Introduction to Strong Educator Support System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
Cultural Competency Inside JCPS September 25 & 26, 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is Screening?
National Center on Response to Intervention Sara Prewett, The National Center on RTI The University of Kansas RTI Scheduling.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series IDEA and the Multi-level Prevention System.
Family-School Partnerships: Strategies Leading to Positive Student Outcomes Martha Blue-Banning University of Kansas Grace Francis University.
The SWIFT Center SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION.
Linda Bragg Office of Title II, III and System Support Division of Educator Quality and System Support.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
SWIFT School Wide Integrated Framework for Transformation
Professional Learning Communities in Schools Online Workshop.
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What is RTI?
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Implementer Webinar Series: What Is a Multi-level Prevention System?
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Creating System-Wide Support for Learning Coaches with Joellen Killion
Professional Learning in the Learning Profession Effective Practice  Increased Student Learning Frederick Brown Director of Strategy.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
1 Peer Assistance and Coaching (PAC) Race to the Top – Early Learning Challenge Grant.
CEEDAR Cross State Convening Overview: Innovation Configurations Course Enhancement Modules H325A
SCHOOLWIDE INTEGRATED FRAMEWORK FOR TRANSFORMATION
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
SWIFT Center Policy Alignment Influence on Building Capacity and Sustainability in Schoolwide Transformation Jenny Stonemeier, TASH.
Policy for Results: How Policy Meets Preparation to Lead the Way to Improved Outcomes: H325A
1 SHARED LEADERSHIP: Parents as Partners Presented by the Partnership for Family Success Training & TA Center January 14, 2009.
Archived Information The information in this presentation is archived for historical and research purposes only.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
A TAP Story: A. A. Nelson Elementary School Jacqueline Smith, Principal A.A. Nelson Elementary School TAP Leadership Team Teddy Broussard, State TAP Director.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Progress Monitoring National Center on Response to Intervention.
National Center on Response to Intervention RTI Essential Component: Schoolwide, Multi-Level Prevention System Katie Klingler Tackett National Center on.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Dial-in: Passcode: RTI/Multi-Tiered Models of Intervention PLC Movement Between Tiers of Intervention & Implications for Special.
Site Name Data Snapshots Date. Slide 12 swiftschools.org WHY? Data Snapshots engage education leaders in a concentrated analysis of what they do, how.
Creating a Coherent MTSS for All: Baltimore City and SWIFT
OSEP Project Director’s Conference August 1, 2016 Carol Quirk
Resource Mapping & Matching
Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
Site Name Design Date.
Site Name Visioning Date.
Ohio Dean’s Compact Meeting September 14, 2018 ceedar.org
Mary T. Brownell, Director
Site Name Priorities DATE.
Integrating Practice and coursework
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
Introductions Introduction
Using data for instructional decision-making
Introductions Introduction
February 21-22, 2018.
Integrating Quality Practice-based Opportunities within Campus-based Coursework and Field Experiences H325A
Essential Questions How can states, districts, and educator preparation programs work together to ensure equitable outcomes for diverse learners? What.
Multiple background possibilities
Introductions Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Strong Educator Support System

Strong Educator Support System is About… … supporting efforts to improve teaching and learning through instructional coaching, professional learning, and supportive personnel evaluations. … ensuring inclusive opportunities for professional development.

Why is a Strong Educator Support System Important? Advance Organizer: Be thinking about… Why is creating a strong educator support system needed for school transformation?

Research Support Strong Educator Support System Literacy coaching has demonstrated increased learning of 16% over baseline average after one year, and 27% after two years of implementation. Learning Forward’s Coaching Academy is strongly associated with three states’ improved high school graduation rates and student achievement. Educational personnel evaluation systems that primarily build educator capacity and effectiveness are both comprehensive and specific, and they focus on the teacher’s growth in various instructional strategies.

How?: Creating Strong Educator Support Systems Practice 1: Ensure all educators have access to instructional coaching. Practice 2: Empower teachers to guide individual and collective professional learning needs. Practice 3: Make sure professional learning is inclusive and available to all interested parties. Practice 4: Use school-wide data to guide decisions about professional learning. Practice 5: Ensure personnel evaluations are supportive and focused on improving teaching and learning.

Application: Strategies for Practice Implementation Practice 1: Ensure all educators have access to instructional coaching. Instructional coaching should include opportunities for reflection, demonstration, support, and feedback. Instructional coaching does not need to be full-time role. Consider other resources that may meet this need such as teacher leaders, mentors, district- level coaches, and peers. Develop a process for teachers to request instructional coaching. Develop guidelines for identifying the need for instructional coaching.

Ensure all Educators Have Access to Instructional Coaching Broadening View of Instructional Coaching Creating an Inviting and Trusting Culture for Coaching How can teachers lead the coaching process – identify outcomes they want from the experience? How can we think of each teacher as a coach to another? If we have designated instructional coaches, how can we most effectively use their time and expertise?

Application: Strategies for Practice Implementation Practice 2: Empower teachers to guide individual and collective professional learning needs. Formatively gather input from teachers that informs professional development planning. Ensure professional learning is aligned with collective vision of the school, families, and community. Provide opportunities for staff to choose among a variety of professional learning opportunities.

Develop a Teacher-Led Process to Guide Professional Development Planning How can needs assessments be used to prioritize and plan? Formatively Evaluate Needs and Next Steps Provide Choices

Application: Strategies for Practice Implementation Practice 3: Make sure professional learning is inclusive and available to all interested parties.

Make Sure Professional Learning is Inclusive and Available to All Interested Parties Inclusive Professional Learning Availability to All Interested Parties

Application: Strategies for Practice Implementation Practice 4: Use school-wide data to guide decisions about professional learning. Use SWIFT-FIT and SWIFT-FIA data to identify priorities and areas for improvement and plan professional learning to address identified needs.

Use School-Wide Data to Guide Decisions About Professional Learning Use SWIFT-FIT and SWIFT-FIA data

Application: Strategies for Practice Implementation Practice 5: Ensure personnel evaluations are supportive and focused on improving teaching and learning. Use multiple sources of evidence for personnel evaluations. Provide feedback that is specific, positive, and that has a growth orientation.

Provide Specific Feedback on Strengths and Areas of Improvement How can our evaluation process be linked directly to our vision? How can we strengthen feedback so it is positive, specific, and growth oriented?

Application Return to WHY: Why is creating a strong educator support system important? What DOES the educator support system currently look like at our school? What COULD the educator support system look like at our school in the future? What will it take?

SWIFT Center produced this presentation under U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs Grant No. H325Y OSEP Project Officers Grace Zamora Durán and Tina Diamond served as the project officers. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the positions or policies of the Department of Education. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education of any product, commodity, service or enterprise mentioned in this publication is intended or should be inferred. This product is public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. Please cite as: SWIFT Center. (2015). Strong educator support system. SWIFT Feature Introduction Guide PPT#1. Lawrence, KS: Author.