to Original DOQ Carrying DOQ errors forward Not making use of technology improvements – ABGPS and IMU – Processing Improvements