Pilot and Feasibility Studies NIHR Research Design Service Sam Norton, Liz Steed, Lauren Bell.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kirsty McCormack.
Advertisements

Focusing an Evaluation Ben Silliman, Youth Development Specialist NC 4-H Youth Development.
How to write a study protocol Hanne-Merete Eriksen (based on Epiet 2004)
The CAREDEM feasibility study Joint CIs: Iliffe (UCL) & Robinson (Newcastle University) PIs: Robinson (North east), Livingston (London), Fox (Kent)
What makes a good NIHR application? 9 February 2012 Professor Jonathan Michaels.
RESEARCH CLINIC SESSION 1 Committed Officials Pursuing Excellence in Research 27 June 2013.
Pilot studies Karla Hemming The University of Birmingham.
Protocol Development.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
NMAHP – Readiness for eHealth Heather Strachan NMAHP eHealth Lead eHealth Directorate Scottish Government.
NIHR Research Design Service London Enabling Better Research Forming a research team Victoria Cornelius, PhD Senior Lecturer in Medical Statistics Deputy.
A feasibility study to explore patient, clinician and GP decision making of acute recurrent tonsillitis for NATTINA: The NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy.
Managing evaluation research on behalf of the National Institute for Health Research NIHR Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Obesity Themed.
Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar January 2014 Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar.
How does the process work? Submissions in 2007 (n=13,043) Perspectives.
How do nurses use new technologies to inform decision making?
Research Proposal Development of research question
Pilot Study Design Issues
Creating a service Idea. Creating a service Networking / consultation Identify the need Find funding Create a project plan Business Plan.
Proposal Writing for Competitive Grant Systems
Moving from Development to Efficacy & Intervention Fidelity Topics National Center for Special Education Research Grantee Meeting: June 28, 2010.
Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre 5 July 2013 NIHR Programmes and topic identification Alison Ford, Senior Programme Manager.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
How to Write Successful Grant Proposals Carmichael Centre Facilitator: Caroline Egan, Consultant & External Relations Manager.
Steph Garfield-Birkbeck Assistant Director NIHR Evaluation Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre, University of Southampton.
Introduction to Evaluation Odette Parry & Sally-Ann Baker
Successful Concepts Study Rationale Literature Review Study Design Rationale for Intervention Eligibility Criteria Endpoint Measurement Tools.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 2c – Process Evaluation.
Evaluation, Trials and Studies Coordinating Centre Developing Sight Loss and Vision research questions: a funder’s perspective Anna Tallant Scientific.
Identifying and recruiting patients for clinical trials in the future: a pharma perspective Rob Thwaites EC/EFPIA Workshop on ” Primary and secondary use.
Development Impact Evaluation in Finance and Private Sector 1.
1 Centre for Sport and Exercise Science, Sheffield Hallam University, U. K. 2 York Trials Unit, Department of Health Sciences, University of York, U. K.
Improvement Model and PDSA Cycles. Organ Donation The Service Improvement Model provides a framework to test, implement and sustain change ideas to overcome.
How To Design a Clinical Trial
Patient And Public Involvement (PPI) in Research Dr. Steven Blackburn NIHR Research Design Service West Midlands (Keele University Hub)
NIHR Themed Call Prevention and treatment of obesity Writing a good application and the role of the RDS 19 th January 2016.
Unit 11: Evaluating Epidemiologic Literature. Unit 11 Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize uniform guidelines used in preparing manuscripts for publication.
European Patients’ Academy on Therapeutic Innovation Ethical and practical challenges of organising clinical trials in small populations.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
HTA Efficient Study Designs Peter Davidson Head of HTA at NETSCC.
CONSORT 2010 Balakrishnan S, Pondicherry Institute of Medical Sciences.
CHAPTER 16 Preparing Effective Proposals. PRELIMINARY CONSIDERATIONS  Conducting a Preliminary Assessment  Prior to Writing the Proposal  How Fundable.
Simon Butler Centre Manager Funding Track record £7.8M.
NIHR using systematic reviews to inform funding decisions Matt Westmore, Director of Finance and Strategy Sheetal Bhurke, Research Fellow NIHR Evaluation,
Research for Patient Benefit Preparing a research proposal What makes a good proposal? Professor Scott Weich, Panel Chair.
Public Health Research Programme Preventing the development and spread of Antimicrobial Resistance am - 2 October 2013 NIHR Public Health Research.
SECCN/SPACeR Critical Care Conference Introduction to the NIHR Research Design Service Research Design Service- South East Dr Bernadette Egan University.
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
Health Management Information Systems Unit 3 Electronic Health Records Component 6/Unit31 Health IT Workforce Curriculum Version 1.0/Fall 2010.
Evaluation Planning Checklist (1 of 2) Planning Checklist Planning is a crucial part of the evaluation process. The following checklist (based on the original.
MEASURE Evaluation Data Quality Assurance Workshop Session 3 Introduction to Routine Data Quality Assessment.
GCP (GOOD CLINICAL PRACTISE)
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Stages of Research and Development
Title Investigators and sites. Clinical Trial Proposal Presentation Template for open forum at the 2017 ASM.
Front Line Innovation and Trials
CLINICAL PROTOCOL DEVELOPMENT
Reducing bias in randomised controlled trials involving therapists:
Leigh E. Tenkku, PhD, MPH Department of Family and Community Medicine
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
What the NIHR Research Design Service (RDS) can do to support you
Training package is appropriate
Designing Research that Improves Health and Wellbeing for All How the NIHR Research Design Service North East can help.
YSGOL GWYDDORAU GOFAL IECHYD / SCHOOL OF HEALTHCARE SCIENCES
Professor Stephen Pilling PhD
Pilot Studies: What we need to know
Resource 1. Evaluation Planning Template
An Introduction to the NIHR programmes
How to apply successfully to the NIHR HTA Board?
What makes a good grant application
Presentation transcript:

Pilot and Feasibility Studies NIHR Research Design Service Sam Norton, Liz Steed, Lauren Bell

Overview Definitions and appropriate NIHR programmes Designing a study (task) Things to include / avoid in an application Summary & resources

What are they? Feasibility study and pilot study used interchangeably Both describe activities to prepare for a larger study – small studies used to plan larger studies Definitions emphasise different things –Feasibility studies focus on deciding whether a full-scale study could be delivered –Pilot studies focus on improving the quality of the future study? Typically NIHR follows definition agreed by EME, PHR, HTA & RfPB

NIHR definitions Feasibility study ‘Research done before a main study in order to answer the question “Can this study be done?”.’ Do not evaluate the primary outcome for efficacy Objectives typically focused on –feasibility of recruitment, follow-up, outcomes May or may not be randomised Sample size not based on a power calculation, but on precision of estimates for the parameters of interest

NIHR definition Pilot study Miniature version of the main study to ‘test whether the components of the main study can all work together’ Focused on the processes of the main study ‘to ensure recruitment, randomisation, treatment, and follow-up assessments all run smoothly’ Two types –Internal pilot: data potentially included in final analysis –External pilot: data analysed but not used in the final analysis of the main study

Schemes FeasibilityPilotLimit% Research for Patient Benefit  £250k>50% Programme Development Grant £100k~33%* Programmer Grants for Applied Research <£800k~50% Efficacy & Mechanism Evaluation None~20%* Health Technology Assessment None~20%* Health Service & Delivery Research None~15%* Public Health Research None~33% Fellowship None~20% *

Exercise Research Question Can a training intervention directed at community pharmacy workers reduce obesity rates? Planned design for main trial is a pragmatic cluster RCT What should the overall aim be? What should the design of this study be? What are the objectives? What might progression criteria be?

Objectives TO TEST KEY UNCERTAINTIES IN STUDY Trial Uncertainties Integrity of study protocol Recruitment and consent rates Selecting primary outcome measure Randomisation procedure Data Collection Intervention Uncertainties –Acceptability of intervention –Implementation and delivery –Training of staff

Things to include Rationale for why feasibility/pilot needed Clear objectives which study will meet Pre-specified feasibility criteria for full scale trial to be feasible –60% of patients must consent to participation in study –75% of patients must complete >4 of 6 exercise sessions How proposed pilot/feasibility study relates to full study and what the trajectory is Patient & public involvement activities

Trajectory: aims & objectives Example “The purpose of the future trial will be to investigate the clinical and cost effectiveness of intervention Y for the treatment of condition X. “ The aim of this present proposal is to pave the way for that future trial by resolving key uncertainties in its planning. Specific objectives are to:- - assess acceptability of the intervention defined as… - assess likely recruitment and retention rates - check suitability of the potential primary outcome

Trajectory: dissemination and outputs Example “Findings from the intended large future trial will be disseminated to maximise potential influence on clinical practice. They will be sent to relevant patient groups, presented at international conferences and published in high impact peer-reviewed journals, etc…. “Results from the present pilot/feasibility study will be presented at national conferences in order to stimulate enthusiasm for centres to participate in the intended future trial….”

Things to avoid Often there aren’t compelling reasons given for why a pilot or feasibility study is needed Justification for the intended follow-on trial is often weak Objectives are not always clear in proposals Likely to be underpowered by design, do not confuse with a phase II study and focus on efficacy Papers based on findings from pilot studies often don’t acknowledge they were pilot studies

Summary Feasibility and pilot study are related but (according to NIHR definition) distinct types of study Appropriate for all NIHR research programmes Need carefully thought out (and justified) aims and objectives Progression criteria useful for judging success Resources –Research Design Service –NIHR databases of funded research –BMC Journal: Feasibility & Pilot Studies –CONSORT guideline extension in preparation

Finally …… THANK YOU GOOD LUCK!!