Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY 2008-2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IEP Planning Process Beginning at age 14 the IEP should be focused on meeting the student’s postsecondary goals. The IEP is a plan for preparing the student.
Advertisements

Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Revised June 2011.
Changes to Administrative Rules Impacting Secondary Transition Florida Department of Education Dr. Eric J. Smith, Commissioner.
Special Education 101 Special Education: A SERVICE, NOT A PLACE John Payne Office of Exceptional Children SC State Department of Education.
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Process Presented by Lexington Special Education Staff February 1, 2013.
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
Reevaluation Exceptional Children Division 1. Reevaluation NC Policies , , and
IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
NONDISCRIMINATORY, MULTIFACTORED EVALUATION AND IDENTIFICATION
Overview of Serving Students with Disabilities under the IDEA School Counselor Summer Institute June 24, 2014 Olympia, WA Scott Michael Raub OSPI Special.
Individual Education Program (IEP) Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
1 The Individualized Education Program (IEP) Yell / The Law and Special Education, Second Edition Copyright © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. All rights.
Region 3 Monitors April What is a REED? It is a “process” whereby the IEP team reviews existing evaluation data to make evaluation decisions about.
1 Evaluation Reviews and Reevaluations Macomb ISD Special Education Management Services August, 2006.
Everything you need to know before the Annual Review March 16, 2011 The New State Mandated IEP.
1 Massachusetts DOE IEP Transition Process FUTURE.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Transition 101 I-13 Compliance: Transition Activities for Before, During and After the IEP Meeting.
PED 383: Adapted Physical Education Dr. Johnson.  Who needs them?  Students with Disabilities  Students with Unique needs  Individualized Education.
MN CIMP 2012 COMPLIANCE FOR PARTS OF THE IEP. Compliance Self-Check.
1 The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) Implementation Training Spring/Summer 2005.
Transition: Understanding ADA vs. IDEA DRUMMOND WOODSUM Jeanne M. Kincaid.
INDICATORS 11 AND 13 Bureau of Indian Education Division of Performance and Accountability WebEx October 18, 2011 DESK AUDIT.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
IEP Definition The Individualized Education Program (IEP) is developed for a student with an identified disability by an IEP team that includes the.
Identification, Assessment, and Evaluation
1 Common IEP Errors and Legal Requirements. 2 Today’s Agenda Parent Survey Results Procedural Compliance Self Assessment Results.
Special Education Adrienne Lacey-Bushell, Ed.D. Director Special Education.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
SPED Referral and IEP Process Guide Ginger Alonzo & Emily Disbennett.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Laura Matson, Ph.D. Director, Special Services Puget Sound Educational Service District Navigating the School Culture September 25, 2014.
Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008 Chapter 2: The Personnel and Procedures of Special Education Chapter 2 Copyright © Allyn & Bacon 2008.
A Review of the Special Education Integrated Monitoring Process BIE Special Education Academy September 12-15, 2011 Tampa, Florida.
Pre-referral Process Student support team Student support team –General education teacher identifies a student –Meets with the SST to discuss strategies.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
1 The Special Education Assessment and IEP Process EDPOWER Teacher Institute 2013.
I.D.E.A LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of the IEP Team, School Staff, and Parents LANGUAGE & LEGAL ISSUES Impacting the Process of.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Legal Aspects of Special Education and Social Foundations Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11 Individualized Education Plan Chapter 11.
Intensive Technical Assistance Schools Identified with Continued Findings of Noncompliance for SY March 10, 2011.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEA 2004) For Families and Advocates Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act.
1 McKinney-Vento and Special Education  Overview  Revocation of Consent  FAQ’s  Resources.
REEVALUATION: BEST PRACTICES M-DCPS EXCEPTIONAL STUDENT EDUCATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN BEESS 037.
REFERRAL AND ASSESSMENT DIVISION OF PERFORMANCE AND ACCOUNTABILITY SPECIAL EDUCATION WEBINAR: MARCH 27, 2012.
Chapter 3 Assessment. Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved. 3-2 Highlights of the Law: IDEA-1997 Strengthens the role of parents.
Sally Simich. IDEA 2004 Requires a SUMMARY OF PERFORMANCE: “a local educational agency shall provide the child with a summary of the child's academic.
How to write great transition IEPs and meet compliance for Indicator 13!
Chapter 3. Assessment Highlights of the Law:IDEA 1997 Strengthens the role of parents Ensures access to the general education curriculum Increases attention.
The New IDEA in Special Education
IDEA 1997 P.L The Facts. IEP Must explain how the child’s disability affects their ability to participate in the general education classroom Must.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Department of Education California Department of.
Improving Secondary Transition Services: Meeting the Requirements of Indicator 13 National Secondary Transition Technical Assistance Center.
SPECIAL EDUCATION BASICS Adrienne Volenik Education Rights Clinic University of Richmond School of Law
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Prince George’s County Public Schools 1 The IEP Team Process Department of Special Education Linda Gaskill and Darice Holmes March 3, 2008.
Special Education Resources Hello, My name is Amy Mathews and I am studying to be a special education teacher. I am presenting some valuable information.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Individualized Education Programs Evaluations and Reevaluations.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Review, Revise and Amend from Procedures for State Board Policy 74
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Teaching Students With Exceptionalities
Mission Possible: Planning a Successful Life for Students with Intellectual Disabilities TAC it up! VCU T/TAC May 2010.
Downingtown Area School District Central Office April 4, 2018
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
Presented By: Eric G. Rodriguez
Presentation transcript:

Categorical Findings of Noncompliance March 24, 2011 Guidance & Intensive Technical Assistance Related to Correction of Noncompliance for SY

Four noncompliant findings areas CategoriesItems of NoncomplianceFindings Referral and Evaluation Assessment Procedures Participants on the IEP Team6627 IEP Content18630 Transition Services6612

 Referral and Evaluation Assessment Procedures Referral Student progress in general education curriculum and grade-level standards CFR (a)(5)(i, ii) General education interventions prior to referral CFR (b)(1) Parent written consent for evaluation CFR (a)(ii) Evaluation Initial Evaluation 60 day completion timeline requirement CFR (a)(1)(i) 30 day IEP timeline development requirement CFR (c)(1) Documentation of reasonable effort to obtain informed consent from the parent before the initial provision of special education and related services CFR (b)(1) Re-Evaluation Must occur every three years (unless parent and school agree evaluation not needed) CFR (b)(2) Informed Parent consent obtained prior to conducting re-evaluation CFR (c)(1)(i) IEP Team and other qualified professionals, determine whether the student continues to have a disability and whether the student continues to need special education and related services CFR (a)(2)(B)

 Referral and Evaluation Assessment Procedures (continued) Evaluation Assessment Process Parent consent for evaluation CFR (b)(1) Variety of assessment tools and strategies used CFR (b)(1) Student is assessed in all areas of suspected disabilities CFR (c)(4) Assessment administered by trained and knowledgeable personnel CFR (c)(iv) Determination made by multidisciplinary team, including parents CFR (a)(1) Evaluation reports Report completed and kept in the student file CFR Copy of evaluation report given to parents CFR (a)(2)

 Required Appropriate Participants of the IEP Team The Parents/Student if age of majority CFR (a)(1) School Administrator CFR (a)(4)(i,ii,iii) Qualified to provide or supervise the provision of specially designed instruction, knowledgeable about the general education curriculum and the availability of resources and can commit funds Not less than one special education teacher CFR (a)(3) Not less than one general education teacher CFR (a)(2) Individual who can interpret test results and instructional implications CFR (a)(5)

 IEP Content Current student IEP is in student file CFR (a) Present Level of Academic Achievement and Functional Performance (PLAAFP) CFR (a)(1)(i) Measurable annual goals CFR (a)(2)(i) Short-term objectives CFR (a)(2)(B)(ii) Parents informed of student progress toward the annual goals achievement CFR (a)(3)(i,ii) Accommodations in administration of state or school wide assessments CFR (a)(6)(i) Accommodations and supports in general education and special education classrooms CFR (a)(4) Special education and related services, and supplementary aids and services CFR (a)(4)

