Comparison of 2013 to 2016 Manufactured Food Regulatory Program Standards (MFRPS) Guy Delius, CSO FDA-OP/SIS Morgan Poloni, CSO FDA-OP/SIS Clint Priestley,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Checking & Corrective Action
Advertisements

1. (c) Alan Rowley Associates Laboratory Accreditation Dr Alan G Rowley Quality Policy based on Quality Objectives Quality Management System Communicate.
Module 13 Oversight Assessment of Auditor Authentication Bodies
MODULE B - PROCESS B1.ASME Organizational Structure B2.Standards Development: Staff and Volunteer Roles and Responsibilities B3.Conformity Assessment:
MODULE B - PROCESS B1. ASME Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Staff and Volunteer Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity Assessment:
ANSI/ASQ E Overview Gary L. Johnson U.S. EPA
ISO in Histopathology Louise O’Callaghan MSc FAMLS
Next Steps in Change Process March 12, :00 – 11:45 am Steven Mandernach Bureau Chief Food and Consumer Safety Iowa Department of Inspections and.
Getting started with the Program Standards David Lawrence EHS III, Fairfax County Health Department Paul Stromp RS/REHS, Lake County General Health District.
October In May 2000, Walkerton’s drinking water system became contaminated with deadly bacteria, primarily Escherichia coli O157:H7.1 Seven people.
1 WebTrust for Certification Authorities (CAs) Overview October 2011 WebTrust for Certification Authorities (CAs) Overview October 2011 Presentation based.
Intentional Adulteration Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
State Assessment Observations Tressa Madden, MPH, RES CSO/Standards Implementation Staff FDA Tuesday, March 11, :00 am – 10:00 am.
MFRPS Lesson Learned North Carolina
1 Webinar on: Establishing a Fully Integrated National Food Safety System with Strengthened Inspection, Laboratory and Response Capacity Sponsored by Partnership.
RC14001 ® Update GPCA Responsible Care Committee September 23, 2013.
FPSC Safety, LLC ISO AUDIT.
ASPEC Internal Auditor Training Version
Quality Representative Training Version
Proposed Rules to Help Ensure the Safety of Imported Food 1.
1 Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) April Full Traceability (Pre-harvest) Birth Premises Slaughter Full Traceability All Production and Points.
FDA Recalls Risk Communication Advisory Committee David K. Elder Director, Office of Enforcement.
Key changes and transition process
Key changes from OHSAS 18001:1999
APHL Update – FDA Cooperative agreement. The Association of Public Health Laboratories (APHL) has been actively working towards meeting the deliverables.
By: Carol Martineau, Acting Assistant Manager, Aircraft Maintenance Division, AFS-301 Date: June 7, 2015 Federal Aviation Administration ASA Conference.
By: Farzad Dadgari Soil and Environmental Specialist SWHISA.
FDA Regulatory review in Minutes: What Product Development Executives Need-to-Know. Specifically, frequent causes of recalls and related areas that investigators.
Unit 8:COOP Plan and Procedures  Explain purpose of a COOP plan  Propose an outline for a COOP plan  Identify procedures that can effectively support.
Fourth Annual Medical Research Summit Concurrent Session 4.05 – Managing CROs and SMOs from a Compliance Perspective Michael SwiatochaAprill 23, 2004.
1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction State Performance Plan (SPP) & Annual Performance Report.
Summary of Assessment Reports and Gap Analysis
MFRPS “LESSONS LEARNED” Steve Stich New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets San Diego, CA March 9-13, 2015.
ISO Sampling Agreement Requirements and National Sampling Plan Guy F. Delius CSO FDA Tim McGrath Acting Deputy Director ORS-FDA March 10, :15-1:45.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: By: Date: Oversight Throughout the Supply Chain: Is It Adequate? DOT OIG Audit: Assessment of FAA's Risk-Based.
Item 5d Texas RE 2011 Budget Assumptions April 19, Texas RE Preliminary Budget Assumptions Board of Directors and Advisory Committee April 19,
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
Geoffrey L. Beausoleil Assistant Manager, Office of Operational Support DOE Idaho Operations Office September 12, 2006 Presentation to DOE ISM Champions.
Preventive Controls for Human Food S upplemental Proposal 1
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food September 16, THE FUTURE IS NOW 1.
Foreign Supplier Verification Programs Supplemental Proposal 1.
Standard 4 – Inspection Audit Program
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) AS9104/2A Presentation San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company 1 Other Party.
CIFOR Council to Improve Foodborne Outbreak Response CIFOR Guidelines and CIFOR Toolkit Donald J. Sharp, MD, DTM&H Food Safety Office National Center for.
Lessons Learned from the 5 MFRPS Pilot States Oregon Wednesday, March 11, :45 AM – 9:45 AM San Diego, CA Oregon Department of Agriculture Food Safety.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
MFRPS Change Process March 13, :30 – 9:15 am Steven Mandernach Bureau Chief Food and Consumer Safety Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals Timothy.
Revised AQTF Standards for Registered Training Organisations Strengthening our commitment to quality - COAG February August 2006.
Module 2Slide 1 of 26 WHO - EDM Quality Management Basic Principles of GMP Part One.
FDA job description  Regulates about 25% of all consumer purchases  Mission summary: protect and advance public health  Products: food, cosmetics, drugs,
Most Common Deficiencies Cheryl O. Morton Managing Director, AIHA Laboratory Accreditation Programs, LLC.
Current MFRPS State Implementation Status February 3, :15 – 9:45 am Timothy Weigner Staff Director U.S. FDA Office of Regulatory Affairs, Office.
2016 MFRPS: Changes To Standard 10 Guy F. Delius, R. S. CSO Food and Drug Administration Office Of Partnerships Standards Implementation Staff February.
OHSAS Occupational health and safety management system.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Import Safety Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
A LOOK AT AMENDMENTS TO ISO/IEC (1999) Presented at NCSLI Conference Washington DC August 11, 2005 by Roxanne Robinson.

