AACTE Annual Meeting 2016: Professional Development Through Online Professional Seminars (OPS)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Review: Whats happened so far. May 19, 2008 In-service.
Advertisements

Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Foundation Competencies New CSWE procedures
World’s Largest Educational Community
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
Presented by: Kelly Coxe & Mary Greene Thomasson.
MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Section 2: Historical Perspective of Policy 2320 Dr. Donna Davis Deputy Director, OEPA.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
As presented to the Global Colloquium on Engineering Education Deborah Wolfe, P.Eng. October 2008 The Canadian Process for Incorporating Outcomes Assessment.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
PEER REVIEW OF TEACHING WORKSHOP SUSAN S. WILLIAMS VICE DEAN ALAN KALISH DIRECTOR, UNIVERSITY CENTER FOR ADVANCEMENT OF TEACHING ASC CHAIRS — JAN. 30,
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Orientation for New Site Visitors CIDA’s Mission, Value, and the Guiding Principles of Peer Review.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.
Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling
Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS) Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee A New Road Ahead Presentation Dr. Keith M. McCoy, Vice President Professor Jennifer Jakob, English Associate Director.
Listening, Learning, and Leading Emmanuel Caulk August 24, 2015.
Keeping the End in Mind: The Rigor of College and Career Readiness in Virginia Dr. Linda Wallinger Assistant Superintendent for Instruction Virginia Department.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
At the Mitchell Institute 22 Monument Square, Suite 404 Portland, Maine GreatSchoolsPartnership.org.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Hazlet Township Public Schools
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
PERIODIC ASSESSMENT OF PROGRAMS AT UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL Office of the Provost Hélène David, associate vice-rector academic affairs Claude Mailhot, Professor.
Title I Schoolwide Planning Comprehensive Needs Assessment Wednesday, October 24, 2012.
Next-Generation Standards and Accountability Terry Holliday, Ph.D. Kentucky Education Commissioner Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
1.  Accreditation: ◦ Purpose ◦ Guiding Principles  Accreditation Standards Development Working Group ◦ Members ◦ Goals  Proposed Framework for Standards.
SACS CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools/ Council on Accreditation and School Improvement
Term Creating and Supporting a Performance and Development Culture.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Using Missouri’s Annual Performance Report for Continuous Improvement in Educator Preparation Gale “Hap” Hairston Director – Educator Preparation David.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Illinois Community College BoardIllinois State Board of Education Programs of Study Self-Assessment: Starting the Journey on the Right Foot February 4,
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
The Conceptual Framework: What It Is and How It Works Linda Bradley, James Madison University Monica Minor, NCATE April 2008.
2014 National Call Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform H325A
SACS Coordinators Meeting Wednesday, June 6, 2012 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS Accreditation.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Gordon State College Office of Institutional Effectiveness Faculty Meeting August 5, 2015.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Help to develop, improve, and sustain educators’ competence and confidence to implement effective educational practices and supports. Help ensure sustainability.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Rubrics, and Validity, and Reliability: Oh My! Pre Conference Session The Committee on Preparation and Professional Accountability AACTE Annual Meeting.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Contents Playbook Objectives Playbook Value Details Playbook Design
Maja Holmes and Margaret Stout West Virginia University
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
AACTE OUR MISSION AACTE leads the field in advocating for and building capacity for high-quality educator preparation programs in a dynamic landscape.
Orientation for New Site Visitors
SCHOOL and DISTRICT ACCREDITATION
Curriculum and Accreditation
Programmatic Review and Enhancement
Assessing the Impact of Governors
Community schools: a strategy, not a program
Participants Introductions: Mark Lacelle-Peterson, AACTE Sr. Vice-President for Policy and Programs Moderator: Linda McKee, AACTE Senior Director of.
Assessment & Evaluation Committee
Development of Internal Quality Assurance and its Challenges in Taiwan Higher Education from University and Students’ Perspectives Angela Yung Chi Hou.
Size, Scope, and Quality Definition Perkins V Town Hall Meeting
Presentation transcript:

AACTE Annual Meeting 2016: Professional Development Through Online Professional Seminars (OPS)

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Today’s Panelists Moderator: Linda McKee, AACTE, Sr. Director of Performance Measurement and Assessment Policy; OPS Facilitator Panelists: Tim Finklea, AACTE, Director for Member Engagement; OPS Facilitator. Patricia Parrish, Saint Leo University, Associate VP and Accreditation and New Program Integration, Academic Affairs; OPS # 1-6 participant. Deborah L. Rickey, Associate Dean, College of Education, Grand Canyon University; OPS # 1-6 participant. Sandra J. Doran, Principal, HigherEdLearning Consulting Group; OPS Technical Assistance.

