September 10, 20021 FY 2003 Plans Bob Simmons. September 10, 20022 Introduction Overview of Project and Engineering Plans Project Plans Engineering Plans.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT ROLE OF KEY PERSONNEL Bernd Madauss International Space University Strasbourg February, 2011
Advertisements

Software Quality Assurance Plan
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
Sixth Hour Lecture 10:30 – 11:20 am, September 9 Framework for a Software Management Process – Artifacts of the Process (Part II, Chapter 6 of Royce’ book)
Software Configuration Management (SCM)
Secure System Administration & Certification DITSCAP Manual (Chapter 6) Phase 4 Post Accreditation Stephen I. Khan Ted Chapman University of Tulsa Department.
Chapter 5: Project Scope Management
Systems Engineering Management
Configuration Management
Software Configuration Management
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Configuration Management for Transportation Management Systems Establishing and Maintaining System Integrity.
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
Project Management Considerations B. Nelson US ITER TBM Meeting INEL August 11, 2005.
Chapter 2: Overview of Essentials ISE 443 / ETM 543 Fall 2013.
OSF/ISD Project Portfolio Management Framework January 17, 2011.
Software Configuration Management
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Authorization Basis Plan Steven Hoey, ESH Manager NSLS-II Project Advisory Committee Meeting December 10 – 11, 2009.
1/18/2005Module 41 How the NCSX Project Does Business Work Planning & Design Review Processes.
NIST Special Publication Revision 1
NCSX Management Overview Hutch Neilson, NCSX Project Manager NCSX Conceptual Design Review Princeton, NJ May 23, 2002.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES National Synchrotron Light Source II Project Management Jim Yeck Deputy Director (Project Management)
VST: dome THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS Ing. Davide Fierro THE LIFE CYCLE OF MODERN TECHNOLOGICAL PROJECTS.
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
1.  Describe an overall framework for project integration management ◦ RelatIion to the other project management knowledge areas and the project life.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Executive Session Director’s CD-3b Review of the MicroBooNE Project January 18, 2012 Dean Hoffer.
Configuration Management Non Government Std: EIA Standard-649 “A management process for establishing and maintaining consistency of a product’s performance,
LCFOA Meeting at SLAC Linear Collider Forum of the Americas 1 LINEAR COLLIDER FORUM OF THE AMERICAS CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES OVERVIEW Victor R. Kuchler.
© Mahindra Satyam 2009 Configuration Management QMS Training.
University of Southern California Center for Systems and Software Engineering Barry Boehm, USC CS 510 Software Planning Guidelines.
NCSX NCSX Design Review Guide May 27, 2005 Wayne Reiersen NCSX.
12/2/04Module 2D1 The NCSX Engineering Web – An Overview Part IV Engineering Management & Systems Engineering and Other.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
1 | 2010 Lecture 3: Project processes. Covered in this lecture Project processes Project Planning (PP) Project Assessment & Control (PAC) Risk Management.
NCSX Systems Engineering Management Plan Peer Review Bob Simmons May 15, 2003.
Critical Design Review (CDR)
Module 5 Session 5.2 Visual 1 Module 5 Refining Objectives, Scope, and Other Project Parameters Session 5.2 Reviewing the PAR and refining key project.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
NCSX Data Management Plan Peer Review Bob Simmons March 31, 2003.
11/23/2004Module # 11 The NCSX Project Web An Indoctrination and Overview.
How the NCSX Project Does Business
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
NCSX Interface Control Management Plan and Implementing Procedure 003 Peer Review December 19, 2002.
~ pertemuan 4 ~ Oleh: Ir. Abdul Hayat, MTI 20-Mar-2009 [Abdul Hayat, [4]Project Integration Management, Semester Genap 2008/2009] 1 PROJECT INTEGRATION.
12/2/04Module 2C1 The NCSX Engineering Web – An Overview Part III Design Data, Fabrication, Assembly, and Installation Plans.
1 Lecture 2.4a: SEF SE Planning and the SEP (SEF Ch 16) Dr. John MacCarthy UMBC CMSC 615 Fall, 2006.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Development of the Basis Document for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
NCSX Document and Records Plan Peer Review Bob Simmons March 14, 2003.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
1 WBS 1 Preparation for FDRs NCSX WBS 1 Engineering Meeting March 17, 2003 What establishes the plan? What are near term deliverables? How will we status.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
6/6/ SOFTWARE LIFE CYCLE OVERVIEW Professor Ron Kenett Tel Aviv University School of Engineering.
TMP3413 Software Engineering Lab Lab 01: TSPi Tool Support.
Camera PDR/CD1 Planning 19 September 2008
Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA)
Life Cycle Logistics.
Software Project Configuration Management
Project Management PTM721S
ISA 201 Intermediate Information Systems Acquisition
Chapter 11: Software Configuration Management
Software Configuration Management
Project Management Lifecycle Phases
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
Guidance notes for Project Manager
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
Chapter 11: Software Configuration Management
DOD’S PHASED SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT PROCESS
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
Presentation transcript:

September 10, FY 2003 Plans Bob Simmons

September 10, Introduction Overview of Project and Engineering Plans Project Plans Engineering Plans What You Need to Know

September 10, Overview of Project and Engineering Plans

September 10, Project Guidance Documents DOE Order – Provides DOE guidance for the management of DOE projects Project Management and Critical Decisions Configuration Management Project Control Acquisition Execution Plan – High level Project response to DOE O Mission Technical, cost, and schedule objectives (targets) Procurement strategy Major project milestones – To be Approved by Under Secretary of Energy

September 10, Project Plans Project Execution Plan (PEP) – Broader discussion of mission and technical objectives Related to FESAC and Fusion Energy Science Goals – Broad description of project – Outlines project organization and management structure – Outlines management processes (e.g., WBS, project baselines, systems engineering, configuration management, funds management, etc.) – Defines project completion criteria – Approved by Associate Director for Fusion Energy Sciences Systems Engineering Management Plan (SEMP) – Defines how the Engineering organization will operate

September 10, Engineering Organization

September 10, Key Features of SEMP Systems Integration Team – Forum for discussing and resolving engineering issues – Responsible for risk management at the system level – Members Project Manager, Deputy Project Manager for Programs, Engineering Manager, Physics Manager, Project Control Manager, Systems Engineering Support Manager, Project Engineers (as appropriate) Specification Hierarchy “Design to” vs. “Build to” specs –“Design to” specs by PDR –“Build to” specs by FDR General Requirements Document (GRD) is the highest level specification (ASPEC) –Allocation and flow-down of requirements to lower level specifications Three project baselines Technical ( Pro/E models/drawings, specs, etc.), cost (P3 data base), schedule (also in P3 data base) Changes to these baseline only modified by configuration control process

September 10, Key Features of the CMP Outlines configuration management and details of change control processes Not all CIs come under Configuration Control at the same time – Initial baselines established at the start of Preliminary Design (Oct 2002) – Developmental “baselines” evolve as the design matures – At design review, unless major change occurs, baselines will be updated and more CIs and documentation placed under Configuration Control – ECP is the vehicle by which the baselines are revised Stand-alone ECP for significant changes “Omnibus” ECP

September 10, Change Control Board Change Control Board (CCB) is normal means of reviewing and approving ECPs – Senior NCSX management team members of CCB, but NCSX Project Manager is the Chair => all others in advisory role Expedited ECP Process – In special circumstances (e.g., critical procurement pending, field activities may be delayed, etc.) special “expedited” process where NCSX Project Engineer reviews and approves ECP with only abbreviated input from others – Full CBB will review ECP “after the fact” to ensure no serious omissions/errors

