COLUMBIA BASIN KELTS: ABUNDANCE, DOWNSTREAM PASSAGE, AND REPEAT SPAWNING.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Smolt Monitoring Program 1982-Present BPA project#
Advertisements

COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY (CSS) of PIT-tagged Spring/Summer Chinook and PIT-tagged Summer Steelhead CBFWA Implementation Review Mainstem/Systemwide.
Survival Estimates for the Passage of Juvenile Salmonids Through Dams and Reservoirs of the Lower Snake and Columbia Rivers (Project ) CBFWA March.
Evaluation of Juvenile Salmonid Outmigration and Survival in the Lower Umatilla River Project No Tara White, Shannon Jewett, Josh Hanson,
ISO Adult PIT Interrogation System Installations BPA Project Number July
Evaluate Spawning of Fall Chinook and Chum Salmon Just Below the Four Lowermost Columbia River Mainstem Dams Project PNNL.
Rebecca A. Buchanan Columbia Basin Research School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences University of Washington Seattle, WA INVESTIGATING MIGRATORY PROCESSES.
Growth and Development of the Columbia Basin PIT Tag Information System Growth and Development of the Columbia Basin PIT Tag Information System Overview.
Passage Behavior and Survival for Radio-tagged Subyearling Chinook Salmon at Ice Harbor Dam, 2006 Fish Ecology Division Northwest Fisheries Science Center.
Overview of Current Production Programs Across the Columbia River Basin.
A life history framework to understand production of juvenile steelhead in freshwater applied to the John Day River, Oregon Jason Dunham, USGS Forest and.
NWHA- Panel Discussion “Spawning Better Ideas for Fish Passage”
C. A. Peery, M. L. Keefer, and S. R. Lee Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit U.S. Geological Survey and Northwest Fisheries Science Center.
Variation in Straying Patterns and Rates of Snake River Hatchery Steelhead Stocks in the Deschutes River Basin, Oregon Richard W. Carmichael and Tim Hoffnagle.
Columbia River salmon : Who (or what) will save them? John Williams Klarälven meeting in Karlstad 9 May 2011.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Evaluation of Alternative Commercial Fishing Gear in the Lower Columbia River, 2013: Behavior and.
Charmane Ashbrook, Michael Mizell, & Ken Warheit Tomelleri.
Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers, 2009 Technical Management TeamDecember 11, 2009 Lessons Learned 2009 Bill.
Hydrosystem Operations and Fish Recovery in the Columbia River Basin U
Documenting O. mykiss life histories in the White Salmon River prior to the reintroduction of anadromous fish above Condit Dam. Brady Allen and Patrick.
2014 Program Goal Statements for Salmon and Steelhead Overview Nancy Leonard, Laura Robinson and Patty O’Toole (NPCC)
ISAB Snake River Spill-Transport Review ISAB – Presentation to Council September 17, 2008.
Monitor and Evaluate Salmonid Production in the Asotin Creek Subbasin - LSRCP (ID #200116)
Steelhead Stock Status Review and ESA Oregon Rhine Messmer ODFW District Staff Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Pacific Coast Steelhead Management.
BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 1. BUILDING STRONG ® PORTLAND DISTRICT 2 BiOp Performance Standards for Dam Passage Survival RPA RM&E Actions - Strategy.
COMPARATIVE SURVIVAL STUDY Chapter 3: Annual SAR by study category and ratios of SARs Comparisons of SARs Transport to In-River By hatchery group Hatchery.
Juvenile survival, travel time and the in-river environment Presenter: Steve Haeseker CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Annual SARs by Study Category, TIR and D: Patterns and Significance Presenter: Charlie Petrosky CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
The Columbia River Basin Where we’ve been. Where we’re going. October 18, 2005.
Management & Recovery Implications Of Wild/Hatchery Steelhead Interactions Within A Large, Complex Watershed Research Partners: WDFW Skagit River System.
Washington’s Lower Snake River Compensation Plan Steelhead Program – A retrospective and program adaptive management overview Mark Schuck and Joe Bumgarner.
LGR Adult Ladder Temperature Permanent Fix NOAA Biological Goals: 1) Allow fish the opportunity to exit the ladder without stalling or excessive up/down.
Migration pathway, age at ocean entry, and SARs for Snake River Basin fall Chinook prior to summer spill at LGR, LGS, and LMN dams.
