Carin Bisland, EPA Principals’ Staff Committee 5/14/12.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Marylands Approach to Success Stories Presented to the Region III States Meeting May 12, 2009 Presented by Jim George.
Advertisements

Planning for Our Future:
Chesapeake Bay Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Tracking Thursday, May 31, 2012 Martin Hurd, Vladislav Royzman, Tetra Tech, Inc. Brian Burch, Megan Thynge,
James River Chlorophyll Study Status Update: January 2015 House Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources Committee David K. Paylor, DEQ Director.
CBP Partnership Proposal for Ensuring Full Accountability of Best Practices and Technologies Implemented CBP WQGIT Wastewater Treatment Workgroup Briefing.
Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1.
Carin Bisland, EPA Management Board Presentation 5/9/12.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Six Sigma Black Belt Project Information Prepared: July 20, 2004.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework Briefing CBP Partnership’s Communications Workgroup July 10, 2014.
Progress Update: Evaluation of Federal Facilities in WIPs and Milestones CBPO Management Board March 6, Jim Edward, EPA Greg Allen, EPA.
DC Draft Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan Stakeholder Meeting March 1, 2012 Metropolitan Washington Council Of Governments Hamid Karimi Deputy Director.
Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.
Progress on Coordinating CBP and Federal Leadership Goals, Outcomes, and Actions Principals’ Staff Committee Meeting 2/16/12 Carin Bisland, Associate Director.
1 Chesapeake Bay Program Management Board Meeting March 6, 2012 Discussion for the Final Evaluation of Milestones.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Michigan Watershed Plan Reviews Presentation at the Michigan Watershed-Based Planning Workshop, Mt. Pleasant, Michigan
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Jim Edward EPA Deputy Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office DDOE Meeting with Federal Partners February.
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Updating Background Conditions and BMP Efficiencies Jeff Sweeney Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Office
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should: be designed to restore water quality from nonpoint source impairments using sufficiently analyzed.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
EPA Chesapeake Bay Trading and Offsets Workplan June 1, 2012.
Robert M. Summers, Ph.D. September 16, 2015 How can we make sure the Chesapeake Bay Restoration really works?
Chesapeake Bay Program’s Baywide and Basinwide Monitoring Networks: Options for Adapting Monitoring Networks and Realigning Resources to Address Partner.
Chesapeake Bay TMDL 2017 Midpoint Assessment: A Critical Path Forward Lucinda Power EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting.
Moving towards a restored Chesapeake Bay watershed
Maryland Association of Counties Conference August 12, 2009 Bob Koroncai USEPA Region III The Chesapeake Bay TMDL.
Overview of the Total Maximum Daily Load Program.
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Implementation Plans: Why, What, and When Katherine Antos U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office MACo Winter Conference January.
Potential Activities, Costs, and Priorities for Watershed Monitoring Scott Phillips Joel Blomquist Katie Foreman Eff/Opt Conf Call July 24, 2009.
Existing Non-tidal Monitoring Network. Existing Non-tidal Monitoring Network classified according to size of watershed and predominant land use upstream.
Katherine Antos, Water Quality Team Leader Water Quality Goal Implementation Team Coordinator U.S. EPA Chesapeake Bay Program Office Chesapeake Bay Program.
FY 2016 EAP Proposals 1.Groundwater Sampling at Coulee Creek 2.Deep & Coulee Straight to Implementation Project 3.Little Spokane DO/pH TMDL 4.Lake Spokane.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE SPRING MEETING MARCH 1—2, 2012 CHARLOTTESVILLE, VA EPA’s Evaluation of Bay Jurisdictions’ Draft Phase II WIPs & Final
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Update for the Citizens Advisory Committee February 22, 2017
Chesapeake bay program
CBP Update: Climate Change and the Chesapeake Bay TMDL
Proposed Bay TMDL Schedule
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Citizens Advisory Committee
Chesapeake Bay Program
2025 Chesapeake Bay Climate Change Load Projections
Chesapeake Bay Program Principals’ Staff Committee December 20, 2017
GIS Data Management for SHA’s Bay Restoration Program
Program Manager, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay
Fitting the pieces together
2017 Midpoint Assessment: Year of Decision October 5, 2017 Local Government Advisory Committee Meeting.
Local Government Advisory Committee
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
What is a Watershed Implementation Plan?
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Straight to the Point – Watershed-based Plans Should:
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Jon Capacasa, Director Water Protection Division U.S. EPA Region III
The Nine Elements that Must Be Included in a 319 Watershed Based Plan
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
2018 BMP Verification Assessment
Presentation transcript:

Carin Bisland, EPA Principals’ Staff Committee 5/14/12

EC Presentation of Pollution Reduction Progress Five Sets of Documents Backgrounder - tying all progress together Milestones Progress (2-Pagers) 2011 Reducing Pollution Indicators Summary Milestones (2-Pagers) Nutrient and Sediment Trends One Powerpoint

1. Backgrounder Performance metrics first established in 1987 with the long term goal of 40% nutrient reduction by EC directed partnership to develop short term 2 year milestones in NAS reviewed the concept of 2 year milestones. Midway through milestones, the TMDL was developed New Baseline, planning targets, tracking and accounting system

Backgrounder Continued For the 2012 EC meeting What can we say to answer the ultimate question – are we making appropriate progress in meeting the tidal water quality standards for DO, Clarity, and chlorophyll a? practices put in place during the original milestone period against the practices planned in 2008 to meet the milestones 2011 progress (first year of the TMDL) – Are we generally on a straight line trajectory to meet our targets in 2017? Milestones and 2017 planning targets – do they keep the jurisdictions on a trajectory to meet the 2017 target or is there reasonable assurance that the programs they are putting in place now will get them on track to meet the 2017 targets?

In Addition - Monitoring 20 + year record and new monitoring programs to determine whether the actions on the ground are reducing pollutants in the adjacent rivers. Progress on meeting water quality standards for DO, clarity, chlorophyll a

Diet Analogy

Milestones 2-Pagers for each individual jurisdictions. Progress is based on rates of implementation, not on pollution load reductions. Progress is compared with expected BMP implementation from original factsheets where applicable. Data for implementation of practices from input deck information where possible. Jurisdictions and CBPO are finalizing factsheets now.

Milestones

Progress Run For N, P, and sediment By Jurisdiction By Sector

Milestones 2-Pagers for each individual jurisdiction. General Narrative Highlights of programmatic and BMP actions. Expected load reductions from those actions as stacked bars for N, P, and Sediment Jurisdictions and CBPO are finalizing factsheets this week for the PSC meeting

Milestones

5. Nutrient and Sediment Trends Part of proposed integrated approach to better assess and communicate progress toward attainment of water-quality standards (more detail in next presentation) Provided for two periods, long-term changes ( ) and over 10 years ( ) Uses the CBP nontidal monitoring network to show changes

5. Nutrient and Sediment Trends

2011 Progress (Draft) in Relation to 2009 Baseline, 2013 Milestone (Draft), 2017 Interim Target and 2025 Planning Target

Option 1

Watershed-wide progress Include key “highlights” (to be ID’d by the jurisdictions in the MS factsheets) of accomplishments Identify key highlights of actions that are expected to be taken in (to be ID’d by the jurisdictions in the MS factsheets)

Monitoring Results and Opportunities Could include: Long term and short term non-tidal trends in N, P Tidal Monitoring results for 2011 for Water Clarity, DO New nontidal monitoring to improve understanding of water quality changes based on actions taken