Estimating Cotton Defoliation with Remote Sensing Glen Ritchie 1 and Craig Bednarz 2 1 UGA Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, GA 2 Texas Tech, Lubbock,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Advertisements

NDVI Anomaly, Kenya, January 2009 Vegetation Indices Enhancing green vegetation using mathematical equations and transformations.
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
Crop Canopy Sensors for High Throughput Phenomic Systems
Chlorophyll Estimation Using Multi-spectral Reflectance and Height Sensing C. L. JonesResearch Engineer N. O. Maness Professor M. L. Stone Regents’ Professor.
Environmental Remote Sensing GEOG 2021 Spectral information in remote sensing.
Active Remote Sensing Systems March 2, 2005 Spectral Characteristics of Vegetation Temporal Characteristics of Agricultural Crops Vegetation Indices Biodiversity.
SKYE INSTRUMENTS LTD Llandrindod Wells, United Kingdom.
Sensor Orientation to maize canopy row and estimating biomass and Nitrogen Status Paul Hodgen, Fernando Solari, Jim Schepers, John Shanahan, Dennis Francis.
Resolution.
PhD remote sensing course, 2013 Lund University Understanding Vegetation indices PART 1 Understanding Vegetation indices PART 1 : General Introduction.
Vegetation indices and the red-edge index
A NEW PERSPECTIVE TO VISIBLE NEAR INFRARED REFLECTANCE SPECTROSCOPY: A WAVELET APPROACH Yufeng Ge, Cristine L.S. Morgan, J. Alex Thomasson and Travis Waiser.
Remote Sensing of Aphid-Induced Stress in Wheat BAE/SOIL Precision Agriculture Oklahoma State University Victor W. Slowik April 20, 2001.
NDVI Normalized difference vegetation index Band Ratios in Remote Sensing KEY REFERENCE: Kidwell, K.B., 1990, Global Vegetation Index User's Guide, U.S.
Use of remote sensing on turfgrass Soil 4213 course presentation Xi Xiong April 18, 2003.
Relationships Between NDVI and Plant Physical Measurements Beltwide Cotton Conference January 6-10, 2003 Tim Sharp.
REMOTE SENSING OF IPM: Reflectance Measurements of Aphid Infestation and Density Estimation in Wheat Growing under Field Conditions. Mustafa Mirik, Gerald.
Comparison of Commercial Crop Canopy Sensors Ken Sudduth Newell Kitchen Scott Drummond USDA-ARS, Columbia, Missouri.
NUE Workshop: Improving NUE using Crop Sensing, Waseca, MN
Eric Rafn and Bill Kramber Idaho Department of Water Resources
Remote Sensing Hyperspectral Remote Sensing. 1. Hyperspectral Remote Sensing ► Collects image data in many narrow contiguous spectral bands through the.
Differences b etween Red and Green NDVI, What do they predict and what they don’t predict Shambel Maru.
Using Sonar and Digital Imagery To Estimate Crop Biomass Introduction Sonar: may be used to detect proximity and distance in machine vision (Senix 2003)
Chapter 5 Remote Sensing Crop Science 6 Fall 2004 October 22, 2004.
West Hills College Farm of the Future. West Hills College Farm of the Future Precision Agriculture – Lesson 4 Remote Sensing A group of techniques for.
Karnieli: Introduction to Remote Sensing
Summer Colloquium on the Physics of Weather and Climate ADAPTATION OF A HYDROLOGICAL MODEL TO ROMANIAN PLAIN MARS (Monitoring Agriculture with Remote Sensing)
Determining the Most Effective Growth Stage in Corn Production for Spectral Prediction of Grain Yield and Nitrogen Response Department of Plant and Soil.
Electromagnetic Radiation Most remotely sensed data is derived from Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). This includes: Visible light Infrared light (heat)