Status of Columbia River salmon and links to flow: What we do and do not know Presentation to Northwest Power Planning Council December 11, 2002
Howard Schaller PSMFC Annual Meeting September 24, 2013 Comparative Survival Study Outcomes – Experimental Spill Management 1.
CSS Oversight Committee ISAB November 15, 2013 Comparative Survival Study Outcomes – Experimental Spill Management 1.
Steelhead Kelt Reconditioning Program Update Presented by: Bill Bosch, Yakama Fisheries Acknowledgements: D. Fast, M. Johnston, T. Newsome Prosser Hatchery.
Iteroparity and Steelhead: what we know and don’t know John R. McMillan Oregon State University.
Adult steelhead evaluations in Imnaha River tributaries William Young, Jocelyn Hatch Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries Resources Management.
The relationship of Snake River stream-type Chinook survival rates to in-river, ocean and climate conditions Howard Schaller, USFWS * Charlie Petrosky,
Downstream Survival of Juvenile Stream Type Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Through the Snake/Columbia River Hydropower System and Adult Return Rates AFEP.
Washington State Steelhead Stock Status Review PACIFIC COAST STEELHEAD MEETING AMILEE WILSON WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE MARCH 2004.
2005 Preliminary Summer Spill Data Fall Chinook Radiotelemetry Studies Performed by USGS – BRD, NOAA – NWFSC For the USACE Anadromous Fish Evaluation Program.
Findings of Congress The Endangered Species Act is the last resort for species at risk of extinction. Under the ESA, the National Marine Fisheries Service.
Energy Beyond Hydropower Atlas Chapter 13 Figure 13.1 – Energy Consumption No PNW sources of natural gas or crude oil Refining crude oil – 4 north Puget.
Cost and Energy Impacts of Fish and Wildlife Operations NW Power Planning Council April 3, 2002 Boise, Idaho.
Estimating Viable Salmonid Population Parameters for Snake River Steelhead using Genetic Stock Identification of Adult Mixtures at Lower Granite Dam Tim.
2010 work planned, new operations, and wrap up Presenter: Robin Ehlke CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
2005 Subyearling Migration Fish Passage Center. Overview – summer migration Court ordered summer spill occurred from June 20 to August 31, 2005 Question.
Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.
Columbia River Basin Fish Restoration Activities ACCOMPLISHMENTS TO DATE AND UPCOMING ISSUES Bonneville Legal Briefing – October 2015.
Northwest Power Planning Council Fish and Energy Impacts Resulting from Reductions in Summer Bypass Spill July 16, 2003.
Parr and smolt yield, migration timing, and age structure in a wild steelhead population, Fish Creek, Idaho Alan Byrne Idaho Department of Fish and Game.
Upstream passage success rates and straying of returning adults Presenter: Jack Tuomikoski CSS Annual Meeting Apr 2 nd 2010.
Historical Review Fish Migration Data. Two Management Approaches Spill for Fish Passage Planning dates Percent passage dates.
US Army Corps of Engineers Draft 2009 Kelt Management Plan.
Steelhead Kelt Reconditioning Program Update Presented by: Dave Fast, Yakama Fisheries Acknowledgements: B. Bosch, M. Johnston, T. Newsome Prosser Hatchery.
Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team
Comparative Survival Study Annual Meeting
Hatchery Subyearling Survival Lower Granite to McNary Dam 1998 to 2007 (preliminary results) Fish Passage Center.
Age at ocean entry of Snake River Basin fall Chinook and its significance to adult returns prior to summer spill at LGR, LGS, and LMN dams.
Yakima River Steelhead Status and Trends RM&E Project Overview:
Northwest Fisheries Science Center Technical Management Team
2017 TMT Year-end Review December 12, 2017 Brandon R. Chockley
Direct Survival of Migrating Salmonid Smolts in the Snake and Lower Columbia Rivers: Update with 2007 Results Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
Science Policy Exchange
NOAA Mainstem PIT Tag Research
Behavior and Survival for Juvenile Salmonids Passing Ice Harbor Dam during reduced and BiOp spill treatments, Gordon Axel, Eric Hockersmith, and.
Smolt Migration 2006 (preliminary results)
Eagle Fish Genetics Lab (IDFG): Craig Steele Mike Ackerman
Presentation transcript:

COLUMBIA BASIN KELTS: ABUNDANCE, DOWNSTREAM PASSAGE, AND REPEAT SPAWNING

Introduction Part I: Life After Spawning Kelt Identification Kelt Abundance and Population Structure Kelt Migration  Travel Rates  Dam Passage  In-river Survival

Introduction cont. Part II: Iteroparity and Management Repeat Spawning Rates Restoration Options/Strategies Research and Management Needs

Iteroparity in the Pacific Northwest Several anadromous, iteroparous salmonid species (e.g., steelhead, sea-run cutthroats, dolly varden, arctic char, and inconnu (sheefish).

Steelhead Repeat Spawning Up to four repeat spawning events possible Consecutive and skip-spawners present Female dominated life history High repeat spawning variation (1% to 75%, X=10%) - Differences in run types (winter vs. summer) - Geographic differences (Coast vs. Inland) - Annual differences

Repeat Spawning: Columbia Basin Columbia River: ranges from < 1% to 17% RiverIteroparityDams (rkm)Reference Kalama17%0 (118)Leider Hood10%1 (273)Busby Yakima1.5%4 (539)Hockersmith Snake< 1%4-8 (520-1,500)Wertheimer

Kelts: The Forgotten Life History Kelts:  Post-spawned salmonid capable of iteroparity  Inherent life history trait  Limited by environmental (natural and anthropogenic) and biological constraints Benefits of protection:  Recognition of life history diversity  “Best of the Best”  Female dominated runs  Preserve plasticity

Kelt Identification Geographic and temporal over-lap of maturation types Visual methods est. between 2-25% kelt abundance Need for rapid, accurate, and non- invasive method - morphology - Steroids - Ultrasound Ultrasound is the superior method

Kelt Abundance LocationYear% Kelts Bypass No. Kelts Bypass (% wild) ESA- Component In-river kelt Abundance LGR200096%4,015 (54%)17%15, %12,135 (42%)21%NA 2002*92%9,519 (50%)7%NA McN200175%1,988 (57%)?NA %2,002 (60%)?14,057 JDD200192%2,022 (76%)?NA %2,212 (59%)?NA * RSW installed at LGR

Kelt Population Structure

Kelt Population Structure cont.. Hatchery Versus Wild Kelt Run Timing

Kelt Population Structure Cont. Female Kelt Run LGR = 84% McN = 87%* JDD = 86%* * Excludes unknowns Female versus Male Run Timing

Kelt Population Structure Cont.. LocationGoodFairPoor LGR52%31%17% McN66%23%11% JDD49%28%23% Good Poor

Kelt Population Structure Cont.. LocationBrightInterDark LGR36%47%17% McN65%33%2% JDD45%50%5% Bright Dark

Kelt Migration: Columbia Basin Roy Beaty

1.5 Grams Kelt Migration:  Radio-telemetry

Kelt Migration: Travel Rates Reach No-Spill 2001 Spill Little Goose (60 km) Lower Mon. (47 km) John Day (123 km) N/A The Dalles (38 km) Bonneville (73 km) Free-Flowing (53 km)  Travel times were positively associated with river discharge  Significantly faster in 02 (normal year) relative to 01 (drought).  Travel times were significantly faster in free-flow reach

Kelt Migration: Passage Kelt Migration: Dam Passage

Kelt Migration: B2CC Dam Passage

Kelt Migration: Dam Passage Bonneville Dam (B2) Forebay Residence Time % exited B2 Kcfs 2004 = ~ = ~ (N=235) 2002 (N=50)

Kelt Migration: Survival (2001) I-205 (184) BONJDAICH 3% 4% 10%12%15%24%37%64% Dam tailrace (R km) Cumulative travel time (hrs) Contact Attrition Contact history TDAMCNLMNLGSLGR (696) % -13%-62%-16%-22%-37%-35%-34%

Kelt Migration: Survival * Release Year (n)RKM# of dams & Pools Cumulative LGR a 2001 (197) 2002 (167) 2003 (212) % (7/197) 13.2% (22/167) 34.4 (73/212) McN a 2001 (52) 2002 (273) 2004 (123) % 62.3% 73.0% JDD a 2001 (154) 2002 (10) 2004 (393) % 80.0% 92.0% *good and fair kelts only…poor condition kelts rarely survive outmigration a Wertheimer and Evans (2005)

Kelt Repeat Spawning Rates

John Day The Dalles Kelt Repeat Spawning Rates 3 John Day = 6.2% (140/2,265) McNary = 5.3% (32/603) Lower Granite 0.9% (54/5,885)

Kelt Repeat Spawning Rates Tag Site* Year Sample (n)Bonneville Return (%) “Skip Spawn” LGR , , % 0.4% 1.0% 63% 40% 50% McN % 3.9% 71% 40% JDD % 2.8% 5.4% 41% 38% 29%

Kelt Restoration Options/Strategies: Hydro-system configuration & operation Transportation Kelt Reconditioning   

Kelt Restoration Options/Strategies Spill is an efficient passage option for kelts Surface oriented bypass structures (e.g., sluiceways) are effective ways to pass kelts. Increased flows result in increased travel rates and higher survival. Removable Spillway Weirs

Kelt Restoration Strategies Transportation Snake River (LGR 02): Trans = 2.5% (19/751) In-river = 0.8% (8/1,066) Columbia River (JDD 02): Trans = 11.9% (34/286) In-river = 10.1% (25/247) * values are minimum and returning fish are predominately female

Kelt Restoration Options/Strategies Reconditioning -Kelt ID and capture -Feeding and treatment -Maturation appraisal -Release for natural spawning  Short and Long-term

Reconditioning Results YearTreatmentSample (% YN run) SurvivalRematuration 2000 a - Long-term (37%) - 18% - 12% 2001 b - Long-term (18%) - 39% - 21% 2002 b Short-term Long-term 400 (9%) 420 (9%) 83% 34% 12% 19% 2003 c Short-term Long-term 208 (10%) 482 (22%) 90% 62% n.a. 57% a Evans et al. (2001) ; b Hatch et al. (2003); c Fast (pers. comm.)

Yakima R. Steelhead Escapement with Reconditioning 7.3%14.4% 2.4% Percentage increase in escapement due to reconditioning. Date provide by Dave Fast (YN)

Research and Management Needs  Collected baseline data on Upper Columbia River kelts; abundance, survival, dam passage, and iteroparity rates * Action Agencies = NOAA Fisheries and PUDs  Establish a reconditioning program for Lower Snake River kelts *Action Agencies = NOAA Fisheries, U.S. Army Corps, and BPA  Include kelts and repeat spawners in both regional and local recovery plans; including fish outside of the Columbia River Basin.

Summary Kelts are abundant, good condition, predominately female, and wild. If available, passage is predominately via spillway or alternative surface oriented routes. Out-migration success is negatively correlated with passage distance and positively correlated with water conditions. Iteroparity increases down river, skip-spawning rates decrease. Several kelt management options exist (e.g., hydro system configuration/operation, transportation, and reconditioning). Kelts should be a component of regional steelhead recovery efforts.