Safety Data Initiatives in Reauthorization – What Can We Expect? Kathy Krause, FHWA Office of Safety 30 th Annual International Traffic Records Forum July.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
January 23, 2006 FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FAIRFAX COUNTY PEDESTRIAN TASK FORCE FINAL REPORT.
Advertisements

Oklahoma Strategic Highway Safety Plan presented to Oklahoma Department of Transportation presented by Sam Lawton, Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Marc Long,
Oklahoma Strategic Highway Safety Plan – Meeting Objectives presented to SHSP Leadership Group SHSP Working Group presented by Dawn Sullivan, Oklahoma.
Federal Safety Funding for Local Governments Martin Andersen Local Government Section Manager February 19, 2010.
Strategic Highway Safety Plan/Developing Local Road Safety Plans Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Office of Safety.
Louisiana Safe Routes To School Program
All Roads Transportation Safety Roadway Departure Crash (Formerly Jurisdictionally Blind Safety)
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
SAFETY-LU CONSIDERTATION OF SAFETY IN TRANSPORTATION PROCESS Chimai Ngo Office of Federal Lands FHWA Chimai Ngo Office of Federal Lands FHWA.
Type Name Here Technical Program Services Eduardo C. Serafin, PE, AICP.
High Risk Rural Roads 23 U.S.C. § 148 (a)(1) & (f) Leslie Wright Local/Tribal Road Safety Program Manager Office of Safety, FHWA Leslie Wright Local/Tribal.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
Complete Streets Policy and Implementation Jason Ridgway February 11, 2014.
Planning and Safety: A Comprehensive and Collaborative Process Michael D. Meyer, P.E., Professor School of Civil and Environmental Engineering Georgia.
The National Driver Education Standards and the ADTSEA 3.0 Curriculum
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Highway Safety Provisions Elizabeth Alicandri FHWA.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
How to use this presentation This presentation is for use by transportation professionals to communicate the TSP concept. The presentation comprises a.
Safe Routes to School: An update on programs, practice and how public health is playing a role Nancy Pullen, MPH, Program Manager September 14, 2006.
DATS Bicycle Planning 2009 Bicycle Advisory Committee Kickoff Danville Area Transportation Study July 13, 2009.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E. Traffic Investigations Engineer, ODOT February 26, 2015.
Mapping the Way to Success: the Arkansas Safe Routes to School Program.
Statewide Local Agency Project Delivery Conference SAFETEA-LU: Earmarks and Federal Programs Relating to Local Agencies Travis Brouwer ODOT Federal Affairs.
Louisiana Safe Routes to School Program Department of Transportation and Development Louisiana Safe Routes to School Program The Application.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Performance Management and Performance-Based Planning and.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration MAP-21 Moving Ahead with Progress in the 21 st Century Linking.
Advancing Highway Safety in the U.S. Michael Halladay, Director FHWA Office of Safety Integration Federal Highway Administration Border to Border Transportation.
FY 2012 President’s Budget Released February 14, 2011.
Roadway Safety Data – What Is It and Why Should It Be Important to My State? Name Date.
2010 Wisconsin Safe Routes to School Funding SRTS Project Application Cycle Applications available January 2010 Applications due April 2, 2010 Approximately.
MnDOT-ACEC Annual Conference March 5,  Capital planning and programming at MnDOT  Major considerations  A more transparent and collaborative.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
Mid-States Highway-Rail Grade Crossing Safety Conference Guan Xu, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Office of Safety Design.
Standing Committee on Highway Traffic Safety Silver Legacy Hotel, Reno, NV, March 20-23, 2005.
U.S./Canada Transportation Border Working group April 9, 2014 Roger Petzold Office of Planning Federal Highway Administration.
MOVING AHEAD FOR PROGRESS IN THE 21 ST CENTURY MAP-21 Volusia TPO Board Presentation September 25, 2012.
STATE CROSSING SAFETY PROGRAMS & FEDERAL CROSSING SAFETY FUNDING CROSSINGS FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY SESSION AASHTO – SCORT MEETING March 14, 2011 – Washington,
Module Crash Data Collection and Uses Describe the process by which crash data are collected and used in road safety management.
1 Briefing on Draft Safety Element for the 2007 CLRP Michael J. Farrell Andrew J. Meese, AICP COG/TPB Staff TPB Technical Committee November 2, 2007 Item.
Saving Lives: A Vital FHWA Goal Safety Priorities for 2003 Michael Halladay FHWA Office of Safety Michigan Traffic Safety Summit; April 29, 2003.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
Introduction: Overview of Roadway Safety Management Safety Analysis in a Data-limited, Local Agency Environment: July 22, Boise, Idaho 1 Module.
Louisiana Safe Routes to School. Where it’s safe, get kids walking and biking Where it’s not safe, make it safe Safe Routes to School goals.
October 25, 2015 Funding Your Program October 20, 2008 ATSSA Sign Maintenance and Management Workshop Addison, Texas.
Leanna Depue, Ph.D. On behalf of the Peer Exchange Planning Committee SHSP Survey Summary.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Measure Update.
Rural Transportation Planning Eunice Fitzpatrick Transportation Planner Kentucky River ADD Hazard, KY.
Guide for Rural Local Officials Evaluating Your Input into the Statewide Transportation Planning Process Developed by the National Association of Development.
INFRASTRUCTURE, OPERATIONS & SAFETY A. George Ostensen FHWA Office of Safety 8 January 2005 White House Conference on Aging Listening Session USDOT- FHWA.
Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Palm Beach MPO Draft Complete Streets Policy Advisory Committees September
Lessons Learned from HSIP & CMAQ By Neil J. Pedersen Maryland State Highway Administrator Washington Briefing March 1, 2010.
Implementation: Results from the Using Your Regional ITS Architecture Peer Exchange Network Workshop Mac Lister FHWA Resource Center ITS America Annual.
Caltrans External Advisory Liaison Committee October 2015.
National Walk Summit October 29, 2015 Cooperative Approaches to Pedestrian Safety: Massachusetts.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Complete Streets Michigan’s Approach Mark A. Van Port Fleet AASHTO SCOD Annual Meeting July 15, 2008.
South Dakota Transportation Safety Conference February 21-22, 2007 John G. Rohlf, P.E. Federal Highway Administration Pierre, South Dakota.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users Advancing Safety through SAFETEA-LU Michael Halladay FHWA Office of.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
Comprehensive Highway Safety Plan Leadership and Management Getting buy in … Getting started … Managing the process …
Minnesota State Planning Conference September 28, 2011.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 and Managing National Highway Performance Michael Nesbitt Federal Highway.
INCORPORATING SAFETY IN TRANSPORTATION PLANNING Neil Pedersen Maryland DOT August 7, 2002.
Ken McLeod Program Manager THE BICYCLE FRIENDLY STATE PROGRAM.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Presented to presented by Alabama Department of Transportation April 8, 2016 The Alabama Transportation Planner’s Guide to Safety Data Access and Documentation.
Older Road Users Emphasis Area Team
Data Impacts of Transportation Reauthorization: Data Community’s Plans and Strategies Pat Hu Chair, TRB National Transportation Data Requirements and Programs.
MPO Board Presentation
Safe Routes to School John Schaefer State Coordinator.
Presentation transcript:

Safety Data Initiatives in Reauthorization – What Can We Expect? Kathy Krause, FHWA Office of Safety 30 th Annual International Traffic Records Forum July 25-29, 2004

State Traffic Safety Information System Improvement Grants Description: Grants to improve State safety data & information systems Traffic Records Coordinating Committee of data collectors, managers and users make key decisions on data improvements

State Traffic Safety Information System Improvements - continued Status: House bill includes $159M over 6 years Senate bill includes $270M over 6 years Conferees agreed to accept Senate language but no decision on funds

State Traffic Safety Information System Improvements - continued Outstanding Issues: Funding Senate requirement that States include in model data elements traffic safety impacts of using electronic devices while driving

Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Description: New safety infrastructure program built around a data-driven statewide safety plan It requires: Crash data systems for problem identification & countermeasure analysis Improved traffic records, data collection & analysis Consideration of 4 “E”s of safety on all public roads & consultation with stakeholders

HSIP - Continued Status: Included in Senate bill House bill makes few changes in current safety infrastructure programs & requires no statewide safety plan Senate provides $8.2B over 6 years House provides $3.9B over 6 years

HSIP - Continued Outstanding Issues: Funding Statewide Highway Safety Plan Will final agreement require or encourage States to develop safety plans? How will States obtain comprehensive safety data on roads, drivers, vehicles & EMS? Will States have sufficient safety data on local highway safety needs?

HSIP Reporting Requirements Description: House & Senate bills include: State reports to Secretary on progress in implementing HSIP Secretarial reports to Congress on national implementation of HSIP

HSIP Reporting Requirements - Continued Senate requires annual State reports to: Describe 5% of locations in each State with most severe safety needs Assess potential remedies, costs & impediments Assess effectiveness of projects in reducing fatalities, injuries & severity of crashes Be posted on the DOT website

HSIP Reporting - Continued House limits funds for report data collection & analysis to 2%. Secretary’s report must include: Summary of projects completed & analysis of effectiveness Assessment of adequacy of program funding & State use of funds

HSIP Reporting - Continued Recommendations for future funding & program improvements Analysis & evaluation of State programs Status: Secretarial & State reports will be required No agreement reached on details

HSIP Reporting – Continued Outstanding Issues: Content & timing of reports House 2% limitation on funds Senate requirement to report 5% of locations with severest safety needs Senate requirement to publish reports on website

Safe Routes to School (SRS) Description: States administer grants to State, local & regional agencies to encourage walking & bicycling to school and improve safety near schools Projects within 2 miles of schools for sidewalks, ped/bike crossings & facilities, education, awareness, enforcement, traffic calming & improved traffic operations

SRS - Continued Status: Included in both bills House conferees instructed to insist on House provision Funding: House $1B over 6 years Senate $470M over 6 years

SRS - Continued Outstanding Issues: Funding Many States lack data to identify & promote safety improvements on public roads, pathways and trails within 2 miles of school Apportionment formula: House – primary and middle school enrollment, Senate – STP

High Risk Rural Road Safety Improvement Program Description: To improve safety on rural collector and local roads For construction & operational improvements States must fund projects with greatest highway safety benefits

High Risk Roads - Continued Status: Included only in House bill Outstanding Issues: Funding: House - $675M over 6 years Lack of data on rural roads limits ability to target funds to States with greatest needs Many States lack the data on rural & local roads to identify projects with highest benefits

Status of Reauthorization Congress extended highway, transit & safety programs to September 24 with no changes in funding or policy White House agreed to $299B overall spending for 6-year reauthorization bill this year – House & Senate staff will work on detailed conference agreement

Likely Outcomes? Dedicated funds are likely for state data improvement grants. Funding levels are not yet clear More reporting requirements are likely for safety programs & initiatives - HSIP, Safe Routes to School, High Risk Rural Roads etc.

Likely Outcomes? - Continued State DOTS will need to work with data managers & collectors to fulfill reporting requirements & possibly to develop statewide safety plans State & metropolitan planners will need safety data to integrate safety into planning process

Likely Outcomes? - Continued State DOTs & planners will be encouraged to participate in traffic records coordinating committees Data managers & collectors are likely to have increased opportunities to develop new partners among key customers & users of safety data within States