September 10, Engineering Change Proposal Anyone can initiate a change – Type of change => technical, cost, or schedule (or combination of all) – Reason for change – Impacted WBS elements – Impacts of change => design, performance, requirements, cost, schedule, maintenance, ES&H, RAM – Assessment of other options – Backup detail to support proposed change Initially will be a paper format, but hopefully, within 6 months, this and many other NCSX engineering forms will be on an interactive web environment Extensive list of reviewers to mitigate impact of omissions/errors If DOE approval required, CCB and Project manager will recommend approval and forward to DOE

September 10, Implementation of ECP Status of pending ECP and detailed implementation of ECP will be tracked monthly – Monthly meeting with WBS Managers for status will include discussion of implementing approved ECPs

September 10, Updating Project Baselines

September 10, Date Storage and Retrieval Sites

September 10, Key Features of the DMP Electronic Project Files – Pro/INTRALINK data base will be the repository for all models and drawings as well as approved and controlled technical and project documents (e.g. specs, plans, etc.) Pro/INTRALINK Users Manual being prepared – Other sites may also contain critical design information and details

September 10, Pro/INTRALINK Folders

September 10, Data Management Process

September 10, Drawing Release and Configuration Control Technical baselines established at start of Preliminary Design Drawing release promotion proposed as lead-in to design review Following design review and incorporation of CHITS, ECP processed to reflect changes – Baselines updated – Release level finalized and “frozen” to document the baseline As-built drawings part of the NCSX plan

September 10, Key Features of the DOC Defines the official docments and records for NCSX – Purpose – Content – Format – Approval level – Records retention requirements – Document naming convention Defines how NCSX Project will meet the requirements of the applicable DOE orders and implementing PPPL policies

September 10, Types of Records Project Definition Agreements – AEP Project Plans – PEP, SEMP, CMP, DOC, ICMP, etc. Requirements Documents – GRD and other specs NEPA Documentation – EA, NEPA Planning Forms, SAD Quality Assurance Records Training Records Other Documents – Memoranda – WBS dictionaries – Cost and schedule documents – Design review records – ECPs

September 10, Key Features of the ICMP Interface Definition – An interface represents a technical agreement between two or more activities or Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) Documents the functional, performance, and physical characteristics required to exist at a common boundary between the activities or WBS elements. Interfaces serve as integration constraints to ensure that systems and subsystems mutually can be assembled and/or function together. – Primary interface item Exists between two separately deliverable items (referred to as Configuration Items/CIs in systems engineering terms) when the mutual boundary area is not controlled by a single WBS manager Project Engineer determines the interface to be critical to the performance of the NCSX program ICMP only addresses primary interface definition and management – Secondary interface item Lies solely within the control of a single WBS Manager, even though it might cross WBS boundaries.

September 10, Interface Control Process Throughout project life cycle – Begins with the concept design phase and with the identification of the basic interface boundaries, continues through the design and fabrication phases, the operational phases, and ends with project shutdown and decommissioning. Concept design phase – Major functional interfaces identified for each concept being considered – Reflected in the overall Pro/Engineer (Pro/E) models Preliminary design phase – Scope sheets are prepared early in the preliminary designto initiate agreements that define the primary interfaces required between participants – Scope sheets converted to Interface Control Documents (ICDs) at time of PDR => may be in drawing or book entry format – After PDR, come under configuration control

September 10, Interface Control Process Final design process – Primary interfaces defined at the completion of PDR continue to be refined and increased in detail – Functional integration tests using prototypes (when available) and/or increasingly more detailed models and drawings verify that the design has resulted in compatible items – Existing scope sheets and ICDs are updated and any new scope sheets and ICDs representing new primary interfaces are developed as part of the Final Design Review (FDR) package Fabrication phase – As the need for modifications are identified, the established interfaces are examined for impacts – This iterative process of refining and redefining interfaces continues via the configuration change control process until the project is ready for operation

September 10, Summary This presentation has just covered the surface of the content and purpose of each plan under preparation for the preliminary design Other plans and procedures will be developed to flesh out additional details Sample of some other plans that will be developed – Experimental Plan (EXP) – provides and overview of the planned phases of NCSX operation – Test and Evaluation Plan (TEP) – provides outline of how the integrated system testing will be performed and managed