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OUR MISSION AACTE leads the field in advocating for and building capacity for high-quality educator preparation programs in a dynamic landscape

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OUR CORE VALUES Serving all learners Equity High-quality learning Professionalism Diversity Scholarship and Knowledge Production Accountability Infusing Current Knowledge and Practices into Programs

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Quality Support Initiative

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Quality Support Initiative Goals: Support Profession in the work of Continuous Improvement Support for Achieving Accreditation Professional Development Organizational Development Flexibility for Participants Create corps of credentialed consultants

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Online Professional Seminars Why How Learning Strategies Participants

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OPS Course Inventory OPS 1: Building Quality Assessments OPS 2: Using Data for Improvement OPS 3: Creating a Quality Assurance System OPS 4: Making the Case for Accreditation: Standards and Evidence OPS 5: Preparing for Accreditation OPS 6: Leveraging Accreditation for Quality Improvement CC 1-3: Credentialed Consultants

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OPS 1: Building Quality Assessments

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OPS 1: Learning Outcomes

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OPS 2: Using Data for Improvement

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OPS 2: Learning Outcomes

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Continuous Improvement Model 1. Make the work problem- specific and user-centered. 2. Variation in performance is the core problem to address. 3. See the system that produces the current outcomes. Are the right stakeholders on hand and ready to participate? Can the problem be stated simply with consensual definitions? Do the data indicate patterns in performance? Do the quantitative data produce a normal distribution? Do the qualitative data provide context for the phenomenon? Will improvement be measurable and allow comparison? Have the stakeholders "visited" the setting? Can the setting and processes be observed and described clearly? Can observations pick up on what is not happening? We embrace the principles of improvement outlined in the Carnegie model (including the AACTE questions) in how we approach continuous improvement in educator preparation.

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OPS 3: Creating a Quality Assurance System

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OPS 3: Learning Outcomes

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OPS Participants 854 participants as of February 1, OPSs introduced in June sections of OPS 1, 6 sections of OPS 2, 4 sections of OPS 3 have run and are currently active Sections of OPS 4-6 have run began running in August and are currently active AACTE website has start dates and registration information for upcoming sections events/quality-support-initiative

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Feedback Strongly Agree Participants told us through anonymous end of course surveys: Content was appropriateContent was useful

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education “As the single accreditor in educator preparation, CAEP commends AACTE’s Quality Support Initiative for helping programs to achieve the rigorous, high standards for professional accreditation” -Dr. Christopher A. Koch, President Council for the Accreditation of Educator Preparation (CAEP)

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OPS 4: Making the Case for Accreditation: Standards and Evidence

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OPS 4: Learning Outcomes

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OPS 5: Preparing for Accreditation

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OPS 5: Learning Outcomes

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OPS 6: Leveraging Accreditation for Quality Improvement

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education OPS 6: Learning Outcomes

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Today’s Panelists Sandra J. Doran Deborah L. Rickey Tim FinkleaLinda S. McKee Moderator Patricia Parrish

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Content from OPS 3

Example of Quality Assurance Strategy Analyzed in OPS 3

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Discussion Board OPS 3

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Discussion Board OPS 3

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education AACTE Credentialed Consultants Why? How? Identify authoring team and process for development: Establish protocol, set qualifications for credentialed consultants. Participate in Delphi Study on Competencies Contribute to course authorship – CC 1: Introduction to the Credential – CC 2: Leadership for Consultant – CC 3: Communication

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education “AACTE developed the OPS series in response to members’ interest in using data effectively to document success and drive improvement. We’re thrilled by the interest and participation we’ve received thus far and look forward to further engaging groups to participate in the new in-depth seminars” - Sharon P. Robinson, President and CEO, AACTE