Strengthening Responsible Fatherhood Programs through Research and Evaluation: PACT and FaMLE Cross-Site Texas Fatherhood Summit Austin, TX February 3,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 EEC Board Meeting May 10, 2011 Child Care Development Fund – State Plan for Federal Fiscal Years 2012 and 2013.
Advertisements

Amanda Barczyk, M.S.W. 1 & Valarie Garza 2 The University of Texas at Austin School of Social Work 1 Texas Health Institute 2.
2012 Review Growing Up Great Network February 2013.
“It’s All About the Data” The Interface of Evaluation, Program Development, and Partnership to Address Substance Abuse and Reduce Child Abuse and Neglect.
Linking Actions for Unmet Needs in Children’s Health
Embedding the Early Brain & Child Development Framework into Quality Rating and Improvement Systems Meeting Name Presenter Name Date 1.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
ISOTURE: A Model for Volunteer Management
Community-Based Child Abuse Prevention Program (CBCAP) 2006 Program Instruction Overview May 2006 Melissa Lim Brodowski Office on Child Abuse and Neglect,
Georgia Division of Child Support Services Department of Human Services Outreach Services.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Promoting Increased School Stability & Permanence
Introductions Social Issues Historical Overview Purpose and Goals Program Eligibility Legislation Permanent Connections Resources to Promote Permanency.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Pre- and Post- Placement Intervention Approach with Kinship Families: Role for Child Protection Workers Priscilla Gibson, Ph.D., Katie Haas Shweta Singh.
Center for Urban Families “Including Fathers in the Work We Do with Families” CFUF Presenters: James Worthy, Director of Responsible Fatherhood.
EDUCATION STABILITY MATTERS OREGON. 2 PRESENTED BY: Catherine Stelzer, MSW Oregon Team: A.J. Goins (Project Manager), Julie York, Sarah Walker, Annie.
Participant Choice – Access to Recovery as a Voucher Service Delivery Model Presented to National Summit on Prisoner Re-Entry Sponsored by the White House.
National NCP Employment Demonstration Grant Jackie Scharping, Director Bureau of Child Support.
TANF Recipients Living with a Disability: Policy Framework, Prevalence and Service Strategies Presentation to the Consortium for Citizens with Disabilities.
Needs Assessment: Young People’s Drug and Alcohol Services in Edinburgh City EADP Children, Young People and Families Network Event 7 th March 2012 Joanne.
Ready by 21 is a trademark of the Forum for Youth Investment, core operating division of Impact Strategies, Inc. The SCPA uses the Forum.
Participants Adoption Study 109 (83%) of 133 WSU Cooperative Extension county chairs, faculty, and program staff responded to survey Dissemination & Implementation.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
Building Community Partnerships to Serve Immigrant Workers Funded by the Ford Foundation Nonprofit and Community College Collaborations.
1 Promoting Evidence-Informed Practice: The BASSC Perspective Michael J. Austin, PhD, MSW, MSPH BASSC Staff Director Mack Professor of Nonprofit Management.
USING MEDICAID AND BIRTH DATA FOR EVALUATION OF PERINATAL ORAL HEALTH INITIATIVE IN THE HUSKY PROGRAM PRESENTATION TO OVERSIGHT COUNCIL ON MEDICAL ASSISTANCE.
Understanding TASC Marc Harrington, LPC, LCASI Case Developer Region 4 TASC Robin Cuellar, CCJP, CSAC Buncombe County.
Household food insecurity among low-income Toronto families: Implications for social policy Sharon Kirkpatrick & Valerie Tarasuk Department of Nutritional.
Engaging Student Affairs Professionals in Division-Wide Assessment Lisa Garcia-Hanson,University of Washington Tacoma Charlotte Tullos, Central Washington.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the Corporation for National community Service;
Forging New Partnerships and Employment Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities SPI and BARC SSA Projects Office Virginia Commonwealth University Beth.
Evaluation Highlights from Pilot Phase July 2005 – June 2007 Prepared for Leadership Team Meeting January 11, 2008.
