THM-MMS coordination 1 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS THM-MMS coordination options: summary of Feb 25, 2014.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

SWTTail Season Conjunctions 1 UCB, Dec THEMIS SCIENCE WORKING TEAM MEETING Tail 1 Conjunctions Sabine Frey University of California - Berkeley.

Advertisements

Nonlinear Programming

MMS-THM coordination 1 Iowa 3/25/14 ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS MMS-THEMIS coordination: Optimal Option (and alternatives) Vassilis Angelopoulos (UCLA);

1 Winter Launch Block Modeling and Results MMS Flight Dynamics Team MIWG 8 Feb. 20, 2014.

PLATO Phase A/B1 Status TOU Meeting Catania 28 Feb 2011 PLAnetary Transits and Oscillation of stars.

UCL DEPARTMENT OF SPACE & CLIMATE PHYSICS SPACE PLASMA PHYSICS GROUP A Potential Mission Concept for the M Launch: Investigation of MagnetoPause.

MMS SWG 27 March MMS SWG –27 March 2014 MMS Mission Design March Launch Comparison (slides for the Telecon on 4 April 2014) Stephen A. Fuselier.

MEPAG National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Presentation to MEPAG.

1st Joint Cluster-THEMIS Workshop THEMIS Orbit Updates - 1 UNH, Sep 23-26, 2008 THEMIS Orbit Updates Prior to Second Tail Season 2008/2009 S.Frey, V.Angelopoulos,

Polar – THEMIS Collaboration Opportunities Spacecraft Locations post launch Magnetopause campaign? Conjugate studies with THEMIS Ground Stations C. T.

Phase Shifts of Sinusoidal Graphs. We will graph sine functions of the following form: The amplitude A =  A  The period T = 22  The phase shift comes.

Spacecraft working group report SuperDARN workshop 2011 Rob Fear, Jim Wild & the spacecraft working group.

Overview of space-ground coordination Dec 15 (  2 mo): Apogees around 6UT (MMS 12MLT, Phase 1a / THEMIS 23MLT). Northern winter. Europe on dayside,

April 4, 2014 Flight Dynamics 1 MMS-THEMIS Phasing An apples-to-apples comparison between the Winter Nominal and THEMIS Launch Block Conrad Schiff MMS.

Brief introduction of YINGHUO-1 Micro-satellite for Mars environment exploration J. Wu, G. Zhu, H. Zhao, C. Wang, L. Lei, Y. Sun, W. Guo and S. Huang Center.

Polar Communications & Weather (PCW) Guennadi Kroupnik (CSA)

Session 10: Space Data Support to GFOI R&D DLR Contributing Data Stream Report SDCG-7 Sydney, Australia March 4 th – 6 th 2015 Helmut Staudenrausch, DLR.

Time-Series Forecast Models EXAMPLE Monthly Sales ( in units ) Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Data Point or (observation) MGMT E-5070.

Learn more about the Super Moon phenomenon. Watch this YouTube video.

© 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Discovering the Universe for Yourself.

GEONS Ground Support System Java 7, JavaFX and the NetBeans Platform supporting NASA Missions Operations.

THEMIS peer Instrument CDR 1 CETP, Paris, April 8, 2004 THEMIS Mission Status at Peer UCB Instrument Critical Design Review UCB, April 19/20, 2004 Vassilis.

ORBITALS Phase A Extended Interim Meeting U of A Phase A2 Work Update ORBITALS Science Team, University of Alberta CSA HQ, St. Hubert, 2010/03/17.

Arctic System Model Workshop Background and Objectives International Arctic Research Center Hosted by National Center for Atmospheric Research May 19-22,

Polar Gateways 2008THEMIS Constellation Operations − Jan 2008 THEMIS Constellation Operations Dr. Manfred Bester University of California at Berkeley.

THEMIS-MMS coordination: The makings of a Heliophysics System Observatory and the beginning of a new era in our understanding of global connections Vassilis.

THM-MMS coordination 1 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS THM-MMS coordination options: summary of Feb 25, 2014.

Issue/Revision: 1.0 Reference: Status: For information Only ESA UNCLASSIFIED - For Official Use Solar Orbiter: Launch Options Favouring Data.

Problem 4: Clifton Country Rd/Route 146 Intersection Base Case Phasing and Volumes Analysis Plans Description of Analyses Overarching Issues 4a: AM peak.

Overview of space-ground coordination Dec 15 (  2 mo): Apogees around 6UT (MMS 12MLT, Phase 1a / THEMIS 23MLT). Northern winter. Europe on dayside,

Guan Le NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Challenges in Measuring External Current Systems Driven by Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction.

THEMIS MISSION PDRMISSION DESIGN- 1 UCB, November 12-14, 2003 Mission Design Dr. Sabine Frey University of California - Berkeley.

Van Allen Extended Mission Orbit Analysis 9/2014 SWG T. Sotirelis, F. Siddique JHU/APL.

S. Frey, UCB, THEMIS 1 25th ISSFD, Munich, Germany, Oct.19-23, 2015 ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS The Revised Concept of the THEMIS and MMS Coordination Sabine.

THM-MMS coordination 1 HSO Optimization ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS Regarding revised MMS launch elements (RAP=274, AOP=170) relative to the 3/24/14.

Analysis of Suprathermal Events Observed by STEREO/PLASTIC with a Focus on Upstream Events STEREO SWG - 20 Meredith, NH October 27-29, 2009 Josh Barry,

The diagram below shows the Moon in different positions as it revolves around Earth, as observed from above the North Pole (NP). Which image correctly.

THEMIS MIWG #3Probe Separation Analysis - Page 1June 15 & Probe Separation Analysis Daniel Rummel UCB.

Jan 2008 LMSSC - 1 SWEA Plume Impingements Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Mission.

JMARS THEMIS Targeting Software An Overview for Mars Student Scientists Revised: 19 September 2006.

ISRO – NASA Space Science Co-operation S.Seetha Programme Director, Space Sciene Programme Office, ISRO HQ & Co-Chair-INMWG Meeting on 24 th Feb 2016 at.

SECAS Dec 01 MISSIONS: POLAR, WIND, GEOTAIL, CLUSTER Jim Sharber MISSION STATUS.

THEMIS Mission Ops Peer Review Mission Design − 1 November THEMIS Mission Design.

THEMIS FDMO Review Mission Design Update − 1 October 5, 2004 Mission Design Update Sabine Frey.

HSO optimization 1 THEMIS-MMS coordination ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS THM-MMS coordination, revised: The makings of a Heliophysics System Observatory.

CAA 6 th Cross Cal Meeting RAL, th Oct 2007 RAPID/IES Calibration Status J.A. Davies.

MMS SCIENCE OPERATIONS, SCIENCE DATA SYSTEM, AND DATA ACCESS MMS Contact: Kris Larsen, lead for the MMS Science Data Center

How Eclipses Occur Total Solar Eclipse 14 November 2012 Astronomical Association of Queensland Science Teachers Association of Queensland.

Christian Brothers University

Draft thoughts on selecting LSST DDFs

THEMIS and ARTEMIS Status

Analyzing patterns in the phenomena

SDO Flight Dynamics Subsystem

Swarm constellation options

Transit Orbits Kassandra De Voto

Section 3: The Sun-Earth-Moon System

Launch and On-orbit Checkout

Gantt Chart Enter Year Here Activities Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug

First 10 months (Feb 2007-Dec 2007)

Rev. 5 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY SERVICE PROVIDER JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN.

First 10 months Angelopoulos, 2008 Space Sci. Rev. In Press

Wireless Local Number Portability Timeline - Phase 2

Rev. 5 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY SERVICE PROVIDER JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN.

THEMIS First Results and near future

Phases of the Moon The moon revolves around Earth once a month causing the phases of the moon The phases are caused by the position of the moon relative.

Upcoming Candidate MMS-Cluster-THEMIS Conjunctions Within the Magnetosheath, at the Magnetopause and the LLBL C.P. Escoubet1, S.M. Petrinec2, R. Nakamura3,

Rev. 5 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY SERVICE PROVIDER JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN.

Rev. 2 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY 2002 SERVICE PROVIDER JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP.

Wireless Local Number Portability Timeline - Phase 2

Rev. 2 Wireless Local Number Portability and Pooling Phase 2 Implementation Guideline INDUSTRY 2002 SERVICE PROVIDER JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP.

Presentation transcript:

THM-MMS coordination 1 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS THM-MMS coordination options: summary of Feb 25, 2014 kickoff and how to move forward Vassilis Angelopoulos, Sabine Frey, Cindy Russell, Tai Phan, David Sibeck

THM-MMS coordination 2 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS MMS nominal launch for Mar 7, 2015 (RpxRa=1.2x12 Re, inc=28 o ): Line of apsides drifts back: 25.5deg/yr (counter clockwise) LT 12 LT Circle at 12Re Nominal orbit configurations on XY GSE plane. How to address this large local time difference? X gse Y gse Magnetopause Bow shock Magnetotail …on Mar 7, 2015 Apparent orbit motion: clockwise ~1 o per day Apparent motion: ~1 o per day THM on Mar 7, 2014 (RpxRa=1.145x Re, inc=8 o ) Line of apsides drifts back: 51deg/yr (counter clockwise)

THM-MMS coordination 3 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS Nominal (Spring-like) MMS launch for Mar 7 th is shown in the white area here (but for Mar 11 th, adapted from MMS_WinterBlock_MIWG_CS.pptx) Option 1, 21LT RAP=300 (Fall-like) Options 2,3 16LT RAP=225 (Spring like) Nominal (Spring-like) 3-5LT launch resides here (RAP=36-60) Note: Phase 0 is 5-6mo. Shadows ~3.5hrs (max in Phase 0)

THM-MMS coordination 4 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS Option #1. Enables Tail #2 (Phase2b) alignments, per plan, but MMS gets 2.5mo of commissioning Dayside #2 (Phase 1b, Aug. 28, 2016) Lines of apsides still ~45 o apart 12 MMS Launch: Mar. 7, 2015 ~16LT 6 18 Tail#2 (Phase 2b, Mar. 4, 2017) Within 25 o ; THM apogees: 12-16Re; Get THM resonant orbits w/MMS 55Re P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 MMS MMS on May 22 (2.5 mo. later, at Phase 1a start)

THM-MMS coordination 5 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS Option 1 Fix RAP, Vary RAAN. 7d shadows: Green (req.<1hr); 14d shadows: Ciel (req.<2hrs); LongShadows: Red (req.<3hr) NS Conjunctions: Purple (req. >100min) Available window: RAAN=[55 o,65 o ], 10 o wide, allows for a 40min launch window. (Mar 07 is similar) Investigation of other APERs will be important (under study) to determine a feasible launch plan. Compliant RAANs: ~ 51 o … 65 o

THM-MMS coordination 6 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS Option 1 Vary AOP, RAAN (Explore in 2D). LongShadows: Left; NS Conjunctions: Middle; LongShadows+Conjunctions: Right Phase2b shadows RAP= 300 Phase0,1 shadows Optimal region Optimal region (from 1D) ( ) Optimal region ( ) Optimal region ( ) Shadows and Conjunctions

THM-MMS coordination 7 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS Option #1 (continued). Assessment and future work -Solution space: identified a 10 o -wide RAAN interval with no violations -Pros: Enables Phase 2b alignments -Cons: Reduced commissioning to 2.5 mo. commissioning Future work -Confirmation/validation of available solution space (FDOA). -Risk implications/mitigations of 2.5 mo. commissioning (project). -Improvements on solution space (expand solution window if necessary)? -Use APER-RAAN diagrams to arrive at a launch vehicle request (on-going)

THM-MMS coordination 8 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS Option #2. Phase 0: prime observations, unique HSO science, cross-calibration; Phase 1a: good Dayside #0 (Phase 0, Jun. 29, 2015) Start MMS prime observations THM would be string of pearls Unique science, HSO-calibration 12 MMS Launch: Mar. 7, 2015 THM: ~15LT MMS: 16LT 6 18 Dayside #1 (Phase 1a, Jun. 7, 2016) Separation: o (near-optimal) THM-MMS nested tetrahedra

THM-MMS coordination 9 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS Option #2 (continued): Optimal Phases 1b, 2b [Doubles proposed dayside conjunctions] Dayside #2 (Phase 1b, Jul. 5, 2017) Separation: 0-2 o (optimal) THM-MMS nested tetrahedra Tail#2 (Phase 2b, Jan. 10, 2018) Separation: 6-10 o (optimal) THM apg: 12-16Re. Resonant orbits P3 P4 P5 MMS 55Re P1 P2 - Pros: Optimal HSO operation, double the amount of dayside conjunctions - Cons: 3.5 mo. commissioning, additional 4.5 mo. of mission duration Implications? Mitigations? (e.g., turn off instruments and/or spacecraft for 5-8 mo. after Phase 0 and before Phase 1a to reduce cost/risk)

THM-MMS coordination 10 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS Option #3. Same as Option #2, but Phase 1a is now optimal (MMS adjusted perigee at 1000km). Dayside #0 (Phase 0, Jun. 30, 2015) Start MMS prime observations THM would be string of pearls Unique science, HSO-calibration near-optimal THM-MMS separation 12 MMS Launch: Mar. 7, 2015 at Ra 200km above nominal, then raise prg to 200km below nominal (1000km not 1200km) THM: ~15.2LT MMS: 16LT 6 18 Dayside #1 (Phase 1a, Jun. 10, 2016) Separation: 4-6 o (optimal) THM-MMS nested tetrahedra

