Humanities RQF Trial Results & RQF Groups September 2007.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Prof Jim Piper, DVC (Research) No 1 Chapter 3 Research and Research Training MQ R&RT Strategic Plan A Pervasive Research Culture.

Advertisements

RESEARCH AFTER REF Ian Greer University of Liverpool.

Conducting Research on Student Learning in Higher Education Developing research questions and workable methods Gary Poole Institute for the Scholarship.

Guidance on submissions Chris Taylor, Deputy REF Manager Graeme Rosenberg, REF Manager.

UTAS Research Quality Index Dr Valerie Hazel Office of the PVCR 15 Feb 2007.

The Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education 2010 Survey of Pre-tenure Faculty.

Research Directions at Curtin: The “So What Factor”, Challenges and Responses Professor Linda Kristjanson Pro Vice-Chancellor, Research & Development 29.

Research Quality Framework Presentation to APSR - ARROW The Adaptable Repository 3 May 2007 Dr Alexander Cooke Department of Education Science and Training.

The RQF Explained Adrian Burton, Australian Partnership for Sustainable Repositories.

2005/6 ATN Research Quality Framework (RQF) Trial Curtin University of Technology Queensland University of Technology RMIT University University of South.

Norwegian research council’s Publication grants to Scholarly Journals Presentation to NSSJP meeting November 25th 2009 Rune R. Schjølberg, senior advisor.

Issues in interdisciplinary teaching and learning John Canning Subject Centre for Languages, Linguistics and Area Studies University of Southampton.

Research Impact 19 November 2012 Dr Fiona Cameron Executive Director Australian Research Council.

SUSANA MATOS VIEGAS PORTUGUSE ASSOCIATION OF ANTHROPOLOGY.

REF2014 – results and the way forward SSHP Meeting 12 March 2015.

Orvill Adams, Orvill Adams & Associates B.V. Orvill Adams Orvill Adams & Associates B.V. Measuring the Products of Medical Education.

The One Voice Institute of Elemental Ethics and Education is an organization with a mission: to facilitate positive, critical change in educational processes.

Getting Started: The Publishing Game Murray Goot.

Does Formative Feedback Help or Hinder Students? An Empirical Investigation 2015 DEE Conference Carlos Cortinhas, University of Exeter.

Modern language degrees: Future perspectives Michael Kelly Berlin, 28 November 2013.

Citizenship & Belonging (ENV-Geog) Cities & Social Justice (ENV-Geog) Spatial Analysis and Policy (ENV-Geog) Sustainable Transport Policy (ENV-ITS) Economics.

Page 1 RESEARCH EXCELLENCE FRAMEWORK : RESEARCH IMPACT ASESSMENT LESSONS FROM THE PILOT EXERCISE Professor John Marshall Director Academic Research Development.

The Australian Curriculum Developed by the Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority March 2010.

Janet Warman, 2007 ANAC Summer Institute Elon University Interdisciplinary Initiatives:  The Global Experience (first year core course)  Team-taught.

Rejoinders for ARC DP Assessment Reports: Your last chance for influencing the CoE members Zhihong Xu Griffith University.

From the IR Office To the Classroom: The Role of Assessment in Student Learning Dr. John W. Quinley Dr. Brett Parker.

School of Mechanical Engineering Seminar Friday, 12 December 2008 Recipes for losing an ARC grant application! Dongke Zhang, FTSE.

Research Quality Framework Presentation to APSR - ARROW - Repository Market Day 4 May 2007 Sandra Fox Department of Education Science and Training.

Assessment Conversations Focus on Fall 2009 … and Beyond May 7, 2009.

1 Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Administrative Support for Large- Scale Funding Applications – Session.

Main Panel D Criteria and Working Methods Main Panel D covers: Area Studies Modern Languages and Linguistics English Language and Literature History Classics.

The Research Excellence Framework Impact: the need for evidence Professor Caroline Strange 22 June 2011.

12/9/10 Pilot assessment impact- paperwork Findings of the expert panels- report + appendix Lessons learned- feedback from pilot institutions Examples.

Presentation to Business and Law Research Forum University of Newcastle 17 July 2015 Professor Marian Simms ARC Executive Director.

Welcome to the First Meeting of the Internationalisation Change programme 22 May 2012.

Project selection for sustainable energy projects Determining the most important factors.

Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why become a teacher? Most social studies students do not intend to be professional historians, but rather to gain employment.

Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why become a teacher? Most social studies students do not intend to be professional historians, but rather to gain employment.

Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study International Affairs? Students majoring in International Affairs gain competency in global relations scholarship,

SOUTHINGTON HIGH SCHOOL An Introduction to the Advanced Placement Program ®

Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study Government? The study of government brings a student face-to-face with the issues and concerns of living in a complex.

