Responsibilities of Lead Agency Pages 7-8 of Training Guide 1. Preliminary review a) Determine if activity is a project as described by CEQA b) May require.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Advertisements

Introduction to EIS/EA Managing the Environmental & Project Development Process Presented by the Ohio Dept. of Transportation.
Student Integrity and Misconduct Training and support for decision makers and Academic Integrity Officers.
Summary of NEPA and SEPA Coastal Engineering and Land Use Issues in North Carolina Greenville, NC January 13, 2009 Sean M. Sullivan.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.
General Information on Permitting Electric Transmission Projects at the California Public Utilities Commission June 2009 Presentation created by the Transmission.
Scoping in the EIA process Proposal Identification Screening
CEQA FUNDAMENTALS for LAFCo’s
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Andersonlloyd.co.nz Auckland, Christchurch, Dunedin, Queenstown 18 May 2015 Reform of Resource Consent Application Process Presenter Rachel Brooking.
Office of Business Development Training
W E L C O M E to the SB 1022 Real Estate Due Diligence Training SB 1022 Real Estate Due Diligence Training.
Deciding How To Apply NEPA Environmental Assessments Findings of No Significant Impact Environmental Impact Statements.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
Environmental Impact Assessment Prepared by: Miss Syazwani Mahmad Puzi School of Bioprocess Engineering UniMAP.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project Public Scoping Meetings November 5, 2014 (Sacramento and Red Bluff) State Water Resources Control Board Division of.
What If I Must Go Beyond a Preliminary Assessment? (the example of a USAID EA under Reg. 216) [DATE][SPEAKERS NAMES]
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA): Overview
Page CDBG Recipients' Workshop Community Finance Division NEPA Environmental Procedures.
VIRGINIA PUBLIC-PRIVATE EDUCATION FACILITIES AND INFRASTRUCURE ACT OF 2002 (PPEA) Augusta County Board of Supervisors Wednesday, January 6, 2009.
Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Module 19 STEP 9 Completion of the Feasibility Study Civil Works Orientation Course - FY 11.
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
FAO/WHO Codex Training Package Module 3.2 FAO/WHO CODEX TRAINING PACKAGE SECTION THREE – BASICS OF NATIONAL CODEX ACTIVITIES 3.2 How to develop national.
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act March 23, 2010.
CHAPTER 3 SCOPING AND AGENCY COORDINATION. Scoping - the procedure for determining the appropriate level of study of a proposed project/activity - process.
UNEP Training Resource ManualTopic 1 Slide 1 Aims and objectives of EIA F modify and improve design F ensure efficient resource use F enhance social aspects.
Public-Private Education Facilities and Infrastructure Act 2002 (PPEA) Joe Damico.
Monterey Peninsula Water Management District 1 Confirm Scope of Work and Description for MPWMD ASR Project Item 13 April 18, 2005 Regular Meeting Staff.
CEQA Nuts and Bolts Adam U. Lindgren. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) was passed in 1970 with numerous expressed legislative intents and.
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
SAFETEA-LU Section 6002 “ Efficient Environmental Reviews for Project Decisionmaking”
1 CEQA and CEQA-Plus Presented by Cookie Hirn, Lisa Lee, and Michelle Jones Regional Programs Unit July 2008.
Revisions to Primacy State Underground Injection Control Programs Primacy State Implementation of the New Class V Rule.
Winery Ordinance Update Scoping Meeting for the Environmental Impact Report County of Santa Barbara July 16, 2014.
Environmental Assessment in British Columbia Forum of Federations Conference September 14, 2009.
Cooperating Agency Status Presented by Horst Greczmiel Associate Director, NEPA Oversight Council on Environmental Quality Washington, DC September 14,
1 Findings and Board Resolution Steven Blum. 2 CEQA Findings in the Board Resolution  Resolution or separate appended document contains findings critical.
1 Responding to Comments Janet Cox TMDL/Planning Communications Region 2.
Report On The Status Of The Remediation Of The Sonoma County Waste Tire Sites Board Meeting Agenda Item 4 February 18, 2004.
CEQA and the Delta Plan Presentation to Delta Stewardship Council February 24, 2011.
Horse Creek Wind Farm Community Review Workshop #1: Introductory Meeting April 21, 2011—6:30pm at the Paynter Center.
CEAA 2012 EA PROCESS OPTIONS OCTOBER 15, 2012
Gregory Canyon Landfill San Diego County LEA Gary Erbeck, Director California Integrated Waste Management Board Hearing December 14-15, 2004.
CEQA 101 CEQA City of Sacramento Community Development Dept. March 2016.
Overview of the Surface Mining and Reclamation Act and Designation Process County of San Luis Obispo Office of the County Counsel January 8, 2015.
CEQA 101  CA Legislature passed CEQA in 1970; signed by Governor Reagan  CEQA statutes are found in Public Resources Code sections et seq.  The.
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Welcome to the Permit Implementation Regulations (AB 1497) Workshop.
1 Roles of the State and Regional Boards in the basin Plan Amendment Process.
The Plaza at Santa Monica Project PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
1828 Ocean Ave & 1921 Ocean Front Walk PUBLIC SCOPING MEETING
EIA approval process, Management plan and Monitoring
Introduction to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
La Mesa Climate Action Plan Supplemental Environmental Impact Report Scoping Meeting May 31, 2017.
The Development Process
Facebook Campus Expansion Project EIR
Overview What is the CEQA environmental review process?
[INSERT APPLICABLE REGIONAL ENTITY NAME/LOGO]
Disability Services Agencies Briefing On HIPAA
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Relationship between World Bank and Romanian EA requirements
LAFCO AND CEQA LAFCO Role as A Responsible Agency
Presentation transcript:

