Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Campus Carbon Emissions Inventory: Commuter Contributions and Campus-Land Offsets Paul Tanes Darcy Boellstorff, Ph.D.
Advertisements

WHAT IS YOUR….. By Tabitha Odutayo.
Phoenix College Carbon Emissions Report. Scope of Project To determine, track, and potentially reduce: 1. Direct emissions from sources that are owned.
Mitigation Strategies What and Why?. What is mitigation? To decrease force or intensity. To lower risk. Earthquake mitigation Flood mitigation Climate.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 W ashington University, St. Loui, MO Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus Instructors:
Rensselaer’s Sustainability Charrette Environment – Economics – Education Envision – Explore – Exchange Operations Steve Angle Carbon Footprint.
Washington University Danforth Campus Carbon Footprint: Using the Campus as a Living Laboratory E. M. Robinson, R. B. Husar, M. Malten Washington University,
1 Greenhouse Gas Inventory FY 2013 and FY 2014 for the American College & University Presidents’ Climate Commitment (ACUPCC)
Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Causality of US Sulfur Production and Emission Trends By James Agan, Kate Miller, Cat.
The Office of Sustainability UM Facilities Services 32 Campus Dr MS 9288 Missoula MT, University of Montana Climate Action Plan Planning to reduce.
MITIGATING CLIMATE CHANGE. WHAT WE KNOW The level of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere have increased, causing the Earth’s temperature to rise. One greenhouse.
Global Issues Unit Lesson 3. Objectives Consider the impact of people on physical systems and vice versa. Examine causes and effects of major environmental.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO Transportation Carbon Emissions Model - Midterm.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Energy Analysis and Carbon Footprint of.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS INVENTORY REPORT 2009 Antioch University Seattle.
Class Project Report, Spring 2014 E 449/549 Sustainable Air Quality Sustainability Transition of Sulfurous Air Quality Emissions and Causality.
Class Project Report, Spring 2014 E 449/549 Sustainable Air Quality Sustainability Transition of Sulfurous Air Quality Emissions and Causality.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
EECE 449/549 Sustainable Air Quality: Sustainable Linking of Energy and the Environment Rudolf B. Husar & Erin Robinson Department of Energy, Environmental.
DRAFT, April 24 –All data are preliminary, need verification Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University,
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
Campus Carbon Inventory Challenges and Responses Matthias Ruth Roy F. Weston Chair in Natural Economics Director, Center for Integrative Environmental.
THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND CLIMATE COMMITMENT Carbon Inventory, Lessons Learned, & Next Steps Ramy Serour Ph.D. Candidate Marine, Estuarine and Environmental.
UW-Eau Claire Carbon Emissions Inventory, Spring 2008 Dr. Kristina Beuning (Biology) and the Carbon Neutral Team (Anna Baker, Ashley Clough, Robyn Fennig,
2009 Greenhouse Gas Inventory The American College and University President’s Climate Commitment.
CLASS PROJECT REPORT SUSTAINABLE AIR QUALITY, EECE 449/549, SPRING 2010 WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY, ST. LOUIS, MO INSTRUCTORS: PROFESSOR RUDOLF B. HUSAR, ERIN.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Energy Analysis and Carbon Footprint of.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
Sustainability at NMSU A part of the integrated planning process.
Fort Lewis College Greenhouse Gas Inventory Presented by the Fort Lewis College Environmental Center January 31, 2008.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Energy Analysis and Carbon Footprint of.
Group on Earth Observations (GEO) & Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) A ten year GEOSS plan ( )
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
Net-Zero Rubenstein 5% Energy Reduction Goal Main campus electricity is supplied by the Burlington Electric Department (BED). Nuclear energy, which comprised.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO Transportation Carbon Emissions Model - Midterm.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
Earth’s Changing Environment Lecture 15 Energy Conservation.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 W ashington University, St. Loui, MO Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus Buildings.
Carbon Footprint of the U.S. Population: Causes and Spatial-Temporal Pattern U.S. Residential Electricity Use Analysis Class Project Me/ENV 449, 2007 Nick.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO Transportation Carbon Emissions Model - Midterm.
2008Greenhouse Gas Inventory - Duke University Greenhouse Gas Inventory 2008 Update.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Energy Analysis and Carbon Footprint of.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Energy Analysis and Carbon Footprint of.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Energy Analysis and Carbon Footprint of.
Population - Energy/Goods Consumption– Materials Flow - Emissions SUV/Truck Bus Metro Electric Hydrogen/Other Carbon PMT Fuels (FM), j Emission (EM), k.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and.
Group on Earth Observations (GEO) & Global Earth Observation System of Systems (GEOSS) A ten year GEOSS plan ( )
Welcome and Introductions- Working Group Chair Where We Are/Where We Are Going- Lindsay Batchelor GHG Inventory and CAP Overview- Lindsay Batchelor/Jeff.
DRAFT, April 14 –All data are preliminary, need verification Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University,
Class Project Report, Spring 2014 E 449/549 Sustainable Air Quality Sustainability Transition of Sulfurous Air Quality Emissions and Causality.
Carbon Footprint Dem Two: Enlly Bugarin Narciso Arevalo December 14, 2015.
Session 2 Buildings and Measurements. Buildings Sector Accounts for About 40% of U.S. Energy, 72% of Electricity, 34% of Natural Gas, 38% of Carbon, 18%
Carbon Footprint of the U.S. Population: Causes and Spatial-Temporal Pattern U.S. Residential Electricity Use Analysis Class Project Me/ENV 449, 2007 Nick.
Class Project Report, May 2003 ME/CE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Causality of US Sulfur Production and Emission Trends By James Agan, Kate Miller, Cat.
Carbon Footprint of the U.S. Population: Causes and Spatial-Temporal Pattern U.S. Residential Electricity Use Analysis Class Project Me/ENV 449, 2007 Nick.
Residential/Commercial Carbon Emissions Nationally and on the Danforth Campus.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 W ashington University, St. Loui, MO Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus Buildings.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2009 Washington University, St. Louis, MO Transportation Carbon Emissions Model - Midterm.
A Carbon Footprint Calculator for On-campus Students: Development and Education Jeremy Caves Maiella Leano; Jina Lee; Althea Tupper.
THE NELSON INSTITUTE CARBON FOOTPRINT PROJECT AASHE Conference November 11, 2008 Damon Clark Summit Blue Consulting Jeannette LeBoyer Econergy.
University of Toledo Climate Action Report Scope 1 By Rachel Beres, Andrew Kulikowski, Jon Lockie, Chad Pietkowski, Ken Samoei, and Cory Williams.
American University Lindsay Madeira, Manager of Sustainability Programs American University Mayra Portalatin, LEED AP, Project Manager Facility Engineering.
Integrating Frameworks for Energy and Climate Policy Analysis. Professor Rudolf B. Husar, Director, Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend Analysis,
Class Project Report, Spring 2014 E 449/549 Sustainable Air Quality Sustainability Transition of Sulfurous Air Quality Emissions and Causality.
Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 W ashington University, St. Loui, MO Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus Instructors:
Instructors: Professor Rudolf B. Husar, Erin M. Robinson
Environmental Policy & Outlook Conference
Presentation transcript:

Class Project Report Sustainable Air Quality, EECE 449/549, Spring 2008 Washington University, St. Louis, MO The Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus and its Causality Drivers Instructors: Professor Rudolf B. Husar, Erin M. Robinson For more details see the class wikiclass wiki Students: Devki Desai Martin Groenewegen Tyler Nading Kate Nelson Matt Sculnick Alyssa Smith Varun Yadav

Class Project: Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus Specific Objectives: 1.Develop and apply carbon emission estimation model 2.Estimate the carbon footprint of Danforth Campus 3.Establish the key causality drivers for the emissions 4.Calculate the Potential Cost at Chicago Climate Exchange 5.Compare the WU carbon emissions to other Universities

Main Causality Drivers of Carbon Impact: Students, Faculty, Staff and their Expenditures Between the WU population has fluctuated between 14-16,000 people Students accounted for about 80 percent of the WU population A measure of WU activities is the expenditure: Between , the expenditures increased by 70% 70% increase

Main Components of WU Carbon Emissions: On Campus Energy Use in Buildings and Transportation The impact on carbon arises from on-campus energy use and from transportation On Campus Energy Use Carbon Impact Students Heating Cooling Appliances Faculty/Staff Transportation Carbon Impact Commuting Air Travel University Fleet

Transportation Devki Desai Tyler Nading Varun Yadav

Causality Framework for University Carbon Footprint - Transportation Overall the transportation carbon emissions have remained roughly at 1990 level Population People Transportation Miles Fuel Cons. Gal./yr C Emission Ton C/yr Miles/PersonGal./MileCarbon/Gal

On Campus Energy Use Kate Nelson Alyssa Smith

Trend ( ) of University Expenditures and Building Area 60% increase During the period, the building area on the Danforth Campus has increased by about 60 percent. The 2006 Map of Danforth Campus The new buildings since 1990 are shaded black. Some of the new buildings have replaced old once.

