1 Domestic Heating Fuel Choice Study (aka The Direct Use of Gas) Michael Schilmoeller NW Power and Conservation Council web presentation for the web presentation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New MT Houses with Ground Source Heat Pumps Energy Savings and Costs June 2 nd, 2009 Regional Technical Forum 1.
Advertisements

Analysis of the Direct Use of Natural Gas Statement of Work.
Will CO2 Change What We Do?
Direction on Guidelines Savings Definition Path Results of straw vote and proposed decisions for elements of the savings definition Regional Technical.
The Demand Forecast and Conservation Analysis Interface May PNREC Massoud Jourabchi & Tom Eckman.
1 Conservation: An Alternative Energy Source for Local Communities Ted Coates, Power Manager September 20, 2008.
Energy Efficient Heating and Cooling Systems For Today Geothermal Heating, Cooing And Hot Water Systems.
SEEM Calibration for Multi-Family Buildings Regional Technical Forum September 18, 2012 Analysis Performed By Ben Larson, Jon Heller, Henry Odum, and Carmen.
Beyonce Vs. Buffett: Why Conservative Energy Efficiency is More Cost-effective than “Sexier” Policy Options Sue Libenson, Libenson Consulting, ,
CODE Project WP3 – Modelling support for cogeneration across the EU27.
System Analysis Advisory Committee - A New Metric - Michael Schilmoeller Tuesday, September 27, 2011.
Regional Portfolio Model Redevelopment Presentation to System Analysis Advisory Committee August 23, 2013.
Deeming Savings for Ductless Heat Pumps in Manufactured Homes Regional Technical Forum January 4 th, 2011.
State Incentives for Energy Efficiency Commercial and Industrial New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Office of Clean Energy Mona L. Mosser Bureau of Energy.
IEA HPP Annex 28 Test procedure and seasonal performance calculation of residential heat pump with combined space and domestic hot water production.
Heat Pump Water Heaters Provisional UES Proposal Regional Technical Forum October 4 th, 2011.
Research Strategy Review: Heat Pump Water Heaters Thermostatic Restriction Valves Jennifer Anziano RTF R&E Subcommittee July 8, 2015.
Heat Pump Water Heater (HPWH) Subcommittee Christian Douglass Regional Technical Forum June 18, 2015.
1 Fuel Choice Study Results Michael Schilmoeller and Tom Eckman Northwest Power and Conservation Council WebCast Friday, March 18, 2011.
Knowledge to Shape Your Future Electric / Gas / Water Information collection, analysis and application EE Potential Summary Study Overview CALMAC Meeting.
SEEM Tool Overview Regional Technical Forum Member Orientation January 22, 2013.
EvergreenEcon.com Heat Pump Water Heater Model Validation, Market Progress Assessment, and Process Evaluation RTF HPWH Sub-Committee Meeting October 15,
RTF Small / Rural Subcommittee Quarterly Meeting Wednesday, February 4, :00 am – 10:30 am 1.
HPWH UES Measure Initial Review 16 April Agenda Provisional Measure Review Method Overview Prelim Findings Measure Development Approach Simulation.
Heat Pump Water Heaters: Tier 2 – Ducted Interior Installations Provisional UES Proposal Regional Technical Forum February 14 th, 2012.
Aboriginal Community Energy Plans ( ‘ ACEP ’ ) M é tis Nation of Ontario – Annual General Assembly August 19, 2010.
Northeast and Mid-Atlantic States Regional Low Carbon Fuel Standard Stakeholder Meeting
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Model Conservation Standards Economic Analysis for for New Single Family and Manufactured Home Construction June.
1 Regional Portfolio Model and Direct Use of Gas Assessment Michael Schilmoeller NW Power and Conservation Council for the Regional Technical Forum Tuesday,
RTF Staff, Subcommittee and Work Updates October 23, 2012.
Residential Behavior Programs RTF Subcommittee Ryan Firestone September 17, 2015.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
Fuel Choice Model The Total Resource Cost (TRC) Perspective Michael Schilmoeller 9/8/2011.
HVAC and DHW System Conversion Cost and Energy Use Assumptions for Direct Use of Natural Gas Analysis September 28, 2010.
Discussion of Resource Plans Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Wednesday, June 10, 2009.
Ben Larson 28 September th Avenue NE, Seattle, WA (206) Fax: (206)
Heat Pump Water Heater Request for Feedback on a proposal to add UES measures with a “Retail – any installation location” delivery mechanism Regional Technical.
