1 An Introduction to the Headquarters Operations Center and RASCAL Kevin Quinlan Physical Scientist, NRO U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 21.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to a nuclear plant incident in Wisconsin How a nuclear power plant incident could affect your county October 14, 2009.
Advertisements

Emergency response organization (ERO)
Dose Assessment RASCAL Interface National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference March 30, 2010 George Athey, Athey Consulting James (Van) Ramsdell,
Session 11: Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA 1 Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA Prepared by Dr. Erno Sajo, Associate.
1 NRC Meteorologists Role in Support of the Headquarters Operations Center During an International Event Kevin Quinlan Physical Scientist, NRO U.S. Nuclear.
Vermont Yankee Presentation to VSNAP 7/17/13 VY/Entergy Fukushima Response Update Bernard Buteau.
Meteorology Combined License NRC Review Process Meteorology Joseph Hoch Physical Scientist U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission June , 2008 Nuclear.
A Partnership Dedicated to Radiation Protection Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, Inc. (CRCPD) The structure, working groups, and activities.
Alexander Brandl ERHS 561 Emergency Response Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
HISTORY. History of Emergency Management Within the DOE System The early years In the 1970s, DOE’s focus was on security and energy contingency planning.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Description Supporting Material Accident Analysis
US NRC Protective Action Recommendation Study National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference April 10, 2008 Las Vegas, NV Randy Sullivan, CHP.
1 RASCAL 4.0 Radiological Assessment System for Consequence Analysis National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference March 30, 2010 Part 1 - George.
Overview October, 2006 Volpentest HAMMER Training and Education Center Operated by Fluor Hanford for the U.S. Department of Energy.
Revision of NUREG-0654 Supp. 3 RI Scheduling Conference December 11, 2008 Mystic, Ct Randy Sullivan, CHP.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” EMERGENCY PLANNING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo.
1 RASCAL 4.0 Radiological Assessment System for Consequence Analysis National Radiological Emergency Preparedness Conference March 30, 2010 George Athey,
Weather Support for Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
1 Regulatory Challenges During and Following a Major Safety or Security Event Muhammad Iqbal Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority Presentation at General.
EMERGENCY PLAN AND PROCEDURE IN INDUSTRY INVOLVING NORM/TENORM
EPR-Public Communications L-03 Types of Radiation Emergencies and Communicating Safety.
Nuclearsafety.gc.ca Development and Implementation of Regulatory Requirements for the Security of Radioactive Sources A Canadian perspective Karen Mayer,
EM - TRANSPORTATION. EM Office of Transportation - Organization & Responsibilities Basis of Organization & Responsibilities Basis of Organization & Responsibilities.
Federal Emergency Management Agency Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Region I, Boston September 10, 2012.
Japan Tsunami Marine Debris: Information and Action May 17 th, 2012 Marine Resource Committee Science Fair, Long Beach, WA Washington State Emergency Management.
R. Brad Harvey, CCM Physical Scientist Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 11th NUMUG Meeting, St. Louis, MO, October.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords Commission, regulation, advisory, standards. Description This presentation provides general information about each of the.
International Atomic Energy Agency THE “EMERGENCY CONVENTIONS” Interregional Training Course on Technical Requirements to Fulfil National Obligations in.
James A. FitzPatrick NPP Ingestion Pathway Exercise May and June 21-23, 2011 and LHD Radiological Plan Template Kevin Kraus Associate Radiological.
1 The U.S. NRC’s Reactor Certification and Licensing Process – Meeting the Challenge? Commissioner Peter B. Lyons U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 15.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency V. McClelland, NNSA, US DOE.
New DOE Software Quality Assurance Requirements: Implications for Meteorological Software Cliff Glantz Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: ESTONIA.
MODULE “PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL” SAFETY ASSESSMENT DURING DECOMMISSIONING SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP ,
Containing Toxicity with Policy Natural Disaster.
James S. Ellis National Atmospheric Release Advisory Center Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Department of Energy (DOE) OFCM Special Session Atmospheric.
MODULE “PREPARING AND MANAGEMENT OF DOCUMENTATION” SAFE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS Project BG/04/B/F/PP , Programme “Leonardo da Vinci”
PLUME MODELING WALTER CHROBAK HEADQUARTERS PROGRAM MANAGER NATIONAL ATMOSPHERIC RELEASE ADVISORY CENTER (NARAC) OFFICE OF EMERGENCY OPERATIONS NATIONAL.
Comparison of the AEOLUS3 Atmospheric Dispersion Computer Code with NRC Codes PAVAN and XOQDOQ 13th NUMUG Conference, October 2009, San Francisco, CA.
INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW Nuclear energy. OECD Convention on Third Party Liability in the Field of Nuclear Energy (Paris 1960) Convention on Civil.
1 DHS Emergency Management Presenter: Frank Billard Director, Office of Facilities & Support Services Date: October 21, 2015 Georgia Department of Human.
Nuclear Safety & Nuclear Security Synergy By Dr. Lucian BIRO Director General ROMANIA National Commission for Nuclear Activities Control International.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
RDD/IND Preparedness: The Importance of Plume Modeling Seventh Annual George Mason University Conference on Transport and Dispersion Modeling June 19,
1Office of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology OFCM OFCM Special Session: Uncertainty in Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion (ATD) Models Setting the.
PROTECTIVE ACTIONS AND REENTRY. Protective Actions Promptly and effectively implemented or recommended for implementation to minimize the consequences.
Tom Lenart & John Field CT DEMHS Region 2.  Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection (DESPP)  Commission on Fire Prevention and Control.
Business Continuity Disaster Planning
Harris County Case Study.  Aligning plans with emergency support functions (ESFs) can facilitate an efficient and effective response to emergencies.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
November 19, 2002 – Congress passed the Homeland Security Act of 2002, creating a new cabinet-level agency DHS activated in early 2003 Original Mission.
Summary of the Report, “Federal Research and Development Needs and Priorities for Atmospheric Transport and Diffusion Modeling” 22 September 2004 Walter.
Emergency Preparedness. Proposed Emergency Preparedness Rules NFR/LMC §19.326(a) deleted and moved to § for Emergency Preparedness Rules Places.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
NRC’s 10 CFR Part 37 Program Review of Radioactive Source Security
Occupational Radiation Protection during High Exposure Operations
The Path Forward for WIPP: A State and Local Perspective
Transition To Keyhole, A Better Approach To Emergency Response Rich Janati, M.S., Chief Division of Nuclear Safety PA Dept. of Environmental Protection.
Joseph D. Anderson, Chief
Mitigation of Beyond Design Basis Events (MBDBE) Rule Implementation
Modeling Iodine Released During a Nuclear Power Plant Accident
NRC Cyber Security Regulatory Overview
Radioactive Material Security: Current Activities
Training Courses for RPOs
Robert Kahler Branch Chief
Moving Forward From Fukushima Near-Term Task Force EP Recommendations
NRC Update Nader Mamish, Director Emergency Preparedness Directorate
Rosalyn Leitch Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
The “Green Run”.
Presentation transcript:

1 An Introduction to the Headquarters Operations Center and RASCAL Kevin Quinlan Physical Scientist, NRO U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 21 – 23, Nuclear Utilities Meteorological Data Users Group (NUMUG)

2 Nuclear Security and Incident Response (NSIR) Mission & Vision NSIR Mission To prevent nuclear security incidents and prepare for and respond to safety and security events NSIR Vision To be a valued partner in homeland security and national emergency preparedness and response

3 Response Framework National Response Framework Nuclear/Radiological Incident Annex NRC Incident Response Plan 24/7 Emergency Operations Center Exercises, training, and stakeholder outreach

4 Emergency Responsibilities Licensee: –Mitigate the accident and its consequences –Properly classify and notify off-site officials of the event –Prepare and communicate Protective Action Recommendations (PARs) to State and local officials

5 Emergency Responsibilities State / Local Officials: –Activate resources –Evaluate the licensee’s Protective Action Recommendation(s) –Implement appropriate protective actions

6 Emergency Responsibilities Members of Public: –Heed warnings / orders to take timely and appropriate action to minimize radiation exposure and adverse health effects

7 NRC’s Responsibilities Assess plant conditions Evaluate Protective Action Recommendations Support off-site officials Keep other agencies informed Keep news media informed

8 Coordination With Other Agencies Department of Homeland Security Department of Defense Federal Aviation Administration Department of Energy Environmental Protection Agency Department of Justice Federal Emergency Management Agency States / Locals

9 Classification of Emergencies Notification of Unusual Event –An event that indicates potential degradation in the level of safety of the plant Alert –Loss of a vital system or barrier Site Area Emergency –Loss of a vital safety function General Emergency –Severe core damage accident

10 NRC Response Modes Based upon NRC’s independent assessment: Normal Mode Monitoring Mode Activation Mode Expanded Activation Mode

11 Operations Center Staffing HQ Operations Officers and Emergency Response Officers staff the HQ Operations Center 24/7 to receive and assess all incoming information, coordinate event-related communications, and facilitate a fast startup of the NRC incident response organization if conditions warrant.

12 Introduction to RASCAL Radiological Assessment System for Consequence AnaLysis (RASCAL) Evaluates releases from: –Nuclear Power Plants –Spent Fuel Storage Pools and Casks –Fuel Cycle Facilities –Radioactive Material Handling Facilities

13 RASCAL Developers Van Ramsdell Battelle – Pacific NW National Laboratory Steve McGuire U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission George Athey Athey Consulting

14 Model a variety of processes from source term to dose WIND Dry deposition Wet deposition Plume– mix of radionuclide gases and particles Source term released to atmosphere

15 Model doses at locations away from the release point Groundshine (external) Cloudshine (external) Inhalation (internal)

16 Meteorological Data Needed for RASCAL Needed to model the behavior of the radioactive plume in the atmosphere Minimum required data: –Wind speed & direction: downwind transport –Stability: plume horizontal and vertical growth –Precipitation: wet deposition

17 Sources of Meteorological Data Emergency Response Data System (ERDS) at nuclear power plants National Weather Service Local ASOS Stations Predefined Meteorological Data

18 Predefined Meteorological Data 18 data sets covering a range of common weather conditions (e.g., Summer - Afternoon - Windy) Pros –Can be used with any location and any date and time of release –Quick and easy to use, especially when no actual obs available –No need to run Meteorological Data Processor program Cons –Wind fields are uniform in space –Do not consider topography –Fixed wind direction of 270 degrees –Do not include any diurnal variations.

19 Limits of ERDS Meteorological Data No forecast information May not be connected when needed Single location data may not be sufficient to describe winds in complex terrain

20 Two Transport and Diffusion Models Straight-line Plume Model -- Polar Grid –Used close in –Nodes close together near release point –Plume centerline always passes over nodes Puff Model -- Cartesian Grid –Used further out –Plume (Puff) centerline may not pass directly over nodes

21 Polar Grid for Plume Model Used for close-in calculations 8 concentric circles 10 degree separation Release at center Model is steady state Distances from center may be set by the user

22 Puff Movement 41 x 41 receptor points Lagrangian puff model Time must be allowed for material transport time Puff center moves with winds Puff grows larger as it travels Used for points farther from source

23 Long-range dispersion modeling RASCAL results are reasonably good to at least 10 miles RASCAL calculates to 50 miles, but with diminished accuracy NARAC and NOAA models provide longer range atmospheric dispersion calculations

24 Meteorological Data Field Display

25 Total Equivalent Dose Estimation

26 Maximum Dose Values

27 Who will be running models and how should they interpret the results? NRC, States, Utility, DHS, NARAC It’s only a computer model Each model is different – that can be a good thing; Don’t get hung up on the differences Be aware of the underlying assumptions, limitations, and usefulness of the models

28 Questions