Study for rejection of muons from p/K decays Sergio Grancagnolo Stefania Spagnolo Andrea Ventura.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SU1 sample 176 k events Athena Full Reconstruction.
Advertisements

Impact parameter studies with early data from ATLAS
1 Preliminary stuff Summer09 ppMuMuX sample with CMSSW_3_3_2 –it requires opposite charge generated dimuons from heavy processes or K, pi, K0 L decays.
Giuseppe Roselli (CMS-RPC) Università degli Studi di Bari – INFN RPC Efficiency with Track Reconstruction Giuseppe Roselli.
TRACK DICTIONARY (UPDATE) RESOLUTION, EFFICIENCY AND L – R AMBIGUITY SOLUTION Claudio Chiri MEG meeting, 21 Jan 2004.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February
22/5/2011 Particle-ID and Tracking performance in CLIC_ILD1/27 CLIC_ILD particle identification and tracking performance J. Nardulli This talk in 2 parts:
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
Muon Identification Antoine Cazes Laboratoire de l’ Accelerateur Lineaire OPERA Collaboration Meeting in Frascatti Physics coordination meeting. October.
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
CSC Note Jet 8 Meeting – April 11 '07 Status and plan for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Cross-sections (  barn)   ot (    ) PYTHIA (*) DPMJET (*) Minimum bias (  only) Minimum bias (  only) Single  (all) (  only) (all) (  only)
1 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena Analysis Meeting 12 th June 2007.
1 N. Davidson E/p minimum bias update with Athena Jet Note 8 Meeting 7 th June 2007.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
1 The CMS Heavy Ion Program Michael Murray Kansas.
Trigger efficiencies for GMSB Andrea Bangert Santa Cruz Institute for Particle Physics April 19 th,
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
1 4 th June 2007 C.P. Ward Update on ZZ->llnunu Analysis and Sensitivity to Anomalous Couplings Tom Barber, Richard Batley, Pat Ward University of Cambridge.
Muon rates from minimum bias (without PionDecayer)
Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
What ATLAS would like to learn from the community : soft diffraction Emily Nurse (for ATLAS) Not a list of planned analyses, but rather some issues and.
Preliminary studies on Muon System software alignment LHCb week CERN May 29-th, June 2-nd 2006 Stefania Vecchi INFN Bologna Wander Baldini INFN Ferrara.
Event Filter and Trigger Menu L=10 31 cm -2 s -1 Sergio Grancagnolo on behalf of the Muon Trigger software group.
International Workshop on Linear Colliders, Geneve Muon reconstruction and identification in the ILD detector N. D’Ascenzo, V.Saveliev.
HERA-LHC, CERN Oct Preliminary study of Z+b in ATLAS /1 A preliminary study of Z+b production in ATLAS The D0 measurement of  (Z+b)/  (Z+jet)
Optimization of parameters for jet finding algorithm for p+p collisions at E cm =200 GeV T. G. Dedovich & M.V. Tokarev JINR, Dubna  Motivations.
Quarkonia spectra in PbPb at 2.76 TeV Abdulla Abdulsalam (Dr. Prashant Shukla) BARC, Mumbai Outline Motivation Event selection Kinematic cuts Acceptance.
Study of L1 and HLT efficiency in VBTF Monika Jindal (Panjab University, Chandigarh) Jasbir Singh (panjab University, Chandigarh), Kajari Mazumdar (TIFR,
October 14, 2004 Single Spin Asymmetries 1 Single Spin Asymmetries for charged pions. Overview  One physics slide  What is measured, kinematic variables.
Muon Trigger Slice Report Sergio Grancagnolo for the Muon Trigger group INFN-University of Lecce CERN Jan 23, 2007.
Status of K S   e analysis C. GattiT. Spadaro Selection on data Selection on MC Efficiencies from data, K L   e, K S    ,      , bhabha.
UC Davis June st Rosi Reed Low Energy Test Run Results Rosi Reed University of California at Davis.
Study of Standard Model Backgrounds for SUSY search with ATLAS detector Takayuki Sasaki, University of Tokyo.
Status of RPC trigger analysis and Muon Trigger efficiencies for W-> μν study By Archana Sharma, Suman B. Beri Panjab University Chandigarh India-CMS Meeting.
2004 Fall JPS meeting (English version) K.Okada1 Measurement of prompt photon in sqrt(s)=200GeV pp collisions Kensuke Okada (RIKEN-BNL research center)
Update on Diffractive Dijet Production Search Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham Birmingham ATLAS Weekly Meeting 24/01/2013.
Muons from  /K CSC samples vs generator predictions: preliminary comparisons.
Hardeep Bansil, Oldrich Kepka, Vlastimil Kus, Paul Newman, Marek Tasevsky Workshop on Diffractive Analyses with ALFA 09/10/2012 Diffractive analyses with.
Study of pair-produced doubly charged Higgs bosons with a four muon final state at the CMS detector (CMS NOTE 2006/081, Authors : T.Rommerskirchen and.
High P T Inclusive Jets Study High P T Inclusive Jets Study Manuk Zubin Mehta, Prof. Manjit kaur Panjab University, Chandigarh India CMS Meeting March,
Study of muon pairs production process at PANDA and its backgrounds A.N.Skachkova (JINR, Dubna) Obninsk 2010.
Hggs-D meeting MPI 11/20061 Higgs Physics – Activities in Bonn/Siegen Jörn Große-Knetter ATLAS-Higgs-D Treffen München,
1 Jet Triggers and Dijet Mass Selda Esen and Robert M. Harris Fermilab TTU Weekly HEP Group Meeting Feb 16, 2006.
L1 Global Muon Trigger Simulation Status URL of this presentation:
Σ Eγ comparison using Woochun Park Univ of South Carolina Feb 26,
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
Tomas Hreus, Pascal Vanlaer Overview: K0s correction stability tests Jet-pt correction closure test Study of Strangeness Production in Underlying Event.
Study of B s         Supreet Pal Singh Prof. Kajari Mazumdar Prof. J.B.Singh 1India-CMS Meeting 27th-28th.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Low Mass Vector Mesons Nuclear Modification Factors in d+Au 200GeV Lei Guo Los Alamos National Laboratory PHENIX Collaboration.
Tau31 Tracking Efficiency at BaBar Ian Nugent UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA Sept 2005 Outline Introduction  Decays Efficiency Charge Asymmetry Pt Dependence.
1 Exotic States 2005 E.C. Aschenauer The search for Pentaquarks at on behalf of the HERMES Collaboration E.C. Aschenauer DESY.
1 Plans for the Muon Trigger CSC Note. 2 Muon Trigger CSC Studies General performance studies and trigger rate evalution for the full slice Evaluation.
Viktor Veszpremi Purdue University, CDF Collaboration Tev4LHC Workshop, Oct , Fermilab ZH->vvbb results from CDF.
LNF 12/12/06 1 F.Ambrosino-T. Capussela-F.Perfetto Update on        Dalitz plot slope Where we started from A big surprise Systematic checks.
E. Soldatov Tight photon efficiency study using FSR photons from Z  ll  decays E.Yu.Soldatov* *National Research Nuclear University “MEPhI”
QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.
Upsilon production and μ-tagged jets in DØ Horst D. Wahl Florida State University (DØ collaboration) 29 April 2005 DIS April to 1 May 2005 Madison.
Muons from single top events for DC04
Event Filter and Trigger Menu L=1031
Search for Pentaquarks at
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Search for supersymmetric neutral Higgs bosons in the decay channel A/H->m+m- in the ATLAS detector George Dedes , Sandra Horvat Max-Planck-Institut.
Muons from light meson decays
Samples and MC Selection
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Presentation transcript:

Study for rejection of muons from p/K decays Sergio Grancagnolo Stefania Spagnolo Andrea Ventura

Outline Definition of sample under study and goal p T spectra for selected particles Establish amount of events to generate Reproduction of p T spectra Rejection of p not in the spectrometer Identification of selection criteria DoneIn progressTo do

Sample under study minimum bias (MB) and dijets (J1-J8) data samples pythia csc11 v v v Dataset pT ranges (*) (GeV) expected cross-section (mb) Events analyzed MB J117 – J235 – E J370 – E J4140 – E J5280 – E J6560 – E J71120 – E J8> E (*)

Selection Cuts at athena level – select p, K, K L – p T > 500 MeV – |eta| < 2.7 Cuts at root level – p T > 2500 MeV – Distance to the interaction point = 0. Events with selected particles are weighted and merged for each MB and J1-J8 data sample Entries are rescaled to the minimum bias luminosity, corresponding to ~2.5×10 -3 nb -1

p T vs eta spectra for p Gaussian smearing is used for MB (J1-J2) events with pT > 8.8 (20) GeV

Reproduction of spectra pT vs eta spectra used for generation –Sliced in 31 pT bins (more dense where more events) –At higher pT values expo function is used to model pT –Pol2 function is used to model eta in each pT bin –Special treatment for last slice

Muon generation To estimate an efficiency of the order of with a relative error of 10% are required 10 6 muons in a certain pT bin range –Considering 10 pT bins of 500 MeV between 2.5 and 7.5 GeV –Factor 3 including endcaps –Expected 1 over 100 pions that decay before the calorimeter Required ~3×10 9 single pion events

Generation and simulation Event generation machinery ready to use for production –Generation of 10 5 events require 10 3 CPU sec and a disk space of 15 Mbytes –Expected to run less than 200 jobs into 1nd queue to produce all required statistic For simulation plans to use a G4 UserAction to save only events with a pion decaying before the muon spectrometer –This reduce by a factor 10 2 the amount of used disk space for simulation –Time not reduced