© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved EA in the Federal Enterprise Life Cycle September 2006 Steve Decker MITRE Corporation Center for Enterprise.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CPIC Training Session: Enterprise Architecture
Advertisements

2007 – 2008 Academic/Business Plan …a strategic initiative School District of Palm Beach County New Horizons for Student Success.
A BPM Framework for KPI-Driven Performance Management
Course: e-Governance Project Lifecycle Day 1
© 2009 The MITRE Corporation. All rights Reserved. Evolutionary Strategies for the Development of a SOA-Enabled USMC Enterprise Mohamed Hussein, Ph.D.
BENEFITS OF SUCCESSFUL IT MODERNIZATION
Queensland Treasury Department Role and Function of Treasury Financial Framework Charter of Fiscal and Social Responsibility and Priorities in Progress.
Enterprise Strategic Planning Digital Government Summit September 14, 2006.
Presented By: Thelma Ameyaw Security Management TEL2813 4/18/2008Thelma Ameyaw TEL2813.
AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM ACF Roundtable IT Governance – what does it mean to you as an audit committee member July 2010 The AUDIT COMMITTEE FORUM TM is.
Adopt & Adapt Tips on Enterprise Data Management Annette Pence September 10, 2009 MITRE.
IUC Shared Services Project Commissioned by Ohio Intra-University Council Commissioned by Ohio Intra-University Council Involving all 14 four year public.
With Development of National e-Agriculture Strategy In collaboration with.
Reference Models مدل های مرجع معماری.
OneMinnesota January 25, 2012 Carolyn Parnell OET Commissioner and State CIO.
Principles of Information Systems, Seventh Edition2 An organization’s TPS must support the routine, day-to- day activities that occur in the normal course.
Aust. AM Collaborative Group (AAMCOG) An introduction to ISO “What to do” guide 20th October 2014.
Moving from money well accounted for to money well spent UK Information Technology Summit May 2005 Helen McDonald A/Chief Information Officer Treasury.
Investment Management Concepts Portfolio Management | Segment Architecture March 25, 2009 Adrienne Walker and Kshemendra Paul
How the Balance Scorecard Approach Compares to Policy Governance ® IPGA 2007 Annual Conference Alexandria, VA June 23, 2007 Presented by: David Mustine.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Microsoft ® Office Project Portfolio Server 2007.
Microsoft Office Project Portfolio Server
Getting Smarter with Information An Information Agenda Approach
European Public Sector Information Systems Conference -- September 30, 1998 Case Study: Building the Skills that Produce Success - A Case Study from the.
Proposed EA Assessment Framework 2.0 Chief Architect’s Forum (CAF) Dick Burk Chief Architect and Director of Federal Enterprise Architecture Program, OMB.
© 2010 Plexent – All rights reserved. 1 Change –The addition, modification or removal of approved, supported or baselined CIs Request for Change –Record.
Presented to: Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee By: Stan Pszczolkowski, Manager, System Analysis Division Date: March 1, 2006 Federal Aviation.
The Microsoft Office 2007 Enterprise Project Management Solution:
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Information Technology Strategy & 5 Year Plan.
OSF/ISD Project Portfolio Management Framework January 17, 2011.
1 1 BRANCH: CORPORATE AFFAIRS 1. CORPORATE MANAGEMENT SERVICES To provide financial and strategic support services that enhance service delivery by the.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
HSA 171 CAR. 1436/ 7/4  The results of activities of an organization or investment over a given period of time.  Organizational Performance: ◦ A measure.
“FEA: Beyond Reference Models” September 07, 2006 Dick Burk Chief Architect and Manager, Federal Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office – OMB.
1 Cost Benefit EVM at DOT Presented to: Joint Industry – Government NDIA PMSC session Presented by: H. Giovanni Carnaroli Associate CIO, IT Policy Oversight.
An Integrated Control Framework & Control Objectives for Information Technology – An IT Governance Framework COSO and COBIT 4.0.
Copyright ©2009, Oracle and/or its Affiliates. All rights reserved. 1 Enterprise Project Portfolio Management Value, Visibility, Agility and Accountability.
1 © Material United States Department of the Interior Federal Information Security Management Act (FISMA) April 2008 Larry Ruffin & Joe Seger.
IT Strategic Planning.
FEA DRM Management Strategy Presented by : Mary McCaffery, US EPA.
1 | 2010 Lecture 3: Project processes. Covered in this lecture Project processes Project Planning (PP) Project Assessment & Control (PAC) Risk Management.
Chapter 3 Strategic Information Systems Planning.
Deloitte Consulting LLP Commonwealth of Massachusetts IT Consolidation Initiative IT Governance Target State Update Briefing for Statewide Working Group.
1 DAS Annual Review June 2008 “Build to Share” Suzanne Acar, US DOIAdrian Gardner, US National Weather ServiceCo-Chair, Federal DAS
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
Federal Enterprise BOF Rick Murphy Chief Architect, Blueprint Technologies June 7, 2004.
Proventures reconnect session on Project Portfolio Management (PPM)
1 expect the best Briefing to the IT Project Review Committee December 8, 2004 ITIB Recommended Technology Investment Projects (RTIP)
FY14-FY22 IT Roadmap – Update Budget and Investment Committee October 8, 2013.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program January 17, 2002 eGovernment Executive Council Chris Niedermayer, USDA eGovernment Executive Barbara.
Enterprise Architecture & Process Improvement EPIC Process Improvement Workshop April 17, 2007 Dick Burk Chief Architect and Manager, Federal Enterprise.
12-CRS-0106 REVISED 8 FEB 2013 APO (Align, Plan and Organise)
BEA Orientation November 13, 2007
CYSSC - Cluster 2.0 Partner Management Final Deliverable High Sensitivity Sep 2, 2011 Cluster 2.0 Project Team.
Alex Ezrakhovich Process Approach for an Integrated Management System Change driven.
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
Environment, Safety, and Occupational Health Opportunities in DoD Business Transformation May 4, 2006.
Budget Study Sessions Strategic Support Proposed Operating Budget OUTCOMES: - A High Performing Workforce that is Committed to Exceeding.
Serving IT up with ITIL By Thane Price. IT is the laboratory’s pit crew  Goal : Make technology transparent while accomplishing valuable internal customer.
Managing Enterprise Architecture
Draft - Enterprise Risk Management Risk Universe
Michael J. Novak ASQ Section 0511 Meeting, February 8, 2017
Transforming the Business of Government Through Shared Services JOHN SINDELAR Deputy Associate Administrator United States General Services Administration.
Enterprise Architecture Methods
What is the State of Asset Management?
CAF Quarterly Meeting Measuring the Value of an EA Practice
Vijay Rachamadugu and David Snyder September 7, 2006
The Methodology for Business Transformation
Presentation transcript:

© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved EA in the Federal Enterprise Life Cycle September 2006 Steve Decker MITRE Corporation Center for Enterprise Modernization

© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved Observations “Architecting” at the Enterprise Level of a Department / Agency is not the same as architecting at the Implementation or Operations Levels... Enterprise Level difficulties result from... n Failure of Communication –Failure to identify Business, Investment, and Infrastructure Dimensions using owners language vice architects language n Failure of Time –Failure to create and use separate Master Schedule “roadmaps” for Evolution of Mission Capabilities and Enablers And last but certainly not least... n Failure to “follow the money” –Failure to identify and manage ALL funding sources necessary to deliver a mission capability The Identification of a Federal Enterprise Life Cycle and the addition of time and money Dimensions to a Department/Agency EA can correct these difficulties

© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved Architecting Levels of a Dept/Agency Enterprise Strategic Planning, Policy & Oversight Implementation Operations 24 / 7 / 365 months to years annual milestones Enterprise Architecting System Architecting Service Architecting Mission Capability Needs Mission Capability Delivery Mission Capability Orchestration Cycle times PEOTPEOT PTEOPTEO POETPOET emphasis on... Future Mission – what to do next ? time – priority phasing money – priority funding emphasis on... Program Execution Integration of People Facilities Systems Support Activities emphasis on... Mission Execution Orchestration of Service Capabilities POET Priority P olitical O perational (mission capabilities) E conomic (time & money) T echnical (people, facilities, systems, support activities) Architecting Level

© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved defines Dept / Agency “Enterprise” in Context Government Mission LOBs Legislative BranchExecutive Branch Budget Executive Branch Departments / Agencies / Org’s OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT PRM divided into allocated across drives implemented into measured results satisfies Mission & Business Results Area inputs Process & Activities Area inputs Technology Area inputs authorizes prioritizes allocated across divided into that fund influences TRM * all $$ - Capital & Non-Capital improvement opportunities (all levels) Funding Lines* that satisfies the mission Services to Citizens DRM BRM SRM vocabulary for Mission Capabilities Line of Sight Workforce Installations (Facilities, etc.) Services (Systems, etc.) Support Products Measurement Indicators Customer Results Area inputs Dept / Agency Missions Dept / Agency Mission Enablers

© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved How to Achieve Balance across the Enterprise? defines DRM Government Mission LOBs BRM SRM Legislative BranchExecutive Branch Budget Executive Branch Departments Programs Workforce Facilities Technology Applications OPERATIONAL ENTERPRISE PRM divided into allocated across enabled by drives implemented into measured results satisfies measurement input measurement input measurement input authorizes prioritizes allocated across divided into that fund influences TRM business service design Define Federal Enterprise Life Cycle to balance technology, money, and time priorities Expand EA Dimensions to Support FELC Define Federal Enterprise Life Cycle to balance technology, money, and time priorities Expand EA Dimensions to Support FELC The Federal Enterprise Life Cycle Program Implementation Mission Planning & Control Financial Planning & Control

© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved Federal Enterprise Life Cycle - Defined Planning & Budgeting Strategic Planning Budget Formulation Capital Planning Budget Execution Workforce Planning Management Improvement Budget & Performance Integration Tax & Fiscal Policy Enterprise Architecture Controls & Oversight Corrective Action Program Evaluation Program Monitoring Internal Risk Management & Mitigation Contingency Planning Continuity of Operations Service Recovery Regulatory Development Public Affairs Legislation Relations General Government Revenue Collection Dept / Agency Services for CitizensMode of Delivery Support Delivery of Services Management of Gov Resources Fiscal Mgmt Accounting Budget & Finance Payments Collection & Receivables Asset & Liability Mgmt Reporting & Information Human Resource Mgmt HR Strategy Staff Acquisition Organization & Position Mgmt Compensation Mgmt Benefits Mgmt Employee Development & Performance Mgmt Employee Relations Labor Relations Separation Mgmt Administrative Mgmt Information & Technology Mgmt System Development Lifecycle / Change Mgmt System Maintenance IT Infrastructure Maintenance Info Sys Security Record Retention Information Management Supply Chain Mgmt Performing the Missions Allocated to the Department / AgencyOperating the Department / Agency to Support Mission Performance Same for all Agencies !! Federal Enterprise Life Cycle Processes are comprised of these BRM Sub-Functions Federal Enterprise Life Cycle Processes are comprised of these BRM Sub-Functions

© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved Enterprise Architecture Dimensions - Defined OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT Transition / Sequencing Enterprise Roadmap Programs, Projects Investment Portfolios Strategic Planning Initiatives Goals Objectives Drivers Specifications Executive OrdersPublic Law CFRs Workforce Services (Systems, etc.) Support Products Mission Enablers Mission Processes Business Processes Installations (Facilities, etc.) satisfies These are the Business Processes - in the language of the “Operators” or “Mission Owners” These are the financial line items - in the language of the “Budget Formulation and Execution” people These are the physical elements that are implemented into the Operational Environment, they enable the Mission Capabilities and are funded by Portfolio Programs/Projects - described in the language of the “Operators” and “Maintainers” These are the sequencing plans for the Mission Capabilities, Mission Enablers, and the Programs/Projects that fund them These provide context Mission Capabilities

© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved EA Dimensions related to FELC Processes OPERATIONAL ENVIRONMENT Transition / Sequencing Enterprise Roadmap Programs, Projects Investment Portfolios Strategic Planning Initiatives Goals Objectives Drivers Specifications Executive OrdersPublic Law CFRs Workforce Installations Services (Systems, etc.) Support Products Physical Business Processes Business Processes Customer Result Area Mission & Business Results Area Technology Results Area Measured Results Budget and Performance Integration - Line of Sight Capital Planning Budget Formulation Budget Execution Controls & Oversight Management Improvement Mission Capabilities Enablers Management Improvement

© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved Mission Capabilities are the Balancing Point for FELC Mission Capability x y z NowNext Target Orchestration of Capability Business Processes Synchronization of Capability Enabler Funding Sources Sequencing of Capability EnablersInteroperability of Capability Enablers

© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved Capturing Interrelationships is key to FELC Decision Making Investment Portfolio Program Line Item Project Workforce InstallationServiceSupport Product 1...∞ Physical Enablers 1...∞ These are the minimum interrelationships that must be captured to answer most time, money, and mission impact “what if” questions throughout the FELC processes... Mission Capability 1...∞ A Project must fund at least 1 Enabler Strategic Planning Initiative 1...∞ Business Process 1...∞ A Mission Capability must map to at least 1 Enabler 1...∞ Mission Capability Initiative Enabler Initiative

© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved Roadmaps support FELC Capabilities Enablers FY09FY10FY11FY12 drive FY09FY10FY11FY12 Mission Capability Roadmap VISION During the Budget Formulation Process for a Specific FY… Each Org Prioritizes and Refocuses their Strategic Initiatives – There must be 100% mapping to Initiatives Proposed Mission Capability/Enabler Improvement Initiatives Enabler Roadmap Forecast of “what to do next...” Agency Org Enterprise Roadmap $$ $$ Workforce Installations Services Support Products Capability “A” Capability “B” Update for Approved Budget

© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved Dimensional Interrelationships – Example Service B Strategy Drivers Mission Capability n MC n Roadmap Project m Project z Building C Building D People M1 People M23 BPx: Access to Care BPy: Laboratory Ops BPz: Radiology Sys 74 Sys 32 Sys 99 Mission Capability n Enter Term Look it up Investments Business Implementation Services Installations People Systems What Bus Proc are associated with “MC n”? What Projects fund “MC n”? What is the schedule for “MC n”? What Infrastructure supports “MC n”? Infrastructure Roadmap Cluster Diagram Product

© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved Summary / Conclusions n At the Federal Department / Agency Level... –Enterprise Architecting is really Architecting the Enterprise n Architecting the Enterprise requires understanding of time, money, and Mission Interdependencies –Federal Enterprise Life Cycle is a useful construct for balancing enterprise interdependencies n FEA BRM defines the Business Sub-functions necessary for FELC –Mission Capabilities are a useful construct for highlighting interdependencies to support FELC decisions n Dept / Agency EAs could be expanded to support architecting at the Enterprise level –Allows creation of new products to support n FELC processes n Mission Capability definition and interdependencies –Uses existing data sources!!

© 2006 The MITRE Corporation. All rights reserved QUESTIONS ??