ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, 2004 1 Generating time domain strain data (h(t)) for the ALLEGRO resonant detector or calibration of ALLEGRO data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) HOMODYNE AND HETERODYNE READOUT OF A SIGNAL- RECYCLED GRAVITATIONAL WAVE DETECTOR.
Advertisements

Stability Margins Professor Walter W. Olson
1 Detector characterization for burst searches by resonant detectors F. Salemi Italy, INFN and University of Ferrara for the IGEC2 Collaboration The 10th.
RECOVERING HARDWARE INJECTIONS IN LIGO S5 DATA Ashley Disbrow Carnegie Mellon University Roy Williams, Michele Vallisneri, Jonah Kanner LIGO SURF 2013.
LIGO-G v2 Recovering Burst Injections in LIGO S5 Data Alex Cole Data Analysis Meeting May 6, 2014.
GWDAW9 – Annecy December 15-18, 2004 A. Di Credico Syracuse University LIGO-G Z 1 Gravitational wave burst vetoes in the LIGO S2 and S3 data analyses.
Bounding the strength of gravitational radiation from Sco-X1 C Messenger on behalf of the LSC pulsar group GWDAW 2004 Annecy, 15 th – 18 th December 2004.
Calibration of the gravitational wave signal in the LIGO detectors Gabriela Gonzalez (LSU), Mike Landry (LIGO-LHO), Patrick Sutton (PSU) with the calibration.
LIGO- G Z Optimally Combining the Hanford Interferometer Strain Channels Albert Lazzarini LIGO Laboratory Caltech S. Bose, P. Fritschel, M. McHugh,
Pulsar Detection and Parameter Estimation with MCMC - Six Parameters Nelson Christensen Physics and Astronomy Carleton College GWDAW December 2003.
GWDAW-10 (December 14, 2005, University of Texas at Brownsville, U.S.A.) Data conditioning and veto for TAMA burst analysis Masaki Ando and Koji Ishidoshiro.
Investigation of HPM Effects in Voltage Controlled Oscillators Dr. John Rodgers and Cristina Allen University of Maryland Mid Progress Report July, 2010.
LIGO-G D LIGO calibration during the S3 science run Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins (LHO),
EE-2027 SaS, L15 1/15 Lecture 15: Continuous-Time Transfer Functions 6 Transfer Function of Continuous-Time Systems (3 lectures): Transfer function, frequency.
Investigation of Variations in the Absolute Calibration of the Laser Power Sensors for the LIGO Photon Calibrators Stephanie Erickson (Smith College) Mentor:
Use ofSiesta in VIRGO commissioning Lisa Barsotti University of Pisa – INFN Pisa For the Virgo collaboration Caltech, December 19th 2003.
Calibration of TAMA300 in Time Domain Souichi TELADA, Daisuke TATSUMI, Tomomi AKUTSU, Masaki ANDO, Nobuyuki KANDA and the TAMA collaboration.
CHAPTER 13 TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS. Frequency Modulation (FM) Receiver.
Phase noise measurements in TRIUMF ISAC 2 cryomodule K. Fong, M. Laverty TRIUMF.
ALLEGRO G Z LSC, Livingston 23 March, Calibration for the ALLEGRO resonant detector -- S2 and S4 Martin McHugh, Loyola University New Orleans.
Brennan Ireland Rochester Institute of Technology Astrophysical Sciences and Technology December 5, 2013 LIGO: Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave.
Detector Characterization in GEO 600 by Alicia M. Sintes-Olives on behalf of the GEO-DC team Universitat de les Illes Balears
Systematic effects in gravitational-wave data analysis
Servos Servos are everywhere. Elements of servo System -- to be controlled Sensor or detector -- measure quantity to be controlled Reference -- desired.
Receivers.
Sebastian Böser Acoustic sensor and transmitter development Amanda/IceCube Collaboration Meeting Berkeley March 2005.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
Annecy/Dec'04 1 ALLEGRO:status Dec 2004 Warren Johnson, Bill Hamilton, Peter Zhang, Andrew Weber, Damon Nettles, Jon Hanson, Mark Burgamy, Jordan Weaver.
TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS
Controlling the dynamics time scale of a diode laser using filtered optical feedback. A.P.A. FISCHER, Laboratoire de Physique des Lasers, Universite Paris.
Acknowledgements The work presented in this poster was carried out within the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC). The methods and results presented here.
Searching for gravitational radiation from Scorpius X-1: Limits from the second LIGO science run Alberto Vecchio on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
A coherent null stream consistency test for gravitational wave bursts Antony Searle (ANU) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini, Leo.
Matt Evans, LSC March 2003 (G E)1 Lock Acquisition in LIGO  Who am I? »Matt Evans »Caltech graduate  What is Lock Acquisition? »The process.
Chapter 4. Angle Modulation. 4.7 Generation of FM Waves Direct Method –A sinusoidal oscillator, with one of the reactive elements in the tank circuit.
Martin Hewitson Overview of DC work. GEO DC workshop June DC work Noise characterisation Noise projections, noise sources, noise couplings Calibration.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
Preparing GEO600 for Gravitational Wave astronomy (A status report) Martin Hewitson, AEI Hannover for GEO600.
Leo Lam © Signals and Systems EE235 Lecture 25.
Calibration in the Front End Controls Craig Cahillane LIGO Caltech SURF 2013 Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jamie Rollins Presentation to Calibration Group 8/21/2013.
Thermoelastic dissipation in inhomogeneous media: loss measurements and thermal noise in coated test masses Sheila Rowan, Marty Fejer and LSC Coating collaboration.
MODELING THE CALIBRATED RESPONSE OF THE ADVANCED LIGO DETECTORS Luke Burks 2013 LIGO Caltech SURF Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jameson Rollins Final Presentation.
29 November 2001 LIGO-G Z PAC 11, LIGO Hanford Observatory 1 Proposal to NSF from Loyola University New Orleans RUI: Search for a stochastic background.
SQL Related Experiments at the ANU Conor Mow-Lowry, G de Vine, K MacKenzie, B Sheard, Dr D Shaddock, Dr B Buchler, Dr M Gray, Dr PK Lam, Prof. David McClelland.
LIGO-G Z Confidence Test for Waveform Consistency of LIGO Burst Candidate Events Laura Cadonati LIGO Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
LIGO-G D Commissioning at Hanford Stan Whitcomb Program Advisory Committee 12 December 2000 LIGO Livingston Observatory.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
1 Frequency Noise in Virgo by Matt Evans. 2 The Actors  Noise Sources  Input Mode Cleaner length noise  Sensing noise on IMC lock  Frequency Servo.
SymbolMeaning Frequency of the Input Signal Frequency of the Lock-in Reference Frequency of the Additional Sinusoidal Input Signal (or Coherent Noise)
Soma Mukherjee LSC, Hanford, Aug.19 '04 Generation of realistic data segments: production and application. Soma Mukherjee Centre for Gravitational Wave.
Igor Yakushin, December 2004, GWDAW-9 LIGO-G Z Status of the untriggered burst search in S3 LIGO data Igor Yakushin (LIGO Livingston Observatory)
LIGO-G Z 20 August, 2002 LSC meeting, LIGO Hanford Observatory 1 ALLEGRO data during E7 Presenter: Martin McHugh Orientation GPS UTC IGEC alignment.
S.Klimenko, LSC meeting, March 2002 LineMonitor Sergey Klimenko University of Florida Other contributors: E.Daw (LSU), A.Sazonov(UF), J.Zweizig (Caltech)
A look at interferometer topologies that use reflection gratings
Test of the dressed spoke cavity
Amplitude and time calibration of the gw detector AURIGA
Analysis of LIGO S2 data for GWs from isolated pulsars
Duy dang, Robert kern, esteban kleckner
Overview of E10 / S3 Hardware Injections
Calibration of TAMA300 in Time Domain
Stochastic background search using LIGO Livingston and ALLEGRO
topics Basic Transmission Line Equations
TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS
Update on LLO-ALLEGRO stochastic analysis
M Ashley - LSC Meeting – LIGO Hanford, 12 Nov 2003
ALLEGRO calibration for the LLO-ALLEGRO stochastic analysis
A Waveform Consistency Test for Binary Inspirals using LIGO data
Gravitational radiation from known radio pulsars using LIGO data
Preparing GEO600 for Gravitational Wave astronomy (A status report)
Presentation transcript:

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Generating time domain strain data (h(t)) for the ALLEGRO resonant detector or calibration of ALLEGRO data Martin McHugh Loyola University New Orleans on behalf of the ALLEGRO group

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Outline Motivation Signal flow diagram, transfer function equations Discussion of calibration measurements Noise curves, stability future

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Motivation LSC stochastic background analysis using S2 data from ALLEGRO and LIGO Livingston (see John Whelan’s talk later today) Unlike an event list based search, a coherent search such as this requires a phase consistent response function for the detector signal path

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, ALLEGRO schematic

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Signal path

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Form of each Transfer Function

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Need to determine -- Mode frequencies and Q’s -- f m, f p, Q m, Q p overall scale -- in practice we measure   is mechanical gain -- includes ‘tuning factor’ Lock-in amplifier parameters -- gain, filter delay and phase shift  Also need to know the phase of the lock-in reference oscillator So in practice the calibration amounts to -- Inverse fft then gives complex heterodyned strain time series

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, transducer current changed temperature fluctuations S2 data

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, New calibrator One plate of capacitor is tightly coupled to bar. Other plate is weakly coupled to the bar, so acts like a free mass. Both plates electrically isolated.

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, The calibrator mounted on the bar

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Transfer function - white noise excitation to measured output measurements from 20 March excitation measured through lock-in and A/D plotted here we have gives us the overall scale - 

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December,

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Band-limited white noise injection -- recorded directly and through lock- in/anti-aliasing filters Lock-in measurements

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Compare fourier coefficients Lock-in/filter introduces an 11ms delay and 18 degree phase shift

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December,

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Calibration line Detector resonances Extra mechanical resonances

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Calibrated strain spectrum from S2

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Stability of calibration

ALLEGRO GWDAW-9, Annecy 16 December, Summary, future We have calibrated h(t) for S2 data set at level Currently stored in Matlab files, plan to put these data into frames detector much more stable now, should continue through S4  will determine overall sign  hardware injections are planned