Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kay Graf Physics Institute 1 University of Erlangen ARENA 2006 University of Northumbria June 28 – 30, 2006 Integration of Acoustic Neutrino Detection.
Advertisements

A scalable DAQ system using the DRS4 sampling chip H.Friederich 1, G.Davatz 1, U.Hartmann 2, A.Howard 1, H.Meyer 1, D.Murer 1, S.Ritt 2, N.Schlumpf 2 1.
VLV T – Workshop 2003 C. A. Nicolau – VLV T - Amsterdam 5-8 October 2003 A 200-MHz FPGA based PMT acquisition electronics for NEMO experiment Read Out.
Calibration of the 10inch PMT for IceCube Experiment 03UM1106 Kazuhiro Fujimoto A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Prototype string for a km3 Baikal neutrino telescope Roma International Conference on Astroparticle Physics V.Aynutdinov, INR RAS for the Baikal Collaboration.
Sebastian Böser Acoustic test setup at south pole IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Berkeley, March 2005.
U niversity of S cience and T echnology of C hina Design for Distributed Scheme of WCDA Readout Electronics CAO Zhe University of Science and Technology.
TOF Electronics Qi An Fast Electronics Lab, USTC Sept. 16~17, 2002.
The ANTARES experiment is currently the largest underwater neutrino telescope and is taking high quality data since Sea water is used as the detection.
Report on SiPM Tests SiPM as a alternative photo detector to replace PMT. Qauntify basic characteristics Measure Energy, Timing resolution Develop simulation.
Coincidence analysis in ANTARES: Potassium-40 and muons  Brief overview of ANTARES experiment  Potassium-40 calibration technique  Adjacent floor coincidences.
Francisco Salesa Greus IFIC (CSIC–Universitat de València, Spain) Representing the KM3NeT Consortium 4 th International Workshop on Very Large Volume Neutrino.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
SINP MSU, July 7, 2012 I.Belolaptikov behalf BAIKAL collaboration.
Data acquisition system for the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Denis Kuleshov Valday, February 3, 2015.
AMANDA and IceCube neutrino telescopes at the South Pole Per Olof Hulth Stockholm University.
S. Viola VLVνT 2015, Rome – 14/09/2015 Characterization and testing of the KM3NeT acoustic positioning system F. Simeone VLVνT 2015 – Rome, 14/09/2015.
Baikal Neutrino Experiment Vladimir Aynutdinov for the Baikal Collaboration Athens, October 13, 2009.
1 N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Operation and performance of the NESTOR test detector.
STATUS OF BAIKAL NEUTRINO EXPERIMENT: Vladimir Aynutdinov, INR RAS, Moscow for the Baikal Collaboration for the Baikal Collaboration HECR’ May.
NESTOR SIMULATION TOOLS AND METHODS Antonis Leisos Hellenic Open University Vlvnt Workhop.
Standard Candle, Flasher, and Cascade Simulations in IceCube Michelangelo D’Agostino UC Berkeley PSU Analysis Meeting June 21-24, 2006.
1 A.Tsirigotus Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch The NESTOR O.M.
Time Calibration with Optical Beacons Pylos, Apr 2007 C.Bigongiari IFIC Pylos, Apr 2007 C.Bigongiari IFIC (CSIC – Universitat de València)
Baikal-GVD: status and plans Denis Kuleshov Denis Kuleshov INR, Moscow, Oct 28, 2015.
IceCube Calibration Overview Kurt Woschnagg University of California, Berkeley MANTS 2009 Berlin, 25 September identical sensors in ultraclean,
Gigaton Volume Detector in Lake Baikal: status of the project Zh.-A. Dzhilkibaev (INR, Moscow) Zh.-A. Dzhilkibaev (INR, Moscow) for the Baikal Collaboration.
Autonomous Rate Measuring System Theodoros Athanasopoulos Representing the KM3NeT Consortium Nestor Institute For Astroparticle Physics VLV v T09 Athens.
5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Software Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL Chuck McParland.
BAIKAL-GVD: status, results and plans Zh.-A. Dzhilkibaev, INR (Moscow), for the Baikal Collaboration for the Baikal Collaboration Amsterdam, October 17,
5 June 2002DOM Main Board Engineering Requirements Review 1 DOM Main Board Hardware Engineering Requirements Review June 5, 2002 LBNL David Nygren.
A commercially available digitization system Fotiou Andreas Andreas Fotiou.
A Device for Detection of Acoustic Signals from Super High Energy Neutrinos Presenter: Presenter: G.L.Pan'kov Applied Physics Institute of Irkutsk State.
Nearly vertical muons from the lower hemisphere in the Baikal neutrino experiment Zh. Dzhilkibaev - INR (Moscow) for the Baikal Collaboration ( Uppsala,
Calibration of Under Water Neutrino Telescope ANTARES Garabed HALLADJIAN October 15 th, 2008 GDR Neutrino, CPPM, Marseille.
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
1 Timing of the calorimeter monitoring signals 1.Introduction 2.LED trigger signal timing * propagation delay of the broadcast calibration command * calibration.
Update on works with SiPMs at Pisa Matteo Morrocchi.
The BAIKAL-GVD project of a km3-scale neutrino telescope in Lake Baikal Vladimir Aynutdinov for the Baikal Collaboration Beijing, 17 August, International.
Isabella Amore VLV T08, Toulon, France April 2008 International Workshop on a Very Large Volume Neutrino Telescope for the Mediterranean Sea Results.
Status and Perspectives of the BAIKAL-GVD Project Zh.-A. Dzhilkibaev, INR (Moscow), for the Baikal Collaboration for the Baikal Collaboration September.
Gigaton Volume Detector in Lake Baikal Vladimir Aynutdinov for the Baikal Collaboration Cassis, May 3, th International Workshop on Ring Imaging.
Vladimir Zhulanov for BelleII ECL group Budker INP, Novosibirsk INSTR2014, Novosibirsk 2014/02/28 1.
Status of Detector Characterization a.k.a. Calibration & Monitoring Project Year 2 objectives ( → Mar ‘04) 1. Calibration plan (first draft in March.
Prototyping Phase of the BAIKAL-GVD Project Zh.-A. Dzhilkibaev, INR (Moscow), for the Baikal Collaboration for the Baikal Collaboration Rome, May,
THE BAIKAL NEUTRINO EXPERIMENT: STATUS, SELECTED PHYSICS RESULTS, AND PERSPECTIVES Vladimir Aynutdinov, INR RAS, Moscow for the Baikal Collaboration for.
 13 Readout Electronics A First Look 28-Jan-2004.
The prototype string for the km3 scale Baikal neutrino telescope VLVnT April 2008 Vladimir Aynutdinov, INR RAS for the Baikal Collaboration for.
The dynamic range extension system for the LHAASO-WCDA experiment
Fabio, Francesco, Francesco and Nicola INFN and University Bari
Front-end Electronic for a neutrino telescope : a new ASIC SCOTT
Status of the Baikal-GVD experiment
Jinfan Chang Experimental Physics Center , IHEP Feb 18 , 2011
CTA-LST meeting February 2015
Status of the BAIKAL-GVD Project Zh.-A. Dzhilkibaev, INR (Moscow),
Yuzhe Liu1,2, Lian Chen1,2, Futian Liang1,3, Feng Li1,2, Ge Jin1,2
Data acquisition system for the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope
An expected performance of Dubna neutrino telescope
KRB proposal (Read Board of Kyiv group)
Baikal-GVD (technical report)
A First Look J. Pilcher 12-Mar-2004
ANTARES time calibration
Hellenic Open University
Department of Physics and Astronomy,
Commodity Flash ADC-FPGA Based Electronics for an
String-21 Flasher Analysis
BESIII EMC electronics
Read Out and Data Transmission Working Group
Nanobeacon: A low cost calibration instrument for KM3NeT
Presentation transcript:

Time and amplitude calibration of the Baikal-GVD neutrino telescope Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration S Vladimir Aynutdinov, Bair Shaybonov for Baikal collaboration September, 2015 VLVνT-2015 Roma, Italy

Calibration vs DAQ DAQ center 40 m 350 m Section request Global trigger Section Cluster Baikal-GVD April Sections are grouped in to 8 strings. (192 OMs, 1275 m below surface) Cluster DAQ center (30 m below surface) Electro-optical cable to shore (~6 km) Section: Section provides the Request: coincidence of neighboring pairs of OMs with 0.5 p.e. and 3 p.e. thresholds. Request is transmitted to the DAQ center. Cluster DAQ Center provides a global trigger, that transmitted to all sections (ADCs stop and waveform data are sent to the shore). Calibration of the section time offset. Measuring channel: Channel consists of PMT, amplifier, cable from OM to the Section center (90 m), ADC. Calibration of the channel (time and amplitude). Cluster DAQ center connected to shore with optical line. Time calibration and clock synchronization of the Cluster. 2 Request Trigger m

Block diagram of the OM calibration facility Calibration facility LED flasher: 2 blue LEDs L7113, 2  1/2=16 , FWHM ~6 ns - LED intensities regulation: 1…~10 8 photons - Flashes delay regulation LED 1 : LED 2 : 0 … 1000 ns - Light propagation distance for maximum LED intensity ~100 m along the string in Baikal water. Test pulse (PMT delay measurement) Reference (test) pulse generated directly to the measuring channel and gives a time mark of the start time of the LED flash. Spectral characteristic of the LED Kingbright L nm at peak Amplitude376.5 ± 1.6 mV FWHM92.63 ± ns Rising edge47.31 ± ns Rear edge56.3 ± 0.11 ns 3