NACCHO Program Standards Mentorship
Final Rule for Preventive Controls for Human Food
Prepared by Rand E Winters, Jr. ASR Senior Auditor October 2014
2019 Local School District Charter Application Process
Egg Safety Regulatory Program Standards Development – CAP Update
The Value of Accreditation
Final Rule on Foreign Supplier Verification Programs
MFRPS in an Integrated Food Safety System
Aerodrome Certification Workshop
Presentation transcript:

Comparison of 2013 to 2016 Manufactured Food Regulatory Program Standards (MFRPS) Guy Delius, CSO FDA-OP/SIS Morgan Poloni, CSO FDA-OP/SIS Clint Priestley, CSO FDA-OO/AS February 3, :30-3:00 pm

Overview Background Timeline – what’s next? Summary of 2016 MFRPS and changes What do these changes mean to you? Questions

MFRPS Cycle of Revisions On a 3 year cycle for renewal and revision Three revisions to date: – 2007 MFRPS – 2010 MFRPS – 2013 MFRPS – Proposed 2016 MFRPS

2016 MFRPS Revisions More collaboration with FDA and their partners. MFRPS Alliance developed a vetting process Active MFRPS enrollee participation Laid the foundation for future revisions

Where did the changes come from? 2013 MFRPS Interpretation Document Submitted Issues to Alliance Awareness and the need for clarification Alliance Workgroups: – Workgroup 1: Standards 1, 7, and 8 – Workgroup 2: Standards 2, 3, 4, and 6 – Workgroup 3: Standards 5 and 10

Where did the changes go next? MFRPA Workgroups MFRPA Board PFP Governing Council FDA Internal Review Process

2016 MFRPS Overall Changes “The Merge” Blend the three Alliance Workgroup outcomes into one document – Consistent writing style throughout – Clarify language – Content consistency check across all Standards – Matching Program Elements to Appendices

What’s Next? 12/31/2015 OP/SIS Prep for OMB Submission 1/15/2016 Submit to OMB for 60 Day Federal Registry Posting 3/1/2016 – 5/1/2016 Public Open Comment Period 5/1/2016 – 7/1/2016 FDA Respond to OMB Comments 7/1/2016 – 7/31/2016 Submit to OMB 30 Day Submission 9/30/2016 OMB Approval and 2016 MFRPS Release

Disclaimer This is a summary – not word for word 2016 MFRPS is still subject to change based on the OMB process.

2016 MFRPS Overall Changes Updated Intro and Background Section Definitions Section – Definitions noted in Standards by SMALL CAPS. Sequential Numbering System

2016 MFRPS Overall Changes Each Standard was reviewed: – Purpose – Requirement Summary – Program Element – Outcome – Documentation

2016 MFRPS Summary Format Defined Terms New Sections New Appendices Updates to Standard Updates to Appendices/Worksheets

2016 Standard 1 Changes Defined Terms – Equivalent – Equivalent in Effect – Not Equivalent – Regulatory Foundation No new sections or appendices added

2016 Standard 1 Changes Updates to 1.3 Program Elements – Added a written procedure for Evaluation of Legal Authority (1.3.1) – Removed the CFRs and FD&C Act that reference Tobacco. – Optional: consultation with legal counsel for review of equivalent laws.

