CERN F. Alessio & R. Jacobsson CERN LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting, April 15, 2010 11 LHCb Upgrade Front End  Back End Readout Architecture Proposal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PXL RDO System Requirements And meeting goals 11/12/2009BNL_CD-1_SENSOR_RDO - LG1.
Advertisements

24 September 2002Paul Dauncey1 Trigger issues for the CALICE beam test Paul Dauncey Imperial College London, UK.
LHCb Upgrade Overview ALICE, ATLAS, CMS & LHCb joint workshop on DAQ Château de Bossey 13 March 2013 Beat Jost / Cern.
PCIe based readout U. Marconi, INFN Bologna CERN, May 2013.
Study on buffer usage and data packing at the FE Federico Alessio, with inputs from Richard, Ken, Guillaume LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting 11 April 2013.
Laboratoire de l’Accélérateur Linéaire (IN2P3-CNRS) Orsay, France Calorimeter upgrade meeting Olivier Duarte Upgrade calo FE review Comments : Digital.
LHCb DAQ Review, September LHCb Timing and Fast Control System TFC Team: Arek Chlopik, Warsaw Zbigniew Guzik, Warsaw Richard Jacobsson, CERN Beat.
Architecture and Dataflow Overview LHCb Data-Flow Review September 2001 Beat Jost Cern / EP.
Start-up & synchronization sequence for Front-End LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting 13 February 2014 F. Alessio, CERN.
U N C L A S S I F I E D FVTX Detector Readout Concept S. Butsyk For LANL P-25 group.
Status of Readout Board Firmware Guillaume Vouters On behalf of the MiniDAQ developers 11 December 2014 LHCb Upgrade Electronics.
Status of the Beam Phase and Intensity Monitor for LHCb Richard Jacobsson Zbigniew Guzik Federico Alessio TFC Team: Motivation Aims Overview of the board.
CERN Real Time conference, Montreal May 18 – 23, 2003 Richard Jacobsson 1 Driving the LHCb Front-End Readout TFC Team: Arek Chlopik, IPJ, Poland Zbigniew.
Status report for TFC and ECS* LHCb Upgrade Electronics meeting F. Alessio, CERN with acknowledgements to Cairo (Caplan), Mauricio (Rivello),
David Bailey University of Manchester. Overview Aim to develop a generic system –Maximise use of off-the-shelf commercial components Reduce as far as.
Readout Control specifications for FE and BE in the upgraded LHCb readout system Federico Alessio Richard Jacobsson LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting 26.
Hall D Online Meeting 28 March 2008 Fast Electronics R. Chris Cuevas Group Leader Jefferson Lab Experimental Nuclear Physics Division System Engineering.
Network Architecture for the LHCb DAQ Upgrade Guoming Liu CERN, Switzerland Upgrade DAQ Miniworkshop May 27, 2013.
Muon Electronics Upgrade Present architecture Remarks Present scenario Alternative scenario 1 The Muon Group.
Management of the LHCb DAQ Network Guoming Liu * †, Niko Neufeld * * CERN, Switzerland † University of Ferrara, Italy.
1 VeLo L1 Read Out Guido Haefeli VeLo Comprehensive Review 27/28 January 2003.
Distributed Information Systems. Motivation ● To understand the problems that Web services try to solve it is helpful to understand how distributed information.
Federico Alessio Zbigniew Guzik Richard Jacobsson TFC Team: A Super-TFC for a Super-LHCb - Top-down approach -
Federico Alessio, CERN Richard Jacobsson, CERN A new Readout Control System for the LHCb Upgrade at CERN 18th IEEE-NPSS Real Time Conference, June.
Overview of DAQ at CERN experiments E.Radicioni, INFN MICE Daq and Controls Workshop.
Latest ideas in DAQ development for LHC B. Gorini - CERN 1.
Federico Alessio, CERN Zbigniew Guzik, IPJ, Swierk, Poland Richard Jacobsson, CERN A 40 MHz Trigger-free Readout Architecture for the LHCb experiment 16th.
LHCb front-end electronics and its interface to the DAQ.
Update on the Triple GEM Detectors for Muon Tomography K. Gnanvo, M. Hohlmann, L. Grasso, A. Quintero Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne, FL.