Responsibilities of Lead Agency Pages 7-8 of Training Guide 1. Preliminary review a) Determine if activity is a project as described by CEQA b) May require additional information for environmental evaluation even after application is deemed complete 2. Pre-application consultation 3. Decides what type of CEQA document is required 4. Review for Exemption 5. Initial Study – determines significant effects, determines if Neg Dec or EIR is required 6. Must produce “comprehensive” environmental document that will be of use to responsible agencies; must consult with responsible and trustee agencies throughout CEQA process by soliciting comments/recommendations on the type of CEQA document to prepare, appropriate mitigation, etc. 7. Lead agency may not refuse to exercise its police power to try to mitigate significant effects simply because another agency has the power to do so

Responsibilities of Responsible Agency Pages 8-9 of Training Guide 1.Typically has permitting authority or approval power over some aspect of the overall project 2.Must actively participate in the CEQA process and review the environmental document (includes attending scoping meetings, consulting with lead agency, etc.) 3.Comments must address only activities within its area of expertise or that are required to be carried out or approved by the agency 4.Must use the document in its approval process and make own findings regarding the project 5.May assume lead agency role under certain conditions (see Guidelines section 15052)

Purpose for an early consultation 1.Identify if a project under CEQA exists 2.Disclose environmental impacts (Initial Study, Negative Declaration (Neg Dec), Environmental Impact Report (EIR)) 2.Identify and prevent environmental impacts - Mitigation measures, Alternatives to projects, Mitigation monitoring 3.Disclose agency decision making – Findings, Statements of overriding consideration 4.Enhance public participation and disclosure - Public notice requirement, Response to comments, Availability of documents, Legal enforcement procedures 5.Foster intergovernmental coordination - Early consultation, Scoping meetings, Notices of preparation (NOP) 6.State clearinghouse review

Also need a project description to begin the CEQA process “Whole of the Action” Pages 9-10 of Training Guide 1.Description should include all phases of project 2.Planning, implementations, operations 3.Level of Detail and Scope a)Should be determined by availability of information b)High detail – certainty, locks in maximums, reduced flexibility c)Low detail – flexibility, lack of certainty, permit consistency 4.Segmented Projects – “piecemealing”, breaking a project into parts for evaluation purposes a) When not to segment b) When to segment c) How to segment 5.CEQA Descriptions vs. SWFP Descriptions