THM-MMS coordination 11 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS Option #3 (continued): Same as Option #2 Dayside #2 (Phase 1b, Jul. 10, 2017) Separation: 0-2 o (optimal) THM-MMS nested tetrahedra Tail#2 (Phase 2b, Jan. 15, 2018) Separation: 6-10 o (optimal) THM apg: 12-16Re. Resonant orbits P3 P4 P5 MMS 55Re P1 P2 - Pros: Same as Option 2 + near-optimal Phase 0 and optimal in Phase 1b - Cons: Same as Option 2. Implications? Mitigations? (Same as Option 2) Note: Mission duration can be reduced by 0.25 mo. (to 4.25mo. in addition to nominal) if the Phase 0 science is reduced by 0.25mo.

THM-MMS coordination 12 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS Options 2/3: Fix RAP, Vary RAAN. 7d shadow: Green (req.<1hr) 14d shadow: Ciel (req.<2hrs); LongShadows: Red (req.<3hr?) NS Conjunctions: Purple (req. >100min) Available window: RAAN=[45 o,55 o ], 10 o wide, allows for a 40min launch window. (This is for Option#2 but solution for Option #3 is very similar). “Nominal” (3-5LT) Spring-like launch 1 st year max shadows Compliant RAANs: ~ 42 o … 55 o

THM-MMS coordination 13 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS Options #2&#3 (continued). Assessment and future work -Solution space: identified a 10 o wide RAAN interval with similar long term shadows as nominal Spring-like launch and no early shadows/NS conjunction violations -Pros: -Additional Phase 0 prime MMS observations ( mo.) with unique HSO component (THM nearby, string of pearls) and cross-calibration. -Near-optimal or entirely optimal THM-MMS conjunctions in Phase 1a is in addition to the entirely optimal conjunctions in Phase 1b. More than doubles dayside conjunctions relative to original proposal for Fall launch. -Optimal THM-MMS conjunctions Phase 2b -Cons: -Reduced commissioning to 3.5 mo. commissioning (3-4mo) in exchange for 1month of extra prime observations in Phase 0. -Extra time in space (4.5mo. in addition to nominal Spring-like launch at 5LT). Future work -Completion of Option #3 solution space. -Confirmation/validation of available solution space (FDOA). -Risk mitigation of 3.5 mo. commissioning (partial loss of 1mo. Phase0 science?) -Risk and cost implications of 4.5 mo. extra mission duration relative to nominal? -Improvements on solution space (expand solution window if necessary)? -Use APER-RAAN diagrams to arrive at a launch vehicle request (on-going)

THM-MMS coordination 14 Summary of options from Feb 25, 2014 telecon ARTEMIS THEMIS ARTEMIS THEMIS Option pros, cons as function of launch time Cost/Risk Implications, Mitigations? Feb/MarApr/MayJun/JulAug/Sep Option #1Phase 2b conjunctions retained 2.5 mo. commissioning Phase 2b conjunctions retained <1mo. commissioning -- Option #2- Phase 0 prime obs. (1mo), unique HSO science, cross-cal. - Phase 1a near-optimal, Phases 1b, 2b optimal (doubles MMS-THM conjunctions rel. to Fall launch) mo. (0.5 less than nominal) of commissioning mo. extra in space compared to nominal 5LT - Phase 1a good, Phases 1b, 2b optimal (doubles MMS-THM conjunctions rel. to Fall launch) (no Phase 0 prime sci., but commissioning is now nominal) - MMS Launch at 12LT  MMS mission duration reduced by 2mo. relative to Feb/Mar launch, though [per Trevor] still 4.5 mo. extra compared to nominal (?) - Phase 1a good, Phases 1b, 2b optimal (doubles MMS-THM conjunctions rel. to Fall launch) (no Phase 0 prime sci., but commissioning is now nominal) - MMS Launch at 8LT  Total mission duration reduced by 4mo. relative to Feb/Mar launch, 3 mo. extra in space compared to nominal - Phase 1a good, Phases 1b, 2b optimal (doubles MMS- THM conjunctions rel. to Fall launch) (no Phase 0 prime sci…) - MMS Launch at 4LT  Total mission duration reduced by 6mo. relative to Feb/Mar launch, 1 mo. extra in space compared to nominal Option #3Same as above, but Phase 1a now has optimal MMS-THM conjunctions We probably want to discuss the lowest cost and risk strategies for any of these options, add and subtract implications (pros and cons) to this table and present jointly. In parallel we want to fine-tune the numbers in the tables to ensure they are in the ballpark.