2016 Standard 1 Changes Updates to Appendix 1 – New look and feel – Table has new columns: equivalent, equivalent in effect, and not equivalent – Added 21 CFR 117 Current Good Manufacturing Practice and Hazard Analysis and Risk Based Preventative Controls for Human Food

2016 Standard 2 Changes Defined Terms – Contact hours – Current Experienced Staff – Evaluations – Joint field training inspections – Newly Experienced Staff – Qualified field inspection trainer – Qualified date – Start date

2016 Standard 2 Changes New Sections in 2.3 – Training Plan and Training Records (2.3.1) – New section for inspectors who inspect non high risk food warehouses. ( ) – Experienced inspectors ( ) – Coursework sources (2.3.5)

2016 Standard 2 Changes New Appendices – Appendix 2.1 – Self Assessment Worksheet – Appendix 2.4 – Example Curriculum for Basic Food Inspector Training

2016 Standard 2 Changes Updates to 2.3 Program Elements – No time limit on completing Basic Field Training. ( ) – Option to subdivide the basic course curriculum for inspectors who only inspect low risk warehouses. ( ) – Removed Nutritional Labeling from Advanced Training Curriculum – Traceback Investigations and Foodborne Illness Investigations - not subject to Advanced Field Training requirements. ( ) – Modified the Advanced Field Training requirement to 1 passing eval/audit prior to independent inspections and a 2 nd within one year. ( )

2016 Standard 2 Changes Updates to 2.3 Program Elements (con’t) – Continuing education section was expanded. (2.3.4) – Alternate time frame for tracking contact hours may be established. ( ) – Removed the two joint inspections from Continuing Education.

2016 Standard 2 Changes Updates to Appendices and Worksheets – Appendix 2.2 State Training Record Summary Worksheet – Appendix 2.3 Inspector Training Record

2016 Standard 3 Changes Defined Terms – Consumer Complaint – Industry Complaint – Recall Audit Checks – Sampling Program

2016 Standard 3 Changes New Sections – Inspection Report (3.3.3) Outlines what should be in a protocol for writing inspection reports. – Sampling Procedure (3.3.7) Based on the Partnership for Food Protection’s Food/Feed Testing Laboratories Best Practices Manual. – Records Retention(3.3.8) Describes specific record requirements for Standard 3. No new appendices added

2016 Standard 3 Changes Updates to 3.3 Program Elements – Risk Based Inspection Program - option for other risk factor and classification criteria. ( ) – Inspection Procedure - removed FDA specific terminology and added info on verification of equipment. (3.3.2) – Food Recalls - reformatted and references PFP Best Practices for Improving FDA and State Communication during Recalls.(3.3.4) – Renamed “Food Industry Inspection Complaints” to “Complaints Resulting from State Program Inspection Activities”. (3.3.6)

2016 Standard 3 Changes Updates to Appendix 3.1 – Self Assessment Worksheet – Updated to reflect changes in program elements Updates to Appendix Risk Classification Criteria for Food Plants – Removed specific FDA terminology

2016 Standard 4 Changes Defined Terms – Field Inspection Audit – Qualified Field Inspection Auditor – Verification Audit Inspection No new sections added

2016 Standard 4 Changes New Appendices – The 2013 Appendix 4.1 Self-Assessment Worksheet was removed. – Replaced with new Appendix 4.1 – Self Assessment Worksheet.

2016 Standard 4 Changes Updates to 4.3 Program Elements – Clarified requirements for a written quality assurance protocol. (4.3.1) – Allows use of Appendix 4.5 or a State audit form that meets the Standard 3, Program Element (4.3.2) – The minimum number of Inspection Reports and Sample Reports to be audited is now a scale based on the total number of inspections/samples conducted in 12 months. (4.3.3, 4.3.4) – Clarified when corrective action must be taken. (4.3.5)

2016 Standard 4 Changes Updates to Appendix 4.6 Inspection Report Audit Form – Aligns with Program Elements Standard 3, section Updates to Appendix 4.7 Sample Report Audit Form – Aligns with Program Elements in Standard 3, section

2016 Standard 5 Changes Defined Terms – Environmental Assessment – Food Related Incidents – Hazards – Traceback – Traceforward No new sections or appendices added

2016 Standard 5 Changes Updates to 5.3 Program Elements – Response elements are listed as: 1) coordination with other authorities, 2) surveillance, 3) investigation/environmental assessment, 4) control measures and 5) post response. – Now addresses coordination in all food-related incidents beyond foodborne illness investigation and intentional tampering. – Added maintaining notification of food-related incidents in complaint log(s) or database(s). ( ) – Emphasizes collection of environmental versus epidemiological data during investigations. ( )

2016 Standard 5 Changes Updates to 5.3 Program Elements (con’t) – Tracebacks and traceforwards have been expanded from “food implicated in a FBI” to “foods containing a hazard.” ( ) – Expand lab support for investigations to include all food-related incidents. ( ) – Amended language to focus on environmental assessment data. ( ) – Includes the distribution of recommendations from environmental assessments and investigation reports with stakeholders for prevention. ( )

2016 Standard 5 Changes Updates to Appendices – Appendix 5.1- Self-Assessment Summary Report Reflects updated Program Elements. – Appendix 5.2 – Sample MOU Has been removed.