Estimating Water Optical Properties, Water Depth and Bottom Albedo Using High Resolution Satellite Imagery for Coastal Habitat Mapping S. C. Liew #, P.
Canada Centre for Remote Sensing Field measurements and remote sensing-derived maps of vegetation around two arctic communities in Nunavut F. Zhou, W.
Remote Sensing of Vegetation. Vegetation and Photosynthesis About 70% of the Earth’s land surface is covered by vegetation with perennial or seasonal.
NDVI: What It Is and What It Measures Danielle Williams.
The Use of Red and Green Reflectance in the Calculation of NDVI for Wheat, Bermudagrass, and Corn Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213 Robert W. Mullen SOIL 4213.
UTILIZATION OF CROP SENSORS TO DETECT COTTON GROWTH AND N NUTRITION
GEOG2021 Environmental Remote Sensing Lecture 3 Spectral Information in Remote Sensing.
Development of Vegetation Indices as Economic Thresholds for Control of Defoliating Insects of Soybean James BoardVijay MakaRandy PriceDina KnightMatthew.
Measuring Vegetation Characteristics
State of Engineering in Precision Agriculture, Boundaries and Limits for Agronomy.
Observing Laramie Basin Grassland Phenology Using MODIS Josh Reynolds with PROPOSED RESEARCH PROJECT Acknowledgments Steven Prager, Dept. of Geography.
Moving Beyond NDVI for Active Sensing in Cotton
Calculation of Vegetation Indices with PAR and Solar Radiation Measurements David R. Cook Argonne National Laboratory.
A Remote Sensing Approach for Estimating Regional Scale Surface Moisture Luke J. Marzen Associate Professor of Geography Auburn University Co-Director.
Generalized Algorithm for Variable Rate Nitrogen Application on Cereal Grains John B. Solie, Regents Professor Biosystems and Agri. Engineering Dept. William.
References: 1)Ganguly, S., Samanta, A., Schull, M. A., Shabanov, N. V., Milesi, C., Nemani, R. R., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B., Generating vegetation.
Assessment on Phytoplankton Quantity in Coastal Area by Using Remote Sensing Data RI Songgun Marine Environment Monitoring and Forecasting Division State.
Farms, sensors and satellites. Using fertilisers Farming practice are changing Growing quality crops in good yields depends on many factors, including.
Electromagnetic Radiation
Monitoring Vegetation Health
GEOG2021 Environmental Remote Sensing
REMOTE SENSING OF IPM: Reflectance Measurements of Aphid Infestation and Density Estimation in Wheat Growing under Field Conditions. Mustafa Mirik, Gerald.
Using vegetation indices (NDVI) to study vegetation
Evolution of OSU Optical Sensor Based Variable Rate Applicator
Moment Distance Metric
STUDY ON THE PHENOLOGY OF ASPEN
OWC/OWRF Use of Sensors and Spectral Reflectance Water Indices to Select for Grain Yield in Wheat Dr. Arthur Klatt Dr. Ali Babar Dr. B. Prasad Mr. Mario.
Basics of radiation physics for remote sensing of vegetation
Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Radiometric Theory and Vegetative Indices
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Why does NDVI work? What biological parameter could I use to make agronomic decisions if it could be estimated indirectly? Plant Biomass  Nitrogen Uptake.
By: Paul A. Pellissier, Scott V. Ollinger, Lucie C. Lepine
Image Information Extraction
Late-Season Prediction of Wheat Grain Yield and Protein
Sources of Variability in Canopy Spectra and the Convergent Properties of Plants Funding From: S.V. Ollinger, L. Lepine, H. Wicklein, F. Sullivan, M. Day.
Reflectance and Sensor Basics
Remote Sensing Landscape Changes Before and After King Fire 2014
Hyperspectral Remote Sensing
Presentation transcript:

Estimating Cotton Defoliation with Remote Sensing Glen Ritchie 1 and Craig Bednarz 2 1 UGA Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, GA 2 Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX 1 UGA Coastal Plain Experiment Station, Tifton, GA 2 Texas Tech, Lubbock, TX Funding provided by

Cotton Defoliants Facilitate machine harvest Reduce weather-induced losses Cost $$$ May be unnecessary in places Facilitate machine harvest Reduce weather-induced losses Cost $$$ May be unnecessary in places

Estimating Defoliation Visual Estimates –Inexpensive –Quick –Accurate??? Remote Sensing –Can cover broad areas –Estimates vegetation well –Relatively untested on defoliation Visual Estimates –Inexpensive –Quick –Accurate??? Remote Sensing –Can cover broad areas –Estimates vegetation well –Relatively untested on defoliation

Vegetation Indices Plant vs. soil reflectance –Ratios –Differences –Derivatives Separate plant and soil Plant vs. soil reflectance –Ratios –Differences –Derivatives Separate plant and soil BlueGreenRed Edge NIR Visible Soil Plant

Chlorophyll Leaf Structure Blue Green Red Edge Red Edge NIR Soil Plant

Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) (NIR-R)/(NIR+R) Rouse et al., 1973 ( ) ( ) = 0.85 ( ) ( ) = (0.5 - ) (0.5+ ) = (0.5 - ) (0.5+ ) = ( - ) ( + ) = ( - ) ( + ) = 11 11 22 22 or (  2 -  1 )/(  2 +  1 )

Which wavelengths? –Red and NIR –Green and red edge variants –Higher order models Which wavelengths? –Red and NIR –Green and red edge variants –Higher order models NDVI

Potential Confounding Factors Atmospheric effects Green leaves on ground Desiccated leaves on plant Plant height, orientation Leaf structure Atmospheric effects Green leaves on ground Desiccated leaves on plant Plant height, orientation Leaf structure

Materials and Methods Four locations in Tifton: DP 555 and Stoneville 4892 Reflectance on 0.91 m of row Visual estimates Leaves removed by hand LAI from leaf area meter NDVI regressed against LAI Four locations in Tifton: DP 555 and Stoneville 4892 Reflectance on 0.91 m of row Visual estimates Leaves removed by hand LAI from leaf area meter NDVI regressed against LAI

Materials nm range 1.5 nm resolution nm range 1.5 nm resolution 2 m fiber optic cable Photos courtesy Apogee Instruments, Inc. LI-COR LI-3100 leaf area meter LI-COR LI-3100 leaf area meter Apogee PAR/NIR Spectrometer

Regression Analysis 22 22 820 nm (  2 -  1 )/(  2 +  1 ) If  1 and  2 are arbitrary, 250,000 NDVI wavelength combinations possible If  2 is fixed, 500 NDVI possibilities If  1 and  2 are arbitrary, 250,000 NDVI wavelength combinations possible If  2 is fixed, 500 NDVI possibilities 11 11

Regression Analysis LAI estimates were compared using the coefficient of determination (r 2 ). r 2 = 1 : perfect relationship between x and y r 2 = 0 : no relationship between x and y LAI estimates were compared using the coefficient of determination (r 2 ). r 2 = 1 : perfect relationship between x and y r 2 = 0 : no relationship between x and y r 2 = 1.0 r 2 = 0.0

Results Linear (y =  0 +  1 x) Quadratic (y =  0 +  1 x +  2 x 2 ) All dates, all locations

High quadratic correlation: flattening of NDVI at high LAI levels. Red NDVI did not increase above LAI of 1.2. Red edge NDVI continued to trend upward with LAI. High quadratic correlation: flattening of NDVI at high LAI levels. Red NDVI did not increase above LAI of 1.2. Red edge NDVI continued to trend upward with LAI. Results

Results: Quadratic Model Maximum Estimated LAI Minimum Estimated LAI Crop Reflectance

Results: All Combinations Comparison of all  1 and  2 Highest correlations: Combinations of red edge and near- infrared reflectance bands Comparison of all  1 and  2 Highest correlations: Combinations of red edge and near- infrared reflectance bands

Results: Visual Estimates Reviewer 1 Reviewer 2 Reviewer 3

Results: Visual Estimates Reviewer r 2 (all LAI) r 2 (LAI<0.5) Slope (LAI<0.5) r 2 (LAI>0.5) Slope (LAI>0.5) NDVI 710 nm  NS  : Not significant at 0.05 level

Conclusions Red edge: NIR wavelength combinations most consistently estimate LAI Individual reviewers are generally very good at estimating changes in LAI Estimates vary between reviewers Precision defoliant application… Red edge: NIR wavelength combinations most consistently estimate LAI Individual reviewers are generally very good at estimating changes in LAI Estimates vary between reviewers Precision defoliant application…

Acknowledgments Georgia Cotton Commission Cotton physiology technical staff Steve Brown and Stanley Culpepper Georgia Cotton Commission Cotton physiology technical staff Steve Brown and Stanley Culpepper