Addressing Maternal Depression Healthy Start Interconception Care Learning Collaborative Kimberly Deavers, MPH U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.
1 The Federal Shared Youth Vision Partnership A Federal Partnership between the United States Departments of Education, Health.
Felicia Yang DeLeone, Institute for Children, Poverty and Homelessness Dona Anderson, Homes for the Homeless November 7, 2011 Child Care Use in Homeless.
Evaluation of the Indiana ECCS Initiative. State Context Previous Early Childhood System Initiatives –Step Ahead –Building Bright Beginnings SPRANS Grant.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
0 Emerging Findings from the Employment Retention and Advancement (ERA) Evaluation Gayle Hamilton, MDRC Workforce Innovations 2005 Conference.
Sussex County Child Health Promotion Coalition May 17, 2006.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Enhanced Services for the Hard-to-Employ Project Transitional Jobs for Ex-Prisoners: Early Impacts from a Random Assignment Evaluation of the Center for.
One-Stop Centre Best Practices July 2014 Ilala Crest Lodge.
Paducah Head Start/Preschool Self-Assessment. The Foundation for Building Program Excellence At least once each program year, with the consultation and.
Family Homework Night Establishing Routines to Support Parent Involvement Kaitlyn Nykwest Homeless Children’s Education Fund 1.
Massachusetts Universal Pre- Kindergarten Program Evaluation of the First Two Years of the Pilot Initiative Alyssa Rulf Fountain Barbara Goodson September.
Medicaid/SCHIP Technical Assistance for Health IT/HIE 2008 AHRQ Annual Conference Presented by: Linda Dimitropoulos, RTI International.
Common Core Parenting: Best Practice Strategies to Support Student Success Core Components: Successful Models Patty Bunker National Director Parenting.
1 YOUTHBUILD EVALUATION Building evidence about the effect of YouthBuild on the young people it serves August 17, 2011 Washington, D.C.
TEXAS FATHERHOOD SUMMIT | OVERVIEW OF FATHERHOOD RESEARCH Cynthia Osborne, Ph.D. Child and Family Research Partnership University of Texas at.
Virginia Knox, MDRC Texas Fatherhood Summit February 3, 2016.
CAREER PATHWAYS THE NEW WAY OF DOING BUSINESS. Agenda for our Discussion Today we’ll discuss: Career Pathways Systems and Programs Where we’ve been and.
Lorna Howarth Local Parenting Strategy Team Families Policy, Development & Delivery Unit Parenting Support Policy Update.
2016 Spring Grantee Convening IKF Evaluation Update Center for Community Health and Evaluation April 11, 2016 Foundation for a Healthy Kentucky.
HEALTH CARE AND HUMAN SERVICES POLICY, RESEARCH, AND CONSULTING - WITH REAL-WORLD PERSPECTIVE. ADRC Statewide Planning Plenary Workshop: Definition of.
Strategies and Challenges in Conducting Randomized Control Trials (RCTs): Experiences from the PACT Evaluation Fatherhood Research and Practice Network.
BUILDING BRIDGES AND BONDS (B3) A rigorous, multi-site study of innovative services offered by Responsible Fatherhood/ReFORM (RF) programs Unique opportunity.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
Youth in Focus. Young people’s voices “ money issues are a key thing for me” “the right kind of support is really important to me” “ forming relationships.
Housing & Employment Navigator Workforce Innovation Fund Study.
Headquarters 11 Infantry Brigade and Headquarters South East A £10 million government scheme which funds projects that support the Covenant or Covenant.
UNITY and the RoadMap for urban youth violence prevention American Public Health Association Annual Meeting 2007 Session.
Pathways for Advancing Careers and Education (PACE): Findings from a Study of a Career Pathways Program Karen Gardiner Abt Associates, Inc. National Association.
Adding an evidence-based family strengthening program
CAN Language Access Report Summary
Connecting TANF to Career Pathways with HPOG
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
State Driven Research to Answer Key Policy Questions
Presented by: Robin Koralek, Abt Associates
HUD’s Coordinated Entry Data & Management Guide
Presentation transcript:

Strengthening Responsible Fatherhood Programs through Research and Evaluation: PACT and FaMLE Cross-Site Texas Fatherhood Summit Austin, TX February 3, 2016 Robin Dion

2 Overview Parents and Children Together (PACT) –Focus on selected grantees from ACF’s 2011 cohort of Responsible Fatherhood programs Selected Findings from PACT Implementation and Qualitative Studies Fatherhood and Marriage Local Evaluation (FaMLE) and Cross-Site Project –Focus on ACF’s entire 2015 cohort of Responsible Fatherhood grantees

3 The Parents and Children Together Evaluation – PACT

4 PACT: A Multi-Component Evaluation Qualitative Study –How do fathers view and carry out their roles as parents, providers, and partners? Implementation Study –How were PACT programs designed and implemented? Impact Study –Do programs improve outcomes for enrolled fathers? Study of Hispanic Fatherhood Programs –How are programs for Hispanic fathers designed and received?

5 PACT: Robust Study Methods Mixed-method implementation study –Staff interviews and web survey –Enrollment and participation data –Focus groups with participating fathers In-depth 2-hour interviews with participating fathers –Obtain rich and nuanced detail about fathers’ lives –Complement what is learned through other methods Experimental impact evaluation –Baseline survey; random assignment to program or control –Twelve month follow-up survey with fathers in both groups –Administrative data on fathers from NDNH

6 PACT: Current Status Four RF programs in the implementation, qualitative, and impact study –Connections to Success in Kansas City MO and Kansas City KS –Fathers’ Support Center in St. Louis MO –Goodwill-Easter Seals Minnesota in Minneapolis and St. Paul MN –Urban Ventures in Minneapolis MN Study enrollment ended February 2015 with 5,522 fathers Baseline surveys complete; currently completing 12- month followup; 71% response rate so far 87 fathers participated in first wave of in-depth interviews; 59 in second wave; third wave this spring Implementation data for full period of evaluation collected; findings from initial period being updated

7 Who are the Fathers that Enrolled in PACT? Source: PACT Baseline Survey Data, through 8/22/14. N = 4,734 fathers. Note: Programs began PACT intake between 12/9/12 and 2/13/13. CharacteristicsOverall Average age (years)35 Black, non-Hispanic81% HS Diploma or GED69% Recent paid work50% Criminal conviction73% Unstable housing54% Family StructureOverall Number of children (avg)2.6 Children by multiple mothers47% Formal child support order58% Living with any of their children 22% Spent time with any of their children in past month 80%

8 PACT Implementation Study of Four Fatherhood Programs

9 Selected PACT Implementation Study Findings All programs went beyond the three core services to include content on “personal/father development” Initial program engagement relatively high, but retention best in cohort-based programs –Standalone relationship skills workshops for fathers had the least take-up All programs partnered with local child support, but assistance ranged from very limited to extensive Setting performance targets, using data to monitor progress helped programs enroll and engage fathers

10 Implications from Implementation Study To improve take-up of relationship skills component, Increase accessibility and relevance of content To maximize participation, carefully consider service delivery structure –Open entry may not result in more participation because of availability bias –Offer services in larger time blocks Working closely and creatively with child support agencies may promote positive outcomes Reducing child support arrears may be a powerful incentive for program participation

11 PACT Qualitative Study: Fathers’ Perspectives

12 Selected PACT Qualitative Study Findings Fathers expressed intense desire to be a positive influence in their children’s lives Appreciated parenting workshops--early family instability and fatherlessness left men unprepared Fathers inspired and motivated by staff who had overcome similar challenges Most common barrier was limited access to children due to contentious relationships with mothers Effect of past criminal records on employability and large child support arrearages made financial support of children challenging

13 Implications from Qualitative Study Strengthen efforts to improve fathers’ access to children –Focus relationship services on co-parenting –Seek to resolve co-parenting conflicts between parents, such as through mediation –Help fathers secure legal parenting time orders Augment existing employment services, assist with expunging criminal records when possible Increase collaboration with child support and court system to modify orders, reduce arrearages Expand and intensify supplementary services (mental health, housing, drug treatment, legal assistance)

14 Published and Forthcoming PACT Reports “In Their Own Voices” … report on Wave 1 of Qualitative Study, June 2015 “Design and Implementation of RF Programs” … report on first wave of data on RF programs, September, 2015 “H-PACT” … report on a study of RF programs serving Hispanic men, November 2015 Practitioners’ Brief on Responsible Fatherhood programming, April 2015 Three research briefs on findings from Qualitative Study Wave 2 Research brief on quality of program implementation Report integrating findings from all waves of implementation and qualitative study Report on impacts of RF programs (estimated July 2017) Policy forum, webinar, podcasts Published: RF OnlyForthcoming: RF Only

15 For More Information about PACT Contact Robin Dion at Mathematica Policy Research For published reports see ACF website – parents-and-children-together-pact-evaluationhttp:// parents-and-children-together-pact-evaluation Mathematica’s website – findings/projects/parents-and-children-togetherhttp:// findings/projects/parents-and-children-together

16 Family and Marriage Local Evaluation and Cross-Site Project

17 FaMLE Cross-Site Project Supports all Responsible Fatherhood (RF) and Healthy Marriage (HM) grantees awarded 2015 ACF funding Key activities –Develop comprehensive set of evidence-informed performance measures (inputs, outputs, and outcomes) –Design and implement a new management information system to facilitate data collection by grantees –Provide training and technical support as grantees collect and report data –Support grantees as they conduct “local” evaluations –Conduct cross-site analyses of RF/HM grantees’ program design, implementation, and outcomes

18 FaMLE Cross-Site Website Designed specifically for OFA’s RF and HM grant applicants –Program design –Evaluation design –Performance measures –nFORM prototype Questions to consider Tips Links to other resources