A Pivotal Phase 2 Trial of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib, or with the T315I BCR ‐ ABL Mutation:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The National CML Society 2012 CML UPDATE “What’s New? What’s Coming?” Luke Akard MD Co-Director Indiana Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program.
Advertisements

Long Term Follow-Up After Imatinib Cessation for Patients in Deep Molecular Response: The Update Results of the STIM1 Study1 Preliminary Report of the.
Ponatinib in Patients (pts) with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (Ph+ ALL) Resistant or.
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 446.
Final Study Results of the Phase III Dasatinib versus Imatinib in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Trial (DASISION, CA )1.
Stopping TKI treatment in CML: Who and when
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
Monitoring CML Treatment: Addressing the Issues for the Community Hematologist/Oncologist Hagop M. Kantarjian, MD Chairman; Professor, Department of Leukemia.
1 Rea D et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 811.
Copyright © 2011 Research To Practice. All rights reserved. Interest in Topics Related to the Treatment of Patients with CML (Percent Responding 9 or 10)
Comparison of Nilotinib and Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): ENESTnd Beyond One Year Larson.
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
Treatment with Bendamustine- Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shows Significant Activity and Is Well Tolerated Ludwig H.
Interim Results of an International, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study of Bruton’s Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor, Ibrutinib (PCI-32765), in Relapsed or Refractory.
Ponatinib as Initial Therapy for Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) Cortes JE et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 1483.
Discontinuation of Imatinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Maintained Complete Molecular Response: Updated Results of the STIM 1 Discontinuation.
What are the risks and benefits of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ? Wendy Osborne Consultant Haematologist Freeman Hospital, Newcastle.
ENESTnd Update: Nilotinib (NIL) vs Imatinib (IM) in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP) and the Impact.
Dose Interruption/Reduction of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the First 3 Months of Treatment of CML Is Associated with Inferior Early Molecular Responses.
ENESTnd 24-Month Update: Continued Superiority of Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase.
Ibrutinib in Combination with Bendamustine and Rituximab Is Active and Tolerable in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory CLL/SLL: Final Results of a Phase.
An Ongoing Phase 3 Study of Bosutinib (SKI-606) versus Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Gambacorti-Passerini.
A Phase II Study with Carfilzomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (CCd) for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Bringhen S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract.
1 FDA Review of DASATINIB Oncology Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) June 2, 2006.
Ibrutinib, Single Agent or in Combination with Dexamethasone, in Patients with Relapsed or Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (MM): Preliminary Phase.
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
Ruan J et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 247.
Epic: A Phase 3 Trial of Ponatinib Compared with Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CP-CML) Lipton JH.
Final Efficacy Results from OAM4558g, a Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating MetMAb or Placebo in Combination with Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC Spigel DR.
Early Molecular and Cytogenic Response Is Predictive for Long-Term Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) Hanfstein B.
Maintenance Therapy with Bortezomib plus Thalidomide (VT) or Bortezomib plus Prednisone (VP) in Elderly Myeloma Patients Included in the GEM2005MAS65 Spanish.
Dasatinib Compared to Imatinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Twelve- Month Efficacy and Safety.
Initial Findings from the PACE Trial: A Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib,
Switching to Nilotinib in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase with Suboptimal Cytogenetic Response on Imatinib: Results from the LASOR.
A Phase 1 Study of the Selective Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinase-Delta (PI3Kδ) Inhibitor, Idelalisib (GS- 1101) in Combination with Rituximab and/or Bendamustine.
Changes in Quality of Life and Disease- Related Symptoms in Patients with Polycythemia Vera Receiving Ruxolitinib or Best Available Therapy: RESPONSE Trial.
A Multi-Center Phase I/II Trial of Carfilzomib and Pomalidomide with Dexamethasone (Car-Pom-d) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Shah.
Phase II Trial of R-CHOP plus Bortezomib Induction Therapy Followed by Bortezomib Maintenance for Previously Untreated Mantle Cell Lymphoma: SWOG 0601.
Nilotinib versus Imatinib in Patients (pts) with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive (Ph+) Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP):
Dasatinib or Imatinib (IM) in Newly Diagnosed Chronic Myeloid Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP): Two-Year Follow-Up from DASISION Kantarjian H et al.
Bosutinib as Therapy for Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Following Resistance or Intolerance to Imatinib: 36-Month Minimum Follow-Up Update Cortes.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Future of CML treatments – Are they getting us closer to cure? Andreas Hochhaus Universitätsklinikum Jena, Germany.
Romidepsin in Association with CHOP in Patients with Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of the Phase Ib/II Ro-CHOP Study Dupuis J et al. Proc ASH.
Kantarjian HM et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Long-Term Follow-Up of Ongoing Patients in 2 Studies of Omacetaxine Mepesuccinate for Chronic Myeloid.
Update on Approved TKIs Jorge Cortes, MD Chief, CML and AML Sections Department of Leukemia MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston, Texas.
Pomalidomide + Low-Dose Dexamethasone (POM + LoDex) vs High-Dose Dexamethasone (HiDex) in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM): MM-003 Analysis.
Shah N et al. Proc ASH 2010;Abstract 206.
Randomized, Open-Label Phase 1/2 Study of Pomalidomide Alone or in Combination with Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple.
Early Molecular and Cytogenetic Response Predict for Better Outcomes in Untreated Patients with CML-CP — Comparison of 4 TKI Modalities (Standard- and.
Martinelli G et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 679.
Mateos MV et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 403.
Jointly sponsored by Postgraduate Institute for Medicine and Clinical Care Options, LLC Clinical Focus: Options for Treatment-Resistant or Treatment-Intolerant.
New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage
Dimopoulos MA et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract LBA-6.
Cortes JE et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract 6502.
Resistant CML: Understanding the Science to Change Outcomes
Great Debates and Updates in Hematologic Malignancies 2014
Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia Diagnosis and Treatment
Best Practices in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia by Multidisciplinary Teams
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Challenge
Great Debates-CML Omacetaxine succinate
Crossover for pts meeting ELN 2013 failure criteria
1 Verstovsek S et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract Cervantes F et al.
Ahmadi T et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 266.
Advani RH et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 443.
1Kantarjian HM et al. Lancet Oncol 2011;12:
Branford S et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 254.
Leber B et al. Proc ASH 2013;Abstract 94.
Presentation transcript:

A Pivotal Phase 2 Trial of Ponatinib in Patients with CML and Ph+ ALL Resistant or Intolerant to Dasatinib or Nilotinib, or with the T315I BCR ‐ ABL Mutation: 12 ‐ Month Follow ‐ Up of the PACE Trial Cortes JE et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 163.

Background In approximately 25% of patients with CML, the disease does not respond or becomes resistant to imatinib. –Resistance is often caused by mutations in the BCR-ABL protein, which prevent imatinib from binding to that protein. –Approximately 50% of patients respond to second- generation TKIs dasatinib and nilotinib, but many will become resistant to these drugs as well. Ponatinib was molecularly designed to overcome limitations of other TKIs. Current study objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ponatinib in patients with CML or Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL.

Eligibility (N = 449) CML-CP, CML-AP, CML-BP or Ph+ ALL T315I mutation or Resistant or intolerant (R/I) to dasatinib or nilotinib Primary endpoints Major cytogenetic response (MCyR) at any time within 12 months Major hematologic response (MaHR) at any time within 6 months Ponatinib 45 mg orally once daily Phase II International PACE Trial Design Cortes JE et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 163.

Primary Endpoint: Responses CML-CPCML-AP CML-BP/ Ph+ ALL Primary endpointMCyRMaHR R/I to dasatinib or nilotinib (n = 203; 65; 48) 51%58%35% T315I mutation (n = 64; 18, 46) 70%50%33% Total (n = 267, 83, 94) 56%57%34% Cortes JE et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 163. Patients remaining on study (n, %): CML-CP (171, 63%), CML-AP (45, 53%), CML-BP/Ph+ ALL (6, 6%)

Response Characteristics and Survival: CML-CP Response rate(n = 267) Any cytogenetic response67% MCyR56% CCyR46% Major molecular response (MMR)34% Median time to response MCyR2.8 months MMR5.5 months Clinical outcomes at 12 months MCyR91% PFS80% OS94% Cortes JE et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 163.

Response by Number of Prior Approved TKIs: CML-CP Cortes JE et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 163. TKIs = imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib

Select Adverse Events (AEs): Total Population (N = 449) NonhematologicAny gradeGrade 3/4 Rash38%4% Abdominal pain38%9% Headache35%2% Dry skin35%2% Constipation34%2% Hypertension21%7% HematologicAny gradeGrade 3/4 Thrombocytopenia42%34% Neutropenia24%21% Anemia20%14% Cortes JE et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 163. Serious AEs: Pancreatitis: 5%; myocardial infarction: 3%; cardiac failure/atrial fibrillation: 6%

Author Conclusions: 12-Month Follow-Up Summary Robust clinical activity of ponatinib was observed in patients with heavily pretreated disease, with –Responses regardless of mutation status or disease stage –Higher response rates in patients with less heavily pretreated disease Early and deep responses were observed: 34% MMR and 15% MR. Responses were durable: 91% estimated to remain in MCyR at 1 year. Ponatinib was generally well tolerated. Ponatinib may be an important new treatment for CML and Ph+ ALL resistant or intolerant to prior TKIs. Cortes JE et al. Proc ASH 2012;Abstract 163.

Investigator Commentary: Pivotal Phase II International PACE Trial of Ponatinib in CML and Ph+ ALL Ponatinib is the fifth TKI approved in CML, and it’s perhaps the most powerful of all the TKIs because it “covers” virtually all of the mutations. The PACE study included patients with CML-CP, CML-AP, CML-BP and Ph+ ALL, with or without the T315I mutation. I emphasize the T315I mutation because that is a mutation within the BCR-ABL kinase domain that is resistant to all existing treatments for CML other than ponatinib and the chemotherapeutic agent omacetaxine. So T315I is the ultimate mutation, which renders the disease resistant to imatinib, nilotinib, dasatinib and bosutinib. However, the disease is responsive to ponatinib, which was demonstrated in the PACE study. Additionally, there were high response rates in patients who were resistant to 1, 2 and even 3 prior TKIs. Surprisingly, major cytogenetic responses were observed in more than 50% of patients, with more than 40% complete cytogenetic responses. Why is this important? This is a group of patients with bad, long-standing disease that is resistant to all other treatments. Nevertheless, the disease responded to ponatinib — not just in terms of hematologic response but also by cytogenetic improvement. Interview with Moshe Talpaz, MD, February 20, 2013