BAC Meeting: Review of Planning Factor Formulas Arlington Public Schools November 14, 2012 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Budget Development Roseville Area Schools.
Advertisements

Little Egg Harbor Township School District March 1, 2011 Dr. Frank Kasyan, Superintendent Mrs. Lynn Coates, School Business Administrator Board of Education.
RE-ADOPTED BUDGET December 16, 2014 DAAC presentation January /16/20141My job is to accelerate learning for every APS student, every day.
Proposed Budget FY 2011 Stewart County Public Schools Cool Springs, Virginia.
1 March 5, 2014 Budget Education. Agenda External Environment External Environment Financial Structure Financial Structure General Fund Budget Overview.
The Financial and Instructional Impact of Changing the School Schedule Michael D. Rettig Professor Emeritus James Madison University
Building Capacity Methodology Evaluation & Proposal March 22, 2012.
MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM (MAEP) AN OVERVIEW OF HOW THE FORMULA IS CALCULATED.
CHIPPEWA FALLS AREA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PROPOSED BUDGET.
1 FY 2010 Budget Update ACPS School Board November 17, 2008.
MSAD # PROPOSED BUDGET. MSAD #11 District Goals The budget was developed to ensure implementation of the district goals and to prepare students.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Georgia CTI Fall Conference November 11, 2011 Atlanta,
Class Size, Capacity and Planning Factors: Additional Information Joint FAC & BAC Meeting Arlington Public Schools January 7, 2010.
March 4, 2013Norwich FY14 Proposed BudgetSlide 1 Norwich School District Proposed Budget For the School Year.
Olympia School District Slide 1 9/15/2015 Administration Budget Proposal School Year.
Shrewsbury Public Schools Fiscal Year 2013 Administrative Budget Recommendation March 14, 2012.
Ava Goldman, Administrative Director Shannon Gottardi, Executive Director Spring 2015.
HINGHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS April 6, 2015 Revised Operating and Capital Budget Proposals for the School Committee’s Review, Consideration, and Possible Adoption.
May Revise Update Presented By: Kari K. Sousa Assistant Superintendent Business Services.
Toronto Catholic DSB Preliminary Budget Status Committee of the Whole Board April 14, 2008.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2013 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting State.
11 School Board Monitoring Report: Capacity Update Arlington Public Schools April 29, 2010.
June 12, 2012 Mr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent Brantley Thomas, Chief Financial Officer BERKELEY COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT FY PUBLIC HEARING.
Food & Nutrition Services Paid Lunch Prices
Student Based Budgeting (SBB) Overview MARCH 27, 2012 Prince George’s County Public Schools 1.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Riverside County Office of Education November 22, 2013.
Staffing Plan FY13 January 24, Assumptions  Sustain excellence in academic programs  No substantive changes to curriculum beyond those required.
Lincoln Public Schools Budget Tool Kit. Timeline for Budget September Last Friday - Enrollment January-March Staffing Conferences January-June.
Hopkinton Public Schools FY17 Budget Proposal Learn, Create, and Achieve Together December 04, 2015.
1 Staffing Timelines and the Issuance of Contracts and Letters of Reasonable Assurance Tom Hancock Administrator for Human Resources January 28, 2016.
FY 2015 Proposed Budget Development 1 Dr. Patrick K. Murphy December 11, 2013.
AreaElem.H.S. 1. Basic Amount$ $ Group B Spec. Ed.Varies by Category 3. Pupil Transportation (Average) $ Capital (CORL and Soft.
StaffingRequest February 25, 2015 First Request.
SUPERINTENDENT ’S PROPOSED BUDGET School Board Meeting FEBRUARY 25, 2016.
College Community School District 4 Budget Calculations for General Fund Budget Year.
Financial Update of The Kenai Peninsula Borough School District.
Presented by Dr. Klint W. Willert Superintendent of Schools Brookings School District May 9, 2016.
Open Budget Meeting April 21, Budget Calendar & Timeline CSU’s Internal Budget Process Governor’s Proposal January General Assembly Winter Finalized.
Enrollment Formula Funding and Outcomes Funding
MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM (MAEP)
Budget Overview State Budget Overview M & O Levy Review
Portland Public Schools Proposed Budget
Where Does the Money Go? Programs Expenses Developmental Debt Service
Special Review Team Required Actions October 23, 2011
SUPERINTENDENT’S RECOMMENDATIONS: Additional Information
Budget Revenue Calculations.
Superintendent’s Funding Request FY19
Budget Overview Review of Last Years Budget
FY19 Budget Greenfield Public Schools Ways & Means Presentation
FY Approved Budget.
BUDGET LISTENING & LEARNING SESSION
MSAD # PROPOSED BUDGET.
RYE SCHOOL DISTRICT PRESENTATION TO THE RYE BUDGET COMMITTEE
Short- and Long-Term Capacity Needs
Bradley Beach Board of Education
CTE Administrative Internship Program January 18, 2008
Davenport School Board Meeting
Budget Report to NISD Board of Trustees
DRAFT (MOVE $100M) FUNDING CATEGORY WEST ($ IN BILLIONS)
FY2019 Budget Update Good Morning/Afternoon! Today we begin the process of planning our school’s budget for FY19. I know we are all here for the same reason.
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #883
Beecher Hills Elementary School
The $64 Million Dollar Question
CENTRAL BERKSHIRE REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
Grady High School Good Morning/Afternoon! Today we begin the process of planning our school’s budget for FY20. I know we are all here for the same reason.
STAFFING ALLOCATION PROCESS OVERVIEW
D15: large classes, overcrowding, and what can be done
Humphries Elementary School
Bradley Beach Board of Education
Presentation transcript:

BAC Meeting: Review of Planning Factor Formulas Arlington Public Schools November 14,

Planning Factors Approved formulas with which staffing, materials, and supplies are allocated to schools. Almost all of the schools’ budgets are calculated according to formula. Allocating funds using formulas based on enrollment projections is done to ensure funding equity among schools and programs. 2

Fall enrollment projections including SPED and ESOL/HILT Planning factors are applied to projections for staffing, materials and supplies Base data for Superintendent’s budget Enrollment projections are updated in Spring based on more recent data Planning factors applied again to update staffing, materials and supplies includes any proposed changes to planning factors becomes part of School Board’s Proposed and Adopted Budgets Staff contingency is available for variations from projections Overview 3

FY 2013 Elementary Classroom Teacher Planning Factor Formula FORMULA AB # of students divided by planning factor # of students divided by recommended maximum class size Grade 1# of students divided by 20# of students divided by 24 Grade 2# of students divided by 22# of students divided by 26 Grade 3# of students divided by 22# of students divided by 26 Grade 4# of students divided by 23# of students divided by 27 Grade 5# of students divided by 23# of students divided by 27 4

Example 1 of Current Classroom Elementary Planning Factor Calculation Enrollment Projections PF Calculation: Class Size when Leveling Rec Max Grade divided by 20= Grade divided by 22= Grade divided by 22= Grade divided by 23= Grade divided by 23= Total Staffing classes to keep within rec max Total Staffing (rounded up to nearest whole) 13 Total Staffing: Amount needed to meet recommended maximum 13 5

Example 2 of Current Classroom Elementary Planning Factor Calculation Enrollment Projections PF Calculation: Class Size when LevelingRec Max Grade divided by 20= Grade divided by 22= Grade divided by 22= Grade divided by 23= Grade divided by 23= Total Staffing classes to keep within rec max Total Staffing (rounded up to nearest whole)11 Total Staffing: Amount needed to meet recommended maximum 10 6

Example 3 of Current Classroom Elementary Planning Factor Calculation Enrollment Projections PF Calculation: Class Size when LevelingRec Max Grade divided by 20= Grade divided by 22= Grade divided by 22= Grade divided by 23= Grade divided by 23= Total Staffing classes to keep within rec max Total Staffing (rounded up to nearest whole)14 Total Staffing: Amount needed to meet recommended maximum 15 7