Danforth Campus Electric Energy and Fuel Consumption Purchased electricity increased 90% between The total energy for electricity includes losses in the power plant and during transmission. Fuel used on campus for heating and hot water: coal, oil and natural gas. In 1993, the University made several upgrades: –Switched from coal to natural gas –Switched to electric chillers –Shut off steam plant from May-October hot water

Linear Causality Model for Campus Carbon Emissions The carbon impact of on-campus energy is due to direct fuel consumption and indirectly from electricity use The overall carbon impact for on campus energy consumption has increased 50% from Electricity use contributed about 80 percent to the on-campus carbon impact Population Students Activities $ Expend./yr Buildings Sq. Ft Fuel Cons. BTU/yr C Emission Ton C/yr Fuel Cons. BTU/yr C Emission Ton C/yr Electr. Cons Kw-Hr/yr $/StudentSq. Ft./$BTU/Sq.Ft. Kw-hr/Sq.Ft. BTU/Kw-hr Carbon/BTU

The student population increased only by 10% since 1990 However, the expenditures/student have increased by 60 percent The buildings/expenditure has barely changed and the increased expenditures were matched by 60% growth in campus building area Neither the energy use/sq ft nor the C emission/energy use has changed much Hence, the key driver for the 60% carbon emission growth were the increased expenditures (prosperity) and the associated growth in the physical campus expansion.

Carbon Emissions for Hilltop Campus 85% of Emission due to On Campus Sources Total Emissions increased 70%

University-wide vs. Hilltop Campus Comparison

Increased 25% Increased 100% Decreased 60%

Hilltop Campus Medical Campus N., S., W. Campuses, Tyson Research Center, South 40

Switch to natural gas On campus emissions increased ~50%

Completely stop coal usage Switch to only low sulfur coal Decreased emissions 6%

Other University Comparison Martin Groenewegen Tyler Nading

Total Emission Comparison between Universities In the class project, the published carbon emissions of 14 Universities were analyzed Evidently, the carbon emissions are roughly proportional to the campus building square footage. This class project data indicate that WU emissions/area are comparable to the other schools

Transportation Emission Comparison between Universities The transportation portion of carbon emissions indicate rough proportionality to school population Evidently, the WU transportation carbon emissions are also in line with other colleges. However, the WU estimates are uncertain and given as a range based on two calculation methods

Working Toward a Sustainable Transition Alyssa Smith

Working Toward a Sustainable Carbon Footprint As is the case for most universities, WU’s carbon footprint growth is not sustainable and eventually it will need to be reduced. A ‘transition to sustainability’ needs to occur with the goal of : –Meeting WU’s needs in education and research –While preserving the Earth’s life support systems In spite of the common concerns, WU and others face difficult questions with multiple legitimate answers: –What Is To Be Sustained –What Is To Be Developed –For How Long? The Transition to Sustainability is therefore an academic, organizational and social learning process that requires broad community participation. This class project is a modest contribution to the Transition to Sustainability in the domain of atmospheric carbon. Neutral Business as Usual Best Case

Links to Class Wiki and Documents Class Project: Carbon Footprint of Danforth Campus –On Campus Energy UseOn Campus Energy Use –TransportationTransportation –Other University ComparisonOther University Comparison –Washington University and the Chicago Climate ExchangeWashington University and the Chicago Climate Exchange –Working Toward a Sustainable TransitionWorking Toward a Sustainable Transition Related Links –Clean Air/Cool PlanetClean Air/Cool Planet –Other University InventoriesOther University Inventories –National Academy of Science Report: Our Common JourneyNational Academy of Science Report: Our Common Journey –All class contributed linksAll class contributed links

Links Class wiki: ort_on_Wash_U_Carbon ort_on_Wash_U_Carbon Delicious Resources tagged by class: