Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

OCTOBER 10, 2011 An Update on Educator Effectiveness 1.

Advertisements

Professional Growth and

Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework

Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework

Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.

Contextualized Goals Setting: How to operationalize ISLLC standards for school improvement Dawn Shannon Assistant Superintendent, Broome-Tioga BOCES

April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.

Update: January 24, 2012 SIS Meeting.  Effective Teacher: An effective teacher consistently uses educational practices that foster the intellectual,

Educator Effectiveness Framework Associate Executive Director, AWSA

PUSD Site Administrator Evaluation SY 13/14 Governing Board Presentation May 23, 2013 Dr. Heather Cruz, Deputy Superintendent.

Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.

Professional Growth and

PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.

Central Office Administrator Development and Evaluation Adaptations for Central Office Administrators.

 Reading School Committee January 23,

Teacher Professional Growth & Effectiveness System Monica Osborne, presenter KDE Effectiveness Coach 1.

1 Principal Practice and School Learning Objectives July 29, 2013 Joe Schroeder, AWSA Associate Executive Director Patty Polczynski, Templeton Middle School.

1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.

Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por

1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.

Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,

Successful Practices Network Annual Professional Performance Review and CTE Carol Ann Zygo, Field Team Associate of Central And Northern.

Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,

ISLN Meeting March 10, PPGES Pilot Completion 0 2 nd Site Visit 0 Mid-Year Review 0 Student Growth Goals, 0 Working Condition Goals, 0 Professional.

1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.

Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.

Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.

AiZ and FT&LQ project Teachers working collaboratively in teams (PLTs, Triads) Teachers developing a shared understanding of effective teaching (PoLT,

1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.

PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.

PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.

Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.

Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.

WELCOME Professional Growth and Evaluation System.

What is the Educator Development Suite? Provides teachers with the results of classroom observations and student perception surveys Suggests contextualized.

Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.

Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.

Mid-Course Check In, Data Tracking and Preparation for Summative Cycle T-PGES Daviess County Public Schools February 2015.

The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline.

March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.

Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.

PGES: The Final 10% i21: Navigating the 21 st Century Highway to Top Ten.

Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.

Texas Educator Evaluation & Support System Systems US Department of Education NCLB Waiver-Fall 2013 Condition of Waiver to develop new Texas evaluation.

Update on the MA Task Force on Evaluation of Teachers and Administrators Presented to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education Associate Commissioner.

1 Dara Bass, KSBA Director of Policy ServicesJodie Zeller, KDE Integrated Design Team.

NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.

Educator Development Suite. Kentucky Department of Education Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Teacher Effectiveness Observation Peer Observation.

Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.

Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES & PPGES Strategy Team.

Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)

CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.

Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD Getting Ready for the Professional Growth & Effectiveness System AISD.

Developed by Earl W. Hughes, KLA Regional Facilitator and PGES Integrated Design Team Member.

1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.

Evaluation: An Opportunity to leverage learning at all levels School Board Presentation – May 22, 2013.

OVEC/KDE Instructional Support Leadership Network Welcome Your facilitators are: Dr. Molly Sullivan Mr. Buddy Berry Mr. Thom Coffee Mr. Bill Hogan Mr.

Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Update Kentucky Board of Education August 8,

Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.

Pike County Schools Implementing PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Focus on the Students Sherri Heise, Director of Instruction Tonia.

Clinical Practice Guidelines and Document Submission

DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents

Five Required Elements

Educator Effectiveness System Overview

State Board of Education Progress Update

CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment

Why do we have to change? Every student is taught by an effective teacher and every school is led by an effective principal. Fair and equitable statewide.

Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Overview

Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System

Presentation transcript:

Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System

KENTUCKY’S COMMITMENT To change how teachers and administrators are evaluated. To change how they are supported to:  Continuously improve their professional practice;  Enhance their effectiveness; and  Drive increasingly high levels of student achievement.

PROGRESS TO DATE: IMPLEMENTATION CYCLE Steering Committees (Provide initial and on- going guidance) Integrated Design Team (incorporates Steering Committee guidance into documents) District Focus Groups (review individual components) Regional Focus Groups (consolidate district input for Steering Committee feedback) Integrated Design Team (incorporates field guidance into documents) The feedback loop provides local districts and Steering Committee members opportunity to inform the work at each stage of the process.

CONSTRUCTION UNDERWAY Three Year Process of System Redesign Teacher and Principal Effectiveness Steering Committees Integrated Design Team Synthesizes Field and Steering Committee Feedback Framework Design 2010 – 2011 ( 25 Districts) Field Testing (50+ Districts) State-wide Pilot Full State Implementation

PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR TEACHER EFFECTIVENESS Teacher Effectiveness Framework Observation Peer Observation Professional Growth Self Reflection Student VoiceParent VoiceStudent Growth All multiple measures are supported through artifacts and evidence.

PROPOSED MULTIPLE MEASURES FOR PRINCIPAL EFFECTIVENESS Principal Effectiveness Framework ObservationProfessional Growth Self Reflection Student Voice Parent Voice Student Growth All multiple measures are supported through artifacts and evidence. Teacher Reflection ValEd 360

Comments: (Provide brief comments to support the holistic recommendation.) DOMAINSTANDARDPEROFRMANCE LEVELS EFFECTIVENESS FRAMEWORKS

EFFECTIVENESS FRAMEWORK DOMAINS The domains for both teacher and principal effectiveness frameworks are the same:  Instruction  Learning Climate  Leadership and Professionalism  Student Growth

EFFECTIVENESS FRAMEWORK STANDARDS The standards for teacher and principal effectiveness are different:  Teacher standards are based on the Kentucky Teacher Standards and are aligned with the characteristics of highly effective teaching and learning.  Principal standards are based on ISLLC; The Interstate School Leaders Licensure Consortium Standards

K L A ACCELERATED! CONNECTIONS Thinking in the context of the individual professional learning communities (classroom, school, district) in which you work daily, what connections do you see to your existing effectiveness initiatives and the teacher and/or principal effectiveness framework(s)? What implications do those connections have for your classroom, school or district?

MAKING A DIFFERENCE IN KENTUCKY!