Session 5: More Information About Determining a Rating Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delaware Building BLOCKS EARLY CHILDHOOD MONITORING – INSTRUCTION – ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM FOR YOUNG CHILDREN School District Meetings September and October.
Advertisements

Delaware Building BLOCKS EARLY CHILDHOOD MONITORING – INSTRUCTION – ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM FOR YOUNG CHILDREN Delaware Special Education Meeting September.
Brian W. Wojcik, Ed.D., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
Assistive Technology & the IEP Sue Loeffler, M.A., CCC-SLP Assistive Technology Specialist Denver Public Schools.
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY An overview of AT services to support the teachers and students in Cobb County.
Assistive Technology Definitions and the Law. Assistive Technology Devices Services Consideration.
Legal Terminology: DEVICE: An Assistive Technology device is any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether acquired commercially off the shelf,
Considering Assistive Technology and the AT Plan Sara Menzel, ATP UCP Michigan Assistive Technology Center
Assistive Technology AT services provided through Oklahoma ABLE Tech, a contractor for the Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Module 2 Learning More about the Summary of Functional Performance Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires the world to discover, love and.
Brian W. Wojcik, Ed.D., ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Refresher: Child Outcome Summary Form Child Outcome Summary Form.
Indicator 7 Child Outcomes MAKING SENSE OF THE DATA June
Does anyone have concerns about the child’s functioning with regard to the outcome area? D OES THE CHILD EVER FUNCTION IN WAYS THAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED.
Early On® Michigan Child Outcomes
Module 3 Essential Knowledge for Completing the Summary of Functional Performance Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires the world.
May 26, 2003 Athens, Greece Deree College The American College of Greece Technology as a Tool for Persons with Mental Retardation Christine A. Macfarlane,
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)
July 2013 IFSP and Practice Manual Revisions April 29, 2013 May 3, 2013 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Practice Manual Infant & Toddler Connection.
AT services provided through Oklahoma ABLE Tech, a contractor for the Oklahoma State Department of Education.
Assistive Technology and the Autistic Child Presented by Jill Whalen Fall, 2002.
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 12: Child Outcomes Summary Form Exit Information.
N.C. Division of Public Health, Early Intervention Branch, January 2010 Introduction to the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF) Professional Development.
Assistive Technology Works: Legislation, Definitions and Benefits
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 6: Child Outcomes Summary Form Entry Information.
Child and Family Outcomes Chapter 7: Developmental Milestones Chart A Brief Overview of the Developmental Milestones Associated with Each Outcome.
Session 1: So What’s This All About? Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module.
Assistive Technology: Making it Real! Brian W. Wojcik, MS. Ed, ATP SEAT Center Illinois State University.
Coweta County In-Service Training for Assistive Technology.
Pacific TA Meeting: Quality Practices in Early Intervention and Preschool Programs.
Using Assistive Technology to Teach Students with Learning Disabilities By: Alexis Schoen Educ. 509: Computers in Elementary Education
Assistive Technology Getting There Another Way. “The Power of A.T. to improve and enhance the lives of individuals with disabilities is virtually.
True or False A student’s need for AT must be considered at every ARD.
Assistive Technology in the Classroom Leroy Steele ED 505.
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY DEVICES AND SERVICES Special Education Department Presenters Assistive Technology Team.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
$1 Million $500,000 $250,000 $125,000 $64,000 $32,000 $16,000 $8,000 $4,000 $2,000 $1,000 $500 $300 $200 $100 Welcome.
Welcome to CE430 – Unit 7 Class will start at the top of the hour! Please turn the volume up on your computer speakers to access the audio feature of this.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress 2007.
ASSISTIVE technology Kia R Carter Kia R Carter WMU EDT 347.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 The Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)
AssistiveTechnology101 SPECIAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT.
Session 4: The 7-Point Scale Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.
AN OVERVIEW OF THE CHILD OUTCOMES SUMMARY RATING PROCESS 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
Indicator 7: Measuring Preschool Outcomes Entry Data Collection Using the COS Process Sarah Geldart – MA ESE
Session 2: Overview of the COS Process Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module.
Assistive Technology Courtney Jenkins. What is Assistive Technology? As stated by IDEA 2004, Assistive Technology (AT) is any item, piece of equipment.
ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY LEGAL ISSUES that influence decision making.
SPECIAL FACTORS PIKES PEAK BOCES LEADERSHIP DECEMBER 2015.
1 Outcomes review and use of the 7-point scale. 2 Outcomes Jeopardy Jeopardy score sheet Jeopardy score sheet Pointing to the cabinet for cereal Reading.
Early Childhood Outcomes Workgroup Christina Kasprzak and Lynne Kahn ECO and NECTAC July 2009.
1 We Changed the COSF The Flip The Skills The Decision-Tree Questions.
1 Resources for Increasing Child Development Knowledge Virginia August 27, 2008 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia.
How to Involve Families in the Child Outcome Summary (COS) Process Debi Donelan, MSSA Early Support for Infants and Toddlers Katrina Martin, Ph.D. SRI.
Section 6 The Three Global Outcomes. Key Principles for Early Intervention Service Provision 1.Infants and toddlers learn best through every day experiences.
Purpose The purpose of Module 1 is to orient new staff to child outcomes measurement and the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF).
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Session 5: More Information About Determining a Rating
Meeting the Needs of Students with Significant Disabilities: ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGY SUPPLEMENTAL FUNDING GRANT Kathy Knighton
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Purpose Introduction to Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Using the Decision Tree for Summary Ratings Discussions
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Introduction to the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)
Presentation transcript:

Session 5: More Information About Determining a Rating Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module

Decision Tree for Summary Rating Discussions Does the child ever function in ways that would be considered age-expected with regard to this outcome? Yes (consider rating 4–7) To what extent is the child’s functioning age-expected across settings and situations? Does anyone have concerns about the child’s functioning with regard to the outcome area? Occasional use of age- expected skills; more behavior that is not age- expected Uses a mix of age-expected and not age- expected behaviors and skills Rating = 4Rating = 5 NoYes Rating = 6 Rating = 7 Does the child function in ways that would be considered age-expected across all or almost all settings and situations? No (consider rating 1–3) To what extent is the child using immediate foundational skills across settings and situations? Uses skills that are not yet immediate foundational Rating = 1 Uses immediate foundational skills most or all of the time Occasional use of immediate foundational skills Rating = 2 Rating = 3 Does the child use any immediate foundational skills related to this outcome upon which to build age- expected functioning across settings and situations? YesNo Yes The Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center Updated 11/12/2015

Using the Decision Tree Effectively Not a script Guides the team to consider the implications of the distance of the child’s skills from age expected for the selection of a rating

4 Special Considerations

5 Always Provide Ratings for All Three Outcomes Ratings are needed for all outcomes even if… No one has concerns about a child’s development in an outcome area. A child has delays in one or two outcome areas but not in all three.

Do Not Adjust Age for Prematurity The purpose of the COS rating is to document current functioning. Do not adjust for prematurity. Determine the rating on the basis of what would be expected for the child’s chronological age.

Children Who Have Only Communication Delays The COS team needs to focus discussions on whether and how communication difficulties are affecting the child’s functioning with regard to each of the three outcomes.

Discussion Points for the Team Is the child able to communicate with peers in play situations? Can others understand the child when he is making a request ? Is the child able to convey critical needs (e.g., safety needs)? How does the child’s communication influence her functioning across settings and with different people?

Children With Atypical Functioning Sometimes children display skills or behaviors that are different from the typical progression of skills. Examples of atypical behaviors: Self-stimulating behaviors Perseverations on specific activities Strict adherence to daily rituals Echolalia

Considering Atypical Functioning in Ratings To determine a rating, consider: The extent to which the atypical behavior influences the child’s functioning in the outcome area; and As with all ratings, the extent to which the child shows age-expected functioning in the outcome area across settings and situations.

Assistive Technology Devices If the child has access to and uses an assistive technology device, rate the child’s functioning using that device. If the child uses an assistive technology device only in some settings (e.g., only at home), think about this as you would any instance where the child displays different skills or behaviors across settings. Assistive technology device “Any item, piece of equipment, or product system, whether acquired commercially off the shelf, modified, or customized, that is used to increase, maintain, or improve functional capabilities of a child with a disability.” (IDEA, 2004)

Can a Child Have All 7’s at Entry? Ratings reflect everyday functioning. Children with visual impairments or other diagnosed conditions may show age-expected functioning in all three outcomes even at program entry. For these children, services are provided to keep their functioning at age expectations.

Final Points to Ponder Click the back arrow to return to the module.