2016 Standard 6 Changes Defined Terms – Critical Violations No new sections added New Appendices – Appendix 6.1 – Self Assessment Worksheet Redesigned into a self-assessment worksheet.

2016 Standard 6 Changes Updates to 6.3 Program Elements – Provide a clear requirement for a written compliance and enforcement program. (6.3.1) – Removed the requirement to monitor “critical violators”. – Amended language throughout to provide clarification.

2016 Standard 6 Changes Updates to Appendices – Appendix 6.2 Calculation of the Level of Conformance to Compliance Procedures, instead of a worksheet. – Worksheet 6.2a Performance Review of Enforcement Actions is now a worksheet and not an Appendix.

2016 Standard 7 Changes Defined Terms – Outreach Activity Event No new sections added New Appendices – Appendix 7.1 – Self-Assessment Worksheet

2016 Standard 7 Changes Updates to 7.3 Program Elements – Now requires a written procedure of methods that will be used for communication with the food industry, stakeholders and consumers. (7.3.1) – Amended to add the requirement to document and evaluate Outreach Activity Events using Appendix 7.2 or equivalent form.

2016 Standard 7 Changes Updates to the Appendices – The 2013 Appendix 7.1 was renumbered as 7.2.

2016 Standard 8 Changes No Defined Terms No new sections added New Appendices – Appendix 8.1a – Self Assessment Worksheet Instructions

2016 Standard 8 Changes Updates to Standard – Amended to simplify and clarify in three parts: Program Assessment Staffing Equipment

2016 Standard 8 Changes Updates to Appendix 8.3 Inspection Equipment – New column to indicate if equipment will be verified.

2016 Standard 9 Changes Defined Terms – Assessments – Conformance – Current and Fit-for-Use – Document Control – Implementation – Strategic Improvement Plan No new sections or appendices added

2016 Standard 9 Changes Updates to 9.3 Program Elements – A written document control procedure is required. ( ) – New language clarifies that a state’s record retention laws or specific language in another Standard may supersede the 3-year requirement. ( ) – New requirements for the strategic improvement plan including: Personnel responsible for completing the task and date the task is completed ( and ) An annual review (9.3.4) Address FDA assessment observations and to add corrective actions to the strategic plan, if necessary (9.3.5)

2016 Standard 9 Changes Updates to 9.3 Program Elements (con’t) – Now an annual review/update to appendices (9.3.4) – FDA Assessments has replaced “FDA Program Assessment Validation Audit” and “comprehensive program audit.” (9.3.5) – Removed the language for audit procedures and audit timeframes. (9.3.5) – Added the 3-year record retention requirement and expanded it to include previous versions of SOPs. ( )

2016 Standard 10 Changes Defined Terms – Primary Servicing Laboratory New Section – Non-ISO Accredited Laboratories. Describes requirements for labs that do not have an ISO Accreditation. No new appendices added

2016 Standard 10 Changes Updates to 10.3 Program Elements – Includes what should be in a contract or written agreement with a primary servicing labs. ( ) – The requirement for documentation from non- primary servicing labs. ( ) – The requirement for labs to be accredited by a body that is a full signatory to the ILAC Mutual Recognition Arrangement (MFA). (10.3.2) – For non-ISO accredited labs there is now a defined quality system. (10.3.3)

2016 Standard 10 Changes Updates to Appendix 10.1 Self Assessment Worksheet – Reflects changes in 10.3 Program Elements

Phasing in 2016 MFRPS When will the 2016 MFRPS go into effect? – October 1, 2016

Phasing in 2016 MFRPS Will there be further education/outreach? – Yes. – Starting Spring, 2016 Webinars Conference Calls Discussion during SIS visits

Phasing in 2016 MFRPS Will there be an Assessment Phase in? – Yes. – The FDA/OO Audit Staff will work to schedule FY17 MFRPS Assessments after January 1, 2017.

What can you do now? Gain better understanding of the 2016 MFRPS Start thinking about the SIP and what needs to be updated Continue to make progress

Questions?

Contact Information Guy F. Delius Morgan Poloni Clint Priestley