 IEP Content (continue) IEP Considerations Positive behavior interventions and supports CFR (a)(2)(i) Extended school year CFR Assistive Technology devices and services CFR (a)(2)(v) Physical impairment needs CFR (a)(2)(iii) NIMAS CFR

 Transition Services Students 16 or older, or will turn 16 during the duration of the IEP, appropriate measureable post-secondary CFR (b)(1) Measureable post-secondary goals updated annually CFR (b) Measureable post-secondary goals based on age appropriate transition assessments CFR (b)(1) Transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet his/her post-secondary goals CFR 300/320(b)(2) Course of study that will reasonably enable the student to meet his/her post-secondary goals CFR (b)(2)

 Transition Services (continue) Student invited to meeting when transition services were discussed CFR (b)(1) If appropriate, a representative of any participating agency was invited to the IEP meeting with prior consent of the parent(s) or student who has reached the age of majority CFR (b)(3) NLT one year before the student reaches the age of majority under State law, student is informed of his/her rights on reaching the age of majority CFR (c) A Summary of Performance (SOP) is provided to students who graduate with a regular diploma or age out when reaching maximum age CFR (e)(3)

INSANITY -do the same thing over and over, and expect to get different results. It might be time to try another approach. Let’s get to the Root Cause.

What are the facts (current data)? What worked well? What can be improved? Where are we now? What do we want to achieve (goal)? What is the expected outcome? Where are we going? What steps must we take to ensure we reach the outcome? Who are the key members of team (teachers, staff, administrators)? How will we get there? Is there support for improvement planning and implementation? What roadblocks must we overcome in order to reach the expected outcome? What is holding us back?

In review of student IEP files for Referral and Evaluation Assessment Procedures, 1 of 5 IEPs reviewed for 60 day completion of initial evaluation requirement was in noncompliance Where are we now? Completion of initial evaluation process within 60 day timeline requirement at 100% compliance (parent consent- IEP Team eligibility determination) Where are we going? What steps must we take to ensure we reach the outcome? Who are the key members of team (teachers, staff, administrators)? How will we get there? Is there support for improvement planning and implementation? What roadblocks must we overcome in order to reach the expected outcome? What is holding us back?

In reviewed of student IEP files for Participants on the IEP Team, 3/20 student files were in noncompliance, no school administrator in attendance at the IEP meeting. Where are we now? At IEP meetings, a school administrator will be in attendance with 100% compliance Where are we going? What steps must we take to ensure we reach the outcome? Who are the key members of team (teachers, staff, administrators)? How will we get there? Is there support for improvement planning and implementation? What roadblocks must we overcome in order to reach the expected outcome? What is holding us back?

In reviewed of student IEP files for IEP Content, 5/20 student files were in noncompliance for no documentation of accommodations and support provided to student in general and special education classrooms Where are we now? IEPs will contain documentation of accommodations and support provided to student in general and special education classrooms with 100% compliance Where are we going? What steps must we take to ensure we reach the outcome? Who are the key members of team (teachers, staff, administrators)? How will we get there? Is there support for improvement planning and implementation? What roadblocks must we overcome in order to reach the expected outcome? What is holding us back?

In reviewed of student IEP files for Transition Services, 2/20 student files were in noncompliance, no measureable post- secondary goals for student 16 or older, or will turn 16 during the duration of the IEP Where are we now? IEPs for students16 or older, or will turn 16 during the duration of the IEP,will contain measureable post-secondary goals with 100% compliance Where are we going? What steps must we take to ensure we reach the outcome? Who are the key members of team (teachers, staff, administrators)? How will we get there? Is there support for improvement planning and implementation? What roadblocks must we overcome in order to reach the expected outcome? What is holding us back?

 Week of April 18, 2010 ◦ Sampling Review of NASIS IEP Student Files  Current student files (December 1, 2010-April 18,2011  Lock IEPs ◦ After parent has signed  Scan and upload IEP supporting documentation ◦ NASIS Special Education Process Guide  dc pdf dc pdf  Continual update of NASIS information ◦ Real-time accurate data

 Correction of Noncompliance Findings ◦ Donald Griffin  Phone: (505) ◦ Dr. Eugene Thompson  Phone: (505)  Root Cause Analysis ◦ Dr. Marilyn Johnson  Phone: (505)