Title III, Part A, Foundations Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Shyla Vesitis, Title I/III Specialist Title III University September 24, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title I & Title III Annual Parent Meeting
Advertisements

Title III-A All identified English language learners assessed for English language proficiency (ELP) with the ACCESS for ELLs TM, with all 4 domains (Reading,
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
1 Alternative Language Services (ALS) November 10, 2008.
Attendance ConferenceAttendance Conference New Directors TrainingNew Directors Training April 16, 2014April 16, 2014.
LPAC overview - Fall 2004 The Language Assessment Process in Texas  LPAC, Language Assessment Proficiency Committee  ARD is the Admissions, Review and.
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
These webinars will address compliance with federal and state provisions for the education of English learners (ELs); understanding and using assessment.
September, 2010 Accomack County Public Schools. DEFINITION OF AN LEP STUDENT  An LEP student is one: Who was not born in the U.S. or whose native language.
Using Title I, Part A, and Title III, Part A, Funds to Support Students Experiencing Homelessness Lynn Sodat, Ph.D. Judy Radford Office of Program Administration.
Ensuring Effective Services to Immigrant &/or LEP/ELL Children & Families: It’s Right, & It’s the Law! © Statewide Parent Advocacy Network 1.
Serving English Language Learners LASAFAP October 30, 2014.
Title III, Part A Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Students Virginia Department of Education April 2015.
South Carolina Public Charter School District Federal Programs Overview Robert Compton, Director of Student Services Vamshi Rudrapati, Coordinator of Student.
New Title III Guidance U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Justice Jointly Released: January 7, 2015 Office of Program Administration.
Title III: Language Instruction for Limited English Proficient and Immigrant Students Serving English Language Learners – It’s the Law VAFEPA: October.
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
The English as a Second Language Program
Gary Martin EL (Title III) Consultant ONGL-Division of Learning Services Diverse Learners Branch BOY September 23 Begins 9 AM.
How to Interpret and Use Standards of Learning (SOL) and ACCESS for ELLs® Data to Make Instructional Decisions for English Learners.
Language Proficiency Assessment Commitee (LPAC)
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
This session will begin with a discussion of strategies to ensure appropriate identification and interventions for ELLs as well as teacher resources. Strategies.
Rowland Unified School District Program Specialist/ LD Meeting September 10, 2012.
U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights (OCR) Title VI, Section 504, Title II – Special Education and Limited English Proficient Students.
Educational Leadership & ELLs Presented By: Reyna P. Hernandez Research and Policy Associate Latino Policy Forum
Questions and Responses: New Joint Title III Guidance U.S. Department of Education and U.S. Department of Justice Jointly Released: January 7, 2015 Office.
Serving English Language Learners with ESEA Title III, Part A Funds.
Placement and Identification Procedures for English Language Learners in Hattiesburg Public Schools Cristina Hudgins
ESOL Program (English for Speakers of Other Languages) in Greenwood District Questions and Answers Updated July 2015.
VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY SEPTEMBER 18, 2012 Immigrant and Youth Funds Under Title III.
Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Shyla Vesitis, Title I/III Specialist Coordinators’ Academy July 2015.
1 What is Bilingual Education? An educational approach that involves the use of two languages of instruction; In the USA, bilingual education assumes use.
Parent Notification for New and Continuing ESL Program Students Elementary
Parent Notification for New and Continuing ESL Program Students School
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
» September 3, 2015 » December 3, 2015 » February 4, 2016.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
ESEA Directors Institute 2014ESEA Directors Institute 2014 ESEA DirectorsESEA Directors Wednesday, October 8, 2014Wednesday, October 8, 2014.
Hawkins CountyHawkins County Serving English LearnersServing English Learners July 16, 2013July 16,
Equitable Services, Part 2 Planning for Equitable Services Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I.
Questions and Answers.  Gwd 50 has over 1,000 ESOL students; each school has ESOL students.  ESOL is a federal program under Title III legislation.
Laws Governing ESL Programs in the US Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI prohibits discrimination on the grounds of race, color,
ALBERTVILLE CITY SCHOOLS Enrollment, Identification and Education of EL Students
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Creating a Good Title III Plan Title III & Migrant Directors’ Meeting Lansing, Michigan April 26, 2011 Shereen Tabrizi, Ph.D. Manager, Special Populations.
VDOE Updates VESA Meeting October 1, 2015 Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Office of Program Administration and Accountability Virginia Department of.
Understanding AMAOs Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives for Title III Districts School Year Results.
Joint Guidance from USED and DOJ on LEP Students Released: January 7, 2015 Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Shyla Vesitis, Title I/III Specialist Office.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title.
Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Chris Kelly, Education Coordinator Shyla Vesitis, Title I/Title III Specialist Office of Program Administration and.
What are the Differences Between Targeted and Schoolwide Title I Programs?
Directions: This is a Power Point presentation about ESL. The information is used for staff development and there is a short quiz at the end.
Title III: 101 Jacqueline A. Iribarren Ph.D. Title III, ESL & Bilingual Ed. Consultant October 20, 2011.
Federal Program Monitoring (FPM) Chris McLaughlin Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Virginia Association.
Title III, Part A, Foundations Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Shyla Vesitis, Title I/III Specialist Title III University October 8, 2015.
Virginia Department of Education November 5, 2015.
English Language Learner Updates LASAFAP April 5,2016.
ELL 101 Stephanie Johnson, LPSD38 ELL Coordinator.
Federal Title III Monitoring Visit Educational Equity Charlene Lui, Paul Ross, Cheryl Pietz, Nathan Moore, Sara Moore.
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
January 14, 2016 Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist
Introduction to English learners and Related Federal and State Rules
LIEPing to Excellence for ELs
Title III, Part A Foundations for New Coordinators July 2018
ESL Program Data Protocols Montgomery County Public Schools
Effective Implementation: WIDA ELD Standards
ESL/Title III Consultants
Presentation transcript:

Title III, Part A, Foundations Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Shyla Vesitis, Title I/III Specialist Title III University September 24, 2015

The purpose of this presentation is to address overall federal requirements for serving English language learners (ELLs). 2

Who are ELLs? Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA) Definitions 3

Federal Definitions Understanding the federal definitions as described in the ESEA for ELLs and Immigrant Children and Youth (IY) students is essential to: Identifying these students in order to ensure they are provided full and equal access to the same curriculum and educational opportunities as all students Determining the Title III, Part A, allocations to school divisions based on an accurate count of ELLs and IY students. 4

Federal Definition of Limited English Proficient (LEP) Students According to the federal definition as described in the ESEA, an LEP student is defined as: A student (A.) who is aged 3 through 21; (B.) who is enrolled or preparing to enroll in an elementary school or secondary school; (C.)(i.) who was not born in the United States or whose native language is a language other than English; and who comes from an environment where a language other than English is dominant; 5

OR (ii.)(I.) who is a Native American or Alaska Native, or a native resident of outlying areas; and (II.) who comes from an environment where a language other than English has had a significant impact on the individual’s level of English language proficiency; OR (iii.) who is migratory, whose native language is a language other than English, and who comes from an environment where a language other than English is dominant; 6

AND D.) whose difficulties speaking, reading, writing, or understanding the English language may be sufficient to deny the individual the ability to meet the state’s proficient level of achievement on state assessments described in Section 1111(b)(3); the ability to achieve successfully in classrooms where the language of instruction is English; or the opportunity to participate fully in society. [ESEA, Title IX, Part A, Sec. 9101, (25)] 7

Further Clarification on High School Exchange Students For students on J-1 (Exchange Visitor) visas and F1 (Exchange High School Student) visas, the standard identification, screening, and placement process must be followed as required by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to determine if the student is an ELL. If a school division has followed this process and determined that the exchange student is not an ELL, this determination should be documented in the student’s educational record. 8

Immigrant Children and Youth (IY) Immigrant children and youth (IY) students are classified as those students who: are aged 3 through 21; were not born in any state; and have not been attending one or more schools in any one or more states for more than three full academic years*. ESEA, Section 3301(6) *The “three full academic years” requirement must be applied on a Cumulative basis. It is also important to note that IY students may or may not be ELLs. 9

Further Clarification of Immigrant Children and Youth (IY) The term “state” means each of the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Therefore, students born in Puerto Rico are not considered immigrant. Students born in U.S. territories such as Guam, American Samoa, or the U.S. Virgin Islands, may be considered immigrant if they meet the federal definition of IY. ESEA, Section 3101(14) 10

The following students may be considered as IY if they meet all of the criteria in the federal definition of immigrant children and youth (IY): Children of U.S. military personnel Children of NATO families Children of visiting faculty Children who are temporarily residing in the U.S. because of parental employment Students on Exchange Visitor (J-1) visas or Exchange High School Student (F-1) visas Further Clarification of Immigrant Children and Youth (IY) 11

12

13

Identifying Questions Identifying questions should be included in the enrollment process to ensure that ELLs are consistently identified. The identifying questions below are recommended by the U.S. Department of Education: o What is the primary language used in the home, regardless of the language spoken by the student? o What language is most often spoken by the student? o What is the language the student first acquired? 14

Home Language Survey (HLS) School divisions may choose to use a home language survey (HLS) to determine the need for:  an English language proficiency screening; and  possible English as a Second Language (ESL) services. The division may also choose to use the HLS to collect additional information about the student to aid in determining effective instructional practices. 15

Equity in the Identification Process  All students enrolling in the school division should be identified with the same procedures and in the same manner to ensure that students are not over- or under- identified as ELLs.  Students should not be selectively identified based on ethnicity, nationality, name, appearance, or family background. 16

 School divisions must identify ELLs in need of language assistance services in a timely manner.  Parents and guardians must be informed in a timely manner of their child’s ELP level and program options.  School divisions are required to communicate information regarding a child’s ELP level and program options in a language that the parent understands. Equity in the Identification Process 17

For more information on the identification process for ELLs: learner-toolkit/chap1.pdf Equity in the Identification Process 18

19

If a student has been identified as a potential ELL during the enrollment process, an English language proficiency (ELP) screening tool must be administered to determine the student’s ELP level. Screening 20

Screening School divisions must screen potential ELLs to determine each student’s English language proficiency level. Divisions may use one of the following English language proficiency screening tools: 1. W-APT 2. WIDA model 3. Locally developed or selected tool(s) 21

Optional screening tools* Once a screening tool has been administered and the ELP level determined, additional assessments, such as reading or mathematics tests, may be administered to assist with placing the student appropriately in instructional programs. * *Optional screening tools may not be used to determine a student’s English language proficiency level. Screening 22

23

Placement Once the screening tool has been used to determine the student is an ELL and an ELP level has been provided, the student must be placed in an instructional program that will provide opportunities to: attain high levels of academic achievement; develop English proficiency, and have access to the same curriculum and student support services as all students. 24

An effective instructional program for ELLs must be an integral part of a division-wide academic achievement program. The Virginia Standards of Learning (SOL), in conjunction with the World-Class Instructional Design and Assessment (WIDA) English Language Development (ELD) standards, should guide the development of the academic curriculum and the classroom instructional practices of both ESL teachers and general education teachers of ELLs. Placement 25

Instructional programs and services for ELLs must :  provide ELLs meaningful access to the same curriculum and educational opportunities as all students  enable ELLs to meaningfully participate in content classrooms without additional supports within a reasonable timeframe  help ELLs attain English proficiency within a reasonable timeframe  be based on sound educational theory Placement 26

Instructional programs and services for ELLs must:  provide resources sufficient enough to meet the intent of the program.  be evaluated after a reasonable period of time past implementation and modified if the program fails to help ELLs overcome linguistic barriers. Placement 27

ELLs cannot be placed in special education programs and services solely based on their English language skills. ELLs cannot be denied special education programs and services based on their English language proficiency status. Placement 28

29

Exiting LEP Status Students achieve proficiency and exit the LEP status once they have met all three of the following criteria: o 5.0 or better on the overall composite score; o 5.0 or better on the literacy score; o Tier C. School divisions may not exit students from the LEP status based on time in program or ability of the student to meet the proficiency criteria. 30

Exiting Limited English Proficient (LEP) status means that ELLs are designated as Level 6, years 1 and 2.  Formerly LEP students no longer participate in ACCESS for ELLs testing.  The SOL reading and mathematics scores of formerly LEP students are included in the LEP subgroup for two years after the student is designated as Level 6. Exiting LEP Status 31

 Formerly LEP students are no longer eligible for testing options or accommodations available to ELLs.  School divisions do not receive Title III funding for formerly LEP students.  Students classified as formerly LEP (Level 6 Years 1 and 2) must be monitored for two full academic years to ensure that they can participate meaningfully in the regular educational program. Exiting LEP Status 32

Re-designation as LEP Federal law allows students to be re-designated as LEP. Prior to re-designating a formerly LEP student, the school division should:  Provide consistent interventions to the formerly LEP student for a reasonable period of time;  Ensure that the interventions are the same as those available to all students at risk for academic failure; and  Convene a committee of stakeholders during the process to determine the impact of the interventions on the student’s academic performance. 33

Strengthening and Improving Programs and Services for ELLs For more information on strengthening and improving programs and services for ELLs: learner-toolkit/chap2.pdf 34

Staffing and Supporting Programs and Services for ELLs  School divisions must provide the personnel necessary to effectively implement programs and services for ELLs.  Necessary personnel include teachers who are qualified to provide ELL services, core-content teachers who are highly qualified in their field and trained to support ELLs. 35

Staffing and Supporting Programs and Services for ELLs  School divisions must ensure that administrators who evaluate teachers working with ELLs are adequately trained to meaningfully evaluate whether these teachers are successfully meeting the objectives of the programs and services for ELLs.  LEAs must provide adequate professional development and follow-up training prepare ELL program teachers and administrators to implement the ELL programs and services effectively. 36

Parental Notification of Placement 37

Parental Notification Letter School divisions must inform parents annually regarding their child’s placement in a language instruction education program within 30 days after the beginning of the school year, or within two weeks of the child’s placement within a program. The notification must be in a language the parents understand. A checklist and sample letter have been posted to Title III Web page of the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) Web site. Look in the Title III Toolkit under the Compliance tab. 38

Parental Outreach School divisions must ensure that parents are fully informed about: The placement decision for their student Their right to “opt out” the student from language assistance services The impact this decision may have on the student’s academic achievement 39

Parental Outreach School divisions must ensure that: Parents are fully informed about alternative programs and services that are available to help their student achieve academically and acquire English. Parents are provided information in a language they can understand. 40

Virginia Department of Education Title III Contacts Veronica Tate Director Program Administration and Accountability (804) Judy Radford, ESL Professional Development Coordinator (804) Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist (804) Shyla Vesitis Title I/Title III Specialist (804) Christopher Kelly Education Specialist (804)