10/16/ Residential Sector Conservation Resource Assessment Technologies, Measures and Practices “Scouting Report” September 30, 2002.
Residential Single Family and Manufactured Home Heat Pump Water Heaters Christian Douglass Regional Technical Forum 4/14/2015.
Preliminary Results with the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory.
Northwest Power Planning Council The Fifth Plan’s Draft Conservation Resource Assessment Summary of Results To Date April 8, 2003.
Applying SEEM Updates, Calibration, and Measure Interaction Decisions to: Single Family Weatherization and HVAC UES Measures Follow-up from August RTF.
SEEM Calibration: Phase II Single Family Heating Energy Regional Technical Forum August 20, 2013 Presented By: Josh Rushton and Adam Hadley Subcommittee.
1 Proposed Revisions to Deemed Savings Input Assumptions for PTCS Duct Sealing and Heat Pump Efficiency Upgrades and Duct Sealing, Commissioning and Controls.
1 Introduction to the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller NW Power and Conservation Council Thursday, June 10, 2010.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Residential Conservation Resource Assessment Overview of Analytical Process and Major Assumptions April 21, 2009.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
Fuel Choice Model The Total Resource Cost (TRC) Perspective Michael Schilmoeller 10/27/2011 (revised)
Residential Duct Insulation New Deemed Measure Proposal – A Second Look Regional Technical Forum May 4 th, 2010.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 1 Distribution System Efficiency Potential & Conservation Voltage Reduction Power Committee April 2009.
SEEM Calibration for Multi-Family Buildings Regional Technical Forum September 18, 2012 Analysis Performed By Ben Larson, Jon Heller, Henry Odum, and Carmen.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council A Look At The Council’s Conservation Planning Methodology and Assumptions A Look At The Council’s Conservation.
Northwest Power Planning Council Residential Space Conditioning and Domestic Hot Water Conservation Resource Assessment Overview of Analytical Process.
Uncertainty in the Regional Portfolio Model Michael Schilmoeller for the Northwest Power and Conservation Council Generation Resource Advisory Committee.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council The Role of Energy Efficiency in Could (and Should) Play in Montana’s Future Insights from the 5 th Northwest.
1 Proposed Input Assumptions to RTF Cost-Effectiveness Determinations February 2, 2010.
RTF Administrative Measure Decisions November 14, 2012.
1 Domestic Heating Fuel Choice Study (aka The Direct Use of Gas) Michael Schilmoeller NW Power and Conservation Council presentation for the presentation.
DHP for New Construction: How to establish the baseline Adam Hadley and Phillip Kelsven RTF Subcommittee December 4, 2015.
Direct Use of Natural Gas Status of Analysis Staff Analysis Today’s Agenda: Review of Major Analytical Input Assumptions Present Preliminary Results (Not.
DISPATCHING DIRECT USE Achieving Greenhouse Gas Reductions & Energy Savings.
RTF Management Update Jennifer Anziano Regional Technical Forum March 17, 2015.
Northwest Power Planning Council Residential Space Conditioning Conservation Resource Assessment Overview of Analytical Process and Major Assumptions January.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Heat Pump Water Heaters Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation Resources Northwest Power and Conservation Council.
Boiler Operations, Maintenance and Performance Conference.
Utility Bill Analysis Charlie Richardson Longs Peak EC Boulder, CO.
DISSEMINATION MEETING HEAT4U PROJECT Gas Absorption Heat Pump solution for existing residential buildings Luigi Tischer, Project Coordinator HEAT4U PROJECT.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Direct Use of Natural Gas Economic Fuel Choices from the Regional Power System and Consumer’s Perspective.
Web-Enabled Thermostats
Sixth Power Plan Setting Conservation Targets and Implementation Strategies Jill Steiner, Snohomish Public Utility District Northwest Power and Conservation.
Presentation transcript:

1 Domestic Heating Fuel Choice Study (aka The Direct Use of Gas) Michael Schilmoeller NW Power and Conservation Council web presentation for the web presentation for the RTF DUG Task Force Monday, August 16, 2010

2 GAS TANK 58% EFFINSTANT GAS 82% EFF ELEC TANK 93% EFF HPWH 200% EFF GAS PIPE & DISTRIB 99% EFF COMBUSTION TURBINE 48% EFF GAS PIPE & DISTRIB 99+% EFF 57%81% 38% Hot Water Thermodynamic s ELEC TRANS & DISTRIB 86% EFF

3 GAS TANK $283/Tank INSTANT GAS $911/Tank ELEC TANK $286/Tank HPWH $1300/Tank GAS PIPE & DISTRIB $/cuft-year COMBUSTION TURBINE $92/kW-year GAS PIPE & DISTRIB $/cuft-year Hot Water Economics ELEC TRANS & DISTRIB $45/kW-year

4 Study Objectives What’s better economically? –Costs and decisions use total resource cost, with wholesale prices for electricity and gas –The study should consider carbon penalty costs and other sources of risks –Conversion can go either way : direct gas to electricity or electricity to direct gas Recognize uncertainty and imperfect foresight Determine if incentives or disincentives improve the outcome

5 Analyze Customer Segments and Develop Model Data A Regional Technical Forum (RTF) advisory group scoped the study –e.g., study will consider residential conversions only Northwest Gas Association, Puget Sound Energy, and the RTF provided funding Global Energy Partners, LLC, (GEP) won the contract January 2009 GEP completed their tasks September 2009 –Completed 60+ large tables of RPM input data –Reduced to 87 the 212 customer conversion options that are available to 19 customer segments –Built an Excel ® model to evaluate conversions

6 Key Assumptions Limited to existing construction Assume that energy requirement per household for water and space heating is seasonal but insensitive to natural gas and electricity price Assume that a fixed portion of existing stock turns over each year, which determines the conversion potential

7 Existing Segments Customer segments were determined primarily by existing circumstances –Single- or multi-family building –Existing space heating appliance –Existing water heating appliance –Whether or not a gas main is available, and if so, whether service already exists or an extension from the gas main is necessary

8 Existing Segments Market segments include single- (s) and multi-family (m) homes FAF refers to forced air furnaces DHW refers to domestic hot water Conversion opportunities distinguish segments 2 and 3

9 Conversion Options Note that there are only four choices for retrofit domestic hot water: heat pump water heats (HPWH), electric resistance, gas tank, and instant gas.

10 Selected Combinations Only water heating conversion is available to segment 2; only space heating conversion is available to segment 3.

11 Least-Cost Solution one market segment, fixed gas price Total Cost (real levelized 2006$/10 3 BTU) Electricity Price (2006$/MWh)

12 Schedule The RTF reviewed some of the early work on June 29 RTF participants studying the assumptions Upcoming meetings –August 3 RTF meeting –Conservation Resource Advisory Committee (CRAC) meeting on policy implications in September? –Results to the Power Committee of the Council in September?

13 GEP Model The following equations represent, to the best of my ability, the relationships in the GEP Gas Conversion Model The Council staff is actively considering alternative representations, such as –Relation of household size to equipment cost and energy usage –Relation of household circumference to ductwork cost

14 Representation of Fixed Cost The indices k and j correspond to the households and systems, respectively. In the fixed cost calculation, we basically have cost elements that are ĉ s – one-time equipment purchase and installation costs ($), that are assumed independent of the house size (square feet), family type, etc., but may be subject to a utilization factor. These include all new appliances except electric FAF, which is taken as proportional to house size in the GEP model. ĉ a – one -time costs that are strictly proportional to house floor area in square feet ($). The electric FAF has installation cost is the only factor proportional to square footage in the GEP model. continued on next slide

15 Representation of Fixed Cost ĉ l – one -time costs that are proportional to house circumference in feet ($). The only such cost is for installation of hydronic systems in the GEP model. – annual operations and maintenance costs ($/year) ĉ d – one-time duct work costs ($). These are independent of the house size, family type, etc. in the GEP model. While they are a function of whether or not a family has a basement, this influence is handled by using a household-weighted cost. ĉ g – one -time gas service acquisition costs that depend on family type and on availability of gas main ($).

16 Representation of Usage The requirements for gas (MMBTU/hour) for household k and system j will be

17 Representation of Usage The corresponding electricity equation is identical except for a conversion constant, MWh per MMBTU, about 3.414

18 Initial Results

19 Initial Results

20 Initial Results

21