Increase both the planning factor and recommended maximum by one at each grade level; may or may not change number of students in an individual class depending on grade, school, and year Increase Class Size by One 8

CURRENT Class Size when Leveling Rec Max Kindergarten with SC Grade 1 with SC Grade 2 with SC Grade 3 with SC Grade 4 with SC Grade 5 with SC Total INCREASE BY ONE (K-5) Students Class Size when Leveling Rec Max Kindergarten with SC Grade 1 with SC Grade 2 with SC Grade 3 with SC Grade 4 with SC Grade 5 with SC Total Impact of Increasing Class Size by One Elementary Example 9

Example 1: Impact of Increasing Planning Factor by One but not Recommended Maximum CURRENT Enrollment Projections Calculation current PF: Class Size when Leveling Rec Max Grade 146divided by 20= Grade 247divided by 22= Grade 350divided by 22= Grade 447divided by 23= Grade 541divided by 23= Total Staffing classes to keep within rec max Total Staffing (rounded up to nearest whole)11 Total Staffing: Amount needed to meet recommended maximum 10 INCREASE BY ONE (K-5) Enrollment Projections Calculation Increase PF by One: Class Size when Leveling Rec Max Grade 146divided by 21= Grade 247divided by 23= Grade 350divided by 23= Grade 447divided by 24= Grade 541divided by 24= Total Staffing classes to keep within rec max Total Staffing (rounded up to nearest whole)11 Total Staffing: Amount needed to meet recommended maximum 10

Example 2: Impact of Increasing Planning Factor by One but not Recommended Maximum CURRENT Enrollment Projections Calculation current PF: Class Size when Leveling Rec Max Grade 184divided by 20= Grade 283divided by 22= Grade 383divided by 22= Grade 484divided by 23= Grade 593divided by 23= Total Staffing classes to keep within rec max Total Staffing (rounded up to nearest whole)20 Total Staffing: Amount needed to meet recommended maximum 20 INCREASE BY ONE (K-5) Enrollment Projections Calculation Increase PF by One: Class Size when Leveling Rec Max Grade 184divided by 21= Grade 283divided by 23= Grade 383divided by 23= Grade 484divided by 24= Grade 593divided by 24= Total Staffing classes to keep within rec max Total Staffing (rounded up to nearest whole)19 Total Staffing: Amount needed to meet recommended maximum 20 11

FY 2013 Middle School Classroom Teacher Planning Factor 1.0 classroom teacher for every 23.4 general education students –# of general education students ÷ 23.4 Adjustment to extrapolate 5 teaching periods to 7 student periods –result from #1 above ÷ 5/7 Factor for mainstreaming special education students for one period –(result from #1 above + (number of special education students ÷ 23.4)) ÷ 5 teaching periods 12

FY 2013 High School Classroom Teacher Planning Factor 1.0 classroom teacher for every 25.4 general education students –# of general education students divided by 25.4 Adjustment to extrapolate 5 teaching periods to 7 student periods –results from #1 above ÷ 5/7 Factor for mainstreaming special education students for one period –(results from above + (number of special education students ÷ 25.4)) ÷ 5 teaching periods Staffing is reduced at each high school to account for students taking courses at the Career Center 13

Impact of Increasing Class Size by One Middle School Current Classroom Teacher Planning Factor Formula Calculation Total Regular Enrollment {no HILT, no Self Cont, no Interlude} ÷ 23.4 ÷ 5/7 =26.38 Self Contained I (Category 1 and Cat 2)79 Interlude13 (79+13) ÷ 23.4 ÷5 =0.79 Total Staffing (rounded to nearest 0.20) Increase by 1: Formula Calculation Total Regular Enrollment {no HILT, no Self Cont, no Interlude} ÷ 24.4 ÷ 5/7 =25.30 Self Contained I (Category 1 and Cat 2)79 Interlude13 (79+13) ÷ 24.4 ÷5 =0.75 Total Staffing (rounded to nearest 0.20)

BAC Meeting: Review of Planning Factor Formulas Arlington Public Schools November 14,