Time calibration of the channels (technique) Time [ns] Waveform of the test pulse and LED pulse. LED trigger is delayed at ~500 ns. Laboratory calibration of OM cable delays (2015) PMT ElectronicsFADC: ± 2V 90 m coax.cable Laboratory calibration of the delays between LED trigger and test pulse (2015). Additional laboratory calibration is required (correction ~1 ns) 4 In-situ calibration of PMT delay

The time offset of the channels in dependence of the PMT voltage Time calibration of the channels (results) 5 In-situ calibration of PMT delays for the strings #4, #5, #6 (72 OMs) PMT voltage

Time calibration of the channels with LED (accuracy estimation) LED 15 m- distance between OMs dT 0 = 64.9 ns – expected time difference dT The distribution of the adjacent channels on the relative time offset measured with test pulse (dT TST ) and LED (dT LED ). The distribution of the channels on dT LED – dT TST Waveforms of the LED pulses on two adjacent channels. Calibration accuracy ~2 ns 6 Strings #4, #5

Time calibration of the section (technique) 1.Calibration of the sections on one string. Relative time offset of the sections is measured with OM LED flasher. LED 15 m The top of the bottom section The bottom of the top section 2. Calibration of the sections on different strings. Relative time offset of the sections is measured with LED beacon. LED beacon comprises 6 pairs of blue LEDs: six point upward, six point horizontally. Acoustic positioning system provides string coordinates LED beacon Time offset of Str#4 vs Str#5 Time offset of Str#2 vs Str#8 (combined time offsets of all channels) Mean =7 ns Mean =142 ns

Time difference between different pairs of channels of two strings: expected and measured values. Relative time offsets of the strings measured with different pairs of channels. Time calibration of the section (accuracy) Str#2 vs Str#8 Str#4 vs Str#5 Section calibration accuracy ~2 ns (including channel calibration uncertainties). Systematic uncertainties (OM rotation around string, the bend of the string, light scattering in water) is under investigation. 8 Str#4 vs Str#5 Str#2 vs Str#8

Amplitude calibration of the channels (linearity range) Charge [codes] = 30 ch  A pe ~ 10% Distribution of the channels on A SPE. N 10% SPE pulse Trigger pulse There are two methods of amplitude calibration: -The measuring of PMT noise spectrum; -SPE spectrum measuring with LED SPE spectrum measuring with LEDs: The SPE pulse (the first LED) is triggered by delayed pulse with large amplitude (the second LED) for PMT noise suppression The objective of the calibration is the converting ADC channels to photoelectrons. ADC chan

10 Curve of nonlinearity: S(N pe ) = Q / (N pe × Q pe ) Q – the measured charge Q pe – the charge of an SPE signal N pe – the number of photoelectrons in the pulse Fit: y = 1 / (1+D) D = ((lg N pe ) / x 0 ) P x 0 = 2.68 p = 8.67 The fit of individual channel  estimating S(N pe ) with 10% precision up to ~ 10 3 p.e. Amplitude calibration of the channels (nonlinearity range) 72 channels: strings 4, 5, 6. Laboratory calibration

Summary  The methods and systems used to perform the time and amplitude calibration for the Baikal-GVD neutrino detector have been reviewed. They have been successfully tested in situ.  Cross-checks between two independent time calibration methods give an agreement of ~2 ns. 11

12

13 Backup slides

LED flashes detection Reference channel Ch 60 Ch 61 Ch 62 Ch 59 Ch 58 Ch 57 Ch 63 Ch 64 LED ~1 p.e. t, ns R, m RUN C m “On the Velocity of light signal …” NIM A482 (2002),

15 FADC (AD9430) 12bit, 200 MSPS FPGA (Xilinx Spartan 6) - Trigger logic: 2-level adjustable digital comparator forms low threshold L and high threshold H channel requests - Data channel (triggered) consists of double-buffered memory and data transmitter. - Monitor channel (non-triggered) includes peak detector and amplitude analyzer. ADC board 12-ch 200 MSPS ADC - Trigger logic(L&H coincidence of neighboring channels - Data readout from ADC buffer - Control of OM mode of operation - Connection via local Ethernet to the cluster DAQ center

Cluster with 8 two- section strings (2015) Basic principles of GVD design: -Simplicity of all elements; -Deployment convenience from the ice cover; -Detector extendability and configuration flexibility Basic GVD elements -Optical module (OM); -Section: 12 OM (spaced by 15m) & Section electronic module (12 FADCs) -String: 2 Sections & String electronic module -Cluster: 8 strings & DAQ center. GVD cluster architecture Cluster DAQ center Section electronic module Optical module String electronic module SECTION STRING 16

Triggering and Data Transmission SECTION CLUSTER 17