Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. 2013 Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation March 1 Webinar Neil Naftzger and Samantha.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2010 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Washington 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation February 2011.
Advertisements

Copyright © 2010 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Washington 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation – April Update.
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Oregon 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation Neil Naftzger.
| imodules.com Strategic Consulting Presented by Lesley Thompson, University of Denver Mirko Widenhorn, iModules.
Afterschool Youth Outcomes Copyright © 20XX American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Leadership Institute Neil Naftzger.
Copyright © 2007 Learning Point Associates. All rights reserved. TM Introduction to PPICS for Washington 21st CCLC Grantees Michael Hutson Research Associate.
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Oregon 21st CCLC Leading Indicators Breakout Session Neil Naftzger and Deborah Moroney.
Neil Naftzger Principal Researcher Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation February 2015 Copyright © 20XX American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved.
Measuring and reporting outcomes for your BTOP grant 1Measuring and Reporting Outcomes.
How are we doing with assessment? Update from the Information Services Assessment Council March 8, 2006.
Copyright © 2012 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Administration of the Youth Skills and Beliefs Survey American Institutes for Research.
Copyright © 2013 by ScottMadden. All rights reserved. University of Florida Business Process Census Information Session April 2013.
Welcome to the Learning Community 2015 Roll out webinar Hosted by the Family Institute for Education, Practice & Research The webinar will begin shortly.
LONGER SCHOOL DAY PARAMETERS & PLANNING TEMPLATE Longer School Day Design Parameters and Planning Template Tuesday, December 13, :30 – 10:30 AM.
Principals’ Council Meetings May  Given feedback from multiple stakeholders and after much deliberation, PDE has made the determination to classify.
Cohort 8 Grant Closeout Procedures HEIDI SCHULTZ DEBRA APPLETON.
1 California Career Pathways Trust Reporting March 15, 2015 CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY COLLEGES CHANCELLOR’S OFFICE.
Copyright © 2007 Learning Point Associates. All rights reserved. TM Overview of the Oregon Attendees Module Neil Naftzger Principal Researcher To hear.
NCMGA membership survey  Objectives –Assess if and how NCMGA will continue?  Methods –Develop a survey  Sonja, Leslie, Pam and Cynthia –Create survey.
DWINSA 2007 Website. Website Purpose Allow states to track status of questionnaires Allow systems >100K or states to upload project data.
Market Meeting Support Susan Munson ERCOT Retail Market Liaison Commercial Operations Subcommittee (COPS) June 10, 2008.
Surveying patrons with the Impact Survey A fast, easy way to gather feedback from the community about public technology needs Samantha Becker, MLIS, MPA.
Honors Level Course Implementation Webinar Honors Rubric and Portfolio Review Process October 7, 2013.
Roster Verification RV Presentation to School Administrators Spring 2012.
Profile and Performance Information Collection System (PPICS)
The Career and Technical Education (CTE) Completer Follow-up 2015 Follow-Up of the 2014 CTE Graduates.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Participation of the State Advisory Panel and State Interagency.
AY 2009 Unit Review Data Delivery Plan Data Description Process – Timeline Rev
Legal Services Advisory Committee (LSAC) Grant Applicant Workshop February 11, 2013.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
Engaging Student Affairs Professionals in Division-Wide Assessment Lisa Garcia-Hanson,University of Washington Tacoma Charlotte Tullos, Central Washington.
Introduction to The Grant Center Grant Center, Fitchburg State College.
2006 ANNUAL MEETING Arlington, Virginia INDUSTRY / UNIVERSITY COOPERATIVE RESEARCH CENTERS PROGRAM Evaluators' Breakout II: EVALUATING THE EVALUATOR 10:00.
Introduction to The Grant Center Fitchburg State University.
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Oregon 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation Neil Naftzger.
MISSOURI PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENTS An Overview. Content of the Assessments 2  Pre-Service Teacher Assessments  Entry Level  Exit Level  School Leader.
0 eCPIC Admin Training: OMB Submission Packages and Annual Submissions These training materials are owned by the Federal Government. They can be used or.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
2014 Performance Review Process Overview
Technology Planning Presentation to Technology Coordinators February 21, 2007.
TTI Performance Evaluation Training. Agenda F Brief Introduction of Performance Management Model F TTI Annual Performance Review Online Module.
2009 Post-school Survey Webinar #7 June 2, 2010 Presented by: Center for Change in Transition Services Cinda Johnson, Wendy Iwaszuk, Denny Hasko
Understanding Your LI Reports October 16, 2015 October 2015 Copyright © 2015 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Samantha Sniegowski.
Educator Effectiveness Updates April Updates Closing up Looking forward to
Programs of the Intel® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation. Copyright © 2007 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.
Washington 21 st CCLC Evaluation February 2016 Copyright © 2016 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved Data Collection Activities.
Accreditation (AdvancED) Process School Improvement Activities February 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna Boruch, Coordinator of.
2015/16 Staff Performance Appraisals Webinar for ANR Supervisors Spring 2016.
21 st CCLC APR System Webinar Tanya Morin Gary Sumnicht Alison Wineberg April 25 and 26, 2016.
ACF Office of Community Services (OCS) Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Survey of Grantees Satisfaction with OCS Survey of Eligible Entities Satisfaction.
SCHOOL-WIDE POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORT: ADDRESSING THE BEHAVIOR OF ALL STUDENTS Benchmarks of Quality KENTUCKY CENTER FOR INSTRUCTIONAL.
Component D: Activity D.3: Surveys Department EU Twinning Project.
Blackboard Learn 9.1 Communicating with Students © 2010 Blackboard Inc. All rights reserved.
The Career and Technical Education (CTE) Completer Follow-up 2016 Follow-Up of the 2015 CTE Graduates March 3, 2016.
PVAAS Update PAIU Curriculum Coordinators Meeting January 19, 2017
CCIUCC/SEAC/Charters
Program Attendance Module
Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC)
UPDATE Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation:  A Data-Informed Approach to State Program Review Presentation to the Alabama State Board of Education.
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Understanding Your LI Reports October 19, 2016
Continuous Quality Improvement Process
Washington 21st CCLC Data Collection Webinar Samantha Sniegowski
Data Collection in MTM Choosing the right method for survey data collection.
How to Create and Start a Test Session
Washington 21st CCLC Annual Performance Report Technical Support Webinar Samantha Sniegowski November 2015 Copyright © 2015 American Institutes for Research.
BellSouth Quality in the Classroom Regional Assessment Tool Overview
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
The Career and Technical Education (CTE) Completer Follow-up
Presentation transcript:

Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation March 1 Webinar Neil Naftzger and Samantha Sugar March 1, 2013

2 Topics Review site coordinator and staff survey data collection efforts and address any questions project directors have about the process Review suggestions for modifying the leading indicator reports Highlight the new local evaluation guidelines

3 Survey Timeline Site coordinator and staff survey data collection interface is now open s to project directors containing survey links were sent on Friday, February 22 Complete surveys from site coordinator and afterschool program staff are due April 5th

4 Survey Administration Process  Once logged into the Project Director Survey Management page:  Ensure the centers listed for a given grant are correct and send any corrections needed to  Under the name of each center, a survey Web link unique to each center is provided  This link needs to be forwarded to the site coordinator for that center  When the link is clicked on, the respondent will be asked to create a survey account and then be prompted to take the survey in question  Site coordinators and staff will utilize the same link to create a survey account and take the survey for their role in the program  You can return to the Project Director Survey Management page to view the completion status of surveys and send reminders  ideally, a minimum of 12 staff per site should be identified per center

5 Questions About Leading Indicators  Site coordinator survey will contain questions about the leading indicator reports and the advanced planning with data sessions held last fall  Interested in learning what impact these efforts have had, if any, on internal program improvement efforts  How have you or your staff used the leading indicator reports and/or the tools provided in the advanced training with data session to inform quality-related discussions in your program?

6 Leading Indicators The collection of site coordinator and staff survey data represents the start of the leading indicator reporting process for Goal is to make leading indicator reports available in PPICS by August 15, 2013 Now is the time to make any changes to the leading indicator reports to make them more useful for programs

7 Suggestions Provide more clarity on the presentation and interpretation of youth outcome data Allow for the presentation of leading indicator data at the grantee level Include a more dashboard-like summary at the top of the report Allow access to data obtained from state data warehouses to further support local evaluation efforts

8 Questions What additional changes would you recommend be made to the leading indicator reports? What changes should be made to the rollout of the reports and processes to support report utilization?

9 PPICS Data Collection Schedule

10 PPICS Webinars  Two Webinars will be held in April and May 2013 to provide a review of PPICS reporting requirements  Friday, April 19th at 10:00 am Pacific - General Overview of APR Reporting Requirements  Friday, May 3rd at 10:00 am Pacific - Focus on the WA Attendee Module

11 Local Evaluation Guidelines Revisions - Purpose More structure with more freedom Reduce redundancies Improve the quality of reports

12 Local Evaluation Guidelines Revisions - Method Use multiple data sources to justify revisions Local Evaluator Interviews Project Director Interviews Survey data AIR review of local evaluation reports Review of draft revisions by LIAG

13 Local Evaluation Guidelines Revisions – Findings Program goals & objectives Remove requirement on more cumbersome data elements Guidance on how to present data Guidance on how to include other sources of data Inclusion of a logic model/theory of change Guidance on support provided by local evaluator Need for annual meeting for local evaluators Need for exemplars of quality reports

14 Local Evaluation Guidelines Revisions – Changes Made Evaluation Process Guidance on timelines, goals and objectives, evaluation plans. Guidance on submitting and reviewing reports Report Content Required elements Recommended elements Report Format Guidance on expectations

15 Local Evaluation Guidelines Revisions Available by Friday, March 8 th !

16 For Additional Help