Slide 1 -- February 24, 2016 RAMONA Overview
Slide 2 -- February 24, 2016 Project Goals Develop a functional and easy-to-use tool that will encourage state and local governments to inventory their data and keep their inventories up-to-date (at least 75% don’t create metadata now) Provide a tool that statewide coordination councils will get behind to prevent a proliferation of systems that can’t communicate with each other
Slide 3 -- February 24, 2016 Acrobat FileAcrobat File ed out ed out Completed on paperCompleted on paper FAX’ed back to DNRFAX’ed back to DNR Data entered and reconciled by one personData entered and reconciled by one person Maryland and Pennsylvania
Slide 4 -- February 24, 2016 Metadata Creation Original Access Database Query Database Populate WORD Document Using MACRO Create Text File Run Through “MP”
Slide 5 -- February 24, 2016 Indiana
Slide 6 -- February 24, 2016 North Carolina
Slide 7 -- February 24, 2016 Management Information
Slide 8 -- February 24, 2016 User Access GOS Portal Clearinghouse Nodes RAMONA Internet Registered UserPublic User Trusted Partner “Wrapper” Trusted Partner System Administrator
Slide 9 -- February 24, 2016 Required Features Internet tool to inventory data (only issue is how thoroughly we document) Provide a search capability to discover data Develop stock/custom report formats Create status maps Automatically generate metadata from inventory database and post to GOS Automatically update the metadata forms when changes are made to inventory
Slide February 24, 2016 Required Features Integrate with OGC environment for automatic data discovery and access Maintain a professional directory (Rolodex) Track applications development Track potential/future data collaboration projects Provide adequate security with open architecture design
Slide February 24, 2016 User Profile and Data Documentation User Profile (15 to 30 minutes) –Organization and contact information –GIS and systems information –Data distribution policies –Internet mapping services Data Profile (2 to 5 minutes per layer) –Consistent questions on all layers –Additional questions on select layers
Slide February 24, 2016 Layers Assigned to ISO Headings Locations & Geodetic NetworksGeographic Coordinates Data Base (GCDB) Horizontal Control Monuments Locations Name File (GNIS) Vertical Control Monuments Imagery, Base Maps & Land CoverDigital Raster Graphics Impervious Surfaces Land Cover Orthoimagery Rectified Imagery Elevation & Derived ProductsBathymetric Contours Digital Elevation Model Digital Terrain Models Spot Elevations Topographic Contours Triangulated Irregular Network ISO HeadingLayer Name
Slide February 24, 2016 Consistent Required Information for Every Data Layer Scale Choices 1:1200 1:2400 1:4800 1:7200 1: : : : :30000 >1:30000 For This Layer What is the Completion Status?Complete Coverage Partial Coverage No Coverage What Was the Source Material For this Layer?Uncorrected Photography Orthophotography Hardcopy Maps LIDAR IFSAR Satellite Imagery Field Survey/GPS Other (Please List)Free Text What is the Approximate Scale for this Layer?See Table at Right What is the Date of the Source Material for this Layer?Free Text 4-digit year What is the Date of Production of this Layer?Free Text 4-digit year
Slide February 24, 2016 Required Information Continued Scale Choices 1:1200 1:2400 1:4800 1:7200 1: : : : :30000 >1:30000 What is Your Update Frequency?Continually Daily Weekly Monthly Quarterly Semi-Annually Annually As Required Irregularly None Planned Other (Please List)Free Text What Type of Metadata Do You Produce for this Layer?FGDC Compliant Locally Defined Data Dictionary Other (Please List)Free Text None What is the Publication Scale for this Data Layer?See Table at Right How is This Data Layer Attributed?GIS Attributes Text Annotations Graphic Text Labels Other (Please List)Free Text No Attributes
Slide February 24, 2016 Unique Information for Select Data Types If Your Jurisdiction Creates DEM or Topographic Data, Please Answer the Following Questions. What Post Spacing Was Used in Your DEM's?See Table at Right What Contour Interval Does Your Data Support?See Table at Right Do You Have Breaklines?Yes No Do You Have Control Monuments?Yes No If Yes, Were They Established With GPS?Yes No What is the Date Range That Your Monuments Were Set? Free Text (years to years prompt) <1 meter ~1 meter ~2 meter ~3 meter ~4 meter ~5 meter ~6 meter ~7 meter ~8 meter ~9 meter ~10 meter ~15 meter ~20 meter >20 meter 1' 2' 3' 4' 5' 6' 7' 8' 9' 10' >10'
Slide February 24, 2016 Expected Headaches Unique Identifier Numbers to exchange data with Census (TED), FEMA (MIPS), NDOP, etc. Providing a comprehensive list of layers so that they are always available in “drop down” form for consistency (Currently ~259 data layers) Must “reconcile” Clearinghouse records with RAMONA records to produce meaningful status maps and management reports (1 record for 1 data set) Training curve to bring community partners (likes states or counties) on-board Quickly managing change when it’s required