What is impact? What is the difference between impact and public engagement? Impact Officers, R&IS.

CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.

Trumbull High School 2015 – 2016 School Year Review Trumbull Board of Education June 7, 2016.

Major Academic Plan (MAP) Why study International Affairs? Students majoring in International Affairs gain competency in global relations scholarship,

Course of Study 9th Grade

NMSI’S COLLEGE READINESS PROGRAM

How to write the Long essay question

Presented to the Board of Education September 23, 2014

A nationwide US student survey

International Skills Diploma Seal

Future Fellowships: perspective from a SAC member

A Practical Guide to Evidencing Impact

EDUCATION STRATEGY 2016–2020.

Research Orientation for New Faculty Hires:

Embargoed Official 2018 MCAS Results

Research Update GERI May 2010.

Towards Excellence in Research: Achievements and Visions of

سنوات خدمت در تربیت معلم: 15سال پردیس/مرکز محل خدمت: بحرالعلوم شهرکرد

Research Support Conference, 21 June 2011

6 Activities of Man: GRAPES

Research Orientation for New Faculty Hires:

From Modular to Linear teaching

Advanced Placement Program®

Advanced Placement Program®

Achievement Data Review LMTSD Board of School Directors

What is Social Studies?.

Curriculum Coordinator: Patrick LaPierre February 1, 2016

Undergraduate Research and Mentoring Education at Queens College

Writing for the Vanier Dr. Danine Farquharson

Presentation transcript:

Humanities RQF Trial Results & RQF Groups September 2007

RQF Trial Results

RQF Trial Divisional Results Ancient HistoryAsianEnglishEuropean Modern HistoryMusicPol & IRTOTAL Rate Rate Rate Rate Rate TOTAL

Humanities RQF Plan Ancient History Group Leaders: Assoc. Prof. Tom Hillard Dr Trevor Evans RFCD: (Hist: Class) (Arch: Med, Levant) (Rel: Chr. Hist) Modern History and Politics Group Leaders: Prof. Angela Woollacott Prof. Murray Goot RFCD : (Hist : Discipline code) (CultSt : Culture, Gender, Sexuality) (PolSc : Discipline code) English and European Literatures Group Leaders: Prof. John Stephens Assoc. Prof. Martina Möllering RFCD: (Lit Studies: Discipline code) (CultSt: Postcolonial and Global Cultural Studies) (Ancient History) (Asian Languages) ______________ Not in trial: 5 (Modern History) (Politics and IR) (Asian Languages) (Division) ______________ Not in trial: 4 (English) (European Languages) In trial: 14 (+ up to 5) Average score: 4.2 5: 5 4: 7 3: 1 In trial: 16 (+ up to 5) Average score: 3.8 5: 3 4: 7 3: 6 In trial: 16 Average score: 3.8 5: 2 4: 9 3: 5 Contemporary Music Studies  Anthropology/Cultural Practice group

Group Leaders (Preparation of ‘Evidence Portfolio’ for RQF Submission) Ancient History Group: Assoc. Prof. Tom Hillard Dr. Trevor Evans Modern History and Politics Group: Prof. Angela Woollacott Prof. Murray Goot English and European Literatures Group: Prof. John Stephens Assoc. Prof. Martina Möllering

RQF Submission ‘Home Panels’ (13): Panel 9: Social Sciences and Politics Panel 12: Humanities Panel 13: Creative Arts, Design, and Built Environment Evidence Portfolio: 1. Group identification 2. Context Statement 3. Details of each researcher 4. Statement of Claims for Impact 5. Metrics (journal rankings)

Evidence Portfolio 1.Group identification: Name of Group RFCD codes (up to 3) and SEO codes Home Panel and any cross-disciplinary Panel

Evidence Portfolio 2. Context Statement: Statement of history, strategic focus, and research objectives of the Group Summary of main achievements of the Group Extent of Cohesion and Collaboration within the Group Collaborative research within the Institution (i.e. University) and/or elsewhere (Australia and overseas) Support for ECRs and HDR students Esteem factors Comment on difficulties overcome Funding income

Evidence Portfolio 3. Details of each researcher: Four ‘Best’ ‘Body of Work’ (all publications) (i.e. a revised version of information prepared for the RQF Trial, using feedback from comments)

Evidence Portfolio 4. Statement of Claims for Impact: Engagement with end-users (including academic discipline) Uptake of research (e.g. public policy) Extent to which research has produced social, economic, environmental, cultural benefits 5. Metrics (journal rankings)