How to conduct an initial study Pages of Training Guide 1.Complete initial study checklist Appendix E of TG 2.Consultation with responsible and trustee agencies 3.Decision to prepare EIR or Neg Dec (30 days from acceptance of complete application) 4.Uses of Initial Studies a) Deciding whether to prepare an EIR b) Avoiding unnecessary EIRs through mitigation c) Focusing the EIR on significant effects d) Facilitating early environmental assessment e) Supporting Negative Declarations f) Fostering the reuse of EIRs g) Identifying whether a program EIR, tiering, or similar process can be used

How to conduct an initial study (cont) 5.Tools for Determining Significant Effects a) Initial study b) CEQA’s mandatory findings of significance c) Appendix G of the Guidelines d) Consultation with other agencies e) Agency thresholds of significance 6.Options When Initial Study Shows Significant Effect a) Prepare EIR b) Reuse EIR prepared for earlier project 1) Program EIRs 2) Master EIRs – prepared for c) Use tiering to limit scope of EIR 1) Tier 1 – General Plan or Program EIR 2) Tier 2 – Community or Specific Plan EIR 3) Tier 3 – Development Project or Infrastructure EIR

Required Contents of an Initial Study 1)Project description 2)Environmental setting 3)Potential environmental impacts 4)Mitigation measures for any significant effect 5)Consistency with plans and policies 6)Names of preparers

Finding mitigation measures Page 20 of Training Guide 1.Who identifies what the mitigation measures should be? 2.Objectives of Environmental Monitoring ● To ensure implementation of mitigation measures during project implementation ● To provide feedback to agency staff and decision-makers about the effectiveness of their actions ● To provide learning opportunities for improving mitigation measures on future projects ● To identify the need for enforcement action before irreversible environmental damage occurs 3.Mitigation Enforcement Mechanisms ● “Stop Work” orders ● Denial of building occupancy permits ● Revocation of project approval (condition of permit) ● Misdemeanor criminal sanctions (fines, jail) ● Performance bonds ●Recording with county recorder

Finding mitigation measures (cont) 4.Mitigation Monitoring Requirements ● Trigger ► Agency adopts a Negative Declaration ► Agency makes findings after preparing an EIR ● CEQA Requirement ► Agency must adopt a “reporting and monitoring” program for changes in the project adopted or made as conditions of approval to mitigate or avoid significant effects ● Provisions for Mitigation Measures ► Certain agencies must provide lead agency with performance standards or monitoring programs for impacts they identify ► Mitigation measure must be made condition of project approval Responsibility for enforcing mitigation measures The LEA is responsible for enforcing those mitigations measures that fall under their jurisdiction.

Process to adopt/certify EIR; make required findings Pages and of Training Guide 1.Public notice and review of Draft EIR a)Notice of Draft EIR availability b)Who gets Public Notice ● County Clerk ● All responsible and trustee agencies ● Any person or organization requesting, or who previously requested, a copy c)Methods of Public Notice d)When is State Clearinghouse Review Required 2.Public hearing on Draft EIR (optional) (30-45 days) 3.Written comments received 4.Responses to comments prepared 5.Responses sent to commenting agencies (10 days before decision)

Process to adopt/certify EIR; make required findings (cont) 6.Final EIR certified by Lead Agency (1 year from acceptance) a) Lead Agency must certify that ● The Final EIR has been completed in compliance with CEQA ● The Final EIR was presented to the decision-making body and was reviewed and considered by the decision-making body prior to approving the project ● The Final EIR reflects the lead agency’s independent judgment and analysis b) In CEQA decision-making, the Agency’s decision must be supported by findings and the findings must be supported by substantial evidence on record.