Guido Haefeli CHIPP Workshop on Detector R&D Geneva, June 2008 R&D at LPHE/EPFL: SiPM and DAQ electronics.
01/04/09A. Salamon – TDAQ WG - CERN1 LKr calorimeter L0 trigger V. Bonaiuto, L. Cesaroni, A. Fucci, A. Salamon, G. Salina, F. Sargeni.
Management of the LHCb Online Network Based on SCADA System Guoming Liu * †, Niko Neufeld † * University of Ferrara, Italy † CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
NSYNC and Data Format S. Cadeddu – INFN Cagliari P. Ciambrone – INFN LNF.
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
Links from experiments to DAQ systems Jorgen Christiansen PH-ESE 1.
Clara Gaspar, December 2012 Experiment Control System & Electronics Upgrade.
A Super-TFC for a Super-LHCb (II) 1. S-TFC on xTCA – Mapping TFC on Marseille hardware 2. ECS+TFC relay in FE Interface 3. Protocol and commands for FE/BE.
Timing and Readout Control of the Upgraded LHCb Readout System Updated system-level specifications Federico Alessio Richard Jacobsson LHCb Electronics.
TFC update and TFC simulation testbench Federico Alessio Richard Jacobsson LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting 14 February 2012.
PhD Student, Federico Alessio Directeur de thèse, Renaud Le Gac Superviseur de thèse, Richard Jacobsson, CERN Beam and Background Monitoring and the Upgrade.
STAR Pixel Detector readout prototyping status. LBNL-IPHC-06/ LG22 Talk Outline Quick review of requirements and system design Status at last meeting.
Common test for L0 calorimeter electronics (2 nd campaign) 4 April 2007 Speaker : Eric Conte (LPC)
Clara Gaspar on behalf of the ECS team: CERN, Marseille, etc. October 2015 Experiment Control System & Electronics Upgrade.
Management of the LHCb DAQ Network Guoming Liu *†, Niko Neufeld * * CERN, Switzerland † University of Ferrara, Italy.
Readout Control specifications for FE and BE in the upgraded LHCb readout system Federico Alessio Richard Jacobsson LHCb FE specificiations Upgrade Meeting.
AMC40 firmware Data format discussions 17/10/2013Guillaume Vouters1.
Introduction to DAQ Architecture Niko Neufeld CERN / IPHE Lausanne.
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory September 1999Fifth Workshop on Electronics for LHC Presented by S. Quinton.
ROM. ROM functionalities. ROM boards has to provide data format conversion. – Event fragments, from the FE electronics, enter the ROM as serial data stream;
Juin 1st 2010 Christophe Beigbeder PID meeting1 PID meeting Electronics Integration.
August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.
The Evaluation Tool for the LHCb Event Builder Network Upgrade Guoming Liu, Niko Neufeld CERN, Switzerland 18 th Real-Time Conference June 13, 2012.
29/05/09A. Salamon – TDAQ WG - CERN1 LKr calorimeter L0 trigger V. Bonaiuto, L. Cesaroni, A. Fucci, A. Salamon, G. Salina, F. Sargeni.
Timing and Fast Control of the Upgraded LHCb Readout System Federico Alessio Richard Jacobsson LHCb Upgrade Electronics Review 5 December 2012.
Giovanna Lehmann Miotto CERN EP/DT-DI On behalf of the DAQ team
of the Upgraded LHCb Readout System
DAQ Requirements M. Villa 21/02/2011.
PANDA collaboration meeting FEE session
Electronics Trigger and DAQ CERN meeting summary.
Enrico Gamberini, Giovanna Lehmann Miotto, Roland Sipos
Status of the Beam Phase and Intensity Monitor for LHCb
Read-out of High Speed S-LINK Data Via a Buffered PCI Card
John Harvey CERN EP/LBC July 24, 2001
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
LHCb Electronics Brainstorm
Throttling: Infrastructure, Dead Time, Monitoring
Control requirements from sub-detectors Results of the ECS to front-end interface questionnaire André Augustinus 18 May 2000.
PID meeting Mechanical implementation Electronics architecture
- TFC status - Switch / RS
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Presentation transcript:

CERN F. Alessio & R. Jacobsson CERN LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting, April 15, LHCb Upgrade Front End  Back End Readout Architecture Proposal - An Orchestra Director view - Federico Alessio & Richard Jacobsson

CERN F. Alessio & R. Jacobsson CERN LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting, April 15, 2010 Aim and not aim of this presentation A somewhat different presentation approach than usually  Concentrate on outlining global concepts on few slides and words and not drown them in details – Top-down approach Hold back description of implementation Hold back on choice of technology –Often detrimental to the constructive discussion of the true requirements Why?  Because we are turning around in circles on trigger and readout strategy  Because I believe there are concepts which have to have common census on today  Start development against common specifications  Of course stay flexible allowing choices of new technologies but goes hand in hand with the requirement of versatility The details of what we present here are available and in development:  December 2008: (LHCbWeek)  May 2009: doc/presentations/conferencetalks/postscript/2009presentations/Alessio-IEEE-NPSS.ppt (RT2009) doc/presentations/conferencetalks/postscript/2009presentations/Alessio-IEEE-NPSS.ppt  September 2009: (TWEPP09)  September-December 2009: (Simulation framework) 2

CERN F. Alessio & R. Jacobsson CERN LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting, April 15, 2010 LHCb Detector FAN I/O ODIN Readout Slice - Global Concepts 3 ODIN CRATE RAD WALL ECS Event Building and Filtering VFE FE Backend VFE FE Backend VFE FE Backend TFC/ECS FAN I/O VFE FE Backend ROB TFC ECS ROB TFC ECS ROB TFC ECS ROB TFC ECS Single internally partionable ODIN Commercial bidirectional FPGA links to ROB crates – latency/phase control solved Intelligent fan-out/in board in each ROB crate Used as local lab ODIN and ECS interface to early FE test benches Not far from available thanks to Marseille hardware and CERN firmware development TFC plug’n’play firmware block – relay of TFC to FE and ECS to/from FE ROB is ECS interface for FE – common approach allow making it available now One optical link to batch of FE corresponding to ROB per ROB Common TFC/ECS fan-out/in board at FE Distribution medium may have individual solutions ECS interface based on DIM on NIOS with PCI-X and any other medium if needed Distributed and hierarchical ECS Not because of bandwidth of performance requirements on onboard ECS interface but Because of the scalability of the control nodes and the global experimental control and its partitionability Nail this down, incorporate a trigger Procedure: Don’t care what is “in principle possible not to need it”, get a flexible and simple solution and integrate it

CERN F. Alessio & R. Jacobsson CERN LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting, April 15, 2010 Our view of the Global Concepts 1. Single internally partionable ODIN 2. Commercial bidirectional FPGA links to ROB crates – latency/phase control solved 3. Intelligent fan-out/in board in each ROB crate  Used as local lab ODIN and ECS interface to early FE test benches  Not far from available thanks to Marseille hardware and CERN firmware development 4. TFC plug’n’play firmware block – relay of TFC to FE and ECS to/from FE 5. ROB is ECS interface for FE – common approach allow making it available now 6. One optical link to batch of FE corresponding to ROB per ROB 7. Common TFC/ECS fan-out/in board at FE  Distribution medium may have individual solutions 8. ECS interface based on DIM on NIOS with PCI-X and any other medium if needed 9. Distributed and hierarchical ECS  Not because of bandwidth of performance requirements on onboard ECS interface but  Because of the scalability of the control nodes and the global experimental control and its partitionability 10. Nail this down, incorporate a trigger  Procedure: Don’t care what is “in principle possible not to need it”, get a flexible and simple solution and integrate it 4

CERN F. Alessio & R. Jacobsson CERN LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting, April 15, 2010 FAN I/O ODIN Readout Slice - Global Concepts 5 ODIN CRATE RAD WALL ECS Event Building and Filtering VFE FE Backend VFE FE Backend VFE FE Backend TFC/ECS FAN I/O VFE FE Backend ROB TFC ECS ROB TFC ECS ROB TFC ECS ROB TFC ECS LHCb Detector

CERN F. Alessio & R. Jacobsson CERN LHCb Electronics Upgrade Meeting, April 15, 2010 Prerequisits to go ahead Ken great job in collecting detector reqs - #links, data size etc  Generating discussion on ZS – we have decided it!, …or,… did we?  We need a document to ultimately check against when reviewing designs, reviews soon! List of functionality on which we have to settle on the specs now  (Mare’s)dream of infinite buffers to handle a world of parallel schemes in FE is utopia Boils down to specify the following mechanisms and model back-end of FE  VFE (almost) full flexibility for individual solutions but timing boundaries  Synchronization  Latency limits and limits on asynchronicity  Truncation  Calibration  NZS data  Header formats (id,error flags, data type)  Throttling  Trigger  We need to clearly outline and incorporate what we use of old system  Control interfaces  ….  To most of these there are clear proposals but it is not enough – chose, write down and sign Availability of plug’n’play TFC and ECS interface for test benches is vital now 6