Process to adopt/certify EIR; make required findings (cont) c)Three Possible Findings ● Project has been changed to avoid or substantially reduce impact magnitude, or ● Changes to project are within another agency’s jurisdiction and such changes have been or should be adopted, or ● Specific economic, social, legal, technical, or other considerations make the mitigation measure or alternative feasible d)Statements of Overriding Considerations ● After EIR is complete ● A loophole ● Balancing environmental damage against social, economic, and other factors ● Lead Agency makes declaration

Process to adopt/certify EIR; make required findings (contd) Contents of Final EIR ● Draft EIR ● Copies of comments received during public review of the Draft EIR ● List of persons or entities commenting on the Draft EIR ● Lead Agency responses to the comments received on the Draft EIR 7.Lead Agency makes decision on project (6 months from final EIR certification) 8.Findings written and adopted 9.Mitigation reporting and monitoring program adopted

Process to adopt/certify EIR; make required findings (cont) 10. Notice of Determination (NOD) filed (5 days from approval) a)Contents of NOD ● Project name ● Project description ● Date of project approval ● Determination of whether the project will have significant effects ● Statement that EIR was prepared and certified ● Were any mitigation measures made a condition of approval ● Were findings made ● Was a statement of overriding considerations adopted

Process to adopt/certify EIR; make required findings (cont) NOD Time Periods ● Lead agency files with County Clerk or Office of Planning and Research within 5 days ● County Clerks posts notice within 24 hours ● Posting lasts 30 days ● Notice retained for 9 months ● NOD starts the clock that limits challenging the CEQA document ● After 30 days, CEQA document cannot be challenged 11. NOD posted (24 hours from filing) 12. Responsible Agency makes decision on project (180 days from Lead Agency decision)

Process to adopt/certify ND/MND; make required findings 1.Contract for Negative Declaration (Neg Dec) preparation executed (45 days from decision to prepare a Neg Dec) 2.Mitigation measures identified and agreed to by project proponent 3.Draft Neg Dec prepared a)Required Contents of a Negative Declaration b)Required Contents for “Mitigated Negative Declarations” ● Mitigation must clearly reduce potentially significant impacts to less-than-significant levels ● Mitigation must be committed to before public review of “Mitigated Negative Declarations” ● Equivalent mitigation may be submitted after public review without recirculation, but a public hearing is required

Process to adopt/certify ND/MND; make required findings (cont) 4.Public notice and review (20-30 days) a)Notice of Intent to adopt a Neg Dec or “Mitigated Neg Dec” must contain ● Brief description of project and location ● Starting and ending dates for public review ● Date, time, and place of any scheduled public meetings or hearings ● Addresses where copies of Neg Dec or “Mitigated Neg Dec” are available for review ● Whether any listed toxic sites are present (Government Code ) ● Other information required by statute or regulations 5.Responses to Neg Dec received 6.Comments considered

Process to adopt/certify ND/MND; make required findings (cont) 7.Neg Dec completed (180 days from acceptance) 8.Commenting agencies notified of date of hearing on project 9. Neg Dec adopted 10. Mitigation reporting and monitoring program adopted 11. Lead Agency makes determination on project (60 days from Neg Dec adoption) 12. Notice of Determination (NOD) filed (5 days from project approval) 13. NOD posted (24 hours from filing) 14. Responsible Agency makes decision on project (180 days from Lead Agency decision)

What if the permit application does not match environmental review document? Operator changes application so it matches CEQA document and resubmits. LEA accepts application package and becomes Lead Agency on CEQA. May assume under certain conditions. (See CEQA Guidelines Section 15052)

Required LEA/EA CEQA Finding Page 84 of Training Guide 1. Full permit: the LEA must make the following written finding prior to submittal of a new or revised proposed permit: "The proposed permit is consistent with, and supported by, existing CEQA analysis." Title 27, Section Title 27, Section Standardized permits: if evidence of CEQA compliance has not previously been submitted, evidence must be received within 15 days of acceptance of the application. Title 14, Section (g), (h) Title 14, Section (g), (h)

Required LEA/EA CEQA Finding Example: The LEA CEQA finding should support the proposed permit by including, at a minimum, the following information: –A statement that the LEA has reviewed the CEQA document(s). –References to all environmental documents and amendments that support this finding, including: title of environmental document, approving agency, date of approval, and State Clearinghouse number (SCH#). –Finding language: "The proposed permit is consistent with, and supported by existing CEQA analysis." –Signed and dated by LEA.